The beauty of Git is that you don't have to only base your changes on one
branch. You can easily merge from multiple branches into your branch.
What I'd recommend is to have a branch, for example vendor, which is what
your internal builds will be from.
Then, each feature would go its own feature
This give some point of view :) Great thanks!
For now I have separate branch for each of my issue. Each branch is
lead from reviewboard master and contain only changes for each issue.
All of issues is merged to intel branch. I made some smart command
intelit which make greate use from git archive
My apologies, I don't think we ever responded to you on this topic. Did you
ever find a solution here?
Basically, there's no great way to migrate content today and merge it with
another instance. There are some old scripts in the source tree's
contrib/db/ directory for exporting/importing, but
There's some code going in to 1.5 that will make ticket-based auth work
better with Perforce.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:04 AM, RShelley 12gaugeme...@gmail.com
Hi,
Did you find a solution to this problem?
You didn't mention this in the e-mail, but did you change the hostname in
the Admin UI - General Settings page?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On
Hi Ryan,
Been out of town the past few days, so I'm catching up on e-mail now.
Okay, so I think I understand. So with this process, you want to continually
update an existing review request, and you want it to incorporate the new
updates alongside the existing ones? So if it's already created
So with this process, you want to continually
update an existing review request, and you want it to incorporate the new
updates alongside the existing ones? So if it's already created with a diff
modifying 5 files, the next update that adds 2 files will result in a diff
containing a total of
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
My apologies, I don't think we ever responded to you on this topic. Did you
ever find a solution here?
Basically, there's no great way to migrate content today and merge it with
another instance. There
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi,
Did you find a solution to this problem?
I actually gave up and created a new site. I then imported the entire
MySQL DB over to this new installation!
You didn't mention this in the e-mail, but
Hi list,
got the following problem with a fresh reviewboard install on RHEL5.3.
it's using python 2.4, and python-ldap-2.2.0-2.1.
1) server, base etc is configured with the web interface
2) when I do the query from the commandline I get the right results
3) ldap server is openldap and allows
Hi,
I had tried to change site domain. I had changed this site setting in
MySQL Database directly and local_settings.py both, And this works.
Table Name is django_site, You may have a try.
Best Regards!
On 4月6日, 下午8时51分, Srinidhi B S srinidhi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Apr 6,
Hi folks,
Still powering through this. I used nginx to get it up and going, and
now I'm getting my first RB page. However, it gives these errors:
Manual server updates required
A recent change requires manual updates to be made on this server.
After these changes are made, you should restart
OK, found it. Needed to do the ./manage.py fixscreenshots
On Apr 6, 10:22 pm, drmikecrowe drmikecr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Still powering through this. I used nginx to get it up and going, and
now I'm getting my first RB page. However, it gives these errors:
Manual server updates
Comment #5 on issue 1580 by chipx86: mysqld hogging cpu on our reviewboard
instance.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1580
For historical purposes, we've discussed this already outside of the bug
report and
are looking into various solutions.
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Milestone-Release1.5 Component-SCMTools
Comment #1 on issue 1583 by chipx86: Review Board doesn't work with private
Mercurial repositories
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1583
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Usability Keyboard Milestone-Release1.5
Comment #1 on issue 1585 by chipx86: Order fields on login form so that TAB
works as expected
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1585
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
Updates:
Status: Confirmed
Labels: Component-DiffViewer
Comment #3 on issue 1591 by chipx86: Improve the navigation by providing a
vertical bar showing where you are, and where diffs are
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1591
Got it. Dunno when we'd do
Comment #12 on issue 1419 by jeff.gabhart: Error uploading diff: The file
was not found in the repository (207)
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1419
Why is pointing to the tip of the repo a requirement?
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
Comment by ollir.h:
Hi, I'm ollir zhang from China, I would like to develop the following
enhancements:
1. Add *report feature* to trace someone's/team's activities.
2. Create *Linux Installer Framework* to make RB installation much easier
(RB installation on our debian linux almost cost me
Comment by mailswami:
It will be nice to have post-commit support.
Instead of every post-commit review being a separate URL, if we could setup
default rules for post-commit reviews to update an existing review
providing the diff-between-diff features, it would be very useful.
For more
Comment #8 on issue 1592 by chipx86: Shouldn't factor out the username when
checking a Subversion repository in usern...@server form
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1592
Seems reasonable. Feel free to file a separate feature request for that.
--
You received this
Comment #3 on issue 1575 by chipx86: Show image files inline as part of
diff view
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1575
We can only get the original, not the modifications. There's no way to see
what
changed, which makes it totally useless. There's also no way of
22 matches
Mail list logo
