Re: Index failure after upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.16

2017-10-05 Thread Christian Hammond
Strange.. Okay, I want to run something else. $ rb-site manage /var/www/reviews shell import reviewboard print reviewboard.VERSION print reviewboard.__file__ import haystack print haystack.__version__ print haystack.__file__ That'll just help me verify that the versions and paths we're seeing

Re: Index failure after upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.16

2017-10-05 Thread 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard
Here you go... >>> import reviewboard >>> print reviewboard.VERSION (2, 5, 16, 0, u'final', 0, True) >>> print reviewboard.__file__ /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/reviewboard/__init__.pyc >>> import haystack >>> print haystack.__version__ (2, 1, 1, u'dev') >>> print haystack.__file__

Re: Index failure after upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.16

2017-10-05 Thread 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard
Hi Chris, Yep, its True. # rb-site manage /var/www/reviews shell Python 2.7.5 (default, Aug 4 2017, 00:39:18) [GCC 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-16)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. (InteractiveConsole) >>> from reviewboard.reviews.models import

Re: Index failure after upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.16

2017-10-05 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Rob, That's the version listed in the source code for the version of Haystack being run. Not sure if that indicates a packaging problem or what, but it's very strange. Could you show me that one line in fields.py? Christian On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 13:22 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard <

Re: Index failure after upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.16

2017-10-05 Thread 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard
Perhaps we're able to add some kind of debugging to the indexing to provide more info? Thanks Rob On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 09:12:26 UTC+1, Rob Backhurst wrote: > > Hi, > > I upgraded our ReviewBoard system from 2.5.10 to 2.5.16 - since then, > indexing doesn't seem to complete. > The index

Re: Verbose Debug Info?

2017-10-05 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, It's not normal on an Ubuntu install to hit a 500 error like this. If you're seeing a 500 this early, it's usually something failing before any requests even get to Review Board. These might appear in the apache error_log in the Review Board site directory's logs/ directory, or maybe in

Re: Index failure after upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.16

2017-10-05 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Rob, Looks like the version of Haystack being run is claiming to be 2.1.1 dev. I don't know what this version might be doing for the attribute lookup, but I'd start by trying to solve the version issue, make sure you're running a 2.3.x release. I would be interested to find out what line 86

Re: Recently our Sub version server got patched and now our from review board instance, I am unable to create any review request- failing with (400 Bad Request)

2017-10-05 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, Do you have any relevant logs you can show, and a full repro case? I don't really have any context to go off of here. What kind of work was done on the server? Christian On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:42 AM, venkata kumar wrote: > Hi Team, > > Recently our Sub version

Re: Verbose Debug Info?

2017-10-05 Thread dduncan
Hi Christian, Thank you for the reply. There is no log being generated in the Review Board folder, but I did see something I hadn't noticed before in the apache log: [Thu Oct 05 06:25:03.401752 2017] [wsgi:warn] [pid 17317:tid > 140477232400256] mod_wsgi: Compiled for Python/2.7.11. > [Thu

Re: Verbose Debug Info?

2017-10-05 Thread dduncan
Forgot to mention in last message: I talked it over with my supervisor and, to the best of our knowledge, there are no other Web Services running on that server. On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 4:08:36 PM UTC-4, ddu...@aviationintertec.com wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > Thank you for the reply.

Re: Index failure after upgrade to ReviewBoard 2.5.16

2017-10-05 Thread 'Rob Backhurst' via reviewboard
Hi Christian, We deinately only have version 2.3.1 installed. python-django-haystack 2.3.1-1.el7 Why would it think we're using 2.1.1 dev? Can we force it to look in the correct place? Thanks Rob On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 09:12:26 UTC+1, Rob Backhurst wrote: > > Hi, > > I upgraded our