Re: Review Board 2.0.1 is released

On 28 May 2014 21:07, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 05/26/2014 09:31 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, Review Board 2.0.1 is out. It fixes a number of bugs that have been reported to us since last week's 2.0 release. A big thanks to everyone who's

Re: Review Board 2.0.1 is released

On 29 May 2014 19:24, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 05/29/2014 07:19 AM, Cian Mc Govern wrote: On 28 May 2014 21:07, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 05/26/2014 09:31 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi

Re: Review Board 2.0.5 released for EPEL 7

Thanks Stephen! I've attempted to install this in the CentOS 7 Docker container and I hit the following dependency issues: Error: Package: ReviewBoard-2.0.5-1.el7.1.noarch (epel) Requires: httpd = 2.4.7-5 Available: httpd-2.4.6-17.el7.centos.1.x86_64 (base)

Re: Review Board 2.0.5 released for EPEL 7

On 18 August 2014 14:19, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 08/13/2014 04:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Crud; ok, I see the problem. Unfortunately I'm sitting in an airport right now with insufficient Internet access to fix it. I'll try to get it fixed up on Friday.

Re: se linux blocking review board

To the professionals who work with Review Board I'm eager to get started with Review Board, but it's not working out of the box. I have Fedora 20 installed, with RB 1.7.26 with httpd 2.4.10. I can only work ReviewBoard if I turn off selinux, i.e. setenforce off. We cannot do this on

Re: se linux blocking review board

On 22 August 2014 13:50, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 08/22/2014 07:04 AM, Cian Mc Govern wrote: To the professionals who work with Review Board I'm eager to get started with Review Board, but it's not working out of the box. I have Fedora 20

Repository configuration documentation typo

Hi, There's a mistake in the ReviewBoard documentation here: https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.0/admin/configuration/repositories/#raw-file-urls The gitweb url is incorrect and should be: http://git.kernel.org/?p=bluetooth/bluez-gnome.git;a=blob_plain;f= filename;h=revision Instead of:

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

On 16 December 2015 at 20:02, Christian Hammond wrote: > That certainly shouldn't be necessary. Sounds like maybe there was a bad > package? > > If it ever happens again, please let me know. I want to be sure we figure > out what's causing that. > > Christian > > -- >

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

rsions so I run it as part of my upgrade process for every version. I'll stop doing it if it can cause issues though. > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Cian Mc Govern <c...@cianmcgovern.com> > wrote: > >> On 4 December 2015 at 16:18, Stephen Gallagher <step...@gallagherhome.