Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that in BitNami we have already released installers, vms and cloud images for ReviewBoard 1.7.4. You can get them in http://bitnami.org/stack/reviewboard Best regards, Victoria. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Ah,

Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released

Great! Thanks Victoria :) We'll work out something at some point to link to your builds for Windows users in the docs and site. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Feb 1, 2013, at 12:22 AM,

Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Great! Thanks Victoria :) We'll work out something at some point to link to your builds for Windows users in the docs and site. Hey! Thanks but we are still working on Windows :) I plan to send you a beta build

Re: Review Board 1.7.4 released

On Feb 1, 2013, at 12:34 AM, victoria ka...@bitrock.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Great! Thanks Victoria :) We'll work out something at some point to link to your builds for Windows users in the docs and site. Hey! Thanks but

Re: GitHub private repo with RB

Google fucked up all attached images. Sorry. All was attached properly. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe

Re: RB server upgrade from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4

Thanks Christian for the response. Good to hear that upgrade is possible from 1.6.1 to 1.7.4 RB version, apart from the database backup do we need to take care of any thing else which will disturb our production setup and in case of any issue we should be able to go back to our original state, if

Re: GitHub private repo with RB

Hi Igor, I don't know what you'd need the WebHook for. Sounds like you're set up to use Review Board with GitHub. We don't work with pull requests, if that's what you're asking. We don't have support on our side, and even if we want to add them, there's a challenge in figuring out how username

Re: a couple of issues post 1.7.1 upgrade

I am also seeing this issue. Did you ever find a solution for this? - Loke On Monday, January 7, 2013 5:46:49 PM UTC+1, Dave Preston wrote: Ok I’ll give that a shot and report back. Thanks again Christian. Dave *From:* revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: [mailto:

Re: a couple of issues post 1.7.1 upgrade

That's concerning. I've spent a lot of time trying to test some of the Subversion cases that were reported, but I haven't hit the problems that were reported, and that code really hasn't changed in any significant ways since 1.6.14... Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review

Re: GitHub private repo with RB

Hi Christian, We already use RB with SVN for a few years. It is in post commit mode. So there is SVN hook which tells RB about commit, RB pulls it and creates reviews. On pictures attached, I think, I configured RB to be able to pull but what will tell RB about GitHub commit if not a web hook

Issue 2885 in reviewboard: Hide whitespace changes toggle not working in diff viewer

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2885 by btho...@gmail.com: Hide whitespace changes toggle not working in diff viewer http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2885 * NOTE: For customer support, please post to * *

Re: Issue 2885 in reviewboard: Hide whitespace changes toggle not working in diff viewer

Comment #1 on issue 2885 by trowb...@gmail.com: Hide whitespace changes toggle not working in diff viewer http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2885 Can you put this up on http://reviews.reviewboard.org/ ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2884 in reviewboard: links with ampersand () are truncated

Comment #1 on issue 2884 by rajas...@gmail.com: links with ampersand () are truncated http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2884 I tested on 1.7.2 and 1.7.4 and dont seem to have this problem. Attaching screenshot. Is this how you modified the description? Attachments: