Accessing different repo types from post-review

2010-09-21 Thread Jay
I have post-review installed on windows and have successfully been creating RB requests against perforce. We also have SVN projects, but when I try to use post-review against them it wants to talk to perforce instead. For instance if I enter: post-review --server=http://somehost/reviewboard

Re: Accessing different repo types from post-review

2010-09-21 Thread Chris Clark
Jay wrote: I have post-review installed on windows and have successfully been creating RB requests against perforce. We also have SVN projects, but when I try to use post-review against them it wants to talk to perforce instead. For instance if I enter: post-review

Re: Accessing different repo types from post-review

2010-09-21 Thread Jay
On Sep 21, 12:11 pm, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com wrote: It looks like p4 is claiming there is a perforce repo in the svn location. A quick hack/test would be to modify postreview to check svn first. I.e. hack the SCMCLIENTS def. And where would the SCMCLIENTS.def be located? Is this

Re: Accessing different repo types from post-review

2010-09-21 Thread Jan Koprowski
in file postreview.py somewhere in /usr/lib/python2.x/site-packges/rbtools/ (this could be zipped so You probably must use some smart editor which allow change files in zipped archives) On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Jay jayki...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 21, 12:11 pm, Chris Clark

Re: Accessing different repo types from post-review

2010-09-21 Thread Jay
On Sep 21, 12:11 pm, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com wrote: It looks like p4 is claiming there is a perforce repo in the svn location. A quick hack/test would be to modify postreview to check svn first. I.e. hack the SCMCLIENTS def. Let's assume this suggestion actually works since it

Re: Issue 1821 in reviewboard: Error during uploading updated diff

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 1821 by chipx86: Error during uploading updated diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1821 Likely due to a compatibility issue in Djblets. Try upgrading Djblets: $ sudo easy_install -U Djblets Then restart Apache. If

Re: Issue 1821 in reviewboard: Error during uploading updated diff

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 1821 by balabol: Error during uploading updated diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1821 As I see, I use actual version of Djblets. Output: easy_install -U Djblets Searching for Djblets Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Djblets/ Reading

Re: Issue 1821 in reviewboard: Error during uploading updated diff

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 1821 by sskrasnov: Error during uploading updated diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1821 As I see, I use actual version of Djblets. Output: easy_install -U Djblets Searching for Djblets Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Djblets/ Reading

Issue 1822 in reviewboard: When ReviewBoard cooperates with BTS(Trac, Redmine), what can you do?

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1822 by asa...@bsc.fujitsu.com: When ReviewBoard cooperates with BTS(Trac, Redmine), what can you do? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1822 What version are you running? ver 1.0.9 What operating

Re: Issue 1822 in reviewboard: When ReviewBoard cooperates with BTS(Trac, Redmine), what can you do?

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NotABug Comment #1 on issue 1822 by chipx86: When ReviewBoard cooperates with BTS(Trac, Redmine), what can you do? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1822 For now, yes, we only support creating the links. In the future, there may be better

Re: Issue 1660 in reviewboard: djblets.utils.misc.cache_memoize wrong work for large data in some cases

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 1660 by email.do.nuno: djblets.utils.misc.cache_memoize wrong work for large data in some cases http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1660 I also have this problem with v1.0.9. After the problem occurs apache keeps using 100% CPU until I restart it --

Issue 1823 in reviewboard: reports an XML file as binary when it is text.

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1823 by cppgent0: reports an XML file as binary when it is text. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1823 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What version are you running? 1.0.7

Re: Issue 1822 in reviewboard: When ReviewBoard cooperates with BTS(Trac, Redmine), what can you do?

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 1822 by asa...@bsc.fujitsu.com: When ReviewBoard cooperates with BTS(Trac, Redmine), what can you do? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1822 Please teach it one more. I understand that one review request and the ticket of the one of bug trackers can

Re: Issue 1822 in reviewboard: When ReviewBoard cooperates with BTS(Trac, Redmine), what can you do?

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 1822 by trowbrds: When ReviewBoard cooperates with BTS(Trac, Redmine), what can you do? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1822 You can link as many tickets as you like, separated by commas. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 1822 in reviewboard: When ReviewBoard cooperates with BTS(Trac, Redmine), what can you do?

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 1822 by asa...@bsc.fujitsu.com: When ReviewBoard cooperates with BTS(Trac, Redmine), what can you do? http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1822 Thank you very much for your quick reply. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Issue 1824 in reviewboard: unable to easy_install 1.5rc2

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1824 by latchkey: unable to easy_install 1.5rc2 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1824 Excited for rc2! I already have rc1 installed. I'm looking at:

Re: Issue 1821 in reviewboard: Error during uploading updated diff

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #4 on issue 1821 by sskrasnov: Error during uploading updated diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1821 If my previous comment was misunderstand, I explain more detailed. I try to update Djblets with easy_install tool, and get message, that I have actual version

Re: Issue 1821 in reviewboard: Error during uploading updated diff

2010-09-21 Thread reviewboard
Comment #5 on issue 1821 by chipx86: Error during uploading updated diff http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1821 Okay, this looks like a regression caused by the newer Djblets. Try to uninstall your old Djblets (you'll need to remove