are probably due to
using fastcgi. Can you switch to a wsgi-based deployment?
-David
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Magic Chen magic...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Hi, David,
the nginx conf file was attached.
we start the reviewboard using the command below:
rb-site manage /opt
Dear all,
We got another problem. when we using RBTools 0.62 , the review request
could be generated, while the diff file could not be uploaded to RB 2.0.6.
the debug information were attached as below.
RBTools 0.6.2
Python 2.7.3 (default, Apr 10 2012, 23:31:26) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)]
星期六UTC+8上午7时51分05秒，David Trowbridge写道：
Can you give us some information about your web server configuration?
-David
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Magic Chen magic...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Dear all,
I've install the latest 2.0.6 version in a CentOS (4G, 4Core
No idea if settings.py, and settings_local.py will help. :)
在 2014年9月9日星期二UTC+8上午9时55分10秒，Magic Chen写道：
Hi, David,
the nginx conf file was attached.
we start the reviewboard using the command below:
rb-site manage /opt/reviewboard runfcgi port=3033 host=127.0.0.1
protocol=fcgi
Dear all,
I've install the latest 2.0.6 version in a CentOS (4G, 4Core), and the
functions is working correctly,
but we noticed that the response time of RB is too slow to be accepted, the
response time for default dashboard page will cost almost 3s...
We use the Postgre and nginx. python
