Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.

2009-06-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #5 on issue 658 by chipx86: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 This usually indicates that the revision is wrong. How was the diff generated, and what repository type? -- You received this message because

Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.

2009-06-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #6 on issue 658 by manjunath.shiva: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 diff is generated on UNIX and copied from screen to windows and that was the problem. Now he tried did an ftp and it worked. With the

Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.

2009-06-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #7 on issue 658 by chipx86: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 But how was the diff generated? What tool, parameters? Copying from screen to windows will break things. I assume you mean copy/paste. That

Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.

2009-06-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #8 on issue 658 by manjunath.shiva: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 diff was generated using cvs diff -u amuoci.c amuoci.diff on UNIX. Here use made a mistake of copy/paste from UNIX shell to Windows.

Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.

2009-06-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #9 on issue 658 by manjunath.shiva: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 I tried with latest post-review version 0.8. The problem is we do have post- review.exe so we need to use UWIN / MKS / Cigwin to run this

Issue 658 in reviewboard: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly.

2009-06-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #10 on issue 658 by chipx86: Error : The patch to 'filepath' didn't apply cleanly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=658 Ah yeah, that's a potential problem for now. However, I do plan to get a post-review.exe into the next release. -- You received this message

Issue 1181 in reviewboard: Wrong content of search-cron.conf after installation

2009-06-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1181 by msu...@redhat.com: Wrong content of search-cron.conf after installation http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1181 What version are you running? ReviewBoard-1.0 What's the URL of the page containing

Issue 1182 in reviewboard: Apache configuration file is misconfigured, if RB do not goes to root.

2009-06-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1182 by msu...@redhat.com: Apache configuration file is misconfigured, if RB do not goes to root. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1182 What version are you running? 1.5 What's the URL of the page

Issue 1182 in reviewboard: Apache configuration file is misconfigured, if RB do not goes to root.

2009-06-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NotABug Comment #1 on issue 1182 by chipx86: Apache configuration file is misconfigured, if RB do not goes to root. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1182 This is actually by design in order to support some existing setups and older versions of

Issue 1183 in reviewboard: Viewing diff in review request causes traceback involving memcache

2009-06-23 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 1183 by chipx86: Viewing diff in review request causes traceback involving memcache http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1183 Definitely never seen that before. Any chance you can provide us with a diff that reproduces