Re: Issues with RBTools and Subversion
svn 1.7's diff returns some extra entries for added binary files (the
prop-add).
We've been getting around this by parsing the diff, keeping track of
any files marked as a binary type, and deleting any subsequent Index:
FILE entries where FILE is one of those binary files. So for example,
changing your diff to just the entry below should make it work...
Index: run/assets/x
===
Cannot display: file marked as a binary type.
svn:mime-type = application/octet-stream
Charlie
On Nov 18, 12:48 pm, Jeff Ward j...@fuzzybinary.com wrote:
Hey All,
I'm having some problems with Subversion 1.7 and RBTools. It looks
like Subversion 1.7 (at least SilkSvn) broke using Windows GNU Diff,
using --diff-cmd as all attempts to get the diff error out with:
===
svn: E200012: 'diff' returned 2
svn: E175002: Error reading spooled REPORT request response
This is probably a bug in subversion 1.7, but I can't get around it
(unless someone knows a good way to do this?)
So I wrote a script to take care of some of this by manually
generating the diff from svn and handing that to RBTools directly.
Now however, I'm getting a different issue. When we added a new
binary file, SVN's diff says:
Index: run/assets/x
===
Cannot display: file marked as a binary type.
svn:mime-type = application/octet-stream
Index: run/assets/x
===
--- run/assets/x (revision 184)
+++ run/assets/x (revision 185)
Apparently when this gets sent to Review board, it makes it unhappy
and reports this:
Got API Error 207 (HTTP code 400): The file was not found in the
repository
Error data: {u'stat': u'fail', u'file': u'/run/assets/x', u'err':
{u'msg': u'The file was not found in the repository', u'code': 207},
u'revision': u'184'}
Is there a way around this? Should Review board understand that
revision --- for revision 184 means it *shouldn't* exist?
--
Jeff
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: Phasing out repositories with incorrect paths
Thanks David. Will post-review attempt to publish requests to these unshown repositories? On Jul 12, 5:34 pm, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote: The best way to do this is to leave the repository objects there, and just turn off the show check-box in the admin. This will remove it from the UI but leave existing review requests unaffected. -David On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Charlie Hsu vmdx.d...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, We are currently using a few SVN repositories in RB that were configured to point to subdirectories within the SVN repository root. For example: XXX.XXX.com/netrepo is the repository root. We have a few repos with paths: XXX.XXX.com/netrepo/network XXX.XXX.com/netrepo/util XXX.XXX.com/netrepo/other , etc. Since this isn't the correct way to use SVN repos (they should be pointing to the SVN repository root), we'd like to phase all these into a single netrepo RB repo entry, but we'd like to keep previous review requests. Simply deleting the repositories, according to the docs, will remove all data associated with the repos… Can anyone advise on the best course of action here? Thanks! Charlie Hsu -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Phasing out repositories with incorrect paths
Hello, We are currently using a few SVN repositories in RB that were configured to point to subdirectories within the SVN repository root. For example: XXX.XXX.com/netrepo is the repository root. We have a few repos with paths: XXX.XXX.com/netrepo/network XXX.XXX.com/netrepo/util XXX.XXX.com/netrepo/other , etc. Since this isn't the correct way to use SVN repos (they should be pointing to the SVN repository root), we'd like to phase all these into a single netrepo RB repo entry, but we'd like to keep previous review requests. Simply deleting the repositories, according to the docs, will remove all data associated with the repos… Can anyone advise on the best course of action here? Thanks! Charlie Hsu -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
