Re: Excepted release of reviewboard 3.0

+1 to question! On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:15 AM, satish singh wrote: > Hi Team, > > What is the expected release date for Review Board 3.0, we are planning to > upgrade our Review Board server > and I am very interested to move to release 3.0 of Review Board. > > Thanks, >

Re: Reviewboard takes more than 20 minutes to create a new review request

Hi, Here is potential fix which possibly fix your problem. Patch for 2.5.1. but I think it will work for you too: https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/8075/ Thanks! On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Kangqiao Hu wrote: > I am running my 2.5.3 on a server and trying to create

[question] python-dateutil version

Hi, I'm working on porting ReviewBoard 2.x on FreeBSD system. Today I've faced problem with versioning of python-dateutil. According to setup.py, RB requires dateutil ver.1.5 (exact), but actual version (with Py2 support) is 2.4.2. My question is: is there any (hidden) reason to have exact

Re: Migrating from sqlite3 to MySQL or PostgreSQL

Hi Joe, David, Few years ago I've used Django command dump db to json format. Hope it will be useful for you Best regards, Michael. On Apr 12, 2014 10:30 AM, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote: Joe, There are two management commands you can use for this. They aren't well-documented,

Re: emial setting problem

Hi, RB uses the only email address and on behalf of mechanism. It's normal practice to suit email server policies. Could you explain your problem in details? Thank you, Michael Zhilin On Jan 25, 2013, at 10:31, xf0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Because of the limit of our company email

Re: Encoding problems.

Hi Kirill, We use RB on Postgres for 3 years and we never saw any problem of Russian symbols. :-) DB is configured in UTF-8. I can share DB setting if you want to try Postgres. Best regards, Michael Zhilin On Jan 25, 2013, at 11:14, Кирилл Колесников kirill.j.kolesni...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Email setup help

Hi Christian, Could it be implemented as extension or not? Thank you, Michael Zhilin On Dec 26, 2012, at 23:57, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Peer, We don't e-mail when closing review requests. We only e-mail for new updates and reviews/replies. I'd be happy to take

Re: cannot join review group?

Hi, I've heard same problem from users, but found workaround is to assign groups via admin UI. Really it's issue. Best regards, Michael Пользователь Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com писал: I'm trying out 1.7 beta 2, and I'm noticing that I don't seem to be able to join any review

Re: How to specify cookie name

, because post-review actually looks specifically for the rbsessionid cookie. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Michael Zhilin miz

Default tab configuration

Hi, We use RB since year 2009 and several reviewers requested default tab configuration. When reviewer opens review request first time, View Diff tab should be opened. Another case is tha when author/reviewer received email with review and click on link, View Reviews tab should be opened. To

How to specify cookie name

Hi, I've installed two instances on same server thanks to virtualenv. But I faced issue with cookies. I can't work on both servers simultaneously because cookie name and host names are same for both environments. I had quick look at setting.py and found out that COOKIE_NAME variable is defined

Re: Default tab configuration

/reviews/datagrids.py. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi, We use RB since year 2009

Re: Default tab configuration

-- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi Christian, Thank you for quick reply and consultation. I think that my

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is released

/htdocs/static/rb So after manual correction of them, all functionality work. Best regards, Michael On Thursday, September 27, 2012 5:48:35 AM UTC+4, Christian Hammond wrote: Did you do an rb-site upgrade? Christian On Sep 26, 2012, at 15:54, Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.com javascript

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is released

, and the resulting symlinks were broken? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi Christian, Thank you

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is released

Hi, I've another issue. After upgrade from 1.7b1 to 1.7b2 I can't open close dropdown list on request or expand hide lines of code. I didn't perform any analysis of issue, but do you have any idea why it happens? Thank you in advance, Michael среда, 26 сентября 2012 г., 22:19:32 UTC+4

Re: Review Board 1.7 beta 2 is released

if I've restarted httpd service. Could please give me advice how to load static mapping? Best regards, Michael On Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:44:50 AM UTC+4, Michael Zhilin wrote: Hi, I've another issue. After upgrade from 1.7b1 to 1.7b2 I can't open close dropdown list on request

Re: ReviewBoard Extension models: what's wrong?

Today I've installed extension on production environment and there is no problem on it. So root cause seems to be in my development environment configuration. I'll try to deep dive into problem... Best regards, Michael On Thursday, August 30, 2012 2:28:29 AM UTC+4, Michael Zhilin wrote: Hi

ReviewBoard Extension models: what's wrong?

Hi, First of all, I would like to say that ReviewBoard is very-very powerful, useful tool. We can't live without him. But now I have some problems with extension framework and existing extension named RBWebHooks. I'm using reviewboard 1.7 beta 1 and trying to install RB webhook extension,

Re: Clearcase Integration

it work better. On Dec 20, 7:15 am, Michael Zhilin miz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dan, Nitin, I would like to explain how we use ReviewBoard with ClearCase. Each project contains 2 CC streams: for development and for integration. We review only changes of development stream. Changes with same