Re: Issue 1515 in reviewboard: SVN hook can include empty arguments which seems to confuse svn diff

Comment #2 on issue 1515 by stodge: SVN hook can include empty arguments which seems to confuse svn diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515 I tried already but the site crashed with an exception that the patch was empty. I guess I need to diff against the git

Re: Issue 1515 in reviewboard: SVN hook can include empty arguments which seems to confuse svn diff

Comment #3 on issue 1515 by stodge: SVN hook can include empty arguments which seems to confuse svn diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515 Environment: Request Method: POST Request URL: http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/new/ Django Version: 1.1.1 Python Version:

Issue 1518 in reviewboard: new json api - get list of review requests created between date range

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1518 by stodge: new json api - get list of review requests created between date range http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1518 *NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.review-

Re: Issue 1518 in reviewboard: new json api - get list of review requests created between date range

Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Component-API Milestone-Release1.5 Comment #1 on issue 1518 by chipx86: new json api - get list of review requests created between date range http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1518 I really want date ranges on all the

Re: Issue 1517 in reviewboard: Review Board needs a better error response when using short SHA1s with git diffs

Updates: Summary: Review Board needs a better error response when using short SHA1s with git diffs Status: Confirmed Labels: Component-SCMTools Milestone-Release1.5 Comment #1 on issue 1517 by chipx86: Review Board needs a better error response when using short SHA1s with

Re: Issue 1515 in reviewboard: SVN hook can include empty arguments which seems to confuse svn diff

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #4 on issue 1515 by chipx86: SVN hook can include empty arguments which seems to confuse svn diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515 Are you using post-review? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner

Re: Issue 1513 in reviewboard: Update diff : Error: Saving the form failed due to a server error: 0 n/a

Updates: Labels: Browser Comment #1 on issue 1513 by chipx86: Update diff : Error: Saving the form failed due to a server error: 0 n/a http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1513 Most likely this is a bug with this version of Opera and Review Board. -- You received

Re: Issue 1516 in reviewboard: ClearCase configuration in post-review should move to .reviewboardrc

Updates: Summary: ClearCase configuration in post-review should move to .reviewboardrc Status: Confirmed Labels: -Component-Docs Component-RBTools Milestone-RBTools-Release1.0 Priority-High Comment #2 on issue 1516 by chipx86: ClearCase configuration in post-review should move

Re: Issue 1515 in reviewboard: SVN hook can include empty arguments which seems to confuse svn diff

Comment #5 on issue 1515 by stodge: SVN hook can include empty arguments which seems to confuse svn diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1515 Not for the crash in comment 3. I think you explained this my other bug report. I'll try to get back to this next week. --

Re: Issue 1510 in reviewboard: Exception thrown during post-review -- 'rsp' is used before being defined

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 1510 by chipx86: Exception thrown during post-review -- 'rsp' is used before being defined http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1510 This has been committed. The nightlies should have the fix. -- You received this message

Re: Issue 1519 in reviewboard: Ignore emails for a review

Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low Milestone-Release1.5 Component-EMail Comment #1 on issue 1519 by chipx86: Ignore emails for a review http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1519 Seems reasonable. I don't know that this is going to

Issue 1520 in reviewboard: User Permission UI block is too small , user permissions are not readable since they are hide behind the selection box

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1520 by asitjaiswal: User Permission UI block is too small , user permissions are not readable since they are hide behind the selection box http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1520 *NOTE: Do not post