Re: Important: Who's running directly out of an SVN checkout?

2008-10-16 Thread Christian Hammond
We'll look into a solution for this. We know we need to be able to give users an alternate directory for media installation, so that you can have multiple instances with their own uploaded directories. This will at leas take that part out of the egg directory. I'm trying to figure out the best

Re: Important: Who's running directly out of an SVN checkout?

2008-10-16 Thread AndyP
We are running out of an SVN checkout as well. Maybe that is the reason my upgrade doesn't work - I was following the instructions on the wiki to set up a new machine, and have been having significant issues. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because

Re: Important: Who's running directly out of an SVN checkout?

2008-10-15 Thread Joshua Slominski
I am also running from the SVN checkout On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Florian Föbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi, I'm still using reviewboard directly via SVN checkout as I did not see argument for changing that, yet. So if you make those changes it would be nice to have a short transition

Re: Important: Who's running directly out of an SVN checkout?

2008-10-15 Thread Rusty Burchfield
On Oct 14, 11:09 pm, Christian Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We need to know who is still running Review Board directly out of a SVN checkout, rather than through an installed copy (by way of make install). We are running r1537 directly from a checkout. A heads up with the last version