Hi, I am considering using this tool but I have some questions to clarify ReviewBoard usage.
Before the questions, just a quick note: the website states Stable: 1.7.1<http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.7.1/> In-development: 1.7 RC 1<http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/dev/reviewboard/1.7-rc-1/> Which is not very logical and don't really feel professional either... :) 0. The context I would use this is: - I'm working alone for now - I have some friends who can help by reviewing the code - until now I just gave them access to the source code but it's not perfect to do reviews In this context, is there some specific feature you think would appeal to me in ReviewBoard? 1. Can I use Mercurial and Git with 1.7.1? It is not clear from the documentation, I just see some discussions implying I can, but I didn't find explicit statements. 2. I'm using Rhodecode to manage my repositories. It have basic review support apparently. How does ReviewBoard compare? 3. How does ReviewBoard compare to Phabricator's review system and Atlassian's one? So far I have a hard time seeing any real difference other than the cost. The problem is that I didn't use any such tool so far so I don't know what kind of feature are good or not. Thanks for your time Joel Lamotte -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en