Comment #2 on issue 3397 by rafal.wo...@gmail.com: Wrong review request
window formatting after upgrading from 1.7.22 to 2.0.1
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3397
I spent some time on investigating this issue and I already know how to
reproduce it. Please have
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3398 by hith...@gmail.com: Error displaying this diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3398
What version are you running? 2,0,1
What's the URL of the page containing the problem? r/218/diff/#
What
Comment #1 on issue 3398 by chip...@gmail.com: Error displaying this diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3398
You'll need to talk to your administrator about this. There's nothing we
can do without the diff.
--
You received this message because this project is
Comment #2 on issue 3398 by hith...@gmail.com: Error displaying this diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3398
I'm my administrator, I don't know whats speciall about that diff and is
happening with others as well
--
You received this message because this project is
Comment #3 on issue 3398 by chip...@gmail.com: Error displaying this diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3398
Okay, my apologies. We get these questions a lot on here and they're
usually from general users on a server.
First thing to check is the files in the temp
Comment #2 on issue 3339 by bruce.c...@gmail.com: 2.0RC3: ldap.open() is
deprecated - use ldap.initialize() instead
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3339
Should this have been fixed in 2.0.x? It appears it's only in master
Updates:
Summary: Minor UI bug on review request page with long field text
Comment #2 on issue 3371 by trowb...@gmail.com: Minor UI bug on review
request page with long field text
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3371
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 3371
Comment #3 on issue 3397 by trowb...@gmail.com: Wrong review request window
formatting after upgrading from 1.7.22 to 2.0.1
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3397
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Comment #3 on issue 3371 by trowb...@gmail.com: Minor UI bug on review
request page with long field text
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3371
Issue 3397 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #1 on issue 3399 by bruce.c...@gmail.com: v2.0.1, RB throws
LookupError in convert_to_unicode for ISO-8859 with CRLF file
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3399
The file contains a section symbol 'ยง' which is probably causing the
problem, since it's non-ascii.
Comment #3 on issue 3339 by chip...@gmail.com: 2.0RC3: ldap.open() is
deprecated - use ldap.initialize() instead
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3339
I just copied this to the 2.0 branch. It'll be part of the 2.0.2.
--
You received this message because this project is
Comment #2 on issue 3399 by bruce.c...@gmail.com: v2.0.1, RB throws
LookupError in convert_to_unicode for ISO-8859 with CRLF file
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3399
Overriding the encoding to be utf-8 appears to have fixed (worked around?)
the problem.
--
You
Comment #7 on issue 921 by erik.l...@gmail.com: Add post-commit review
submission to post-review for perforce
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=921
I don't think this change actually solves the problem. When you list a
single CLN, it appears to treat it as a range of
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3400 by davwill...@gmail.com: Unable to Download Diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3400
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report will be
Updates:
Status: NotABug
Comment #1 on issue 3400 by trowb...@gmail.com: Unable to Download Diff
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3400
If a diff was uploaded by hand, the filename that it downloads
from Download Diff will be whatever it was when the author
15 matches
Mail list logo
