Re: How to access on different computers?

2023-06-13 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Lean,

To have a working shared install of Review Board (or any other web server
software), you'll need to do a few things:

1. Have a stable IP address that others can access.
2. Make sure that IP address can route to your WSL. This will require
proxying a port (see
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/networking). Also, make sure
the firewall allows this port.
3. Set up a domain/subdomain in your network that can map to the IP. I'm
assuming your company has a centralized DNS server somewhere for this? If
you can't set up a domain, and must only use the IP, then you can specify
the IP in place of the domain, but I'll assume you can get a domain going.
4. Configure the domain in Review Board (Admin UI -> General Settings) and
in your sitedir/conf/settings_local.py in ALLOWED_HOSTS.
5. Configure Apache to serve up Review Board under your domain.

A lot of this is dependent on your company/organization's networking setup
and policies, so I can only provide some broad guidance. But hopefully the
link above helps with the inability to reach it by IP.

Christian

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 5:47 AM Lean Gerard 
wrote:

> I have installed RB 5.0.4 on my local PC. I have installed RB using WSL. I
> have the website running on "localhost" on my web browser, I was hoping to
> connect the website that I have created to another PC I have, What is the
> best way to do this? I have tried using the IP address however it is not
> working, Please help.
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/6d75191d-ac30-4f37-8c16-12d118ea023an%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>


-- 
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag 
Makers of Review Board 

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/CAE7Vndna4MU9c%3DuztF2uqRbFmPSVD6TocQuYvekOSur2U%2B2c6Q%40mail.gmail.com.


Re: RB 2.0.17 - Interdiff fails to highlight deleted code

2023-06-13 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Sebastian,

Hmm, that's unfortunate. We have recently found an edge case ourselves
involving the new algorithm, but need to collect more samples. Would it be
possible to collect some information from you privately about the diff and
its contents? We're happy to sign an NDA.

Christian

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 3:19 PM sebun...@gmail.com 
wrote:

> This is still an issue in 5.0.4.
>
> On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 12:29:53 PM UTC+12 Sebastian Unger wrote:
>
>> We've just come across this (or something very similar) in 2.5.13.1.
>>
>>
>>- Is this expected (i.e. you know the bug is still there) or
>>something new (i.e. you fixed the bug and this is something else)?
>>- Is there a bug tracker issue somewhere that I can subscribe to to
>>get updates regarding this?
>>- Are the circumstances under which this happens known so I can
>>inform my users what to look out for?
>>- Is there any additional testing or debugging I can help with to get
>>this resolved?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Seb
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 05:46:52 UTC+12, Will Jacobs wrote:
>>>
>>> Awesome, thanks again!
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 11:31:07 AM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hey Will,

 It's a bug in 2.5.x and later 2.0.x releases. It wasn't present in
 1.6.x or 1.7.x.

 Christian

 On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Will Jacobs 
 wrote:

> Hey Christian -
>
> Thanks as usual for the response! Just a quick question - how long has
> this bug been around? I recently upgraded from 1.6.14 to 2.5.12, and am
> seeing this as well, but I'm trying to understand if it was also a bug in
> 1.6.14 which we never noticed or never exhibited.
>
> Thanks,
> -Will
>
> On Thursday, July 6, 2017 at 6:14:07 AM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Peter. There's still bugs here, and I've spent a lot of time
>> reworking the algorithms to fix these. I'm not ready to ship any of that
>> code yet, though. Needs further tweaking and testing. Having test cases
>> like these really help with that, and I'll add the files to my regression
>> tests.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Peter Hodgson 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> I've now replicated this with a very simple example.
>>>
>>> The original file is attached as LICENSE.
>>>
>>> I added a char and committed the change reflected in rb40.patch and
>>> created the review request (that file is created via the download patch
>>> link)
>>>
>>> I then committed a change removing the line starting with the word
>>> LIABILITY and updated the review request, the full diff of which is the
>>> file rb40_v2.patch (again created via the download patch link).
>>>
>>> To define the issue again:
>>> orig - v2 Shows the correct diff, showing both the char addition and
>>> line removal
>>> orig - v1 Shows the correct diff, showing just the line change
>>> v1 - v2Is nonsense, the diff claims "This file contains only
>>> whitespace changes" and shows the last 5 lines of the rev1 file vs the 
>>> last
>>> four of the rev2 file. It does not highlight the missing lines.
>>>
>>> I understand this is an old thread, if I don't hear back in a couple
>>> of days I'll raise it afresh.
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 5 July 2017 16:35:28 UTC+1, Peter Hodgson wrote:

 Hi Chris,

 I just came across this same bug in 2.5.12 exactly as described by
 Paul so I'm presuming it wasn't fixed.

 What files do you need to debug this? I'll see if I can reproduce
 this without distributing our actual codebase.

 Thanks,
 Peter

 On Tuesday, 30 June 2015 22:37:02 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> We recently fixed a bug like this, but perhaps there's another
> issue somewhere.
>
> In order to diagnose this, I'll need to have original copies of
> the affected files, as well as both diffs. I won't be able to diagnose
> without those, unfortunately.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
> Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Fee 
> Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com >
> Date: June 30, 2015 at 4:02:10 AM
> To: revie...@googlegroups.com >
> Subject:  RB 2.0.17 - Interdiff fails to highlight deleted code
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm using ReviewBoard 2.0.17 and see unexpected behaviour in the
> diff
> > viewer.
> >
> > 

How to access on different computers?

2023-06-13 Thread Lean Gerard
I have installed RB 5.0.4 on my local PC. I have installed RB using WSL. I 
have the website running on "localhost" on my web browser, I was hoping to 
connect the website that I have created to another PC I have, What is the 
best way to do this? I have tried using the IP address however it is not 
working, Please help.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/6d75191d-ac30-4f37-8c16-12d118ea023an%40googlegroups.com.