is sending an Authorization: header in a
> request, and what form of authentication the client is using for this?
>
> Christian
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:00 AM Raghuveer Mudiraj
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have done the LDAP settings on our reviewboard ser
unt)
> and using that as the password? That’s generally better for scripts anyway,
> but I want to just verify that the general authentication path that’s
> posing problems.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 21:42 Raghuveer Mudiraj
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chr
uld be the issue? How test if the url is working with respect to
user authentication?
On Friday, May 21, 2021 at 2:13:30 PM UTC+5:30 Raghuveer Mudiraj wrote:
> Currently i am using ReviewBoard 1.7.9. Does it have any other option to
> create API token? If not, can we create the throug
Hi,
I have done the LDAP settings on our reviewboard server. However, when I am
trying to login to the reviewboard server using the below code, it is
throwing the below error:
DEBUG: CM::RBDBI::__RBinit__: HASH(0x2a5aae0)
DEBUG: CM::RBDBI::__RBinit__: HTTP::Headers=HASH(0x2b9f0f0)
DEBUG:
Hi,
While raising the review request for the specific files in the clearcase
repository it is giving the below error:
"Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached"
It is coming out of the review request by giving the above error message.
Any idea why it comes?
--
ld, and is no longer supported. We can't easily
> provide support for this version. I'd also recommen scheduling some time to
> test and perform an upgrade to a modern version (4.0), once you're past
> this issue.
>
> Christian
>
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:46 AM Raghu
aise errorclass, errorvalue
DatabaseError: (1406, "Data too long for column 'source_revision' at row 1")
@
On Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 9:11:37 PM UTC+5:30 Raghuveer Mudiraj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While raising the review request for the specific files in the clearcase
> repo
Hi,
We are using ReviewBoard 1.7.9 version.
Recently we moved the reviewboard server from one network to another
network.
In the old network, we used Active Directory mechanism for users to login.
In the current network, we used LDAP mechanism for users to login. However,
in LDAP the user
Hi Harish,
I too faced the same problem some time back while setting the LDAP
authentication.
Please refer the below link
http://138.201.16.208/codesearch/raw/2595363/
In the class LDAPBackend, the actual code needs to modify as per the above
link.
the above link helped me to solve this. Hope
It is "Clearcase + UCM" repository.
We are using diff command to generate the diff.
On Fri, 9 Jul, 2021, 4:19 am Christian Hammond,
wrote:
> What type of repository is this, and how are you generating the diff?
>
> Christian
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at
ing to query the LDAP server anonymously, and
> the server is now rejecting that request. You’ll need to configure the
> appropriate credentials in Review Board, which will be dependent on your
> LDAP configuration.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 09:03
Hi,
Last week I setup the LDAP authentication with respect to our ldap server
which was working fine till last friday i.e. till 23rd Apr 2021. After
that, I am not sure what happened, It started throwing an error as below
2021-04-27 16:01:31,158 - WARNING - - LDAP error: {'info': u'Server is
Hi,
Currently we are migrating Reviewboard from centos 6 to Oracle linux 7.0
and the version of Reviewboard is 2.5.17.
While making the reviewboard up, I am seeing the following errors:
Any update on the abelow error:
Thanks & Regards,
M Raghuveer
On Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 8:43:30 PM UTC+5:30 Raghuveer Mudiraj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently we are migrating Reviewboard from centos 6 to Oracle linux 7.0
> and the version of Reviewboard is 2.5.17.
a better way to move to the new server, though.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 06:52 Raghuveer Mudiraj <
> raghuveer.mudi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Any update on the abelow error:
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> M Raghuveer
>>
>&g
t Review Board 2.5 is no longer maintained or
> officially supported without a Premium Support contract. I’ll try to give
> guidance if I think there’s a better way to move to the new server, though.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 06:52 Raghuveer Mudiraj
> w
Hi,
I am using reviewboard 1.7.9. Its a old release.
When I am trying to run post-review, it is giving python exception issue.
When I went into deeper, I found that the error is "404-Page doesnot exist".
Can you please put me in right direction to resolve this issue?
Thanks & Regards,
M
One more last step, run the below command to configure the review board.
6. rb-site install /var/www/rboard
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 9:32 AM raghuveer mudiraj <
raghuveer.mudi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thank you for your support.
>
> Please find the steps be
5 AM UTC+5:30 Raghuveer Mudiraj wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Can you please let me know how to create the .rbtools.cookies to capture
> the rbsessionid?
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> M Raghuveer
>
> On Thursday, April 22, 2021 at 1:14:33 AM UTC+5:30 Christian Ha
, but I don’t
> remember for sure what output we had back then. Both 1.7.9 and post-review
> itself have long since been discontinued, so it might require you to
> manually edit the post-review code and trace the API requests.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021
20 matches
Mail list logo
