Review Board 1.0.2 released

2009-09-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi everyone, We just put out the 1.0.2 release, which contains many bug fixes that users have hit, and improved error logging to help diagnose problems. We strongly encourage everyone to upgrade, and if you hit any new page crashes, we'll probably ask you to upgrade and send us your log file.

Re: Review Board 1.0.2 released

2009-09-16 Thread roshan pius
Hi Christian, I'm having issues upgrading to the latest 1.02 release, when i try upgrading i get a mesage saying that the latest release ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 is already the active version in easy-install.pth is already installed. I was initially running reviewboard from the svn

Re: Review Board 1.0.2 released

2009-09-16 Thread grimbeaver
Christian, I'm having issues upgrading to the latest 1.02 release, when i try upgrading i get a mesage saying that the latest release ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 is already the active version in easy-install.pth is already installed. I was initially running reviewboard from the svn

Question: How to change tab size in diff viewer?

2009-09-16 Thread surk
We're using Review Board 1.0.1, and Firefox 3.5.3. When looking at the diffs using View Diff, all 'tab' chars in the diff-file are displayed with size 8. In the code we're using tab size 4. This makes the code looked misaligned sometimes. Is it possible to change the tab size, of the tab-chars

upload screenshot

2009-09-16 Thread carmenates
Hi: I also have this same problem, which is the solution? Unable to successfully upload screenshot to Review Request. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=641 New issue report by matthew.j.gagne: *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*

Re: Review Board 1.0.2 released

2009-09-16 Thread Kunjal
Chris, You can add Broadcom in the list. We use it for our MobCom group and users are happy !! Kunjal On Sep 16, 1:05 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi everyone, We just put out the 1.0.2 release, which contains many bug fixes that users have hit, and improved error

Re: Reviewboard taking a nap after 1.0.2 upgrade!

2009-09-16 Thread grimbeaver
Anyone have any help at all on this? I don't really want to reload the server because of this. I'm using Ubuntu 8.0(4) LTS and have tried getting the latest updates for all the packages. On Sep 16, 10:43 am, grimbeaver tbrez...@gmail.com wrote: Ok this is really not good, after upgrading to

Re: Reviewboard taking a nap after 1.0.2 upgrade!

2009-09-16 Thread grimbeaver
Thank you, thank you so much. I removed: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg Then when I ran easy_setup again it downloaded Django 1.1 instead and everything works fine. On Sep 16, 12:31 pm, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote: It looks like maybe Django got

Re: Review Board 1.0.2 released

2009-09-16 Thread Christian Hammond
. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:35 AM, roshan pius roshanpiustho...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Christian, I'm having issues upgrading to the latest 1.02 release, when i try upgrading i get a mesage saying that the latest release ReviewBoard 1.1alpha1.dev-20090916 is already the active

Re: Review Board 1.0.2 released

2009-09-16 Thread Vesterbaek
Hi Christian, As always, we're looking to fill out our page of Happy Users (http://review-board.org/users/), so if you use Review Board and can give us permission to list you, please let us know! You can add Bang Olufsen to your list happy users. -- Jeppe

Re: Reviewboard taking a nap after 1.0.2 upgrade!

2009-09-16 Thread Christian Hammond
It looks like the function we use was introduced in Django 1.0.3. I'll bump up the minimum version and maybe push out another release tonight. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Sep 16,

Installing in Ubuntu 9.04 Issues

2009-09-16 Thread Varun Soundararajan
Hi, I followed the instructions in: http://www.review-board.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/ for my ubuntu machine. When I run sudo rb-site install /var/www/reviews after providing the admin account with username, password and email, I get this stack trace on the terminal:

Re: Installing in Ubuntu 9.04 Issues

2009-09-16 Thread Varun Soundararajan
Thanks Chris for the reply. I will watch out for the 1.0.3 version. I just fired up the installation. Its awesome! Thanks for making an awesome open source review tool. Regards Varun On Sep 16, 7:48 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: You need to re-run rb-site upgrade on the

Re: Installing in Ubuntu 9.04 Issues

2009-09-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Yep. The Apache config file is in theory generated correctly in 1.0.2, but in practice, as you noted, installation fails... Oops :/. 1.0.3 isn't that far away. I'll do a post to the mailing list when it's out. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Review Board 1.0.3 released

2009-09-16 Thread Christian Hammond
Last night's 1.0.2 release was pretty broken in two major ways. The web server configuration templates were no longer bundled in the package, due to a change in the structure of our code tree, and users using Django 1.0.2 would hit a bug, as we needed functionality only present in 1.0.3 and

Re: HTTPS certificate not accepted.

2009-09-16 Thread Varun Soundararajan
Hi Christian, So as you have explained here, I did sudo -u www-data it led me to /var/www when i typed cd now I did svn co https rep url it asked me to accept cert permantnety to which i typed p before that I created .subversion directory in /var/www and chowned to www-data I also created

upload screenshot

2009-09-16 Thread Ramos
Hi: I also have this same problem, which is the solution? Unable to successfully upload screenshot to Review Request. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=641 New issue report by matthew.j.gagne: *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.*

Re: upload screenshot

2009-09-16 Thread Christian Hammond
You've posted this three times today. I can't tell if this is a legitimate question or spam, but since the answer is in the bug report and discussion should happen there, I'm inclined to believe it's spam. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Issue 1315 in reviewboard: Can not rb-site upgrade /path/to/reviewboard

2009-09-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 1315 by chipx86: Can not rb-site upgrade /path/to/reviewboard http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1315 It seems you may have grabbed the update just at the wrong time. There was a broken update just around 12AM PST

Issue 647 in reviewboard: Error return value of _prepare_draft unused in webapi/json.py

2009-09-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: chipx86 Labels: -Milestone-Release1.5 Milestone-Release1.0.x Comment #5 on issue 647 by chipx86: Error return value of _prepare_draft unused in webapi/json.py http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=647 The core problem was

Issue 1315 in reviewboard: Can not rb-site upgrade /path/to/reviewboard

2009-09-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 1315 by TAKAHASHI.Kazuyoshi: Can not rb-site upgrade /path/to/reviewboard http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1315 Hi chipx86, I understood your circumstances. I've checked the .egg and it looked correctly. BTW, I could not find required Django version

Issue 762 in reviewboard: post-review script ignores username and password arguments if valid cookie is found

2009-09-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Milestone-RBTools-Release1.0 Component-RBTools PendingReview Comment #2 on issue 762 by chipx86: post-review script ignores username and password arguments if valid cookie is found http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=762 (No

Issue 765 in reviewboard: Replies to comments on an interdiff are tagged in the code improperly

2009-09-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Labels: Milestone-Release1.0.x Comment #4 on issue 765 by chipx86: Replies to comments on an interdiff are tagged in the code improperly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=765 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because

Issue 890 in reviewboard: post-review under Windows-XP (non English language)

2009-09-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Labels: -Component-Scripts Component-RBTools OpSys-Windows Milestone-RBTools-Release1.0 Comment #2 on issue 890 by chipx86: post-review under Windows-XP (non English language) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=890 (No comment was entered for this

Issue 1052 in reviewboard: Submitting a review should not trash unpublished changes

2009-09-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Milestone-Release1.0.x Component-Reviews Comment #1 on issue 1052 by chipx86: Submitting a review should not trash unpublished changes http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1052 (No comment was entered for this change.) --

Issue 1050 in reviewboard: Screenshot Comment location issue with Chrome

2009-09-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Labels: -Milestone-Release1.5 Milestone-Release1.0.x Comment #7 on issue 1050 by chipx86: Screenshot Comment location issue with Chrome http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1050 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because

Issue 1316 in reviewboard: ReviewBoard should support brand new code

2009-09-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1316 by sra...@gmail.com: ReviewBoard should support brand new code http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1316 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running?

Issue 1317 in reviewboard: Differentiate between deleted files and those that have had all contents removed.

2009-09-16 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 1066 Comment #1 on issue 1317 by trowbrds: Differentiate between deleted files and those that have had all contents removed. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1317 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You