Hi, David,
Sorry for my poor knowledge for python... I'm a java programmer indeed.
I'm wondering if Nginx +uWSGI will work to provide the better performance?
or any other candidate?
在 2014年9月10日星期三UTC+8上午5时40分20秒，David Trowbridge写道：
I think a lot of the performance issues you're seeing are
The deployment we've tested most is using apache + mod_wsgi (and sometimes
also using nginx for the static media serving). I personally haven't tested
it, but nginx+uWSGI should be a fairy big step up over fastcgi.
-David
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Magic Chen magic4w...@gmail.com wrote:
In my experience, nginx+uwsgi gives a significant performance improvement over
Apache+mod_wsgi, but I didn’t investigate to find out how much of that comes
from better static file service.
On Sep 10, 2014, at 4:12 PM, David Trowbridge
trowb...@gmail.commailto:trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
The
I think a lot of the performance issues you're seeing are probably due to
using fastcgi. Can you switch to a wsgi-based deployment?
-David
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Magic Chen magic4w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, David,
the nginx conf file was attached.
we start the reviewboard using the
Hi, David,
the nginx conf file was attached.
we start the reviewboard using the command below:
rb-site manage /opt/reviewboard runfcgi port=3033 host=127.0.0.1
protocol=fcgi daemonize=true pidfile=/opt/reviewboard/rb.pid maxspare=20
anything else?
thx a lot for ur kindly help.
在
No idea if settings.py, and settings_local.py will help. :)
在 2014年9月9日星期二UTC+8上午9时55分10秒，Magic Chen写道：
Hi, David,
the nginx conf file was attached.
we start the reviewboard using the command below:
rb-site manage /opt/reviewboard runfcgi port=3033 host=127.0.0.1
protocol=fcgi
Can you give us some information about your web server configuration?
-David
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Magic Chen magic4w...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I've install the latest 2.0.6 version in a CentOS (4G, 4Core), and the
functions is working correctly,
but we noticed that the
Dear all,
I've install the latest 2.0.6 version in a CentOS (4G, 4Core), and the
functions is working correctly,
but we noticed that the response time of RB is too slow to be accepted, the
response time for default dashboard page will cost almost 3s...
We use the Postgre and nginx. python
