Re: Issue 1251 in reviewboard: Review Board and git bare repository

Comment #3 on issue 1251 by gavin.mcquillan: Review Board and git bare repository http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1251 I'm interested in knowing this too. In fact, I'd really appreciate some official guidance on setting up such a system. Bare repositories are the

Re: Issue 1838 in reviewboard: HTTP mail is broken

Comment #5 on issue 1838 by aschwartz: HTTP mail is broken http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1838 It seems that deleting /tmp/reviewboard_cache fixed the problem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post

Re: Issue 1838 in reviewboard: HTTP mail is broken

Comment #6 on issue 1838 by chipx86: HTTP mail is broken http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1838 You may want to look into using memcached, which is more efficient. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To

Re: Issue 1387 in reviewboard: Review ID # should be obvious and visible in HTML content of Review

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 1387 by trowbrds: Review ID # should be obvious and visible in HTML content of Review http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1387 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are