I don't want to distract from my original post but in short I had to move RB to
a new machine (old HD was failing.) Plus I've been meaning to upgrade for a
long time and this was my opportunity. Plus I had till end of today to get RB
up and working (it actually took only a couple of hours).
Thanks for the suggestion! Less than 10 lines of ruby and its done. Would be
nice to have the output cleaned up a little and as a pdf but zipping the files
as is will do fine for now.
John
Sent from my Kindle Fire
_
From: scott.quesne...@gmail.com
Thanks Christian !
I've installed Review Board 1.7 Beta1 in production environment on Apache.
But it is showing Review Board is taking a nap
message when I access.
Please tell what's the wrong with this setup?
Thanks,
KVR
On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 2:27:45 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
There's a number of things that can go wrong, hence my advice that you don't
install in a production environment.
First thing to check is the reviewboard.log file and see if there's any
information there that points to the problem.
The Apache error log may also be useful.
Christian
On Sep
Hi,
We have a RB setup that has around ~50 users utilizing both post-review and
the RB UI.
As of today, all users are able to login successfully, however we have one
user that is not able
to utilize post-review for some reason. Based on the debug output, the
post-review command
thinks we
Thanks Christian !
Resolved this issue by installing pycrypto2.6.
Now the site is up but not displayed properly, so checking the Apache error
log.
Thanks,
KVR
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a number of things that can go wrong, hence my
Solved,
This turned out to be an issue with some proxy settings in the users .kshrc
file.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:20 AM, jacob.j.rosales
jacob.j.rosa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
We have a RB setup that has around ~50 users utilizing both post-review
and the RB UI.
As of today, all users are
Hi everyone,
The post-review ClearCase client is supposed to be working both with
dynamic and snapshot views. Although, in case of snapshot views it
fails when review contains new files.
The problem is related to the diff_directories() function which
doesn't work with snapshot views.
Dear Christian,
I setup refer to this link
http://www.rramsden.ca/blog/2011/09/26/nginx-reviewboard/.
My configuration is below:
server {
listen 80;
server_name review.mysite.com;
root /var/www/review.mysite.com/htdocs/;
location /media {
root
check if user's profile already exist, if yes then delete it and ask user
to try again login
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:50 PM, jacob.j.rosales
jacob.j.rosa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
We have a RB setup that has around ~50 users utilizing both post-review
and the RB UI.
As of today, all users are
We need a positive way to indicate that a review was done. Currently we use
a manual process of adding an OK comment to each code review by each
reviewer. When all comments are OK, then we know the review passed.
This process worked ok in 1.0.7 but fails for us in the current version
because the
Host OS WIndows XP
RBTools 0.4.1
shell is MKS ksh
GnuWin32 diff tools installed and in PATH
Host has PerForce and Subversion installed and configured.
CWD is SVN workspace C:/viewsvn/sosmain
dano@USENDESKELID1E svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: C:\viewsvn\sosmain
URL:
Hi, sorry to horn in on this thread, but I'm having a similar issue.
I'm trying to install version 1.5.5 on a test machine so I can then upgrade
it to the current version before doing so on my production machine.
When I attempt to use the command you list, easy_install ReviewBoard==1.5.5
I get
Christian,
Thanks for the response. We're going to try a couple of things on our
workflow tomorrow to see if we can leverage the issues feature. You've
brought up some good points and perhaps we can use them to our advantage.
BTW we found the checkbox Always open an issue when comment box opens
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2724 by kvr@gmail.com: Ship it when issues are open
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2724
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need immediate support,
Updates:
Status: NotABug
Comment #1 on issue 2724 by trowb...@gmail.com: Ship it when issues are open
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2724
This is the intended behavior. One fairly common use case is for multiple
people to each sign off on a piece of the code. We
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2725 by davwill...@gmail.com: Failed to Update Diff in existing
Review Request
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2725
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you
17 matches
Mail list logo
