Re: Issue 1707 in reviewboard: Description should not be required

2011-01-30 Thread reviewboard 

Updates:
Status: WontFix

Comment #2 on issue 1707 by chip...@gmail.com: Description should not be  
required

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1707

For a reviewer, knowing more information about the change is always  
beneficial. I don't think in the majority of cases that a 1 line summary is  
sufficient. I believe by making this field optional, we'll do nothing but  
decrease quality.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.

Re: Issue 1707 in reviewboard: Description should not be required

2010-08-30 Thread reviewboard 

Updates:
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Component-Reviews

Comment #1 on issue 1707 by trowbrds: Description should not be required
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1707

(No comment was entered for this change.)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.