Issue 836 in reviewboard: Default SiteConfiguration model manager

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 836 by igor.kramer: Default SiteConfiguration model manager http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=836 Hi. Can you add new manager to the SiteConfiguration model? all_objects = model.Manager() -- You rece

Issue 836 in reviewboard: Default SiteConfiguration model manager

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 836 by chipx86: Default SiteConfiguration model manager http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=836 Sorry.. Why? Can you explain why you need this and what purpose it'd serve? -- You received this message because you are listed

Issue 836 in reviewboard: Default SiteConfiguration model manager

Comment #2 on issue 836 by igor.kramer: Default SiteConfiguration model manager http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=836 Sorry, i'm stupid and inconsiderate. Problem in my head :) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Issue 836 in reviewboard: Default SiteConfiguration model manager

Comment #3 on issue 836 by chipx86: Default SiteConfiguration model manager http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=836 No it's fine. I was trying to brainstorm why we needed it but couldn't figure it out. If there's a feature you need there, we can definitely look into adding it

Issue 836 in reviewboard: Default SiteConfiguration model manager

Comment #4 on issue 836 by igor.kramer: Default SiteConfiguration model manager http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=836 This feature is unnecessary. I'm forgot something about model managers. RTFM helps me. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner o

Issue 836 in reviewboard: Default SiteConfiguration model manager

Updates: Status: WontFix Comment #5 on issue 836 by chipx86: Default SiteConfiguration model manager http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=836 Okay. Let me know if you have any questions about siteconfig though :) -- You received this message because you are listed in th

Issue 813 in reviewboard: Non C locale patches fail

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #5 on issue 813 by chipx86: Non C locale patches fail http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=813 Should be fixed in r1722, in that we generate SVN diffs now with the C locale. We still don't support diffs with non-C locales, but post-review

Issue 813 in reviewboard: Non C locale patches fail

Updates: Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 Component-Scripts Comment #6 on issue 813 by chipx86: Non C locale patches fail http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=813 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or C

Issue 749 in reviewboard: psycopg doesn't work with reviewboard, should advocate psycopg2 instead

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 749 by chipx86: psycopg doesn't work with reviewboard, should advocate psycopg2 instead http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=749 Fixed in r1719. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of

Issue 837 in reviewboard: __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 837 by apsoftware: __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=837 What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any? View Differences screen Describe the

Issue 837 in reviewboard: __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)

Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 837 by chipx86: __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=837 You're running a pretty old version. Can you upgrade? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner

Issue 837 in reviewboard: __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)

Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 710 Comment #2 on issue 837 by trowbrds: __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=837 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are liste

Issue 710 in reviewboard: TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)

Comment #3 on issue 710 by trowbrds: TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=710 Issue 837 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or b

Issue 692 in reviewboard: Diff viewer pagination is absurdly silly

Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chipx86 Labels: Milestone-Release1.0 Comment #1 on issue 692 by chipx86: Diff viewer pagination is absurdly silly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=692 Fixed in r1726. -- You received this message because you are listed i