Re: Issue 2239 in reviewboard: Adding comment to review does not work with Chrome 14.0.835.94

2011-10-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 2239 by alan.lam...@gmail.com: Adding comment to review does not work with Chrome 14.0.835.94 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2239 I suspect the issue with this bug is neither Chrome nor Review Board. The culprit is Ad-block. If you force an

Re: Issue 2049 in reviewboard: Filtering requests at least by fields Repository, Reviews, Submitter

2011-10-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 2049 by dane.bet...@gmail.com: Filtering requests at least by fields Repository, Reviews, Submitter http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2049 I think we should be able to filter any column we can sort by. In my company the ship it status is used to

Re: Issue 2054 in reviewboard: RBTools-0.3.2 + Perforce - failed to upload diff when source file is a new file

2011-10-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2054 by roasti...@gmail.com: RBTools-0.3.2 + Perforce - failed to upload diff when source file is a new file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2054 Referring to the bug description above by benbe...@gmail.com: File c:\Python27\lib\httplib.py, line

Re: Issue 2315 in reviewboard: RBTools 0.3.4 is not backward compatible with Reviewboard 1.0.9

2011-10-03 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Owner: chip...@gmail.com Labels: Component-RBTools Comment #1 on issue 2315 by chip...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.3.4 is not backward compatible with Reviewboard 1.0.9 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2315 Can you test this

Re: Issue 2313 in reviewboard: Base64Field requires an AutoField key to operate

2011-10-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2313 by dru...@gmail.com: Base64Field requires an AutoField key to operate http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2313 Here is the error trace: http://paste2.org/p/1688251 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2313 in reviewboard: Base64Field requires an AutoField key to operate

2011-10-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 2313 by trowb...@gmail.com: Base64Field requires an AutoField key to operate http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2313 Christian, this is in David's diff-storage changes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2313 in reviewboard: Base64Field requires an AutoField key to operate

2011-10-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 2313 by chip...@gmail.com: Base64Field requires an AutoField key to operate http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2313 Oh hah. That makes sense. The username is cut off so I didn't associate it. Okay, same question though. Why would id be explicitly

Re: Issue 2313 in reviewboard: Base64Field requires an AutoField key to operate

2011-10-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #7 on issue 2313 by chip...@gmail.com: Base64Field requires an AutoField key to operate http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2313 I think what's actually happening is that the wrong sort of data is going into that field. Maybe it just can't be used with

Re: Issue 2313 in reviewboard: Base64Field requires an AutoField key to operate

2011-10-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #8 on issue 2313 by dru...@gmail.com: Base64Field requires an AutoField key to operate http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2313 From the Django docs: If you'd like to specify a custom primary key, just specify primary_key=True on one of your fields. If Django sees