David,
Sorry for the massive delay! I've finally posted it at
https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/4953/.
On Friday, October 18, 2013 1:51:59 AM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
Daniel,
I'd suggest making a quick clone of the reviewboard repository, making
your change, and then posting your
Daniel,
I'd suggest making a quick clone of the reviewboard repository, making your
change, and then posting your diff against the reviewboard repository by
either creating a diff manually (git diff --full-index) or using rbt post.
-David
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Daniel Kan
David,
Sure, although I'm not sure how to post a bare diff there without
specifying a repository. Is that possible? Thanks!
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 2:43:43 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
Would you mind submitting your change to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ ?
Thanks!
-David
Would you mind submitting your change to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ ?
Thanks!
-David
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Daniel Kan danielk...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using RB 1.7.x with an LDAP authentication backend and it's been
working fine up through 1.7.13. With 1.7.14, the
I am using RB 1.7.x with an LDAP authentication backend and it's been
working fine up through 1.7.13. With 1.7.14, the authentication mechanism
no longer works in my environment. After some digging, it appears that
there was a change in reviewboard/accounts/backends.py to search
anonymously
I found that it was easiest to simply copy the code from the authenticator
closest to what I want,ed and then customize as needed.
Then select the new authenticator as your custom option.
Eric
On Sep 24, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Daniel Kan danielk...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using RB 1.7.x with an
