Re: RBTools Ticket #4711: "putch() argument 1 must be char, not unicode" when authenticating

2018-07-05 Thread 'Angel Cascarino' via reviewboard-issues
happy to dive in if there's somewhere I can help out :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard-issues" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegro

RBTools Ticket #4711: "putch() argument 1 must be char, not unicode" when authenticating

2018-07-02 Thread 'Angel Cascarino' via reviewboard-issues
ing: svn --non-interactive info >>> Running: diff --version >>> Running: svn --non-interactive --version -q >>> Repository info: Path: http://visualsvn.{company}.co.uk/svn/280, Base path: >>> /t runk, Supports changesets: False >>> Making HTTP GET request t

Review Board Ticket #4553: REST API fails when updating an existing default reviewers rule with >1 group/user/repository to 0 group/user/repository.

2017-05-19 Thread 'Kyle Kelly' via reviewboard-issues
. # What operating system are you using? What browser? Server on ubuntu 14.04. Web browser Chrome 59 + macOS # Please provide any additional information below. The issue appears to be the `.split(',')` calls on these fields here: https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/blob/master/reviewboa

Re: Issue 3198 in reviewboard: Downloaded patch files contain hash values that don't match content

2015-11-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3198 by prog...@gmail.com: Downloaded patch files contain hash values that don't match content https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3198 Probably a duplicate of Issue 2916 -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all

Re: Issue 2916 in reviewboard: Review Board does not respect line endings

2015-11-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #23 on issue 2916 by prog...@gmail.com: Review Board does not respect line endings https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2916 I think issue 3198 is another duplicate of this issue This issue issue affect me too- i need the patch to preserve the original CRLFs

Re: Issue 2916 in reviewboard: Review Board does not respect line endings

2015-11-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #24 on issue 2916 by chip...@gmail.com: Review Board does not respect line endings https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2916 This bug has moved to https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/2916/. Please post any updates there. You can use your existing Google login

Re: Issue 3299 in reviewboard: 500 Internal Server Error

2015-10-27 Thread reviewboard
Comment #8 on issue 3299 by farid.m@gmail.com: 500 Internal Server Error https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3299 I had to do 'pip install mod_wsgi ' -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You

Re: Issue 3446 in reviewboard: ReviewRequestFieldsHook and email notfications

2015-10-26 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 3446 by ke...@keithmoyer.com: ReviewRequestFieldsHook and email notfications https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3446 Any chance this will make it into Review Board 2.5? Not trying to rush it; just making sure it wasn't forgotten since you mentioned

Re: Issue 3446 in reviewboard: ReviewRequestFieldsHook and email notfications

2015-10-26 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 3446 by chip...@gmail.com: ReviewRequestFieldsHook and email notfications https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3446 Hi Keith, This bug has moved over to https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/3446/ -- You received this message because this project

Re: Issue 2777 in reviewboard: rbssh is very slow

2015-10-14 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2777 by vlad.rom...@gmail.com: rbssh is very slow https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2777 Replace the contents of /usr/bin/rbssh with the following: #!/bin/sh EXTRA_OPTS="-o UserKnownHostsFile=$HOME/.ssh/known_hosts -o ForwardX11=no -o LogLevel=

Re: Issue 3965 in reviewboard: View diff fails for C/C++ files from unified CVS diff

2015-10-09 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 3965 by boris.bo...@gmail.com: View diff fails for C/C++ files from unified CVS diff https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3965 Further investigation shows that the issue with C/C++ code only appears if the diff is created based on two CVS revisions

Re: Issue 3965 in reviewboard: View diff fails for C/C++ files from unified CVS diff

2015-10-09 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 3965 by chip...@gmail.com: View diff fails for C/C++ files from unified CVS diff https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3965 Hi Boris, This bug has moved to https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/3965/. You can log in with your Google account

Re: Issue 3252 in reviewboard: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist

2015-10-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #7 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252 Thanks for all your information, Website is very nice and informative content. Packers and Movers in Faridabad @ http

Re: Issue 3252 in reviewboard: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist

2015-10-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #9 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252 Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about - Packers and Movers in Chennai @ http

Re: Issue 3252 in reviewboard: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist

2015-10-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252 This article is really fantastic and thanks for sharing the valuable post. Packers and Movers in Gurgaon @ http

Re: Issue 3252 in reviewboard: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist

2015-10-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252 Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about - Packers and Movers in Chennai @ http

Re: Issue 3252 in reviewboard: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist

2015-10-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #10 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252 Thanks for all your information, Website is very nice and informative content. Packers and Movers in Faridabad

Re: Issue 3252 in reviewboard: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist

2015-10-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #8 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252 Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about - Packers and movers in Gurgaon @ http

Re: Issue 3252 in reviewboard: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist

2015-10-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252 Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about - Packers and Movers in Chennai @ http

Re: Issue 3252 in reviewboard: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist

2015-10-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #11 on issue 3252 by akashseo...@gmail.com: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/ does not exist https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3252 Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about - Packers and movers in Gurgaon @ http

Re: Issue 1125 in reviewboard: server port number is missing in review request email

2015-09-29 Thread reviewboard
Comment #12 on issue 1125 by konrad.m...@motorolasolutions.com: server port number is missing in review request email https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1125 ReviewBoard 2.0.20 - same issue. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all

Re: Issue 3184 in reviewboard: rbt status fails with perforce repository

2015-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #8 on issue 3184 by aniru...@sdrc.co.in: rbt status fails with perforce repository https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3184 I have same problem having rbt tools 0.7.4 and review Board 1.7.20 -- You received this message because this project is configured to send

Re: Issue 3184 in reviewboard: rbt status fails with perforce repository

2015-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #9 on issue 3184 by chip...@gmail.com: rbt status fails with perforce repository https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3184 This bug has been moved to https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/3184/ -- You received this message because this project is configured

Re: Issue 180 in reviewboard: "replying" to previous comments in the diff viewer is confusing

2015-09-18 Thread reviewboard
Comment #9 on issue 180 by busuparm...@gmail.com: "replying" to previous comments in the diff viewer is confusing https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=180 using windows xp easier than with Windows 8 http://www.goapindulgelaran.com -- You received this messa

Re: Issue 180 in reviewboard: "replying" to previous comments in the diff viewer is confusing

2015-09-18 Thread reviewboard
Comment #10 on issue 180 by busuparm...@gmail.com: "replying" to previous comments in the diff viewer is confusing https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=180 using windows xp easier than with Windows 8 from me href="http://www.goapindulgelaran.com;>Wis

Re: Issue 180 in reviewboard: "replying" to previous comments in the diff viewer is confusing

2015-09-18 Thread reviewboard
Comment #11 on issue 180 by busuparm...@gmail.com: "replying" to previous comments in the diff viewer is confusing https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=180 using windows xp easier than with Windows 8 http://www.goapindulgelaran.com -- You received this messa

Re: Issue 3145 in reviewboard: Cannot add review comments to attached text files

2015-09-16 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 3145 by khairula...@gmail.com: Cannot add review comments to attached text files https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3145 thank you information sir http://www.taspriaonline.com/ -- You received this message because this project is configured to send

Re: Issue 773 in reviewboard: Add Bazaar (bzr) support to post-review

2015-09-16 Thread reviewboard
Comment #9 on issue 773 by khairula...@gmail.com: Add Bazaar (bzr) support to post-review https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=773 Bzr support is one of the strongest incentives for using reviewboard. http://www.taspriaonline.com/ -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 3966 in reviewboard: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs

2015-09-15 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 3966 by griffin@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966 I observed the same behavior this morning with 2.0.19 and Firefox (I don't have the FF version

Issue 3967 in reviewboard: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error

2015-09-14 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug

Re: Issue 3967 in reviewboard: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error

2015-09-14 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967 yihuihu@shreview02:/var/www$ sudo rb-site manage /var/www/reviewboard list-evolutions [sudo] password for yihuihu: Applied evolutions

Re: Issue 3967 in reviewboard: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error

2015-09-14 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967 OK , I got the result from command line: from django_evolution.models import Version for version in Version.objects.all(): print version

Re: Issue 3967 in reviewboard: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error

2015-09-14 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #2 on issue 3967 by chip...@gmail.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967 Sounds like your database is in a bad state. It needs to be repaired, or this will just continue to happen

Re: Issue 3967 in reviewboard: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error

2015-09-14 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967 admin --- database ---DJANGO_EVOLUTION --- versions: Stored version, updated on 2015-02-12 02:23:19+00:00 Hinted version, updated on 2015

Re: Issue 3967 in reviewboard: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error

2015-09-14 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967 for admin --- database --- django_evolution - versions, get the following list in web UI: Stored version, updated on 2015-02-12 02

Re: Issue 3967 in reviewboard: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error

2015-09-14 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 3967 by chip...@gmail.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967 Okay, something to try: First, back up your database. We will be doing something that might require re-loading it back in. Second, go back

Re: Issue 3967 in reviewboard: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error

2015-09-14 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #8 on issue 3967 by chip...@gmail.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967 Glad to hear it! :) We've seen this in a couple of cases, but it's very unclear why it's happening. -- You

Re: Issue 3967 in reviewboard: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error

2015-09-14 Thread reviewboard
Comment #7 on issue 3967 by shirph...@126.com: upgrade from 2.0.18 to 2.0.20 get error https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3967 Thanks you very very very much, It works now. from django_evolution.models import Version v = Version.objects.all()[0] print v Hinted version

Re: Issue 3841 in reviewboard: rbtools.api.request hardcodes http return codes

2015-09-13 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 3841 by anthonyh...@gmail.com: rbtools.api.request hardcodes http return codes https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3841 I'll pick this up as an easy-fix bug. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue

Re: Issue 3841 in reviewboard: rbtools.api.request hardcodes http return codes

2015-09-13 Thread reviewboard
Comment #7 on issue 3841 by anthonyh...@gmail.com: rbtools.api.request hardcodes http return codes https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3841 Review Request #7625 created for this issue. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue

Re: Issue 3966 in reviewboard: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs

2015-09-11 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 3966 by physicss...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966 It looks like once I've looked at diff/2 and diff/1-2, they get cached in a cookie. When I update

Re: Issue 3963 in reviewboard: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing

2015-09-11 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 3963 by paul.man...@alcatel-lucent.com: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963 I re-read what you wrote and changed browser URL as required and downloaded the payload

Re: Issue 3963 in reviewboard: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing

2015-09-11 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 3963 by paul.man...@alcatel-lucent.com: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963 I don't have any admin rights on our server running reviewboard so I can only tell you

Issue 3965 in reviewboard: View diff fails for C/C++ files from unified CVS diff

2015-09-10 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3965 by boris.bo...@gmail.com: View diff fails for C/C++ files from unified CVS diff https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3965 What version are you running? Review Board 2.0.18 What's the URL of the page

Re: Issue 3965 in reviewboard: View diff fails for C/C++ files from unified CVS diff

2015-09-10 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3965 by boris.bo...@gmail.com: View diff fails for C/C++ files from unified CVS diff https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3965 Correction Fedora version is 21. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue

Re: Issue 3963 in reviewboard: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing

2015-09-10 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 3963 by paul.man...@alcatel-lucent.com: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963 Hi, yes, I did publish the review with some notes-for-reviewers set, and then modified

Re: Issue 3966 in reviewboard: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs

2015-09-10 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3966 by physicss...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966 Some new info. This appears to be a Chrome- or at least browser-related issue. I cleared Chrome's

Issue 3966 in reviewboard: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs

2015-09-10 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3966 by physicss...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966 What version are you running? Reviewboard 2.0.19

Re: Issue 3966 in reviewboard: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs

2015-09-10 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 3966 by physicss...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966 I looked up how to flush memcached and ended up running echo 'flush_all' | nc localhost 11211

Re: Issue 3966 in reviewboard: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs

2015-09-10 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #2 on issue 3966 by chip...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966 As a test, what happens if you clear the server cache? Does the problem

Re: Issue 3966 in reviewboard: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs

2015-09-10 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3966 by chip...@gmail.com: Uploading a revision to a CR twice before publishing creates bad partial diffs https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3966 Thanks for the detailed reproduction steps! We generate the changes between diffs on-the-fly by patching

Re: Issue 3963 in reviewboard: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing

2015-09-10 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3963 by chip...@gmail.com: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963 Would you be able to get the API payloads for me at each stage? That'll tell me more. -- You

Re: Issue 3747 in reviewboard: Review images is broken

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 3747 by nano...@gmail.com: Review images is broken https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3747 @david, Is there a chance this issue also affect document (a .docx)? on our side we've got a 500 error when displaying review request containing an attachement

Re: Issue 3935 in reviewboard: Auto populate branch name when creating new Review Request

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 3935 by anthonyh...@gmail.com: Auto populate branch name when creating new Review Request https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3935 Will be working on this as my first easy fix bug. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send

Re: Issue 3747 in reviewboard: Review images is broken

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3747 by nano...@gmail.com: Review images is broken https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3747 I confirm it is the same issue, and David's fix works on any kind of file attachment. It has solved our issue with .docx -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 3809 in reviewboard: Broken .kt style in rb/css/syntax.css

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3809 by justin.h...@gmail.com: Broken .kt style in rb/css/syntax.css https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3809 Was able to replicate the problem and looking into it now. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue

Issue 3962 in reviewboard: Mercurial repositories not usable on Windows Reviewboard install when hg is installed with 'pip'

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3962 by phil...@gmail.com: Mercurial repositories not usable on Windows Reviewboard install when hg is installed with 'pip' https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3962 What version are you running? 2.0.19

Re: Issue 3954 in reviewboard: Error 500 to some tickets

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3954 by alder...@gmail.com: Error 500 to some tickets https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954 I,ve been hitting the same bug with CSV files attachments (pure csv from php csv writter) as well as doc and docx. it blocks the whole review when it happens

Re: Issue 3954 in reviewboard: Error 500 to some tickets

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 3954 by alder...@gmail.com: Error 500 to some tickets https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954 (FYI 2.0.19 as well, and everything was working before) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications

Issue 3963 in reviewboard: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3963 by paul.man...@alcatel-lucent.com: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963 What version are you running? 2.0.15

Re: Issue 3963 in reviewboard: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 3963 by chip...@gmail.com: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963 Also, did you publish between steps 1 and 2? If so, I'd be interested in seeing API data from both

Re: Issue 3962 in reviewboard: Mercurial repositories not usable on Windows Reviewboard install when hg is installed with 'pip'

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: Project-Djblets OpSys-Windows Comment #1 on issue 3962 by chip...@gmail.com: Mercurial repositories not usable on Windows Reviewboard install when hg is installed with 'pip' https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3962 We're

Issue 3964 in reviewboard: Text Overflow in Search Auto-Complete for Long Usernames / Long Review Titles

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3964 by zach...@gmail.com: Text Overflow in Search Auto-Complete for Long Usernames / Long Review Titles https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3964 What version are you running? 2.0.18 What's the URL

Re: Issue 3963 in reviewboard: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Labels: Project-ReviewBoard Component-Markdown Comment #1 on issue 3963 by chip...@gmail.com: markdown in the field Note to Reviewers gets quoted with backslashes after editing https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3963 Interesting

Re: Issue 3954 in reviewboard: Error 500 to some tickets

2015-09-09 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 3954 by chip...@gmail.com: Error 500 to some tickets https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954 We'll have 2.0.20 out in just a couple days with this fix. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications

Issue 3961 in reviewboard: Cannot publish the reply to comments

2015-09-07 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3961 by adilcash...@gmail.com: Cannot publish the reply to comments https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3961 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug

Re: Issue 3891 in reviewboard: Error adding new mercurial repository

2015-09-06 Thread reviewboard
Comment #10 on issue 3891 by justin.h...@gmail.com: Error adding new mercurial repository https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3891 Was able to reproduce the error. Will look into fixing now for an easy-bug-fix. -- You received this message because this project

Issue 3960 in reviewboard: Not able to publish the comments

2015-09-04 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3960 by adilcash...@gmail.com: Not able to publish the comments https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3960 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report

Issue 3959 in reviewboard: Bogus "file was not found" error when moving files and changing their mode in a Git repository

2015-09-04 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3959 by vzeit...@gmail.com: Bogus "file was not found" error when moving files and changing their mode in a Git repository https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3959 Using RBTools 0.7.4 under C

Re: Issue 3960 in reviewboard: Not able to publish the comments

2015-09-04 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 3960 by trowb...@gmail.com: Not able to publish the comments https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3960 We need you to fill out the form in as much detail as possible or we can't do anything to help. -- You received

Issue 3958 in reviewboard: Unicode in user names

2015-09-04 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3958 by damien.d...@bt-ground.com: Unicode in user names https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3958 What version are you running? 2.0.19 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? There's no URL, its

Re: Issue 3956 in reviewboard: review requests with file attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19

2015-09-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 3956 by chip...@gmail.com: review requests with file attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3956 We're planning to release 2.0.20 this weekend, which will fix this. -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 3956 in reviewboard: review requests with file attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19

2015-09-03 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 3954 Comment #3 on issue 3956 by chip...@gmail.com: review requests with file attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3956 (No comment was entered for this change

Re: Issue 3954 in reviewboard: Error 500 to some tickets

2015-09-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 3954 by chip...@gmail.com: Error 500 to some tickets https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954 Issue 3956 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address

Issue 3957 in reviewboard: Issue updating reviews with RB tools 0.7.4, ReviewBoard 2.5 RC1 and Perforce

2015-09-03 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3957 by ramia...@gmail.com: Issue updating reviews with RB tools 0.7.4, ReviewBoard 2.5 RC1 and Perforce https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3957 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete

Issue 3955 in reviewboard: circular dependency between reviews makes review request un-updatable (500 errors)

2015-09-02 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3955 by christop...@delphix.com: circular dependency between reviews makes review request un-updatable (500 errors) https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3955 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must

Issue 3956 in reviewboard: review requests with file attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19

2015-09-02 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3956 by christop...@delphix.com: review requests with file attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3956 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must

Re: Issue 3956 in reviewboard: review requests with file attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19

2015-09-02 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3956 by christop...@delphix.com: review requests with file attachments get 500 errors after upgrade to 2.0.19 https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3956 I forgot to mention that I am unable to reproduce the issue after the upgrade (i.e. creating a new

Re: Issue 3915 in reviewboard: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService

2015-09-01 Thread reviewboard
Comment #16 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915 You can see that in "rbtools/hooks/mercurial.py" with "class MercurialDiffer" at that review request [1] fr

Re: Issue 3954 in reviewboard: Error 500 to some tickets

2015-08-30 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #2 on issue 3954 by chip...@gmail.com: Error 500 to some tickets https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954 What kind of files are attached to that review request? We have a fix coming out in 2.0.20 (probably this week), but were under

Issue 3954 in reviewboard: Error 500 to some tickets

2015-08-27 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3954 by atrubits...@eisgroup.com: Error 500 to some tickets https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954 Here is the output from admin email Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/site

Re: Issue 3954 in reviewboard: Error 500 to some tickets

2015-08-27 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3954 by atrubits...@eisgroup.com: Error 500 to some tickets https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3954 Please let me know what is the error reason and what is the way to fix it -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all

Re: Issue 3953 in reviewboard: no Email on ship it action

2015-08-27 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 3953 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: no Email on ship it action https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3953 Can you try this on the latest release-2.0.x? I believe this was fixed in commit a22600574e26571f0ee31eba46322e73995531cd. -- You received

Re: Issue 3953 in reviewboard: no Email on ship it action

2015-08-27 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3953 by shul...@gmail.com: no Email on ship it action https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3953 Same problem here. Not just for ship it emails, but any emails that contain Chinese characters. -- You received this message because this project

Re: Issue 3915 in reviewboard: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService

2015-08-26 Thread reviewboard
Comment #13 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915 update diffviewer_diffset set base_commit_id=NULL where base_commit_id like '%^1%'; -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 3915 in reviewboard: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService

2015-08-26 Thread reviewboard
Comment #15 on issue 3915 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915 How exactly are you generating the diff with MercurialClient? You may be generating it in an incorrect way. If you generate

Re: Issue 3915 in reviewboard: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService

2015-08-26 Thread reviewboard
Comment #12 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915 This introduces it: https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard/commit/6b34af11397d92ae5c396ed911840ae6b0392cfd If in table

Re: Issue 3915 in reviewboard: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService

2015-08-26 Thread reviewboard
Comment #14 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915 update diffviewer_diffset set base_commit_id=NULL where base_commit_id like '%^1'; -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 3915 in reviewboard: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService

2015-08-25 Thread reviewboard
Comment #11 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915 Work-around: diff --git a/rbtools/clients/mercurial.py b/rbtools/clients/mercurial.py index ad0d1f9..2f6edc9 100644 --- a/rbtools

Re: Issue 3915 in reviewboard: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService

2015-08-25 Thread reviewboard
Comment #10 on issue 3915 by aklitz...@gmail.com: Add support for SCM Manager as a HostingService https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3915 Ok, I found the problem. I'm using a script on server side [1] to create the diff, parent diff and the base commit id using

Issue 3953 in reviewboard: no Email on ship it action

2015-08-25 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3953 by guillaum...@gmail.com: no Email on ship it action https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3953 What version are you running? Review Board 2.0.19 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? http

Issue 3952 in reviewboard: The file was not found in the repository. (HTTP 400, API Error 207)

2015-08-25 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3952 by adilicio...@gmail.com: The file was not found in the repository. (HTTP 400, API Error 207) https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3952 What version are you running? RBTools 0.7.2 What's the URL

Issue 3951 in reviewboard: [Active Directory LDAP ] Misleading info for Anonymous User Mask

2015-08-24 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Component-Docs New issue 3951 by coronari...@gmail.com: [Active Directory LDAP ] Misleading info for Anonymous User Mask https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3951 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? I'm using

Re: Issue 3949 in reviewboard: Diffs: Distinguish between light yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely different lines

2015-08-20 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3949 by alextfish: Diffs: Distinguish between light yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely different lines https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3949 Another example of the current confusing behaviour to demonstrate my

Re: Comment on IdeasFor2_0 in reviewboard

2015-08-20 Thread reviewboard
Comment by rayt...@gmail.com: *[http://bundaku.net Jual Jilbab Instan Online]* For more information: https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/IdeasFor2_0 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To unsubscribe from this group

Issue 3950 in reviewboard: Display filename of diffed file

2015-08-20 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3950 by dhaum...@gmail.com: Display filename of diffed file https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3950 Version: 2.0.18. Description: When reviewing large changes, one sometimes looses the context

Issue 3949 in reviewboard: Diffs: Distinguish between light yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely different lines

2015-08-19 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 3949 by alextfish: Diffs: Distinguish between light yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely different lines https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3949 What version

Re: Issue 3949 in reviewboard: Diffs: Distinguish between light yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely different lines

2015-08-19 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 3949 by alextfish: Diffs: Distinguish between light yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely different lines https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3949 Second attachment (my mocked-up example of how this might look

Re: Issue 3949 in reviewboard: Diffs: Distinguish between light yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely different lines

2015-08-19 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 3949 by alextfish: Diffs: Distinguish between light yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely different lines https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3949 Second screenshot (my mocked-up example of what this might look like

Re: Issue 3949 in reviewboard: Diffs: Distinguish between light yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely different lines

2015-08-19 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 3949 by alextfish: Diffs: Distinguish between light yellow nothing changed/whitespace changes and light yellow completely different lines https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3949 Second screenshot (my mocked-up example of what this might look like

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >