Re: After upgrade to Review board 3.0.3 Apache goes down occasionally.
Hi Christian, Back port or upgrade is complex for us because of in-house changes, can you suggest an alternative. If you can guide us we can incorporate the required changes for the bug, we have been using Review Board from 5+ years and never faced issue like this in upgrade. Request for your help. Regards, Satish On Thursday, 21 June 2018 00:48:34 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Are you looking for a commit that fixes it? If so, it’s more complicated > than just a simple backport. > > Christian > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 03:21 satish singh > wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> Can you point us to fix(3.0.4) for below issue, facing the same after >> upgrade to Review Board 3.0.3. >> >> +Bug Fixes >> += >> + >> +General >> +--- >> + >> +* Fixed a deadlock that could sometimes occur during thread shutdown. >> + >> + We tracked down an issue that could sometimes occur with threads that >> have >> + handled file attachment uploads, where they'd operate on garbage state >> and >> + deadlock when mod_wsgi began shutting down or replacing threads. >> + >> + If you encounter issues where Apache is occassionally not responding to >> + requests after upgrading to this release, please let us know >> >> -- >> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >> https://rbcommons.com/ >> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Review Board Community" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > -- > Christian Hammond > President/CEO of Beanbag > Makers of Review Board > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Review Board Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
After upgrade to Review board 3.0.3 Apache goes down occasionally.
Hi Team, Can you point us to fix(3.0.4) for below issue, facing the same after upgrade to Review Board 3.0.3. +Bug Fixes += + +General +--- + +* Fixed a deadlock that could sometimes occur during thread shutdown. + + We tracked down an issue that could sometimes occur with threads that have + handled file attachment uploads, where they'd operate on garbage state and + deadlock when mod_wsgi began shutting down or replacing threads. + + If you encounter issues where Apache is occassionally not responding to + requests after upgrading to this release, please let us know -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Review Board Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Excepted release of reviewboard 3.0
Hi Christian, Just wanted to know when will we get ReviewBoard 3.0 ? We are waiting to upgrade to RB3.0. If it's still late for 3.0 release we will go for 2.5.x. Regards, Satish On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 13:52:02 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi Satish, Michael, > > We have a handful of tasks still pending for 3.0 beta 2. My hope is that > we'll get this out by end of June/mid-July. That will be the final beta, > and our focus will then be polishing/stability (based on feedback from > those testing the betas). I would like to release 1 month after beta 2 > lands. > > So optimistically, this will ship in August. I'm doing some triaging of > our tasks list to help us hit those deadlines, but most of the big ticket > items are complete for this release at this point. > > Christian > > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Michael Zhilin <miz...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> +1 to question! >> >> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:15 AM, satish singh <triv...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> What is the expected release date for Review Board 3.0, we are planning >>> to upgrade our Review Board server >>> and I am very interested to move to release 3.0 of Review Board. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Satish >>> >>> -- >>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >>> https://rbcommons.com/ >>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "reviewboard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >> https://rbcommons.com/ >> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > Christian Hammond > President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> > Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: CORS issue with ReviewBoard API
Hi Christian,
Thanks a lot for the pointer it worked for me.
The below code in apache conf. file set the appropriate header required by
CORS:
Header always set Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*"
Header always set Access-Control-Allow-Methods "POST, GET, OPTIONS,
DELETE, PUT"
Header always set Access-Control-Max-Age "1000"
Header always set Access-Control-Allow-Headers "x-requested-with,
Content-Type, origin, authorization, accept, client-security-token"
# Added a rewrite to respond with a 200 SUCCESS on every OPTIONS
request.
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} OPTIONS
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1 [R=200,L]
Regards,
Satish
On Saturday, 10 June 2017 14:00:47 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Satish,
>
> I saw your previous post on this. Just haven't responded yet, but doing so
> now.
>
> CORS is a browser concept, and it's controlled by headers coming from the
> web application or web server. You should be able to add the necessary
> headers in your Apache configuration to allow access.
>
> Try adding this to your VirtualHost directive in Apache:
>
> Header set Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*"
>
> For tighter security, use the URL of the server (or the full path to the
> page doing the query) instead of the *
>
> You may need to enable the headers module in Apache, if it complains.
>
> Christian
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 1:26 AM, satish singh <triv...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> I am trying to create a page with AngularJS which will allow RB user's to
>> add review group in Review Board(RB) using RB API.
>>
>> code snippet:
>>
>> $http({
>> method: "GET",
>> url: "http://reviewboar.xyz/api/users/xyz/
>> <http://reviewboar.xyz/users/xyz/>",
>> headers: {'Authorization': 'Basic xyzxyzxyzxyz=='}
>> }).then(function success(response){
>> $scope.data = response.data;
>> $scope.status = response.status;
>> $scope.config = response.config;
>> $scope.header = responce.header;
>> }, function error(response){
>> $scope.status = response.status;
>> console.log($scope.status);
>> });
>>
>> But I am getting CORS error, how can I resolve it ? We have RB in closed
>> environment and don't need CORS.
>> Is there a way we can disable it in Review board ? Please provide any
>> pointer.
>>
>> Error:
>> Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading
>> the remote resource at https://reviewboard.xyz.yu.com/api/
>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fnrbweb-staging.eng.netapp.com%2Fapi%2F=D=1=AFQjCNE-XHOFYTUFA0dVOar015TNnYMs_w>.
>>
>> (Reason: CORS header 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' missing)
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Satish
>>
>> --
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
>
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
CORS issue with ReviewBoard API
Hi Team,
I am trying to create a page with AngularJS which will allow RB user's to
add review group in Review Board(RB) using RB API.
code snippet:
$http({
method: "GET",
url: "http://reviewboar.xyz/api/users/xyz/
.
(Reason: CORS header 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' missing)
Regards,
Satish
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Issue with Review Board API
Hi Team,
I am trying to create a page with AngularJS which will allow RB user's to
add review group in Review Board(RB) using RB API.
code snippet:
$http({
method: "GET",
url: "http://reviewboar.xyz/users/xyz/;,
headers: {'Authorization': 'Basic xyzxyzxyzxyz=='}
}).then(function success(response){
$scope.data = response.data;
$scope.status = response.status;
$scope.config = response.config;
$scope.header = responce.header;
}, function error(response){
$scope.status = response.status;
console.log($scope.status);
});
But I am getting CORS error, how can I resolve it ? We have RB in closed
environment and don't need CORS.
Is there a way we can disable it in Review board ? Please provide any
pointer.
Error:
Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the
remote resource at https://nrbweb-staging.eng.netapp.com/api/. (Reason:
CORS header 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' missing)
Regards,
Satish
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Excepted release of reviewboard 3.0
Hi Team, What is the expected release date for Review Board 3.0, we are planning to upgrade our Review Board server and I am very interested to move to release 3.0 of Review Board. Thanks, Satish -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Review Board Ticket #4554: Addition of git repository on private BitBucket server with Review board Fails.
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4554/ -- New ticket #4554 by satish3 For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New Tags: Priority:Medium, Type:Defect -- Addition of git repository on private BitBucket server with Review board Fails. == # What version are you running? Review Board 2.0.12 # What's the URL of the page containing the problem? 1) We have a private BitBucket server, I was trying to add git repo. on BitBucket to Review Board. 2) I was able to add git repository on private BitBucket server to Review Board using SSH key. With RAW file URL Mask as "https://bitbucket.edg.xyz.com/projects/$PROJECT/repos/$REPO/raw/$FILENAME?at=$REV; 3) Everything look good, but the review diff fails ? 4) In the rejects I can see the diff as [root@xyz reviewboard.FtBqiQ]# cat dependencies.py.diff diff --git a/reviewboard/dependencies.py b/reviewboard/dependencies.py index e48e2922ec79ed0f451d1d20b6196044f9eb4fe0..537c64e8ebe4878f9471feb0ae28ade39fc5da3d 100644 --- a/reviewboard/dependencies.py +++ b/reviewboard/dependencies.py @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +#testing """Version information for Review Board dependencies. This contains constants that other parts of Review Board (primarily packaging) [root@xyz reviewboard.FtBqiQ]# cat tmpmZbvzb-new.rej --- dependencies.py +++ dependencies.py @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +#testing """Version information for Review Board dependencies. This contains constants that other parts of Review Board (primarily packaging) I am not able to understand the issue by seeing the rejects, can you pleae help me with the issue. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
RBTools Ticket #4480: RBT PATCH for moved file fails.
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4480/ -- New ticket #4480 by satish3_singh For Beanbag, Inc. > RBTools Status: New Tags: Priority:Medium, Type:Defect -- RBT PATCH for moved file fails. == # What version are you running? RBtools0.7.5 # What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Raise a review with P4 move change 2. Patch the change using RBT PATCH 3. Changes are patched but I can't see the move effect. (Review Board vesrion is 2.0.12) FIlename remains the same. # What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Filename is changed as move file. # What operating system are you using? # Attach the debug out from the command. ``` $ rbt --debug ``` # Please provide any additional information below. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board Ticket #4382: RB2.0 API for review group user deletion not working
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4382/ -- New update by satish3 For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4382 Reply: working now. Thanks a lot. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board Ticket #4382: RB2.0 API for review group user deletion not working
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4382/ -- New update by satish3 For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4382 Reply: Thanks for the help, but I am getting the below exception: https://xyz.domain.com/api/groups/xyz/users/ MultipleObjectsReturned at /api/groups/xyz/users/ get() returned more than one Group -- it returned 2! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board Ticket #4382: RB2.0 API for review group user deletion not working
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4382/ -- New update by satish3 For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4382 Reply: Can you provide any pointer on this. I will fix it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Dockerized reviewboard
Hi Sir, I wanted to use review board docker and am new to it. Need some help about customizing it, I Want to use Apache/nginx server behind uwsgi? Is it possible ? Please provide some pointers on it. Thanks, Satish -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Review Board Ticket #4452: 403 Forbidden page because of a CSRF Verification Failure
-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4452/ -- New ticket #4452 by satish3_singh For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New Tags: Priority:Medium, Type:Defect -- 403 Forbidden page because of a CSRF Verification Failure == # What version are you running? Review board 2.0.12 # What's the URL of the page containing the problem? https://reviewboard.xyz.com/account/preferences/#groups # What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. GO to https://reviewboard.xyz.com/account/preferences/#groups And use the search (under the word group) And then hit enter/return you’ll get a 403 Forbidden page because of a CSRF Verification Failure # What is the expected output? What do you see instead? # What operating system are you using? What browser? On all the browsers. # Please provide any additional information below. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Review Board Error: float division by zero
We are too facing the same issue with Reviewboard 2.0.12. Please provide any pointer on this ? On Thursday, 3 October 2013 12:34:47 UTC+5:30, Varun Jain wrote: > > Hi Team, > > When I click on "show all files changed" for script review, I get > following error: > > float division by zero > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File > "/opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.7.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py", > > line 226, in view_diff > > page = paginator.page(page_num) > > File > "/opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/core/paginator.py", > > line 37, in page > > number = self.validate_number(number) > > File > "/opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/core/paginator.py", > > line 28, in validate_number > > if number > self.num_pages: > > File > "/opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/core/paginator.py", > > line 64, in _get_num_pages > > self._num_pages = int(ceil(hits / float(self.per_page))) > > ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero > > > > I've not encountered this issue before, is something missing? > > > Thanks, > > Varun > > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Issue with "rbt patch" working on binary file.
Hi Team, "rbt patch" fails for binary files, it doesn't work for binary files. Is this intended behavior ? Review board 2.0.12 RBTools0.5.3 Perforce repository Log: Output of rbt patch --print //depot/aaa///ddd/South-1.0.2.tar.gz#1 ==A== //aaa///ddd/xyz/South-1.0.2.tar.gz Fails for binary file Binary files /tmp/tmpiLF66E and /u/satish3/p4/testRBtools/depot/South-1.0.2.tar.gz differ --- //depot/aaa///ddd/test.py //depot/aaa///ddd//xyz/test.py#1 Works for normal file +++ //depot/prod/code-quality/code-review/rbtools/test.py 2015-11-04 07:35:32 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +#test -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Cannot attach HTML to ReviewBoard after upgrade to 2.0.12
Thanks for the clarification. Regards, Satish Singh -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Cannot attach HTML to ReviewBoard after upgrade to 2.0.12
Log Attached. On Monday, 21 September 2015 15:40:06 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Can you provide a screenshot of this? This might be a bug that we have > fixed in 2.0.20. See > https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0.20/#reviews > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com > Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org > Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:07 AM, satish singh <triv...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> We recently upgraded ReviewBoard from 1.7.7.1 to 2.0.12. After this when >> we upload HTML file to a review it shows the html code on review request >> review instead of renderung the html output. >> >> Please help us to resolve this issue. >> >> -- >> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: >> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ >> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: >> https://rbcommons.com/ >> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "reviewboard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Cannot attach HTML to ReviewBoard after upgrade to 2.0.12
We recently upgraded ReviewBoard from 1.7.7.1 to 2.0.12. After this when we upload HTML file to a review it shows the html code on review request review instead of renderung the html output. Please help us to resolve this issue. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Review Board Extension
Hi Team, I have a query that, if I write a extension for Review Board1.7.7.1, will it work fine on newer releases without a tweak. Like suppose we are planning to move to Review Board2.x in near feature. So, will my extension on Review Board1.7.7.1 work on Review Board 2.x ? Or if a tweak will be required will it be a major one. I am asking this because, I can see that Review Board 2.x has major changes with respect to JS technology, Backbone and underscore js has been introduced in this version. Please let me know what will be the best approach. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Error 500 on opening a review request.
RB Version: Review Board 1.7.7.1 User is getting error 500 on opening a review request which was successfully posted using post-review. Logs: File /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.10-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py, line 111, in get_response response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs) File /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.7.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py, line 20, in _check return login_required(view_func)(*args, **kwargs) File /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.25-py2.7.egg/djblets/auth/util.py, line 47, in _checklogin return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs) File /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.7.1-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py, line 686, in review_detail diff_revision = diffset_versions[info['added'][0][2]] KeyError: 688570 Can anyone provide me a pointer on where is the issue and how it can be resolved ? Satish -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Will Review Board1.7.7.1 show existing diff if a related file is deleted from repository(perforce)
Hi Team, Will ReviewBoard 1.7.7.1 show a existing diff for a review, even if the corresponding file is deleted from perforce after the review is raised ? -- Satish -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Migrating Perforce server because of perforce distributed environment upgrade
Hi Team, Need to discuss on a solution for issue arising due to migration of perforce server: For perforce distributed environment upgrade, we are migrating perforce clients to a different server, now the issue is with existing review request, after the upgrade user can open existing review request but he fails to update those as client are migrated to a different server. One solution will be updating the repository to the new one, as we don't have an API call to update a repository id it is required to be done from database side. There are two tables having the repository id: reviews_reviewrequest , diffviewer_diffset Do I need to update both the tables ? Because in admin page-database we have a option to update repository in GUI, and it looks like it is updating only reviews_reviewrequest. Do I need to update any other table too ? Please guide me to resolve the issue. Thanks, Satish -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Migrating Perforce server because of perforce distributed environment upgrade
Hi David, File path will be the same. So, updating the repository in Review board will be work fine, but there are two tables having the repository id: reviews_reviewrequest , diffviewer_diffset Do I need to update both the tables or just reviews_reviewrequest ? Thanks, Satish On Friday, 11 July 2014 13:08:09 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: Are you slicing the depot into multiple pieces based on file paths or just migrating it to another server? If the file paths are staying the same, you can just update the repository in Review Board to point to the new server. -David On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:35 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi Team, Need to discuss on a solution for issue arising due to migration of perforce server: For perforce distributed environment upgrade, we are migrating perforce clients to a different server, now the issue is with existing review request, after the upgrade user can open existing review request but he fails to update those as client are migrated to a different server. One solution will be updating the repository to the new one, as we don't have an API call to update a repository id it is required to be done from database side. There are two tables having the repository id: reviews_reviewrequest , diffviewer_diffset Do I need to update both the tables ? Because in admin page-database we have a option to update repository in GUI, and it looks like it is updating only reviews_reviewrequest. Do I need to update any other table too ? Please guide me to resolve the issue. Thanks, Satish -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Migrating Perforce server because of perforce distributed environment upgrade
Hi David, The issue is clients are migrated to multiple server across different location, some are migrated to X location some to Y location. In GUI-ADMIN Login-Databases-review_requests, there is a option to update the repository for review request which updates the repository ID. So, I guess there will not be an issue. But I am not able to get the underlying query that is running ? Thanks, Satish On Friday, 11 July 2014 14:56:45 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: I'd suggest just changing the existing Repository object to point to the new server without changing any IDs. -David On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 2:23 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi David, File path will be the same. So, updating the repository in Review board will be work fine, but there are two tables having the repository id: reviews_reviewrequest , diffviewer_diffset Do I need to update both the tables or just reviews_reviewrequest ? Thanks, Satish On Friday, 11 July 2014 13:08:09 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: Are you slicing the depot into multiple pieces based on file paths or just migrating it to another server? If the file paths are staying the same, you can just update the repository in Review Board to point to the new server. -David On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:35 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Team, Need to discuss on a solution for issue arising due to migration of perforce server: For perforce distributed environment upgrade, we are migrating perforce clients to a different server, now the issue is with existing review request, after the upgrade user can open existing review request but he fails to update those as client are migrated to a different server. One solution will be updating the repository to the new one, as we don't have an API call to update a repository id it is required to be done from database side. There are two tables having the repository id: reviews_reviewrequest , diffviewer_diffset Do I need to update both the tables ? Because in admin page-database we have a option to update repository in GUI, and it looks like it is updating only reviews_reviewrequest. Do I need to update any other table too ? Please guide me to resolve the issue. Thanks, Satish -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/ powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Migrating Perforce server because of perforce distributed environment upgrade
Hi David, What you think it will work right ?, Can you let me know how to get the update query running behind the GUI update. -Satish On Friday, 11 July 2014 15:22:07 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: Hi David, The issue is clients are migrated to multiple server across different location, some are migrated to X location some to Y location. In GUI-ADMIN Login-Databases-review_requests, there is a option to update the repository for review request which updates the repository ID. So, I guess there will not be an issue. But I am not able to get the underlying query that is running ? Thanks, Satish On Friday, 11 July 2014 14:56:45 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: I'd suggest just changing the existing Repository object to point to the new server without changing any IDs. -David On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 2:23 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David, File path will be the same. So, updating the repository in Review board will be work fine, but there are two tables having the repository id: reviews_reviewrequest , diffviewer_diffset Do I need to update both the tables or just reviews_reviewrequest ? Thanks, Satish On Friday, 11 July 2014 13:08:09 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: Are you slicing the depot into multiple pieces based on file paths or just migrating it to another server? If the file paths are staying the same, you can just update the repository in Review Board to point to the new server. -David On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:35 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Team, Need to discuss on a solution for issue arising due to migration of perforce server: For perforce distributed environment upgrade, we are migrating perforce clients to a different server, now the issue is with existing review request, after the upgrade user can open existing review request but he fails to update those as client are migrated to a different server. One solution will be updating the repository to the new one, as we don't have an API call to update a repository id it is required to be done from database side. There are two tables having the repository id: reviews_reviewrequest , diffviewer_diffset Do I need to update both the tables ? Because in admin page-database we have a option to update repository in GUI, and it looks like it is updating only reviews_reviewrequest. Do I need to update any other table too ? Please guide me to resolve the issue. Thanks, Satish -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/ powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Git issue in RBTools0.5.7 and RB1.7.7.1
Hi Team, We are migrating to RBtools0.5.7 from RBTools.0.4.3, We got a issue where description of Review request is not getting updated with -g option in some cases: 1) One difference I see now is earlier we used to refer to most recent commit with HEAD~1 and now it's represented by HEAD. It works fine but when we go to pick the description it fails, logs below: bash-4.2$ git log --pretty=format:%s%n%n%b HEAD.. ---Present way of picking the description fails it return None bash-4.2$ git log --pretty=format:%s%n%n%b HEAD~1.. ---Earlier way of picking the description is working this is testing --- output 2) It also fails in case of revision range passed: git log --pretty=format:%s%n%n%b 2c99acc..5d4a157 ---No output Thanks, Satish -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: RBTools0.4.3 posts a review in publish state even if a reviewer information is not provided.
ReviewBoard version is 1.7.7.1 Regards, Satish Singh On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 11:11:38 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: What version of Review Board? -David On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:33 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi Team, I just want to confirm that with RBTools0.4.3 we are able to publish a review with -p option, even if a reviewer information(user/group) is not provided. It shouldn't allow the review to be published right ? regards, Satish Singh -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
RBTools0.4.3 posts a review in publish state even if a reviewer information is not provided.
Hi Team, I just want to confirm that with RBTools0.4.3 we are able to publish a review with -p option, even if a reviewer information(user/group) is not provided. It shouldn't allow the review to be published right ? regards, Satish Singh -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: RB- Bug: Expand to header in diff viewer page is not coming for perl file
Hi Christian, Thanks for helping me, the issue is resolved now. I didn't got file reviewboard/diffviewer/filetypes.py, but in diffviewer/diffutils.py I did added support for .thpl file and it looks to work now. '.thpl': [ re.compile(r'^\s*sub [A-Za-z0-9_]+'), ], '.thpl' extension is used for perl file here, rest every thing is perl. The .*thpl* file type is unique to storage and is used to test filers. Thanks, Satish On Friday, 23 August 2013 00:59:27 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Satish, This would have to be modified in reviewboard/diffviewer/filetypes.py. What does a thpl file represent? I'm not familiar with that extension. If that's standard, it can be added to our mapping in a release. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:23 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi Christian, I got the issue, actually we save a perl file with .thpl extension instead of .pl. I am attaching a screenshot where I have same file with .pl and .thpl extension, the Expand to function/class is working for file with .pl extension and it's not working for .thpl extension. Can you please let me know where to make a corresponding change so that it support .thpl files. Regards, Satish SIngh On Thursday, 22 August 2013 00:59:03 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you provide a sample perl file that it does not work with that you think it should? Can you also take a screenshot? - Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:36 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: Diff-viewer expansion to a function/class is not working for perl files, it working for rest of the file types, can anyone provide some pointers for this. Where to look for the issue ? Review board recently upgraded to 1.7.7.1 from 1.6.3 Thanks. On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 16:30:53 UTC+5:30, Varun Jain wrote: Hi Team, We are not able to see any expand to header button for Perl files that can be seen for all other files. Please let us know if anyone is experiencing same issue. Thanks, Varun -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@** googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@**googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_outhttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out . -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: RB- Bug: Expand to header in diff viewer page is not coming for perl file
Hi Christian, I got the issue, actually we save a perl file with .thpl extension instead of .pl. I am attaching a screenshot where I have same file with .pl and .thpl extension, the Expand to function/class is working for file with .pl extension and it's not working for .thpl extension. Can you please let me know where to make a corresponding change so that it support .thpl files. Regards, Satish SIngh On Thursday, 22 August 2013 00:59:03 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you provide a sample perl file that it does not work with that you think it should? Can you also take a screenshot? - Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:36 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Diff-viewer expansion to a function/class is not working for perl files, it working for rest of the file types, can anyone provide some pointers for this. Where to look for the issue ? Review board recently upgraded to 1.7.7.1 from 1.6.3 Thanks. On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 16:30:53 UTC+5:30, Varun Jain wrote: Hi Team, We are not able to see any expand to header button for Perl files that can be seen for all other files. Please let us know if anyone is experiencing same issue. Thanks, Varun -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. attachment: Expand to function class not working.png
Re: RB- Bug: Expand to header in diff viewer page is not coming for perl file
Diff-viewer expansion to a function/class is not working for perl files, it working for rest of the file types, can anyone provide some pointers for this. Where to look for the issue ? Review board recently upgraded to 1.7.7.1 from 1.6.3 Thanks. On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 16:30:53 UTC+5:30, Varun Jain wrote: Hi Team, We are not able to see any expand to header button for Perl files that can be seen for all other files. Please let us know if anyone is experiencing same issue. Thanks, Varun -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
serach on reviewboard is working as a full text search, even though search is not enabled from admin setting.
Hi Team, Search on ReviewBoard1.7.7.1 is working as a full text search, even though its not enabled from general setting in admin page. Aslo, we have not installed pyluence. It's affecting the performance, request you provide some inputs so, we can fix this on earliest. Thanks, Satish -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: serach on reviewboard is working as a full text search, even though search is not enabled from admin setting.
Hi Christian, Thanks a lot for replying. We have around 2 thousand users using Review Board and we are using MySQL database. I see the search process hogging the cpu/memory for long time. Like if I enter sa in the search box, I can see the response on morzilla firefox, it's too large around 328kb. Please let me know how it can be disabled ? regards, satish On Thursday, 18 July 2013 12:52:59 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you give an example? And some details on your setup, such as how many review requests are on your system, and what type of database you're using? We don't do full-text search, but we do search within summaries of review requests. This cannot be disabled. Christian satish singh wrote: Hi Team, Search on ReviewBoard1.7.7.1 is working as a full text search, even though its not enabled from general setting in admin page. Aslo, we have not installed pyluence. It's affecting the performance, request you provide some inputs so, we can fix this on earliest. Thanks, Satish -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: serach on reviewboard is working as a full text search, even though search is not enabled from admin setting.
should,t we fire ajax call after minimum 3 characters ?. After pressing a ab abc --- three calls are getting fired, the ajax call with single character like a is taking lot of time. thanks, satish On Thursday, 18 July 2013 14:53:51 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: Hi Christian, I have attached the response data from demo.reviewboard, is this ok, can it affect the performance ? Thanks, Satish On Thursday, 18 July 2013 14:00:14 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: You shouldn't be seeing a response that big. Where do you see it? What is this 328kb of data from? There is no way to disable this field. It sounds like there's just a bug that needs fixing. Christian On Jul 18, 2013, at 0:49, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, Thanks a lot for replying. We have around 2 thousand users using Review Board and we are using MySQL database. I see the search process hogging the cpu/memory for long time. Like if I enter sa in the search box, I can see the response on morzilla firefox, it's too large around 328kb. Please let me know how it can be disabled ? regards, satish On Thursday, 18 July 2013 12:52:59 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you give an example? And some details on your setup, such as how many review requests are on your system, and what type of database you're using? We don't do full-text search, but we do search within summaries of review requests. This cannot be disabled. Christian satish singh wrote: Hi Team, Search on ReviewBoard1.7.7.1 is working as a full text search, even though its not enabled from general setting in admin page. Aslo, we have not installed pyluence. It's affecting the performance, request you provide some inputs so, we can fix this on earliest. Thanks, Satish -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: strange behavior of django-evolution 0.6.9
Ya I have the backup. I have not written any evolution file for the columns added. Can you explain a bit please. running --evolve --hint will not write that file for me ? regards, Satish On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 00:27:50 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Satish, It's really pretty iffy adding your own columns to our models. Things can, and will, break, as you're noticing. Did you add an evolution file for your columns? It wasn't clear from your description. If you ran --evolve --hint, you're going to have a bad time, as it's just going to cause problems with our evolutions. Got a backup? What version did you upgrade from? Christian satish singh wrote: Hi Team, Can anyone explain me this behaviour.? On Tuesday, 25 June 2013 18:39:48 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: I had Review Board 1.7.7.1 on our testing environment running successfully on production clone db. I did a model change because of which it asked for running a evolution manually. We ran it and it was successful. Now when we went for upgrade on production db, it asked for manual evolution because of last change. Now when I ran the manual evolution it gave error. Error: Error: Error applying evolution: (1060, Duplicate column name 'diff_base64')***- manual evolution failed*** *I reverted the last change we made and evolution was successful, it doesn't ask for manual evolution* bash-3.2# /opt/software/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/xyz.com http://xyz.com - begin log output -- Creating tables ... There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. --- end log output --- Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete! *After this I modified to include the last change as part of enhancement and ran the upgrade again, it asked for manual evolution and ran successfully:* bash-3.2# /opt/software/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/xyz.com http://xyz.com -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes required. asking for manual evolution The following are the changes that could not be resolved: In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment: Field 'severity' has been added change we made as part of enhancement Error: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot resolve automatically. bash-3.2# /opt/software/bin/python2.7 ./reviewboard/manage.py evolve --hint --execute /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. You have requested a database evolution. This will alter tables and data currently in the 'default' database, and may result in IRREVERSABLE DATA LOSS. Evolutions should be *thoroughly* reviewed prior to execution Are you sure you want to execute the evolutions? Type 'yes' to continue, or 'no' to cancel: yes Evolution successful. *This behavior of django evolution is strange. Why didn't it ran with the change at once and gave the *Duplicate column name 'diff_base64' error. *Is there any logic for this, why it failed ?* -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
strange behavior of django-evolution 0.6.9
I had Review Board 1.7.7.1 on our testing environment running successfully on production clone db. I did a model change because of which it asked for running a evolution manually. We ran it and it was successful. Now when we went for upgrade on production db, it asked for manual evolution because of last change. Now when I ran the manual evolution it gave error. Error: Error: Error applying evolution: (1060, Duplicate column name 'diff_base64')* **- manual evolution failed*** *I reverted the last change we made and evolution was successful, it doesn't ask for manual evolution* bash-3.2# /opt/software/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/xyz.com - begin log output -- Creating tables ... There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. --- end log output --- Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete! *After this I modified to include the last change as part of enhancement and ran the upgrade again, it asked for manual evolution and ran successfully:* bash-3.2# /opt/software/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/xyz.com -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes required. asking for manual evolution The following are the changes that could not be resolved: In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment: Field 'severity' has been added change we made as part of enhancement Error: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot resolve automatically. bash-3.2# /opt/software/bin/python2.7 ./reviewboard/manage.py evolve --hint --execute /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. You have requested a database evolution. This will alter tables and data currently in the 'default' database, and may result in IRREVERSABLE DATA LOSS. Evolutions should be *thoroughly* reviewed prior to execution Are you sure you want to execute the evolutions? Type 'yes' to continue, or 'no' to cancel: yes Evolution successful. *This behavior of django evolution is strange. Why didn't it ran with the change at once and gave the * Duplicate column name 'diff_base64' error. *Is there any logic for this, why it failed ?* -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: strange behavior of django-evolution 0.6.9
Hi Team, Can anyone explain me this behaviour.? On Tuesday, 25 June 2013 18:39:48 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: I had Review Board 1.7.7.1 on our testing environment running successfully on production clone db. I did a model change because of which it asked for running a evolution manually. We ran it and it was successful. Now when we went for upgrade on production db, it asked for manual evolution because of last change. Now when I ran the manual evolution it gave error. Error: Error: Error applying evolution: (1060, Duplicate column name 'diff_base64')* **- manual evolution failed*** *I reverted the last change we made and evolution was successful, it doesn't ask for manual evolution* bash-3.2# /opt/software/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/xyz.com - begin log output -- Creating tables ... There are unapplied evolutions for auth. There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) Evolution successful. --- end log output --- Resetting in-database caches. Upgrade complete! *After this I modified to include the last change as part of enhancement and ran the upgrade again, it asked for manual evolution and ran successfully:* bash-3.2# /opt/software/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/xyz.com -- begin log output -- Creating tables ... Project signature has changed - an evolution is required Installing custom SQL ... Installing indexes ... Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes required. asking for manual evolution The following are the changes that could not be resolved: In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment: Field 'severity' has been added change we made as part of enhancement Error: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot resolve automatically. bash-3.2# /opt/software/bin/python2.7 ./reviewboard/manage.py evolve --hint --execute /opt/software/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. You have requested a database evolution. This will alter tables and data currently in the 'default' database, and may result in IRREVERSABLE DATA LOSS. Evolutions should be *thoroughly* reviewed prior to execution Are you sure you want to execute the evolutions? Type 'yes' to continue, or 'no' to cancel: yes Evolution successful. *This behavior of django evolution is strange. Why didn't it ran with the change at once and gave the * Duplicate column name 'diff_base64' error. *Is there any logic for this, why it failed ?* -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Difference between the cache setting in settings_local.py and admin console cache setting
What is difference between the cache setting in settings_local.py and admin console cache setting, I can see value at both the place can be different ? How to add multiple memcached server through Admin GUI ? Regards, Satish Singh -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Difference between the cache setting in settings_local.py and admin console cache setting
Resolved the issue. Thanks a lot. Regards, Satish On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 12:59:26 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Satish, The one in the admin console overrides the one in settings_local.py. The settings_local one is the default one generated at install time. What version are you running? If it's a newer version of Review Board, the inline help will tell you that you can just separate addresses with semicolons. This should also work for versions without this notice, I believe. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On June 18, 2013 at 12:26:30 AM, satish singh (triv...@gmail.comjavascript:) wrote: What is difference between the cache setting in settings_local.py and admin console cache setting, I can see value at both the place can be different ? How to add multiple memcached server through Admin GUI ? Regards, Satish Singh -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
RB1.7.7.1 Upgrade Bug: Hide WhiteSpace changes in viewdiff is not functioning.
I looked at this issue today. The issue here is, a class called
whitespace-chunk
is not being generated to html page:
It should be like:
tbody id=chunk2.57 class=replace whitespace-chunk
tr line=217 class=first whitespace-line
But its coming rendering like this:
tbody id=chunk2.57 class=replace
tr line=217 class=first whitespace-line
As per my anaysis, this calss is getting rendered through:
reviewboard/templates/diffviewer/diff_file_fragment.html
{% if chunk.meta.whitespace_chunk%} whitespace-chunk{% endif %}
I am not getting what is chunk.meta.whitespace_chunk, why its coming as
false ?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: RB1.7.7.1 Upgrade Bug: Hide WhiteSpace changes in viewdiff is not functioning.
Hi Team,
Please provide some input So, that I can fix this bug.
On Wednesday, 5 June 2013 19:29:40 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote:
I looked at this issue today. The issue here is, a class called
whitespace-chunk
is not being generated to html page:
It should be like:
tbody id=chunk2.57 class=replace whitespace-chunk
tr line=217 class=first whitespace-line
But its coming rendering like this:
tbody id=chunk2.57 class=replace
tr line=217 class=first whitespace-line
As per my anaysis, this calss is getting rendered through:
reviewboard/templates/diffviewer/diff_file_fragment.html
{% if chunk.meta.whitespace_chunk%} whitespace-chunk{% endif %}
I am not getting what is chunk.meta.whitespace_chunk, why its coming as
false ?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Changes to reviews.js not reflecting in reviews.min.js
Hi Team,
I have made changes to review.js, but its not reflecting in review.min.js.
I can see this setting in setting.py:
'reviews': {
'source_filenames': (
# Note: These are roughly in dependency order.
'rb/js/models/abstractCommentBlockModel.js',
'rb/js/models/abstractReviewableModel.js',
'rb/js/models/commentIssueManagerModel.js',
'rb/js/models/fileAttachmentCommentBlockModel.js',
'rb/js/models/fileAttachmentReviewableModel.js',
'rb/js/models/regionCommentBlockModel.js',
'rb/js/models/imageReviewableModel.js',
'rb/js/models/screenshotCommentBlockModel.js',
'rb/js/models/screenshotReviewableModel.js',
'rb/js/views/abstractCommentBlockView.js',
'rb/js/views/abstractReviewableView.js',
'rb/js/views/fileAttachmentCommentBlockView.js',
'rb/js/views/fileAttachmentReviewableView.js',
'rb/js/views/issueSummaryTableView.js',
'rb/js/views/regionCommentBlockView.js',
'rb/js/views/imageReviewableView.js',
'rb/js/diffviewer.js',
'rb/js/reviews.js',
),
'output_filename': 'rb/js/reviews.min.js',
Please any one who can let me know, how to make my changes in reviews.js,
included in reviews.min.js ?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Changes to reviews.js not reflecting in reviews.min.js
Anyone please provide some input on this ?
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 15:15:16 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote:
Hi Team,
I have made changes to review.js, but its not reflecting in review.min.js.
I can see this setting in setting.py:
'reviews': {
'source_filenames': (
# Note: These are roughly in dependency order.
'rb/js/models/abstractCommentBlockModel.js',
'rb/js/models/abstractReviewableModel.js',
'rb/js/models/commentIssueManagerModel.js',
'rb/js/models/fileAttachmentCommentBlockModel.js',
'rb/js/models/fileAttachmentReviewableModel.js',
'rb/js/models/regionCommentBlockModel.js',
'rb/js/models/imageReviewableModel.js',
'rb/js/models/screenshotCommentBlockModel.js',
'rb/js/models/screenshotReviewableModel.js',
'rb/js/views/abstractCommentBlockView.js',
'rb/js/views/abstractReviewableView.js',
'rb/js/views/fileAttachmentCommentBlockView.js',
'rb/js/views/fileAttachmentReviewableView.js',
'rb/js/views/issueSummaryTableView.js',
'rb/js/views/regionCommentBlockView.js',
'rb/js/views/imageReviewableView.js',
'rb/js/diffviewer.js',
'rb/js/reviews.js',
),
'output_filename': 'rb/js/reviews.min.js',
Please any one who can let me know, how to make my changes in reviews.js,
included in reviews.min.js ?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Static media still broken in 1.7 after updating Apache configuration
Hi Chris,
Can this problem be because of virtual environment, because I gave it a try
again using both mod_python and mod_wsgi. Still getiing same error 404 for
static media.
My Apache 2 configuration using mod_python:
VirtualHost *:80
ServerName toolsnb01-06.lab.eng.btc.netapp.in
DocumentRoot /var/www/RB175.com/htdocs
# Error handlers
ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html
# Serve django pages
Location /
PythonPath ['/var/www/RB175.com/conf'] + sys.path
SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE /var/www/RB175.com/tmp/egg_cache
SetEnv HOME /var/www/RB175.com/data
SetHandler mod_python
PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
PythonAutoReload Off
PythonDebug Off
# Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache
PythonInterpreter reviewboard_RB175_com
/Location
# Serve static media without running it through mod_python
# (overrides the above)
Location /media
SetHandler None
/Location
Location /static
SetHandler None
/Location
Location /errordocs
SetHandler None
/Location
Directory /var/www/RB175.com/htdocs
AllowOverride All
Options -Indexes +FollowSymLinks
Allow from all
/Directory
# Alias static media requests to filesystem
Alias /media /var/www/RB175.com/htdocs/media
Alias /static /var/www/RB175.com/htdocs/static
Alias /errordocs /var/www/RB175.com/htdocs/errordocs
/VirtualHost
Please provide some pointers, I did followed all the steps, everything is
working, only static media is not getting loaded.
Regards,
Satish
On Friday, 15 March 2013 15:31:19 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote:
Hi Sir,
I did created an virtualenv and then I installed Review Board 1.7.5 with
easy_install tool. I have not made any change to settings_local.py, just
copied it to ReviewBoard directory.
Installation directory:
(RB1.7.5)bash-3.2$ ls
Django-1.4.5-py2.7.eggJinja2-2.6-py2.7.egg
pip-1.2.1-py2.7.egg ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg
django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.7.egg jsmin-2.0.2_1-py2.7.egg
pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg setuptools-0.6c11-py2.7.egg
django_pipeline-1.2.24-py2.7.egg Markdown-2.2.1-py2.7.egg
Pygments-1.6-py2.7.egg setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.7.egg
Djblets-0.7.11-py2.7.egg mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.7.egg
python_dateutil-1.5-py2.7.eggsetuptools.pth
docutils-0.10-py2.7.egg nose-1.2.1-py2.7.egg
python_memcached-1.48-py2.7.egg Sphinx-1.1.3-py2.7.egg
easy-install.pth paramiko-1.9.0-py2.7.egg
pytz-2012j-py2.7.egg
feedparser-5.1.3-py2.7.eggPIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg
recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.7.egg
(RB1.7.5)bash-3.2$ pwd
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg
(RB1.7.5)bash-3.2$ ls
conf data EGG-INFO htdocs logs reviewboard settings_local.py
settings_local.pyc tmp webtests
content of settings_local.py :
# Site-specific configuration settings for Review Board
# Definitions of these settings can be found at
# http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/settings/
# Database configuration
DATABASES = {
'default': {
'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.sqlite3',
'NAME': '/var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/data/reviewboard.db',
},
}
# Unique secret key. Don't share this with anybody.
SECRET_KEY = '=ck@h)-ns9=xmzt3i^lkkc(^4fp3@gw=h@wy(p)g8bpa3@ys)*'
# Cache backend settings.
CACHES = {
'default': {
'BACKEND': 'django.core.cache.backends.memcached.MemcachedCache',
'LOCATION': 'localhost:11211',
},
}
# Extra site information.
SITE_ID = 1
SITE_ROOT = '/'
FORCE_SCRIPT_NAME = ''
DEBUG = False
Thanks,
Satish
On Friday, 15 March 2013 15:09:53 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
I feel like I asked this, but I can't find where..
How did you install Review Board? It looks like you have a virtualenv set
up. Did you install from source, or our egg?
Did you make any modifications to your settings_local.py file?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mar 15, 2013, at 2:36 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Team,
Please provide any pointers on this, how can i debug ?
thanks ,
satish
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 18:38:04 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote:
Hi Sir,
I have added mod_wsgi configuration, still facing the same issue:
The Review Board 1.7.5 is up but images, CSS and JS files are not
getting loaded
Re: Static media still broken in 1.7 after updating Apache configuration
Hi Sir,
I did created an virtualenv and then I installed Review Board 1.7.5 with
easy_install tool. I have not made any change to settings_local.py, just
copied it to ReviewBoard directory.
Installation directory:
(RB1.7.5)bash-3.2$ ls
Django-1.4.5-py2.7.eggJinja2-2.6-py2.7.egg
pip-1.2.1-py2.7.egg ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg
django_evolution-0.6.8-py2.7.egg jsmin-2.0.2_1-py2.7.egg
pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg setuptools-0.6c11-py2.7.egg
django_pipeline-1.2.24-py2.7.egg Markdown-2.2.1-py2.7.egg
Pygments-1.6-py2.7.egg setuptools-0.6c12dev_r88846-py2.7.egg
Djblets-0.7.11-py2.7.egg mimeparse-0.1.3-py2.7.egg
python_dateutil-1.5-py2.7.eggsetuptools.pth
docutils-0.10-py2.7.egg nose-1.2.1-py2.7.egg
python_memcached-1.48-py2.7.egg Sphinx-1.1.3-py2.7.egg
easy-install.pth paramiko-1.9.0-py2.7.egg
pytz-2012j-py2.7.egg
feedparser-5.1.3-py2.7.eggPIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg
recaptcha_client-1.0.6-py2.7.egg
(RB1.7.5)bash-3.2$ pwd
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg
(RB1.7.5)bash-3.2$ ls
conf data EGG-INFO htdocs logs reviewboard settings_local.py
settings_local.pyc tmp webtests
content of settings_local.py :
# Site-specific configuration settings for Review Board
# Definitions of these settings can be found at
# http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/settings/
# Database configuration
DATABASES = {
'default': {
'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.sqlite3',
'NAME': '/var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/data/reviewboard.db',
},
}
# Unique secret key. Don't share this with anybody.
SECRET_KEY = '=ck@h)-ns9=xmzt3i^lkkc(^4fp3@gw=h@wy(p)g8bpa3@ys)*'
# Cache backend settings.
CACHES = {
'default': {
'BACKEND': 'django.core.cache.backends.memcached.MemcachedCache',
'LOCATION': 'localhost:11211',
},
}
# Extra site information.
SITE_ID = 1
SITE_ROOT = '/'
FORCE_SCRIPT_NAME = ''
DEBUG = False
Thanks,
Satish
On Friday, 15 March 2013 15:09:53 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
I feel like I asked this, but I can't find where..
How did you install Review Board? It looks like you have a virtualenv set
up. Did you install from source, or our egg?
Did you make any modifications to your settings_local.py file?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Mar 15, 2013, at 2:36 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Hi Team,
Please provide any pointers on this, how can i debug ?
thanks ,
satish
On Thursday, 14 March 2013 18:38:04 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote:
Hi Sir,
I have added mod_wsgi configuration, still facing the same issue:
The Review Board 1.7.5 is up but images, CSS and JS files are not getting
loaded. I'm getting 404 errors for anything under /static. Screenshot
attached. It’s strange when I ran findstatic management command it’s
seems to find the static media. But review board doesn’t seem to find it.
Log:
(RB1.7.5)bash-3.2$ python ./reviewboard/manage.py findstatic
rb/images/convo.png
Found 'rb/images/convo.png' here:
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/static/rb/images/convo.png
My Apache 2 configuration (httpd.conf):
LoadModule wsgi_module modules/mod_wsgi.so
VirtualHost *:80
ServerName toolsnb01-06.lab.eng.btc.netapp.in
DocumentRoot /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs
# Error handlers
ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html
WSGIPassAuthorization On
WSGIScriptAlias / /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/
htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi/
Directory /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs
AllowOverride All
Options -Indexes +FollowSymLinks
Allow from all
/Directory
# Alias static media requests to filesystem
Alias /media /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs/media
Alias /static /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs/static
Alias /errordocs /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs/errordocs
Alias /favicon.ico /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/
htdocs/static/rb/images/favicon.png
/VirtualHost.
Please provide some pointers on this. I am stuck with this.
One more question how difficult is it to migrate a ReviewBoard using
mod_python to use mod_wsgi ?
Thanks,
Satish.
On Wednesday, 13 March 2013 00:30:37 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
In confused about your configuration. I don't even see how Review Board
ever gets invoked. No mod_wsgi configuration.
Christian
On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:02, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
I am facing the same issue, can you please help me with it.
My Apache 2 configuration
Re: Facing issue with ReviewBoard 1.7.5
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-MJW84NOjg-Q/UT8DJs2sJeI/BCI/w5sCj93vMw4/s1600/reviewboard.png On Tuesday, 12 March 2013 10:59:04 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: Hi Sir, I am trying to create a staging environment to get the look and feel of Reveiwboard 1.7.5 and try to have some experience before migrating from Review Board 1.6.3 to 1.7.5. To find the challenges in the migration... Its a development server. On Tuesday, 12 March 2013 00:47:42 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Are you trying to do a development install (to actually write Review Board code), or a production install? You can't do the latter the way you're doing. You'll need to install an officially built package and follow our installation guide. Christian On Mar 11, 2013, at 6:12, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi sir, Thanks for replying, I did a fresh RB1.7.5 installation, not the Review Board is UP but images and JS is not loading. Even though the paths seems to be correct. Logs: (RB1.7.5)bash-3.2$ python ./reviewboard/manage.py runserver 10.72.8.200 REVIEWBOARD_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard local_dir /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg reviewboard/ is in the same directory as settings_local.py testing pathssatish HTDOCS_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media EXTENSIONS_STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media/ext ADMIN_MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/staticadmin/ REVIEWBOARD_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard local_dir /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg reviewboard/ is in the same directory as settings_local.py testing pathssatish HTDOCS_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media EXTENSIONS_STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media/ext ADMIN_MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/staticadmin/ Validating models... /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. 0 errors found Django version 1.4.5, using settings 'reviewboard.settings' Development server is running at http://10.72.8.200:8080/ Quit the server with CONTROL-C. Thanks, satish. On Friday, 8 March 2013 06:50:22 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, You shouldn't ever be seeing or hitting any of this. How did you install Review Board? And did you do the required 'rb-site upgrade'? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:00 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to get into this issue further, here are my findings: Django version 1.4.5, using settings 'reviewboard.settings' Development server is running at http://10.72.8.200:8080/ Quit the server with CONTROL-C. name rb/images/comment-draft-small.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/comment-draft-small.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/comment-draft-small.png name rb/images/star_on.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/star_on.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/star_on.png name rb/images/shipit.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/shipit.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/shipit.png name rb/images/convo.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/convo.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/convo.png [07/Mar/2013 11:49:00] GET /dashboard/ HTTP/1.1 302 0 name rb/images/delete.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path=u'rb/images/delete.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/delete.png name rb/images/edit.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme
Re: Static media still broken in 1.7 after updating Apache configuration
Hi Joe, I am facing the same issue, can you please help me with it. My Apache 2 configuration: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName toolsnb01-06.lab.eng.btc.netapp.in DocumentRoot /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs # Error handlers ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html Directory /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs AllowOverride All Options -Indexes +FollowSymLinks Allow from all /Directory Location /media SetHandler None /Location Location /errordocs SetHandler None /Location Location /static SetHandler None /Location # Alias static media requests to filesystem Alias /media /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs/media Alias /static /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs/static Alias /errordocs /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs/errordocs Alias /favicon.ico /var/www/ReviewBoard175.com/htdocs/static/rb/images/favicon.png /VirtualHost Any help would be appreciated. On Tuesday, 18 December 2012 09:45:32 UTC+5:30, Joe Attardi wrote: I updated my site to 1.7.0.1-py2.7 and I'm still getting 404 errors for anything under /static I added the alias for /static and restarted Apache 2, but it seems to have no effect. Am I missing something obvious? My Apache 2 configuration: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName uxworks-reviewboard.mysite.com DocumentRoot /var/www/uxworks-reviewboard/htdocs # Error handlers ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html # Serve django pages Location / PythonPath ['/var/www/uxworks-reviewboard/conf'] + sys.path SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE /var/www/uxworks-reviewboard/tmp/egg_cache SetEnv HOME /var/www/uxworks-reviewboard/data SetHandler mod_python PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython PythonAutoReload Off PythonDebug Off # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache PythonInterpreter reviewboard_uxworks-reviewboard /Location # Serve static media without running it through mod_python # (overrides the above) Location /media SetHandler None /Location Location /errordocs SetHandler None /Location Directory /var/www/uxworks-reviewboard/htdocs AllowOverride All /Directory # Alias static media requests to filesystem Alias /media /var/www/uxworks-reviewboard/htdocs/media Alias /errordocs /var/www/uxworks-reviewboard/htdocs/erordocs Alias /static /var/www/uxworks-reviewboard/htdocs/static /VirtualHost I tried running rb-site manage /var/www/uxworks-reviewboard resolve-check static-media but it gave me an error: Couldn't find manual update check 'static-media' Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Facing issue with ReviewBoard 1.7.5
Hi sir, Thanks for replying, I did a fresh RB1.7.5 installation, not the Review Board is UP but images and JS is not loading. Even though the paths seems to be correct. Logs: (RB1.7.5)bash-3.2$ python ./reviewboard/manage.py runserver 10.72.8.200 REVIEWBOARD_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard local_dir /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg reviewboard/ is in the same directory as settings_local.py testing pathssatish HTDOCS_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media EXTENSIONS_STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media/ext ADMIN_MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/staticadmin/ REVIEWBOARD_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard local_dir /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg reviewboard/ is in the same directory as settings_local.py testing pathssatish HTDOCS_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media EXTENSIONS_STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media/ext ADMIN_MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/staticadmin/ Validating models... /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. 0 errors found Django version 1.4.5, using settings 'reviewboard.settings' Development server is running at http://10.72.8.200:8080/ Quit the server with CONTROL-C. Thanks, satish. On Friday, 8 March 2013 06:50:22 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, You shouldn't ever be seeing or hitting any of this. How did you install Review Board? And did you do the required 'rb-site upgrade'? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript: Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:00 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: I tried to get into this issue further, here are my findings: Django version 1.4.5, using settings 'reviewboard.settings' Development server is running at http://10.72.8.200:8080/ Quit the server with CONTROL-C. name rb/images/comment-draft-small.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/comment-draft-small.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/comment-draft-small.png name rb/images/star_on.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/star_on.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/star_on.png name rb/images/shipit.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/shipit.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/shipit.png name rb/images/convo.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/convo.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/convo.png [07/Mar/2013 11:49:00] GET /dashboard/ HTTP/1.1 302 0 name rb/images/delete.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path=u'rb/images/delete.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/delete.png name rb/images/edit.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path=u'rb/images/edit.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/edit.png name rb/images/favicon_notify.ico parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path=u'rb/images/favicon_notify.ico', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/favicon_notify.ico name rb/images/resize-grip.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path=u'rb/images/resize-grip.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/resize-grip.png name rb/images/spinner.gif parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path=u'rb/images/spinner.gif', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/spinner.gif name rb/images/star_off.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path=u'rb/images/star_off.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/star_off.png name rb/images/favicon.ico parsed_name SplitResult
Re: Facing issue with ReviewBoard 1.7.5
Hi Sir, I am trying to create a staging environment to get the look and feel of Reveiwboard 1.7.5 and try to have some experience before migrating from Review Board 1.6.3 to 1.7.5. To find the challenges in the migration... Its a development server. On Tuesday, 12 March 2013 00:47:42 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Are you trying to do a development install (to actually write Review Board code), or a production install? You can't do the latter the way you're doing. You'll need to install an officially built package and follow our installation guide. Christian On Mar 11, 2013, at 6:12, satish singh triv...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi sir, Thanks for replying, I did a fresh RB1.7.5 installation, not the Review Board is UP but images and JS is not loading. Even though the paths seems to be correct. Logs: (RB1.7.5)bash-3.2$ python ./reviewboard/manage.py runserver 10.72.8.200 REVIEWBOARD_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard local_dir /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg reviewboard/ is in the same directory as settings_local.py testing pathssatish HTDOCS_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media EXTENSIONS_STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media/ext ADMIN_MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/staticadmin/ REVIEWBOARD_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard local_dir /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg reviewboard/ is in the same directory as settings_local.py testing pathssatish HTDOCS_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/static MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media EXTENSIONS_STATIC_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/media/ext ADMIN_MEDIA_ROOT /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.5-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/htdocs/staticadmin/ Validating models... /u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not using mpz_powm_sec. You should rebuild using libgmp = 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability. 0 errors found Django version 1.4.5, using settings 'reviewboard.settings' Development server is running at http://10.72.8.200:8080/ Quit the server with CONTROL-C. Thanks, satish. On Friday, 8 March 2013 06:50:22 UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, You shouldn't ever be seeing or hitting any of this. How did you install Review Board? And did you do the required 'rb-site upgrade'? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:00 AM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to get into this issue further, here are my findings: Django version 1.4.5, using settings 'reviewboard.settings' Development server is running at http://10.72.8.200:8080/ Quit the server with CONTROL-C. name rb/images/comment-draft-small.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/comment-draft-small.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/comment-draft-small.png name rb/images/star_on.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/star_on.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/star_on.png name rb/images/shipit.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/shipit.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/shipit.png name rb/images/convo.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='rb/images/convo.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/convo.png [07/Mar/2013 11:49:00] GET /dashboard/ HTTP/1.1 302 0 name rb/images/delete.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path=u'rb/images/delete.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/delete.png name rb/images/edit.png parsed_name SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path=u'rb/images/edit.png', query='', fragment='') client_name rb/images/edit.png name rb/images/favicon_notify.ico parsed_name SplitResult
Facing issue with ReviewBoard 1.7.5
Hi Team,
Can some one guide me with this error which I am getting after installing
ReviewBoard 1.7.5.
When I try to log in to ReviewBoard I get the below error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py,
line 150, in get_response
response = callback(request, **param_dict)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/utils/decorators.py,
line 91, in _wrapped_view
response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/views/defaults.py,
line 21, in page_not_found
return http.HttpResponseNotFound(t.render(RequestContext(request,
{'request_path': request.path})))
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 140, in render
return self._render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 134, in _render
return self.nodelist.render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 823, in render
bit = self.render_node(node, context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 837, in render_node
return node.render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/loader_tags.py,
line 123, in render
return compiled_parent._render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 134, in _render
return self.nodelist.render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 823, in render
bit = self.render_node(node, context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 837, in render_node
return node.render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 1107, in render
return func(*resolved_args, **resolved_kwargs)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/templatetags/staticfiles.py,
line 13, in static
return staticfiles_storage.url(path)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py,
line 114, in url
hashed_name = self.hashed_name(clean_name).replace('\\', '/')
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py,
line 74, in hashed_name
(clean_name, self))
ValueError: The file 'djblets/js/jquery.gravy.js' could not be found with
pipeline.storage.PipelineCachedStorage object at 0x92d0f8c.
Thanks
Satish
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Facing issue with ReviewBoard 1.7.5
('\\', '/')
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py,
line 80, in hashed_name
(clean_name, self))
ValueError: The file 'djblets/js/jquery.gravy.js' could not be found with
pipeline.storage.PipelineCachedStorage object at 0x9d5202c.
[07/Mar/2013 11:51:01] GET /account/login/?next_page=/dashboard/ HTTP/1.1
500 351
Please if some one can give some inputs on this.
On Thursday, 7 March 2013 15:52:00 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote:
Hi Team,
Can some one guide me with this error which I am getting after installing
ReviewBoard 1.7.5.
When I try to log in to ReviewBoard I get the below error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py,
line 150, in get_response
response = callback(request, **param_dict)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/utils/decorators.py,
line 91, in _wrapped_view
response = view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/views/defaults.py,
line 21, in page_not_found
return http.HttpResponseNotFound(t.render(RequestContext(request,
{'request_path': request.path})))
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 140, in render
return self._render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 134, in _render
return self.nodelist.render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 823, in render
bit = self.render_node(node, context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 837, in render_node
return node.render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/loader_tags.py,
line 123, in render
return compiled_parent._render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 134, in _render
return self.nodelist.render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 823, in render
bit = self.render_node(node, context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 837, in render_node
return node.render(context)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/template/base.py,
line 1107, in render
return func(*resolved_args, **resolved_kwargs)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/templatetags/staticfiles.py,
line 13, in static
return staticfiles_storage.url(path)
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py,
line 114, in url
hashed_name = self.hashed_name(clean_name).replace('\\', '/')
File
/u/satish3/envs/RB1.7.5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Django-1.4.5-py2.7.egg/django/contrib/staticfiles/storage.py,
line 74, in hashed_name
(clean_name, self))
ValueError: The file 'djblets/js/jquery.gravy.js' could not be found with
pipeline.storage.PipelineCachedStorage object at 0x92d0f8c.
Thanks
Satish
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: negative outgoing review
Hi David, Its causing a problem, the diff is not getting uploaded after this change through GUI, have any idea on this. On Tuesday, 18 December 2012 16:39:18 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: Thanks a lot David, it worked. -Satish On Monday, 17 December 2012 11:07:57 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: Satish, If you'd like to backport it, https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/commit/84c42014dafd8be04a2dc34bc0fea56663777176was my change to fix the last issue. That said, I think there are other related issues in 1.6.3. We highly recommend just upgrading to the new 1.6.15, which has this fix and others. -David -David On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:34 PM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David, I have seen the module 'reviewboard.reviews.models' , I put some debug statements and found that the save method is not called with update_counts=True, when we discarded a unpublished review and again publish a review with same change no. It calls the save method but the update_counts is false. def save(self, update_counts=False, **kwargs): self.bugs_closed = self.bugs_closed.strip() self.summary = truncate(self.summary, MAX_SUMMARY_LENGTH) if update_counts or self.id is None: self._update_counts() if self.status != self.PENDING_REVIEW: # If this is not a pending review request now, delete any # and all ReviewRequestVisit objects. self.visits.all().delete() super(ReviewRequest, self).save(**kwargs) Please give me some pointer on how to fix this issue. On Thursday, 13 December 2012 11:03:38 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: I think we still have a lingering bug when reopening existing review requests. I'll look into it. In the meantime, you can run the fixreviewcounts management command to fix these. -David -David On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:30 PM, satish singh triv...@gmail.comwrote: can any one give me a pointer on this pls. On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 15:49:51 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: I am running on Review Board 1.6.3. Say the outgoing review count is 10. When i post a review through GUI with a change no, the outgoing review count is increased by 1 that is 11, and then i discard it before publishing. The outgoing review count is decreased by 1, that is 10. Now again publish a review with same change no. the outgoing review count is not increased this time. and remain 10. if i repeat this 10 more time, the outgoing review count becomes negative. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@** googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: negative outgoing review
Thanks a lot David, it worked. -Satish On Monday, 17 December 2012 11:07:57 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: Satish, If you'd like to backport it, https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/commit/84c42014dafd8be04a2dc34bc0fea56663777176was my change to fix the last issue. That said, I think there are other related issues in 1.6.3. We highly recommend just upgrading to the new 1.6.15, which has this fix and others. -David -David On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:34 PM, satish singh triv...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: Hi David, I have seen the module 'reviewboard.reviews.models' , I put some debug statements and found that the save method is not called with update_counts=True, when we discarded a unpublished review and again publish a review with same change no. It calls the save method but the update_counts is false. def save(self, update_counts=False, **kwargs): self.bugs_closed = self.bugs_closed.strip() self.summary = truncate(self.summary, MAX_SUMMARY_LENGTH) if update_counts or self.id is None: self._update_counts() if self.status != self.PENDING_REVIEW: # If this is not a pending review request now, delete any # and all ReviewRequestVisit objects. self.visits.all().delete() super(ReviewRequest, self).save(**kwargs) Please give me some pointer on how to fix this issue. On Thursday, 13 December 2012 11:03:38 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: I think we still have a lingering bug when reopening existing review requests. I'll look into it. In the meantime, you can run the fixreviewcounts management command to fix these. -David -David On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:30 PM, satish singh triv...@gmail.com wrote: can any one give me a pointer on this pls. On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 15:49:51 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: I am running on Review Board 1.6.3. Say the outgoing review count is 10. When i post a review through GUI with a change no, the outgoing review count is increased by 1 that is 11, and then i discard it before publishing. The outgoing review count is decreased by 1, that is 10. Now again publish a review with same change no. the outgoing review count is not increased this time. and remain 10. if i repeat this 10 more time, the outgoing review count becomes negative. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--**~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@** googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** group/reviewboard?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: negative outgoing review
Hi David, I have seen the module 'reviewboard.reviews.models' , I put some debug statements and found that the save method is not called with update_counts=True, when we discarded a unpublished review and again publish a review with same change no. It calls the save method but the update_counts is false. def save(self, update_counts=False, **kwargs): self.bugs_closed = self.bugs_closed.strip() self.summary = truncate(self.summary, MAX_SUMMARY_LENGTH) if update_counts or self.id is None: self._update_counts() if self.status != self.PENDING_REVIEW: # If this is not a pending review request now, delete any # and all ReviewRequestVisit objects. self.visits.all().delete() super(ReviewRequest, self).save(**kwargs) Please give me some pointer on how to fix this issue. On Thursday, 13 December 2012 11:03:38 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: I think we still have a lingering bug when reopening existing review requests. I'll look into it. In the meantime, you can run the fixreviewcounts management command to fix these. -David -David On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:30 PM, satish singh triv...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: can any one give me a pointer on this pls. On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 15:49:51 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: I am running on Review Board 1.6.3. Say the outgoing review count is 10. When i post a review through GUI with a change no, the outgoing review count is increased by 1 that is 11, and then i discard it before publishing. The outgoing review count is decreased by 1, that is 10. Now again publish a review with same change no. the outgoing review count is not increased this time. and remain 10. if i repeat this 10 more time, the outgoing review count becomes negative. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript: For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
negative outgoing review
I am running on Review Board 1.6.3. Say the outgoing review count is 10. When i post a review through GUI with a change no, the outgoing review count is increased by 1 that is 11, and then i discard it before publishing. The outgoing review count is decreased by 1, that is 10. Now again publish a review with same change no. the outgoing review count is not increased this time. and remain 10. if i repeat this 10 more time, the outgoing review count becomes negative. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Re: negative outgoing review
can any one give me a pointer on this pls. On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 15:49:51 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: I am running on Review Board 1.6.3. Say the outgoing review count is 10. When i post a review through GUI with a change no, the outgoing review count is increased by 1 that is 11, and then i discard it before publishing. The outgoing review count is decreased by 1, that is 10. Now again publish a review with same change no. the outgoing review count is not increased this time. and remain 10. if i repeat this 10 more time, the outgoing review count becomes negative. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
Outgoing Review on dashboard shows -ve value.
I believe the sequence was: * Start to create a new review request with a given change number * Discard the request before publishing it * Create a new request with the same p4 change * At this point, I noticed that my Outgoing Reviews value was 0 despite the request being active * Close the review as Submitted * The value then got decremented from 0 to -1 -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
