Updates:
Summary: Review Board should indicate whether the patch applies against
HEAD
Comment #4 on issue 267 by trowbrds: Review Board should indicate whether
the patch applies against HEAD
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=267
(No comment was entered for this
Comment #13 on issue 147 by trowbrds: Ability to view complete source files
without diff coloring/block insertions
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=147
Issue 1316 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 816 by trowbrds: Adding a review from a directory other
than where the file to review exists cause error.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=816
post-review with SVN can take file arguments now, even for remote
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 1328 by trowbrds: Maintenance For Code Review Standards
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1328
I've been thinking about this, and I don't think there's any way we can do
it which
will scale to the standards used in a
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #5 on issue 311 by trowbrds: Interdiff includes changes from other
changesets
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=311
We've thought about this long and hard (since interdiffs were implemented),
and
there's really no way around it.
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1066
Comment #6 on issue 655 by trowbrds: File listing does not differentiate
between new and branch/integrate
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=655
The description over in bug 1066 is a little bit more complete.
--
Comment #4 on issue 1066 by trowbrds: Show file status in diff (added,
modified, deleted, renamed)
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1066
Issue 655 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 638 by trowbrds: Show the Perforce filetype for files
in a changeset.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=638
I think that these are so rare and esoteric that if they're important, they
should
just be called out in the
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 732 by trowbrds: include 'cvs rdiff' commands and urls
to a cvsweb diff in automatically generated emails
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=732
Ehh. We have download diff already, which does the same thing.
--
You
Updates:
Summary: Hg SCMTool doesn't support old mercurial installs
Comment #3 on issue 953 by trowbrds: Hg SCMTool doesn't support old
mercurial installs
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=953
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 1238 by trowbrds: Support collaborative coding
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1238
For now I'm going to say no; this workflow is pretty unusual. If we get
more requests
for this we'll start to think about how this
Updates:
Status: ThirdParty
Comment #1 on issue 1276 by trowbrds: Customized highlighting comments
similar to //TODO:
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1276
These highlights come from pygments.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 1343 by chipx86: forging a user's 'From:' address in
email notifications is incompatible with DKIM/mail filtering/review list
moderation
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1343
I know very little about DKIM, but am
Comment #8 on issue 445 by trowbrds: Add command-line apply-diff script
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=445
Issue 1319 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #4 on issue 1342 by trowbrds: Suggestion: Autocreate DIFF file by
Checkout Path
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1342
This sort of integration is really, really hard to do in a generic way, and
introduces a lot of moving pieces.
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 1340 by trowbrds: Patch fails to generate diff on
server when the source file does not end with newline char
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1340
Fixed in rbtools 3b21dce. Thanks!
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Type-Support Type-Defect Component-SCMTools
Milestone-Release1.1
Comment #3 on issue 1339 by chipx86: post-review errors with [Errno 2] No
such file or directory
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1339
Fixed on master in
Comment #4 on issue 693 by trowbrds: ability to attach a comment when
clicking [Submitted]
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=693
Issue 268 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 693
Comment #6 on issue 268 by trowbrds: Submitted reviews should include the
date the review was submitted
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=268
When we fix bug 693, this will come with it.
--
You received this
Comment #5 on issue 693 by trowbrds: ability to attach a comment when
clicking [Submitted]
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=693
As listed in bug 268, we should mark the date in the submitted entry in
the
history, even if no comment was added.
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 720 by trowbrds: Editing an existing comment can change
which lines it referred to
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=720
I haven't seen this in a long time, actually. Assuming it got fixed with
one of our
many comment
Comment #2 on issue 1336 by markbroehm: reviewboard 500 error
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1336
Started seeing the same exact error today.
What version are you running?
1.0
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
when publishing a comment
Comment #3 on issue 1336 by chipx86: reviewboard 500 error
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1336
1.0, or something newer? The newer versions log more information to the log
files.
Did you set DEBUG = True, or Debug = True? The latter will not work.
--
You received this
Comment #4 on issue 1336 by markbroehm: reviewboard 500 error
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1336
it's DEBUG = True
i'm going to try and get the latest version installed tonight, i saw there
is better
logging as of 1.0.2. Is it possible to install 1.0.2 specifically
Updates:
Status: NotABug
Comment #1 on issue 1344 by trowbrds: Wrong inline highligthing
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1344
This is actually correct. Inter-diff highlighting works within single
lines, not
across wrapped paragraphs.
--
You received this message
25 matches
Mail list logo