Re: Issue 1939 in reviewboard: .sj Files are being displayed as binary files (despite being text format files) in review board
Comment #2 on issue 1939 by rahulrst...@gmail.com: .sj Files are being displayed as binary files (despite being text format files) in review board http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1939 Yes. The repository looks fine to me. We use perforce as the repository... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 629 in reviewboard: Allow users to create/manage their own groups in addition to the admin groups
Comment #8 on issue 629 by vignesh@gmail.com: Allow users to create/manage their own groups in addition to the admin groups http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=629 This could be a great feature, as I always work on different features of a product and I want different people from different team ( already created as Review board groups ) to review my code. Now I have a text file to organize this with list of names and whenever I submit the code I copy paste it to the People text box. But I was wondering if requesting new groups to be added by Admin could be a better idea in this scenario, as with the help of such group I try to organize myself and getting Admin involved in this could be an overhead I hope this could be a simple personal distribution list kind of thing, where I could add / delete a list and add / delete members to it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1939 in reviewboard: .sj Files are being displayed as binary files (despite being text format files) in review board
Comment #3 on issue 1939 by chip...@gmail.com: .sj Files are being displayed as binary files (despite being text format files) in review board http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1939 Review Board itself doesn't make the determination as to whether it's a text file or binary file, so it's definitely coming from your repository or your diff tool. You can verify this with 'post-review --output-diff changenum -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1222 in reviewboard: Set static FROM address for e-mails
Comment #2 on issue 1222 by szim...@szimano.org: Set static FROM address for e-mails http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1222 I would like to vote for reopening, as sometimes the smtp server blocks all emails outside it's realm to be used as from so If not all users are on the same domain (which happens often) then the emails are blocked. It's better to have the threading broken, then not getting any emails at all IMO ;-) Please think about it again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 1939 in reviewboard: .sj Files are being displayed as binary files (despite being text format files) in review board
Comment #4 on issue 1939 by rahulrst...@gmail.com: .sj Files are being displayed as binary files (despite being text format files) in review board http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1939 I just verfied it.. Looks like there is a problem in the diff tool. The tool which we are using to generate the diff is P5. diff file doesn't contain the text for .sj files Thanks for the clarification.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Issue 2024 in reviewboard: MultipleObjectsReturned: get() returned more than one ReviewRequest
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2024 by m.milbr...@gmail.com: MultipleObjectsReturned: get()
returned more than one ReviewRequest
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2024
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need immediate support, please contact*
* reviewbo...@googlegroups.com *
What version are you running?
1.5.4
What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
https://reviewboard_host/r/new/
What steps will reproduce the problem?
I'm just receiving the errors so am not positive of the exact steps to
reproduce but as indicated in an email thread in
reviewbo...@googlegroups.com is most likely using the creation form.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What operating system are you using? What browser?
Linux/Chrome
Please provide any additional information below.
2011-03-14 09:28:19,338 - ERROR - Exception thrown for user X
at https:///r/new/
get() returned more than one ReviewRequest -- it returned 4! Lookup
parameters were {'changenum': 18332}
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /build/toolchain/noarch/django-1.2.5/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py,
line 100, in get_response
response = callback(request, *callback_args, **callback_kwargs)
File /build/toolchain/noarch/Djblets-0.6.7/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.6.7-py2.6.egg/djblets/auth/util.py,
line 46, in _checklogin
return view_func(request, *args, **kwargs)
File /build/toolchain/noarch/reviewboard-1.5.4.1/ReviewBoard-1.5.4.1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py,
line 68, in new_review_request
parent_diff_file=request.FILES.get('parent_diff_path'))
File /build/toolchain/noarch/reviewboard-1.5.4.1/ReviewBoard-1.5.4.1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/forms.py,
line 166, in create
review_request = ReviewRequest.objects.get(changenum=changenum)
File /build/toolchain/noarch/django-1.2.5/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py,
line 132, in get
return self.get_query_set().get(*args, **kwargs)
File /build/toolchain/noarch/django-1.2.5/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py,
line 349, in get
% (self.model._meta.object_name, num, kwargs))
MultipleObjectsReturned: get() returned more than one ReviewRequest --
it returned 4! Lookup parameters were {'changenum': 18332}
mysql select id, submitter_id, repository_id, changenum from
reviews_reviewrequest where changenum = 18332;
++--+---+---+
| id | submitter_id | repository_id | changenum |
++--+---+---+
| 18284 | 28 | 2 | 18332 |
| 24555 | 1158 |10 | 18332 |
| 216485 | 3484 |14 | 18332 |
| 128542 | 767 |25 | 18332 |
++--+---+---+
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2005 in reviewboard: IE support broken in 1.6beta1
Comment #2 on issue 2005 by d...@n-cube.org: IE support broken in 1.6beta1 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2005 Yes, I'm logged in. In fact, it does appear as if I am not logged in for the review, though since none of the fields are editable. The top status line shows I am logged in and the green bar is available to publish the review request. I tested this with a fresh devserver, and it did not reproduce the problem, so it seems it's not quite so simple. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2005 in reviewboard: IE support broken in 1.6beta1
Comment #3 on issue 2005 by d...@n-cube.org: IE support broken in 1.6beta1 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2005 I've cleared all cookies so that's not the issue. I've narrowed down the problem to somehow be related to having the site in the local intranet zone. If I remove it, the edit icons magically appear next to the fields. If I put it back into the zone, they go away. I'm trying to get the request headers to compare, but wireshark isn't cooperating with decoding the ssl... I also tried changing the security settings to match the internet zone without any behavior change. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
Re: Issue 2005 in reviewboard: IE support broken in 1.6beta1
Comment #4 on issue 2005 by trowb...@gmail.com: IE support broken in 1.6beta1 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2005 It sounds like it's probably having trouble loading some of the javascript files. Does IE8 have any debugging tools that can show you what's loading and what's not? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
