Re: Issue 3834 in reviewboard: Support SlikSVN version on Windows environment

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3834 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Support SlikSVN version on Windows environment https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3834 This bug has been fixed on the release-0.7.x branch as commit 4db748d. It will be in the next minor

Re: Issue 3846 in reviewboard: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 3846 by adogr...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846 Thanks for the response. Could you please provide some more info on the 'Extensions' that you are

Re: Issue 3847 in reviewboard: Last logged in date for users is useless

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3847 by jamesd...@gmail.com: Last logged in date for users is useless https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3847 (Er, the version of Review Board we're using (and where I first noticed this) is 2.0.10, but this behavior is also present in

Re: Issue 3846 in reviewboard: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3846 by adogr...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846 These are good references. A few questions, would appreciate your response. 1. Would the extension only

Issue 3847 in reviewboard: Last logged in date for users is useless

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3847 by jamesd...@gmail.com: Last logged in date for users is useless https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3847 What version are you running? 2.0.10 What's the URL of the page containing the problem?

Re: Issue 3819 in reviewboard: 500 Internal Server Error (AttributeError, specifically) in /admin

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3819 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: 500 Internal Server Error (AttributeError, specifically) in /admin https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3819 The fix for this has landed on the release-2.0.x branch as commit 0e7315. It will

Re: Issue 3831 in reviewboard: InvalidExtensionError when enabling on ReviewBoard 2.0.15

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: UnableToReproduce Comment #2 on issue 3831 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: InvalidExtensionError when enabling on ReviewBoard 2.0.15 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3831 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 3846 in reviewboard: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 3846 by trowb...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846 1. So extensions typically apply to the entire Review Board server. It's possible within a field

Re: Issue 3829 in reviewboard: Upload Attachment View - Submit form without specifying a file

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 3829 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Upload Attachment View - Submit form without specifying a file https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3829 The fix for this bug landed on the release-2.5.x branch as commit eace550. It will be

Re: Issue 3846 in reviewboard: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 3846 by trowb...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846 Review Board has a powerful extension framework that allows third parties to add functionality:

Re: Issue 3819 in reviewboard: 500 Internal Server Error (AttributeError, specifically) in /admin

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3819 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: 500 Internal Server Error (AttributeError, specifically) in /admin https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3819 Issue 3835 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because this project is configured to

Re: Issue 3835 in reviewboard: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get' in reviewboard\admin\views.py, line 39

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 3819 Comment #1 on issue 3835 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get' in reviewboard\admin\views.py, line 39 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3835 (No comment was entered

Re: Issue 2794 in reviewboard: Display changes corresponded to comment regions in the code when the diff is updated

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2794 by trowb...@gmail.com: Display changes corresponded to comment regions in the code when the diff is updated https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2794 Issue 3845 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because this project is

Re: Issue 3846 in reviewboard: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #1 on issue 3846 by trowb...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846 This request is pretty specific to one use case, and as such is something

Issue 3846 in reviewboard: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3846 by adogr...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new field to review board called Impact to code coverage https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846 *** For customer support, please post to

Re: Issue 3845 in reviewboard: When reviewing the updated diff, original comments should be visible for verification

2015-04-15 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 2794 Comment #1 on issue 3845 by trowb...@gmail.com: When reviewing the updated diff, original comments should be visible for verification https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3845 (No comment was entered for this