Comment #6 on issue 733 by yoyo42: Review Board as a VMWare Virtual
Appliance
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=733
Is the idea of a Virtual Appliance one of those that just keeps going to
the end of
the list? I'm sure there is a desire for it, and relying on rPath seems to
be a bad
idea - the one they have at present is badly configured, has *zero*
documentation
(they don't even tell you the password you need to actually run it) and is
way out of
date.
I notice building a VM was on the list as a test of the new build system a
while ago
- is it just a case of doing that step then hosting it somewhere? I'm sure
a call for
volunteers would easily find a host.
A Virtual Appliance is such an obvious step for something with as many
dependencies
as RB, I'm amazed one isn't about. I wonder if the presence of the rPath
attempt is
actually putting off anybody else who would like to have a go? Which would
be a real
shame because as far as I can see the rPath VM is useless, especially for
RB newbies
like myself.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-iss...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.
