Re: Issue 3863 in reviewboard: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry

2015-05-26 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #5 on issue 3863 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this

Re: Issue 3863 in reviewboard: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry

2015-05-26 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 3863 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863 The fix for this issue has landed on release-2.5.x and master as commit 43d9bda. It will be

Re: Issue 3863 in reviewboard: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry

2015-05-25 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: PendingReview Comment #3 on issue 3863 by bar...@beanbaginc.com: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received

Re: Issue 3863 in reviewboard: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry

2015-05-07 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 3863 by csipak.a...@ardinsys.eu: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863 Thanks for the tip, but that would still mean a big payload and a lot of processing on the

Re: Issue 3863 in reviewboard: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry

2015-05-06 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Component-API Comment #1 on issue 3863 by chip...@gmail.com: Web API should provide an id field for a review request's every depends_on entry https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3863 A worthwhile thing to add. What you