Re: Image diffs in 2.0

2014-05-14 Thread David Trowbridge
Sean, The basic framework is in place, but there are a number of complications with binary files in the diff viewer that we didn't solve in time for 2.0, so it's not yet enabled. It's on the roadmap for the next major version. -David On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:15 PM, sean...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Renaming Repositories

2014-05-14 Thread Daniel Laird
That sorted it - thank you. Cheers Dan On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 21:49:26 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote: The fix itself is in djblets 1.7.26. If you upgrade to Review Board 1.7.25 you'll get the latest djblets along with it. -David On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Daniel Laird

Re: Mercurial and kerberos: can't post review

2014-05-14 Thread Peter Burka
I've tried to work around this problem so that I can evaluate the product. I created a local clone of the Mercurial repository and have added that to ReviewBoard instead of the kerberized remote one. When I clone that repository, make a change, and try to create a review I get the following

CVS 1.12 on ReviewBoard

2014-05-14 Thread Jason Woodrich
Greetings, I'm had a problem with adding a CVS repository running on CVS 1.11. I'm accessing it using ssh with a key and my CVSROOT is valid. When I click Save on the Add Repository page it returns the message A repository was not found at the specified path. This is on CentOS 6 with both

Re: CVS 1.12 on ReviewBoard

2014-05-14 Thread David Trowbridge
Jason, Thanks for the report. Would you mind filing a bug on our issue tracker? https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/entry -David On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Jason Woodrich jwoodr...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, I'm had a problem with adding a CVS repository running on CVS

Re: CVS 1.12 on ReviewBoard

2014-05-14 Thread David Trowbridge
Actually, one question, too. Does 'cvs -f -d cvsroot version' actually check that the cvsroot is valid, or does it just check that the local cvs binary runs? The goal of this method is to verify the remote repository. -David On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Jason Woodrich jwoodr...@gmail.com

Re: How to get the issue ID

2014-05-14 Thread Dhananjay Joshi
On Monday, April 14, 2014 10:15:54 PM UTC+5:30, Dhananjay Joshi wrote: Hello, In the document/code reviews how to get a separate Issue ID for the issues reported during the review. Right now there is no issue id specified in the issue table (please see the attachment). PLease help.

Re: Issue 2054 in reviewboard: RBTools-0.3.2 + Perforce - failed to upload diff when source file is a new file

2014-05-14 Thread reviewboard
Comment #6 on issue 2054 by 308007...@qq.com: RBTools-0.3.2 + Perforce - failed to upload diff when source file is a new file http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2054 Thank you for #3 roasti...@gmail.com. In Ubuntu ,the path is /usr/lib/python27 And if your os language is

Issue 3341 in reviewboard: 'Security Checklist' link gives http 500 due to permission problem

2014-05-14 Thread reviewboard
Status: PendingReview Owner: trowb...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Admin Milestone-Release2.0 New issue 3341 by trowb...@gmail.com: 'Security Checklist' link gives http 500 due to permission problem http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3341 The

Issue 3342 in reviewboard: ADS authentication not available after upgrade

2014-05-14 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3342 by tjbut...@gmail.com: ADS authentication not available after upgrade http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3342 *** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING! *** *** You must complete this form in its entirety, or