Re: ReviewBoard search question

2017-11-29 Thread 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard
Ok great, thanks! Sent from my iPhone > On 29 Nov 2017, at 20:49, Christian Hammond wrote: > > The fix will be included in 2.5.17 and 3.0.1. I expect we’ll get 2.5.17 out > in about a week. > > Christian > > >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:31 'Rob Backhurst' via

Re: ReviewBoard search question

2017-11-29 Thread Christian Hammond
The fix will be included in 2.5.17 and 3.0.1. I expect we’ll get 2.5.17 out in about a week. Christian On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:31 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard < reviewboard@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Thanks for the quick reply. > Would it be possible to let me know when

Re: ReviewBoard search question

2017-11-29 Thread 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard
Hi Christian, Thanks for the quick reply. Would it be possible to let me know when this change (back) has been made please? Or should I keep an eye out for the change on future releases? Thanks Rob On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 09:41:24 UTC, Rob Backhurst wrote: > > Hi, > > We are running RB

Re: ReviewBoard search question

2017-11-29 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Rob, We had a rewrite of the API resource backing quick search that aimed to make queries faster, more secure, and to limit results on larger servers. As part of this, we went from building one of our queries to using a centralized convenience method, which had the side effect of limiting the

ReviewBoard search question

2017-11-29 Thread 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard
Hi, We are running RB 2.5.16 and have noticed some changes in the search functionality from previous versions. What is the intended behaviour of the search? Should the Search API and/or the "quick search" include review requests marked as submitted? If not, when was this changed and is there a