Re: Using Powerpack

2014-04-04 Thread Abhijit Patil
Hi David, Thanks for your quick reply. while running below given command on Terminal, I got an easy_install error. Can you please help me to resolve this error. root@127:/home/config# easy_install -U -f http://downloads.beanbaginc.com/powerpack/ ReviewBoardPowerPack Traceback (most recent

Re: Review Board 2.0 RC 2 is released

2014-04-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/02/2014 08:53 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone! Review Board 2.0 RC 2 is out. We've fixed up a number of edge cases that were reported, as well as providing a few useful additions for administrators. Please give this release a try. We're just about done with 2.0! See our

Re: rbt post fails without manual fetch of git repo changes

2014-04-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/03/2014 07:14 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: That's why we recommend using something like cgit/gitweb on your main git server instead. We can then use that to access the files we need directly. This is all due to the lack of support for accessing individual files through the Git

Re: Issues found while adding/modifying Repositories in Review Board 1.7.22

2014-04-04 Thread Vinod Vijayakumar
Hi, I am hoping this will be fixed in the upcoming release. Any idea when we can expect the next release? Thanks, Vinod On Monday, March 24, 2014 4:36:39 PM UTC+5:30, Vinod Vijayakumar wrote: *What version are you running?* 1.7.22 *What's the URL of the page containing the problem?*

Re: Using Powerpack

2014-04-04 Thread Abhijit Patil
Congratulations.Thanks David. Review board site is working good as well as I am able to review PDF format with proper template. Thanks David for your Promt suppot. Thanks Abhijit Patil Emerson Pune On Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:23:18 AM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote: Dhananjay,

Re: Using Powerpack

2014-04-04 Thread dhananjayj602
David, Thanks for the support. The upgraded Powerpack works fine with Chrome but not with IE10. In IE10 the uploaded PDF is shown half cut and inverted when it is opened for review. Please check. Regards, Dhananjay. On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 6:53:18 PM UTC-5, David Trowbridge wrote:

Post Commit Review

2014-04-04 Thread dhananjayj602
Hi, We are using Win-7 on client machines and the RB server is installed on Linux machine. Now, for creating the post commit review do we need to install the RBTools on client machine i.e on Win-7? Regards, Dhananjay. -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at

Unapplied Evolutions error possibly Django related after installing 2.0 RC2. Can upgrade a second time to remove the error and site functions, but admin console and account preferences return ERR:

2014-04-04 Thread Zachary Gallagher
*[root@mercury html]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/html/reviewboard* *Rebuilding directory structure* *Updating database. This may take a while.* *The log output below, including warnings and errors,* *can be ignored unless upgrade fails.* *-- begin log output --*

Re: Post Commit Review

2014-04-04 Thread dhananjayj602
To be precise, would you recommend us to use the RBTools on Client side which is a Windows environment or use the Graphic UI for uploading the diffs. On Friday, April 4, 2014 4:11:51 PM UTC-5, dhanan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We are using Win-7 on client machines and the RB server is

Re: Post Commit Review

2014-04-04 Thread Christian Hammond
We recommend always using RBTools. For some types of repositories, RBTools is required in order to generate a diff with enough information for us to fetch the files for the side-by-side diff view. Some other types of repositories have compatible diffs, but have various problems with how they

Re: Unapplied Evolutions error possibly Django related after installing 2.0 RC2. Can upgrade a second time to remove the error and site functions, but admin console and account preferences return

2014-04-04 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Zachary, As per the instructions, everything within the begin/end log output can be ignored if the install is successful. Those messages you saw about unapplied evolutions were just part of the normal upgrade path, and were then successfully applied. From this end, it looks like everything