Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2013-04-10 Thread reviewboard
Comment #21 on issue 929 by trowb...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 Issue 2953 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2012-09-23 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: PendingReview Owner: chip...@gmail.com Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Critical Milestone-Release1.6.x Comment #18 on issue 929 by chip...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2012-09-23 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #19 on issue 929 by chip...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 This should be fixed properly now, and a release is going up tonight. -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2012-09-23 Thread reviewboard
Comment #20 on issue 929 by chip...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 Pushed to release-1.6.x (8281c37c4fae1f5a283c735f1c7e7cf8546767ac) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2012-09-04 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: New Comment #17 on issue 929 by trowb...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2012-08-01 Thread reviewboard
Comment #15 on issue 929 by trowb...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 Issue 2690 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2012-08-01 Thread reviewboard
Comment #16 on issue 929 by srivatsa...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 It is not clear whether this issue has been closed or not. Comment #11 gives me the impression this has been fixed? Could you please let

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2012-06-27 Thread reviewboard
Comment #12 on issue 929 by d...@vidsolbach.de: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 Hi Chris, can you elaborate on how you changed diff handling for git? We have a user of reviewboard.kde.org who saw that all information

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2012-06-27 Thread reviewboard
Comment #13 on issue 929 by d...@vidsolbach.de: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 Ups sorry, attached the stripped down version. Here is the original patch with the additional info at the top. Attachments:

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2012-05-14 Thread reviewboard
Comment #10 on issue 929 by sed...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 All git diff format support tickets were closed as duplicate of this ticket. I don't know why but the need for git diff format support has more

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2012-05-14 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #11 on issue 929 by chip...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 Hi sedatk, The reason they were closed is that they're all symptoms of Review Board inadvertently stripping

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2011-12-14 Thread reviewboard
Comment #8 on issue 929 by tif...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 This really seems like a big issue. It causes git diff files containing diffs concerning binary or utf16 files to become corrupted. This makes

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2011-12-13 Thread reviewboard
Comment #7 on issue 929 by trowb...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 Issue 2420 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2011-07-12 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 929 by trowb...@gmail.com: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 Issue 2172 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2010-10-18 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 929 by chipx86: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 It does do this. It just breaks it up per-file (which is needed). The problem is that the parser doesn't know about some of the extra metadata. So

Re: Issue 929 in reviewboard: reviewboard should not alter the diff file

2010-10-18 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 929 by d...@n-cube.org: reviewboard should not alter the diff file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=929 I wonder if this wouldn't still be a good idea. I was trying to review http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1737/ the other day because I thought it