Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 1099 by chipx86: ProgrammingError exception after beta2
to beta3 update
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1099
This should be fixed in r1955, and I'm spinning new builds, which will be
ready in
about 20 minutes from the
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1106 by nikolai.prokoschenko: Markup for text fields
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1106
What version are you running?
1.0rc1
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Take a comment field
2. Enter
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1108 by ger...@saygo.ca: RB RC1 uses SQL incompatible with
PostgreSQL
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1108
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*
What version are you
Comment #8 on issue 1082 by javier.ortiz.78: rb-site not working on Windows
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1082
I tried with the rc1 and still the rb-site file has no extension but this
time I was
able to rename it as rb-site.exe and ran it. It's taking a while to
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #5 on issue 1032 by chipx86: Diff currently unavailable when
viewing diffs of diffs
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1032
Can you provide a set of diffs that work as a repro case for this?
--
You received this message because you
Comment #7 on issue 1099 by chipx86: ProgrammingError exception after beta2
to beta3 update
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1099
Issue 1108 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1099
Comment #1 on issue 1108 by chipx86: RB RC1 uses SQL incompatible with
PostgreSQL
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1108
Dup of bug 1099. Go ahead and five the latest nightly a try and let me know
if it
works
Comment #3 on issue 1106 by chipx86: Markup for text fields
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1106
It definitely could, though we need to be careful not to break out existing
text
linkification code, and render proposed code incorrectly.
Also, this must work in
Comment #8 on issue 1099 by durin42: ProgrammingError exception after beta2
to beta3 update
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1099
I was seeing this, and it's fixed now.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Comment #9 on issue 1082 by javier.ortiz.78: rb-site not working on Windows
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1082
Sadly it just hangs there :(
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
Comment #4 on issue 1106 by eduardofelipe87: Markup for text fields
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1106
Why this must work in Javascript? You mean that the conversion should be
done client-
side?
Several webapps use this pretty well. We could at least provide a small
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Component-Reviews
Comment #5 on issue 1106 by chipx86: Markup for text fields
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1106
When the user modifies a field client-side, we post to the server and then
save the
field and do any
12 matches
Mail list logo
