Re: Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-12-21 Thread Yang Zhang
I stepped through the django_evolution code in Command.evolve() and found that it seems to be unconditionally trying to issue these ALTER statements. I'm not sure why it's doing that - seems ridiculous. I tried manually dropping that basedir column to appease the program (all the values were

Re: Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-12-20 Thread Yang Zhang
Hm, one of my prior emails seems to have been dropped. Anyway, I'd appreciate any help on this - otherwise looks like we're stranded. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Yang Zhang yaa...@gmail.com wrote: For what it's worth, I'm upgrading from 1.5.1 to 1.6.3 right now and I just encountered the

Re: Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-12-20 Thread Yang Zhang
I should probably also add that this is the schema in the database: $ psql reviewboard psql (9.1.1) Type help for help. reviewboard=# \d diffviewer_diffset Table public.diffviewer_diffset Column | Type | Modifiers

Re: Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-12-20 Thread Yang Zhang
For what it's worth, I'm upgrading from 1.5.1 to 1.6.3 right now and I just encountered the same error. I'm on Ubuntu 11.10, PostgreSQL 9.1, Python 2.7. $ rb-site upgrade review-www Rebuilding directory structure Upgrading site settings_local.py Updating database. This may take a while.

Re: Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-12-20 Thread Yang Zhang
After some wrangling, I'm still stranded and not quite sure how to get past this. Appreciate any help. On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:48:13 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Thanks for the info Joe. Glad 16.0 to 1.6.1 was more smooth. I'm not sure what caused the problems with the upgrade

Re: Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-09-16 Thread Joe Campbell
I did eventually make it past this issue by physically making the modifications to the postgres database by hand. The evolution then completed and I was able to 'revert' any changes I had done and everything worked. After this was all said and done - upgrading from 1.6.0 to 1.6.1, 'Just worked'

Re: Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-09-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Thanks for the info Joe. Glad 16.0 to 1.6.1 was more smooth. I'm not sure what caused the problems with the upgrade to 1.6.0 (those haven't been showing up in our regression tests), but we'll continue to look into it. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Re: Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-09-11 Thread Joe Campbell
Was upgrading from base 1.5 release to 1.6 with a postgres DB. I did eventually get the evolutions to work by renaming existing columns and dropping at least one empty table. This allowed the evolutions to complete and I was able to get the site back up and running. Joe On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at

Re: Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-09-11 Thread Christian Hammond
Which 1.5? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Joe Campbell joseph.r.campb...@gmail.comwrote: Was upgrading from base 1.5 release to 1.6 with a postgres DB. I

Re: Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-09-10 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Joe, Sorry, this got lost in a flood of e-mails. What version were you upgrading from? What type of database? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Joe Campbell

Went to upgrade to 1.6 and got the following:

2011-09-08 Thread Joe Campbell
Running rb-site upgrade /var/www/cim-review after an easy_install -U ReviewBoard resulted in this: Rebuilding directory structure Updating database. This may take a while. /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.3-py2.6.egg/django/db/ __init__.py:60: DeprecationWarning: Short names for ENGINE