Re: Review Board 2.0.1 is released

2014-05-29 Thread Cian Mc Govern
On 28 May 2014 21:07, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 05/26/2014 09:31 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Review Board 2.0.1 is out. It fixes a number of bugs that have been > > reported to us since last week's 2.0 release. > > > > A big thanks to everyone who's upgraded to 2.0 a

Re: Review Board 2.0.1 is released

2014-06-03 Thread Cian Mc Govern
On 29 May 2014 19:24, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 05/29/2014 07:19 AM, Cian Mc Govern wrote: > > On 28 May 2014 21:07, Stephen Gallagher > <mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com>> wrote: > > > > On 05/26/2014 09:31 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > > &g

Re: Review Board 2.0.5 released for EPEL 7

2014-08-12 Thread Cian Mc Govern
Thanks Stephen! I've attempted to install this in the CentOS 7 Docker container and I hit the following dependency issues: Error: Package: ReviewBoard-2.0.5-1.el7.1.noarch (epel) Requires: httpd >= 2.4.7-5 Available: httpd-2.4.6-17.el7.centos.1.x86_64 (base) h

Re: Review Board 2.0.5 released for EPEL 7

2014-08-19 Thread Cian Mc Govern
On 18 August 2014 14:19, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 08/13/2014 04:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Crud; ok, I see the problem. Unfortunately I'm sitting in an airport > > right now with insufficient Internet access to fix it. I'll try to get > > it fixed up on Friday. > > > > (Short versio

Re: se linux blocking review board

2014-08-22 Thread Cian Mc Govern
> To the professionals who work with Review Board > > I'm eager to get started with Review Board, but it's not working out of > the box. I have Fedora 20 installed, with RB 1.7.26 with httpd 2.4.10. > > I can only work ReviewBoard if I turn off selinux, i.e. "setenforce off." > We cannot do this on

Re: se linux blocking review board

2014-08-22 Thread Cian Mc Govern
On 22 August 2014 13:50, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 08/22/2014 07:04 AM, Cian Mc Govern wrote: > > > > To the professionals who work with Review Board > > > > I'm eager to get started with Review Board, but it's not working out > > of t

Repository configuration documentation typo

2014-11-04 Thread Cian Mc Govern
Hi, There's a mistake in the ReviewBoard documentation here: https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.0/admin/configuration/repositories/#raw-file-urls The gitweb url is incorrect and should be: http://git.kernel.org/?p=bluetooth/bluez-gnome.git;a=blob_plain;f= ;h= Instead of: http://git.kerne

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

2015-12-15 Thread Cian Mc Govern
On 4 December 2015 at 16:18, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Hello, folks! It's time for a big update. As many of you are probably > aware, I maintain the RPMs of Review Board that live in Fedora's EPEL > project[1] (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux). > Thanks for your work on this Stephen. No com

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

2015-12-16 Thread Cian Mc Govern
s part of my upgrade process for every version. I'll stop doing it if it can cause issues though. > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Cian Mc Govern > wrote: > >> On 4 December 2015 at 16:18, Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: >> >>> Hello, folks! It's time

Re: [Testing Needed] Review Board 2.5.2 for RHEL/CentOS 7

2015-12-17 Thread Cian Mc Govern
On 16 December 2015 at 20:02, Christian Hammond wrote: > That certainly shouldn't be necessary. Sounds like maybe there was a bad > package? > > If it ever happens again, please let me know. I want to be sure we figure > out what's causing that. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - christ..