itself in the conf
directory of the site? Im running as the admin of the server as well
so have full rights over the files.
If anyone could give me a hint as to what to look at i really want to
get this sorted, Review Board seems like a great tool if only i could
get it working :)
Thanks,
Chris
.
The main reason i point this out is as great of a tool as review board
is, i'd hate to see no-one use it cause the install process is too
hard.
Thanks for the assistance so far, glad to get it up an running :)
Chris
On May 9, 11:08 am, tom december1...@gmail.com wrote:
Plus we're really Linux guys
want it to get into
trunk, is this possible? i.e. can we stop people committing to trunk,
or is that more something we need to deal with at a people level not
an automation level?
Cheers,
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
:/main)?
Thx best regards,
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
are started)? This would be more robust as you wouldn't have to maintain
a list of binary extensions.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email
work. I've tried cygwin
and the problem persists! Then I tried to delete the file where the
problem is happening... and it works!
I don't know if it will be a common error or just really bad luck.
Doh! I'd be interested to hear if it occurs again.
Chris
using the built in web server).
Turned out in my case I had a mix of bad diffs and bad code in my diff
parser. Probably not relevant to you but I had issues with tabs and
spaces getting switched (due to copy/paste in a terminal).
Good luck!
Chris
to do away with it but I've
not spent any time working out how that will be done :-) The reason for
this was that I wanted the raw diffs that come out to match the diffs
that are uploaded and I needed to put back part of the special header.
Chris
/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/490a3281fd7867a7/64c910b24e3e0790?lnk=gstq=10054#64c910b24e3e0790
Chris
13Strider wrote:
when i try to run post-review with publish enabled i get this error
also when updating a file or setting a target group or target people,
i looks like the error is coming
()
.
parser.add_option(-l, --filelist_filename,
dest=piccolo_flist, default=None,
help='File containing list of files in change.')
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
on files to see if they are text/plain or not.
Subversion won't try and diff binary files so there should be no need to
put this logic in post-review. Where should maybe famous last words,
I'm not using subversion with reviewboard so I've not actually sat down
and tested this.
Chris
/source/browse/trunk/reviewboard/contrib/tools/post-review
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
/issue). The pull from
trunk also updated dbjlets, etc.
I don't need fixes but wanted to share this in case other people hit
this too (and in case I'm deploying incorrectly).
Thanks!
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
but that did not work either. What could be the cause
here? Am I missing some setting?
I've a vague recollection that RB uses a custom colour/color set. Might
be worth checking into that in svn (possibly removing it as a test?).
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
called when I tried to use my new scm.
I used a mix of live debugging in pdb and the occasional print statement.
Chris
tilek wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to create a new SCMTool that is used to connent a PVCS
repository.
I read the python code and I think, I must create a new class
eg.PVCSTool
server.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
I have tried this and still no luck. I have confirmed that svn+ssh
works without any problems from the command line using the webserver
user.
Thanks,
Chris
On Apr 3, 10:38 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Just found this. Maybe it'll help.
http://www.mail-archive.com/versi
may not work for everyone.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
. Diffs show up very
clearly.
Does this appeal to anyone? #1 above would make my life easier. I wanted
to get a feel from a wide audience before posting a for patch for review
where it may not be seen by so many people.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
on this I think.
However this could be an opportunity for some enterprising person to
offer (fee base) ReviewBoard hosting.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post
/
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
above would need to be thrashed out, it is more the
idea that you can override with a search initiated if there is no setting.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard group.
To post
It would be nice if this was customizable. We'd prefer to have a no-reply
account send mail, so that people are forced to go to the website instead of
starting email threads. Has anyone done this kind of thing?
C
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Manny Rodriques
http://code.google.com/p/python-patch/wiki/README
pure python patch tool (only handles unified diffs though).
I've not tested it out but it may be useful to Windows users running a
server who do not want to install binaries.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
.
The closest/similar thing is http://swapoff.org/pyndexter which is not
Django specific (but has not been updated in a while).
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us
the best chance.
Chris
David Resnick wrote:
Understood. I'll see about filing that bug.
Thanks all for your help!
-David
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Christian Hammond
chip...@chipx86.com mailto:chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We don't have the time to check every version of every
/distutils.core/setuptools/' setup.py setuptools_setup.py
python setuptools_setup.py develop
cd ..
Could http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/ be
updated with something like the above, just after the djblets section
before the Review Board section?
Thanks!
Chris
Chris Clark wrote:
I'm setting up a new dev environment for some hacking and I'm following:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/#gettingstarted
After using git to get the reviewboard source and using
./contrib/internal/prepare-dev.py I get errors about
out the review number. I ended up
browsing http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/ and looking at the top to
work out it had created one. Similar behavior if I just do a git diff
and try and use the web interface (i.e. get int arg required error).
Help!
Chris
the
database. So this upgrade was a real pleasure, rb-site is awesome!
Not sure if this will be useful to everyone but thought I'd share the
information just in case.
I'll find out tomorrow what my users see :-)
Thanks again to Chris, David, and everyone else for making ReviewBoard
available
be used.
If I get burned by this later with other security stuff I'll report
back :-)
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
this myself though :-(
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
but
someone else is welcome to make a stab at it. Do you have the original
review for read from stdin? Maybe they would be interested in completing
this.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org
. I don't have a strong
preference (inclined to retain existing behavior) but it would be good
to know if this is a bug or a behavior change.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate
this is NOT a
Reviewboard issue but I wanted to see if anyone else was seeing this
intermittently?
Thanks!
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http
Out of curiosity what size limit is this likely to be? 80 chars, 1024,
1Mb, 1Gb... :-)
Chris
Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Ronak,
We will be limiting the lengths of these fields in a future version.
We're aware of the problem and have encountered this with some users
too. Expect a field
, 80/20 ratio
for Description /Testing length.
This way you get some real world numbers on lengths before you make the
call.
I'm lucky I've not seen this limit yet!
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know
that is the beast
causing the issue here if you want a quick solution. Either monkey patch
urllib OR monkey patch _winreg lookup that urllib relies on.
As the real Chris said, improving postreview and getting the code into
the main git repo is the ideal solution here. You may be the first to
hit
Have you tried using the:
--server=
flag?
RE the version of reviewboard, if this is a new install I would go ahead
and use 1.0.5.1 this shouldn't impact the error you are seeing but why
use an old version when you can use the new stable one ;-)
Chris
Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi
Try the --submit-as flag instead. e.g.:
post-review --submit-as=A myfile
post-review --submit-as=B myfile
Christian Hammond wrote:
Known bug. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=762
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
qhlonline wrote:
在2009-12-23，Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com 写道：
Try the --submit-as flag instead. e.g.:
post-review --submit-as=A myfile
post-review --submit-as=B myfile
But We need that the loged user and the submiter to be the same
user. We are desiring detaied
name,
then it worked fine, but we don't necessarily want to do this.
Is this a bug or am I missing something?
Try specifying the full address/url. e.g:
post-review --server=http://reviewboard.myinternaldomain.prv
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
basic Python skills. Option #2 requires basic
SQL skills.
If you create useful scripts they would be good to post back to the
mailing list.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org
in the .reviewboardrc file
(again you would need to implement this logic). These would probably be
good contributions back for post-review if you do work on this.
Chris
qhlonline wrote:
Hi,sir.
I have met this problem before. post-review's CVSClient now get the
host name of CVS Server through
force but it works :-)
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard
, authentication isn't support with RB 1.0.
If you have the new version the config for auth should be obvious in the
web admin - again should be I'm not using either CVS or any auth
options for the SCM with ReviewBoard.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http
but it would need to
be generic and would probably need a lot of thought to cover all the
different SCMs (it may be more appropriate do this via the plug-in
architecture that Christian has mentioned will be available for later
releases of RB).
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project
You may be interested to see what I did with the mercurial-reviewboard
postreview extension solving this exact issue.
You can find the patch here:
http://code.google.com/p/mercurial-reviewboard/issues/detail?id=8
Chris Bayley
On Dec 3 2009, 2:13 pm, Akhilesh akhileshjo...@gmail.com wrote
that
doesn't do smtp but offers the same API, you would probably only
need to implement sendmail() and pass for all the other methods.
Then you could post to IRC, Jabber, etc.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us
Park, Newcastle upon Tyne,
NE13 9AA. Registered number 1045967
Small world, way back when I used to work on a Point of Sale application
that used Sage for stock levels tracking (MS DOS days) :-)
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate
into source code
control (which is a semi-manual process). What we'd find useful would be
a json call (possibly called from postreview) to mark the review as
submitted (if this is already present please let me know).
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http
is really for posting code so this is
changing the behavior slightly. I think it does fit into what postreview
is used for, tying in working copies to reviews.
If you do this, I'd love to get a copy :-)
Chris
Christian Hammond wrote:
Are you storing and sending the cookie? We handle authentication
? If I want to
send email anonymously, What should I do to change the Reviewboard source?
Anon works for me with 1.0.5.1, where anon means no auth specified (just
the server/port) and the email gets sent as the owner of the review.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate
then include this as an option to postreview (I've added built
in support for our SCM tool for already committed code as it makes
seeing what was changed easier even if the code isn't being reviewed, it
is also good for generating test data for postreview).
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board
, restarted and problem stayed away.
Anyone ever see anything similar? Sharing a memcached instance between
reviewboards should be doable, shouldn't it?
- Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:
Are you running subdir installs? It's possible that could cause problems.
Yup, I'm betting that's it. We have a central reviewboard server with
subdirs. Should I look at patching that code in djblets?
- Chris
through reviewboard. Then (re-)edit with
the real change and the diff will be fine as you would expect.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
your best option (especially if
you have tests as part of the build bot, you could add additional
rejection checks).
I've deliberately minimized the procedures/policies we have for RB at
our site so this isn't something I plan on implementing myself but I can
see the value.
Chris
--
Want
Chris Clark wrote:
Follow up after a days usage after the upgrade.
Follow up a number of months later :-)
It turns out I also hit a problem with missing screenshots, but no error
for the user see:
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/d158d97bf5344847
created uncommitted files
using ReviewBoard?
From memory I'm sure postreview does this for you (it has been a while
since I added a file in svn so I'm a little hazy).
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know
don't have any
recommendations).
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
).
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
it there. The apache setup under Linux is pretty
automatic and so much easier to deploy, no messing around with patch, etc.
There are a few Windows users so hopefully you'll get some more windows
focused advice if you are stuck with Windows.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate
, I've done it for my team as we needed
a bunch of customizations which really aren't appropriate for anyone else.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
dependencies (not many),
e.g. a version module. So you should take the whole thing. You can of
course make an exe from it very easily. See end of mail for the custom
setup script I use.
Chris
Issue:
NOTE using Python 2.4, this results in an exe about 4Mb in size.
NOTE using Python 2.6
that is required?
Let me pose a question to you ;-)
How are you going to submit just *.c and *.h files to subversion when
you come to commit? There is no reviewboard involved at that stage.
Postreview will accept the same filenames on command line that
subversion will take at submit time.
Chris
idea, we can start finalizing the
venue and date/time.
Please e-mail me directly if you'd be interested in going.
I'd be interested. It would be good to finally meet :-)
RE timing, I work in Redwood City (commuting from east bay) so after
work weekdays would be good for me.
Chris
--
Want
.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
Jay wrote:
On Sep 21, 12:11 pm, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com wrote:
It looks like p4 is claiming there is a perforce repo in the svn
location. A quick hack/test would be to modify postreview to check svn
first. I.e. hack the SCMCLIENTS def.
Let's assume this suggestion
to more information.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard
python ./contrib/internal/prepare-dev.py
As background, I'm using Python 2.5.2 under a virtualenv with no site
packages, e.g:
virtualenv --no-site-packages rb15
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know
a sensible timezone!
Any ideas where to look for track this issue down?
The 1.5 release (not RC) has Europe/London on my machine. I'm not sure
the RC is the issue but I'd use the GA release before I starting
debugging further.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http
/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1511
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Yup, that worked. Thanks, Christian.
On Dec 31 2010, 4:21 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com
wrote:
Hi Chris,
It looks like the username/password specified for your database during
configuration was incorrect or that user doesn't have all rights on
the database.
You have to first
an email and it has not yet been saved. webchat on freenode
does this too, it can even detect window/tab closing.
Comments? This isn't meant to be a complaint, I'm trying to see if I'm
the only one seeing this.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http
looks like it has hung!
I've no idea if you are hitting these but I've been meaning to post my
experiences in this area for some time and this was a good reminder.
Chris
demo of built in diff lib cpu clobbering
really heavy cpu intensive, but performs VERY SLOWLY (it looks like it hangs
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/ and other 1.5
documentation links are returning 404s. This was working fine as of
yesterday.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org
. -http://www.vmware.com
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Chris Toomey ctdisp-reviewbo...@yahoo.com
wrote:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/and other 1.5
documentation links are returning 404s. This was working fine as of
yesterday.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board
Sorry to interject: I'm having the same problem, and I am indeed using
mod_wsgi. Specifically, if I go to https://wherever/rb/api/info/ I'm
given the standard Basic Auth box by my browser, and nothing I type in
there works...
Thanks,
Chris
On Mar 5, 12:55 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86
Oh huh, that seems like that'd be it. I couldn't try it earlier (building
flooded, power was out, then drive in the RAID started to flake) but that
worked perfectly. Thanks.
Chris
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:33:07 -0800, Christian Hammond
chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Assuming your
Christian,
Is this a Reviewboard feature or a Django one? I would have guessed
this was a Django behavior. I'm not even a Django (auth) novice, let
alone expert, so sorry if this is a dumb question!
Chris
Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Pablo,
No, there's no way to do this out of the box
does
too) but it is possible that your new code has the Unicode assumption in
it rather than the original RBtools. It is worth your while doing a
quick test with a virgin version of the latest RBTools (that traceback
would be the most helpful to people on the list).
Chris
--
Want to help
Craig A wrote:
You mention you've customized postreview ...
is it possible that your new code has the Unicode assumption in
it rather than the original RBtools.
I don't think so, the relevant line of code looks like this:
return content_type, content
The trace back
documentation.
We maybe brave soon and enable the Lucene support.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from
We're still running fine with the new release, we've had a minor issue
(which is a known issue, but without a consistent reproducing test
case). More information at
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1526#c8
We're still pleased we've upgraded :-)
Chris
Christian Hammond
Craig A wrote:
This may well be fixed by trying python 2.6 (or even 2.5) as you
suggested.
I tried Python 2.6.6 (could not find an msi installer for 2.5.5) and
voila! It works now, no more problems with BOM characters.
Thanks for your help Chris, I am glad this is working now
Martin wrote:
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']
What happens when you manually run:
git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
1.0.5.1
Your seeing it with: Django-1.2.3, Djblets-0.6.6, Reviewboard-1.5.1
I'm seeing it with: Django-1.3, Djblets-0.6.7, Reviewboard-1.5.5
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
Leonel, I forgot to ask, are you seeing this after an upgrade?
Chris Clark wrote:
Leonel Togniolli wrote:
Every week or so I get one of these below in the mail from my RB
server. I wasn't able to determine what triggers it, unfortunately.
Me too. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard
jh5774@samsung.com wrote:
Well, I found a little clue about encoding.
/usr/lib/python2.6/json/__init__.py
in this codes, they said python only decode 'ASCII' and 'Unicode'.
So, python couldn't decode when encounter like a 'Korean word'
I find some solution about decoding.
For example,
)
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
/thread/fad1e1741c19d606/28ccf483f4fd81e1?lnk=gstq=chris+white+space#28ccf483f4fd81e1
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
to close it. I.e. mostly automated client side
at commit time.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from
:
self.viewtype = 'snapshot'
I'm wondering if I should consider an upgrade of my postreview clients.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
.
Any ideas on why this might be failing, and how to debug it further
(where to add additional logging or where to set breakpoints, etc.)?
thanks,
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http
in RB.
Chris
On May 16, 9:12 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
When you do the HTTP POST and get the 400, what's the result payload like?
It should give a hint as to what's failing. At the very least, I'd expect an
error message for the path field.
Christian
, or instructions I can point them to for manually
installing RBTools?
I'm just giving my users a binary, seems to work well for them. They
don't have to install anything, they just but the binary in the path
along with the source code control client binary.
Chris
--
Want to help the Review Board
that was started and not completed or was I
misinterpreting how it was trying to work?
Chris
On May 17, 10:27 pm, Gilles Moris gilles.mo...@free.fr wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 07:51:07 am Chris Toomey wrote:
Hi Christian,
It just has the info about the file/revision that it says
Thanks Gilles. We'll look at switching the repository to http then.
Chris
On May 18, 11:10 pm, Gilles Moris gilles.mo...@free.fr wrote:
AFAIK, the hg serve --stdio command does not start hgweb. It just instruct
HG to start the wire protocol to listen on SSH stdin instead of a HTTP
socket
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
