Updates:
Labels: EasyFix
Comment #12 on issue 3659 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to
differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this
Comment #10 on issue 3659 by shahgunj...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able
to differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
Any update on this ?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low Component-RBTools Project-RBTools
Comment #11 on issue 3659 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to
differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
This is
Comment #9 on issue 3659 by shahgunj...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able
to differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
Yes Perforce.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this
Comment #8 on issue 3659 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to
differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
OK, I think I understand. What version control system? Perforce?
--
You received this message because this project is
Comment #7 on issue 3659 by marc.fo...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to
differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
When I do a review (using post-review) that contains only a single binary
file the review is created and when looking at
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #2 on issue 3659 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to
differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this
Comment #3 on issue 3659 by marc.fo...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to
differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
Yes a jks file is binary. using an older version of rbt that supports
post-review the review is still posted even when
Comment #4 on issue 3659 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to
differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
I don't see how this is a bug. You want a review request with no diffs?
--
You received this message because this project is
Comment #5 on issue 3659 by shahgunj...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able
to differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
We want review request with diffs, using RBTools 0.6.2.
--
You received this message because this project is configured
Comment #6 on issue 3659 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to
differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
I *really* don't understand what you mean. We've never done diffs of binary
files. What behavior are you seeing with the
Comment #1 on issue 3659 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6.2 not able to
differentiate the binary content
https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3659
I'm confused. Is .jks a text file that's being misinterpreted as binary?
We've never been able to post changes to binary
12 matches
Mail list logo
