Hi Peer, Did you ever find a solution to the problem with he diffs not displaying in RB? I've just hit the same issue.
Thanks, Mark On Wednesday, 17 October 2012 08:45:05 UTC+1, Peer wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > can we install an older version of RB 1.6.11 & its dependencies using > easy_install with net connectivity. if yes please let me know the proc for > it. > > Thanks. > Peer > > > > On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 4:33:50 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote: >> >> You can't. We require easy_install. You can download every dependency, >> and easy_install them manually, but we don't provide any list of what you'd >> need. >> >> We're dropping support for installing on Windows, as it tends to be a >> support nightmare, isn't as efficient, and not all of our dependencies work >> well on it. We'll require Linux going forward. If you're a Windows shop, >> you can try installing in a Linux VM, or look into hosting at >> http://rbcommons.com/ >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com >> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Peer <peerm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Also Christian pls let me know how to install RB in windows without >>> easy-install / offline >>> >>> Thanks >>> Peer >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:18:24 PM UTC+5:30, Peer wrote: >>>> >>>> the above traceback err was for the diff uploaded wich was generated >>>> manually by diff -uN, >>>> below trace back is for diff uploaded by post-review, and yes i use >>>> dynamic views and the oid is ther for the file and starts with ==== >>>> >>>> The file 'M:/reviews/sw0/triggers.txt@@/main/2' (r\main\2) could not >>>> be found in the repository >>>> >>>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>>> File "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12- >>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\views.py", line 254, in view_diff >>>> populate_diff_chunks(temp_files, highlighting) >>>> File "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12- >>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 1182, in >>>> populate_diff_chunks >>>> large_data=True) >>>> File >>>> "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\Djblets-0.6.23-py2.5.egg\djblets\util\misc.py", >>>> >>>> line 156, in cache_memoize >>>> data = lookup_callable() >>>> File "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12- >>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 1181, in <lambda> >>>> enable_syntax_highlighting)), >>>> File "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12- >>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 588, in get_chunks >>>> old = get_original_file(filediff) >>>> File "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12- >>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 368, in >>>> get_original_file >>>> large_data=True)[0] >>>> File >>>> "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\Djblets-0.6.23-py2.5.egg\djblets\util\misc.py", >>>> >>>> line 156, in cache_memoize >>>> data = lookup_callable() >>>> File "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12- >>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 367, in <lambda> >>>> data = cache_memoize(key, lambda: [fetch_file(file, revision)], >>>> File "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12- >>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 347, in fetch_file >>>> data = repository.get_file(file, revision) >>>> File "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12- >>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\scmtools\models.py", line 155, in get_file >>>> return self.get_scmtool().get_file(path, revision) >>>> File "c:\python25\lib\site-packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12- >>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\scmtools\clearcase.py", line 235, in get_file >>>> raise FileNotFoundError(extended_path, revision) >>>> FileNotFoundError: The file 'M:/reviews/sw0/triggers.txt@@/main/2' >>>> (r\main\2) could not be found in the repository >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Monday, October 15, 2012 10:06:29 PM UTC+5:30, Tomasz Moń wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Peer <peerm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > i tried using uploading diff generated by diff -uN/diff -c (or) >>>>> post-review >>>>> > (submit diff of checked-out files), all of them diff get broken >>>>> after some >>>>> > time) >>>>> >>>>> If you submitted patch using post-review, the extended_path should >>>>> include version information (the fabulous '@@'). In your traceback it >>>>> appears to be missing. >>>>> In that case, for Dynamic Clear Case Views, it will try to apply the >>>>> patch on current version of the file, so it breaks when both: >>>>> a) file version changes (for example, review gets shipped) >>>>> b) the old file version disappears from cache >>>>> >>>>> When using postreview the patches should include oids, and then the >>>>> ReviewBoard should output correct version and extended paths. You can >>>>> check if your patches contain the oids, by downloading those and >>>>> checking for lines starting/ending with four equal signs (====). >>>>> >>>> -- >>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at >>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ >>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ >>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en >>> >> >> -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
