Re: Issue 1451 in reviewboard: Base field should be stripped before using

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 1451 by chipx86: Base field should be stripped before using http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1451 Fixed on master (3ca1e5a) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Re: Issue 1476 in reviewboard: TypeError: character mapping must return integer, None or unicode

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #15 on issue 1476 by chipx86: TypeError: character mapping must return integer, None or unicode http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1476 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in

Re: Comment on ReviewBoardAPI in reviewboard

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Comment by evgeny.zislis: The responses are json, but the requests (in rb 1.5) are strangle multipart form data! Took me ages to figure out how to request stuff from the server. Example: {{{ curl --cookie cookies.txt --cookie-jar cookies.txt -X POST -F username=xxx -F password=yyy

Re: Comment on ReviewBoardAPI in reviewboard

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Comment by evgeny.zislis: The responses are json, but the requests (in rb 1.5) are strangly sent using multipart form data! Took me ages to figure out how to request stuff from the server. Example: {{{ curl --cookie cookies.txt --cookie-jar cookies.txt -X POST -F username=xxx -F

Re: Comment on ReviewBoardAPI in reviewboard

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Comment by evgeny.zislis: The responses are json, but the requests (in rb 1.5) are strangely sent using multipart form data! Took me ages to figure out how to request stuff from the server. Example: {{{ curl --cookie cookies.txt --cookie-jar cookies.txt -X POST -F username=xxx -F

Re: Issue 1494 in reviewboard: post-review on windows vista/7 uses the wrong folder to store the authentication cookie, and it uses the diff command

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 1494 by gfbett: post-review on windows vista/7 uses the wrong folder to store the authentication cookie, and it uses the diff command http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1494 RC1 fixed the application data issue, but not the external diff command --

Re: Issue 1281 in reviewboard: Adding comments in diff viewer can delete or overwrite existing comments.

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 1281 by kyle.getz: Adding comments in diff viewer can delete or overwrite existing comments. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1281 I don't think the line numbers need to go into the thousands for this to be triggered. On the contrary, I perceive the

Issue 1509 in reviewboard: Throws an exception upon a click on review request

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1509 by kcgade: Throws an exception upon a click on review request http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1509 'm seeing this error for reviewboard.twitter.com when I click on a review request.

Re: Issue 1509 in reviewboard: Throws an exception upon a click on review request

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 1509 by trowbrds: Throws an exception upon a click on review request http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1509 Do you have the full traceback? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

Re: Issue 1491 in reviewboard: LDAP group support

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 1491 by psarmstr: LDAP group support http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1491 To me at least, it feels like not wanting this is specific to certain setups (or small shops that don't have LDAP setup properly yet). Managing everything through a single

Re: Issue 1491 in reviewboard: LDAP group support

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 1491 by chipx86: LDAP group support http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1491 You may want groups for permission purposes, or for review groups, or neither. Some places map review groups to mailman lists, and not anything in LDAP. -- You received this

Re: Issue 1506 in reviewboard: Get Unable to read settings_local.py. error while running rb-site upgrade

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 1506 by locomocogogo: Get Unable to read settings_local.py. error while running rb-site upgrade http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1506 Thanks for your help. Let me give you the info you need first before I try anything... Yes, on our installed copy

Re: Issue 1506 in reviewboard: Get Unable to read settings_local.py. error while running rb-site upgrade

2010-02-22 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 1506 by chipx86: Get Unable to read settings_local.py. error while running rb-site upgrade http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1506 That should be new enough to migrate properly. Anything prior to evolutions (which is a few years old now) would be