Re: Something broke! (Error 500)

2010-05-25 Thread Christian Hammond
Try restarting the web server after enabling logging. What version? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Madhavi Gupta madhavii.gu...@gmail.comwrote: I have

Re: Reviewboard and subversion using file://

2010-05-25 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi David, The Review Board server is running on the same computer as the Subversion server and the clients? You will need to use post-review for generating the diffs. TortoiseSVN's diff generation creates diffs that are slightly incompatible. There's a bug filed for supporting this, which will

Re: how not use plain text password in RBTools

2010-05-25 Thread hayate
Hi Christian, Our case is not accessing reviewboard via browser, but using command line tool post-review.exe to submit request. And our server isn't using fully-qualified domain, just running in internal network. Thanks. On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com

Re: Something broke! (Error 500)

2010-05-25 Thread Madhavi Gupta
the version is 1.0.7 after restating the web server, now I am not able to login. the error screen gets displayed right away. However I created a new site and it is working properly. -Madhavi On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote: Try restarting the web

Re: how not use plain text password in RBTools

2010-05-25 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, Cookies can only be matched against fully-qualified domains. This isn't a Review Board restriction, but rather a restriction of nearly every HTTP client implementation that deals with cookies. This is why post-review is asking you every time. If you were to use a fully-qualified domain inside

Re: how not use plain text password in RBTools

2010-05-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 05/25/2010 04:08 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Cookies can only be matched against fully-qualified domains. This isn't a Review Board restriction, but rather a restriction of nearly every HTTP client implementation that deals with cookies. This is why post-review is asking you every

Re: Successful upgrade from Reviewboard 0.9 to 1.0.5.1

2010-05-25 Thread Chris Clark
Chris Clark wrote: Follow up after a days usage after the upgrade. Follow up a number of months later :-) It turns out I also hit a problem with missing screenshots, but no error for the user see:

Re: Issue 1663 in reviewboard: Add SCA group to review board

2010-05-25 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NotABug Comment #1 on issue 1663 by trowbrds: Add SCA group to review board http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1663 You'll have to ask your server administrator for this. This bug tracker is about the review board software itself. -- You received

Issue 1664 in reviewboard: Chinese characters in code cannot be shown correctly

2010-05-25 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1664 by xfyanghot: Chinese characters in code cannot be shown correctly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1664 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you

Issue 1665 in reviewboard: where to specify the Cc line of notification email?

2010-05-25 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1665 by ryantaocer: where to specify the Cc line of notification email? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1665 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you