Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3834 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Support SlikSVN version
on Windows environment
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3834
This bug has been fixed on the release-0.7.x branch as commit 4db748d. It
will be in the next minor
Comment #2 on issue 3846 by adogr...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new
field to review board called Impact to code coverage
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846
Thanks for the response. Could you please provide some more info on the
'Extensions' that you are
Comment #1 on issue 3847 by jamesd...@gmail.com: Last logged in date for
users is useless
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3847
(Er, the version of Review Board we're using (and where I first noticed
this) is 2.0.10, but this behavior is also present in
Comment #4 on issue 3846 by adogr...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new
field to review board called Impact to code coverage
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846
These are good references. A few questions, would appreciate your response.
1. Would the extension only
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3847 by jamesd...@gmail.com: Last logged in date for users is
useless
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3847
What version are you running?
2.0.10
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3819 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: 500 Internal Server
Error (AttributeError, specifically) in /admin
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3819
The fix for this has landed on the release-2.0.x branch as commit 0e7315.
It will
Updates:
Status: UnableToReproduce
Comment #2 on issue 3831 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: InvalidExtensionError
when enabling on ReviewBoard 2.0.15
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3831
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because
Comment #5 on issue 3846 by trowb...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new
field to review board called Impact to code coverage
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846
1. So extensions typically apply to the entire Review Board server. It's
possible within a field
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 3829 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Upload Attachment View -
Submit form without specifying a file
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3829
The fix for this bug landed on the release-2.5.x branch as commit eace550.
It will be
Comment #3 on issue 3846 by trowb...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new
field to review board called Impact to code coverage
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846
Review Board has a powerful extension framework that allows third parties
to add functionality:
Comment #1 on issue 3819 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: 500 Internal Server
Error (AttributeError, specifically) in /admin
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3819
Issue 3835 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 3819
Comment #1 on issue 3835 by bar...@beanbaginc.com:
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get' in
reviewboard\admin\views.py, line 39
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3835
(No comment was entered
Comment #2 on issue 2794 by trowb...@gmail.com: Display changes
corresponded to comment regions in the code when the diff is updated
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2794
Issue 3845 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 3846 by trowb...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new
field to review board called Impact to code coverage
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846
This request is pretty specific to one use case, and as such is something
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 3846 by adogr...@gmail.com: Request for adding a new field to
review board called Impact to code coverage
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3846
*** For customer support, please post to
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 2794
Comment #1 on issue 3845 by trowb...@gmail.com: When reviewing the updated
diff, original comments should be visible for verification
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3845
(No comment was entered for this
16 matches
Mail list logo