Re: Upgraded OS , then ReviewBoard failed upgrade

2012-06-16 Thread Dan Dumont
-- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Dan Dumont ddum...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, I got things mostly up and running again by reconstructing the sql tables in a new

Re: Upgraded OS , then ReviewBoard failed upgrade

2012-06-16 Thread Dan Dumont
use a protocol relative url? //reviews.apache.org/path/to/api or do you build it off of some variable in the config? On Saturday, June 16, 2012 9:37:11 PM UTC-4, Dan Dumont wrote: Didn't touch the apache config. It's a http - https redirect (no idea why the browser isn't simply following

Re: Upgraded OS , then ReviewBoard failed upgrade

2012-06-16 Thread Dan Dumont
. target_groups: [] 12. target_people: [] 13. testing_done: 14. time_added: 2012-06-17 02:58:19 2. stat: ok Is there a setting I'm missing that controls the protocol? On Saturday, June 16, 2012 9:50:36 PM UTC-4, Dan Dumont wrote: Ahh ok. So a bit more info: http

Re: Upgraded OS , then ReviewBoard failed upgrade

2012-06-16 Thread Dan Dumont
if you guys could just return protocol relative urls //reviewboard.apache.org/etc... Any advice on where to stick that config setting to force https urls? On Saturday, June 16, 2012 11:16:27 PM UTC-4, Dan Dumont wrote: Request URL: https://reviews.apache.org/api/review-requests/5345

Re: Upgraded OS , then ReviewBoard failed upgrade

2012-06-18 Thread Dan Dumont
...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Dan Dumont ddum...@gmail.com wrote: I set https, but it never seemed to stick. Not sure if you've ever tested this deployment, but our server sits behind a reverse