Hi,
I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not
conflict with the issues of using Python 2.4.
Rohan.
On Jun 9, 5:37 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I should point out (we'll make an official announcement when the time comes,
though it'll be a while)
Rohan,
Did You read and try:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/installation/linux/ ?
Regards,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:35 PM, ROAAN rohan.raiza...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am using Python 2.6 which i suppose should be fine and should not
conflict with the issues of using
Jan,
Yes I have been following the exact sequence of steps outlined there.
Actually, I have read it so many times that its memorized to me :-).
Anyhow, one thing which I think might be causing the issue is that I
am having easy_install-2.6, easy_install-2.5. Since the python
version I am using is
Hello all,
For the record, my problem was caused by a corruption of our mysql backend.
(ran out of spaceunbelievable, but I must come clean)
I figured this out and then ran some mysqlcheck type of actions to repair.
We are good now.
Thank you all!
Chris
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:38 PM,
Hi,
I just upgraded to 1.6 beta 2 porting my database over. I was using
1.5 before, with email working ok. I left the email settings intact,
using MS online services. The settings are -
Mail server: Smtp.mail.microsoftonline.com
Port: 587
[checked] Use TLS for authentication
I now get this
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for server_name.
What does nslookup server_name say?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've been trying to run post-review but have been running into a
requested URL could not
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Both return
Name: server_name.domain
Address: ip_address
On Jun 10, 11:15 am, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
You appear to have a DNS problem:
Unable to
Are you using a full server path starting with http:// ? Are you
behind a proxy server?
Christian
On Friday, June 10, 2011, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
I ran nslookup server_name from both server_name (XP server) and
from a sparc-solaris2.10 machine.
Hi Daryl,
The only thing I know has changed on our end is the addition of a Sender:
header. It shouldn't break anything, but perhaps they're strict and
disconnect you early. I don't know what has changed in Django, but maybe
something broke there.
To rule out Review Board as the cause, go into
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:29 PM, ROAAN rohan.raiza...@gmail.com wrote:
Jan,
Yes I have been following the exact sequence of steps outlined there.
Actually, I have read it so many times that its memorized to me :-).
Anyhow, one thing which I think might be causing the issue is that I
am
Jeb,
We faced the same and have come to a manual workaround. We organize around
SCRs (Software Change Requests), with one review per SCR. This leads to a
complication in that each review can have multiple revisions (since an SCR
can have multiple changesets) and multiple files per revision.
Yes, I am using the full server path name with http://
We do have a proxy server, but both the requester and target are
within the proxy server.
On Jun 10, 11:29 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Are you using a full server path starting with http:// ? Are you
behind a proxy
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not the fully
qualified name? If so, that may be part of your problem (throwing out
guesses). Have you tried using the fully qualified name?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tucker,
Thanks for the reply.
Sorry for not listing all the output, but company policy prohibits me
from doing that.
Yes, the error lists the hostname and FQDN
Also, we do give it the FQDN following the --server option
On Jun 10, 2:56 pm, Tucker j...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the error actually only list the hostname and not
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. Regardless
of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your Internet
settings, on Windows), it may still use the proxy server on post-review.
The error output looks very much like it came from a proxy server, meaning
Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt
window do the trick?
On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We've seen people run into this sort of error with proxy servers. Regardless
of your client-side proxy server configuration (say, in your
I know at least on Linux, the http_proxy variable is respected. I don't know
about on Windows. A common problem on Linux is that people will have that
set, in order for other things to work correctly, and then post-review will
pick it up. Some people use an alias or wrapper so that doesn't happen.
Sorry Chrisitan, never mind, I misread your post. I'll do some more
digging for overriding the proxy configuration
On Jun 10, 4:51 pm, ptrchen ptrc...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, so would setting the environment variable in the command prompt
window do the trick?
On Jun 10, 4:32 pm, Christian
This is interesting. First, when I tried removing the Sender e-mail
address, after clicking Save the default noreply came back. And I
got the same error both with noreply and when using the codereviews@
internal email I created (that was working before). I also tried
modifying the code in
Comment #1 on issue 2133 by mattginz...@gmail.com: chrome 12 scrolls
backwards in diff viewer
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2133
I upgraded from Chrome 11 to 12 on another host (also Mac OS X 10.6.7) and
see exactly the same result. Reproducible for me at least.
Comment #3 on issue 2101 by lauren...@gmail.com: Files changed links don't
work with Google Chrome 12.0.742.53
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2101
Version 13.0.782.13 in the dev channel fixes this
I usually don't install those dev builds. Do you think it'll be in
Comment #4 on issue 2101 by mattginz...@gmail.com: Files changed links
don't work with Google Chrome 12.0.742.53
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2101
Thanks. Do you have a bug link at chrome/chromium to reference?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2135 by yos...@hotmail.com: clearcase.py failing on CentOS 5
(Python 2.4)
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2135
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 2134 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diff breaks the review
board.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2134
How did you create your diff? How did you create the review request?
--
You received this message because you are
24 matches
Mail list logo
