Re: Issue 2430 in reviewboard: post-review fails to post diff to reviewboard server if anonymous access disabled

2012-09-29 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #6 on issue 2430 by trowb...@gmail.com: post-review fails to post diff to reviewboard server if anonymous access disabled http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2430 Pushed patch to master (7d0026f). -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 2430 in reviewboard: post-review fails to post diff to reviewboard server if anonymous access disabled

2012-01-05 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 2430 by stid.s...@gmail.com: post-review fails to post diff to reviewboard server if anonymous access disabled http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2430 OK, here is the workaround: 1. In Nginx (front end) configuration, add the following:

Re: Issue 2430 in reviewboard: post-review fails to post diff to reviewboard server if anonymous access disabled

2012-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 2430 by stid.s...@gmail.com: post-review fails to post diff to reviewboard server if anonymous access disabled http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2430 No it comes out it's because I use Nginx as a reverse proxy in front of the uWSGI server, and all

Re: Issue 2430 in reviewboard: post-review fails to post diff to reviewboard server if anonymous access disabled

2012-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2430 by stid.s...@gmail.com: post-review fails to post diff to reviewboard server if anonymous access disabled http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2430 Now it comes out it's because I use Nginx as a reverse proxy in front of the uWSGI server, and all

Re: Issue 2430 in reviewboard: post-review fails to post diff to reviewboard server if anonymous access disabled

2012-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2430 by stid.s...@gmail.com: post-review fails to post diff to reviewboard server if anonymous access disabled http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2430 The way in issue 2279 doesn't work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the