Hi,
p4.run_login() is working for me if I set the user and password before
each p4 login again. P4 seems to loose the values set in __init__
def _connect(self):
if not self.p4.connected():
self.p4.connect()
self.p4.user = self.user
Hello,
I'm new to Review Board and I would like to use it in combination with
Perforce and post-review.
There seems to be no strong connection of comments and code changes.
In Diff View comments seem to be bound to single diffs. When you add a
new diff it is difficult to match old comments and
:29 AM, Philipp Henkel
philipp.hen...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I'm new to Review Board and I would like to use it in combination with
Perforce and post-review.
There seems to be no strong connection of comments and code changes.
In Diff View comments seem to be bound to single diffs
11, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Philipp Henkel
philipp.hen...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Christian,
Thanks for pointing out that the diff viewer is not the right place
for tracking changes and discussions.
I understand that tracking comments across revisions is difficult.
However, I was asking because
Hello,
I plan to extend RB's post commit support in the web user interface.
As we are using Perforce I'm focused on this SCM system only.
Nevertheless I would like to know if there plans to smoothly integrate
post commit handling in the web interface officially.
In the official roadmap document
Dear Review Board developers,
I would like to thank you! Review Board is well programmed and easily
extensible. We are using a customized version since over a year and
had several thousand successful reviews with less pain :)
I implemented post review functionality for both TFS and Perforce in
:)
Tim
-Original Message-
From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewbo...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Philipp Henkel
Sent: August-27-10 4:34 AM
To: reviewboard
Subject: Happy user
Dear Review Board developers,
I would like to thank you! Review Board is well programmed
Hi,
In order to simplify the creation of post-commit review requests I
created a customized version of Review Board 1.5.
I integrated a new request creation form into the web user interface
and extended the Subversion SCM tool.
The creation of a new request is now as simple as follows:
- Select
I think it is easy to support additional centralized SCMs. I already
did it for Perforce and Microsoft TFS in a previous version.
As far as I know there is no similar project for Git. However, it
should be possible to extend post-reviewboard to handle Git as well.
So far I have not looked into
That sounds great. Indeed it would be nice to merge this feature into
the official code line and I'm willing to assist.
Looking forward to your feedback.
Philipp
--
Philipp Henkel
Citrix Online - www.citrixonline.com
The views expressed here are mine alone and have not been authorized
and not much
overhead as all data is already cached. If a regex is used to extract
bug numbers this is good candidate for an official feature in my
opinion.
Have a nice weekend,
Philipp
--
Philipp Henkel
Citrix Online - www.citrixonline.com
On Apr 8, 10:22 am, Rob Coward r...@jive-videos.net wrote:
Hi
/tabs/e.g.:
Upload diff
Enter revisions
Greetings from Poland,
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Philipp Henkel
weltraumpi...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
Most probably moving to 1.6 code line is not much effort. At least I
tried to keep my changes to the main code base small
in the Post-commit web form.
Best regards,
Philipp
--
Philipp Henkel
Citrix Online - www.citrixonline.com
The views expressed here are mine alone and have not been authorized
by, and do not necessarily reflect the views of, Citrix.
On Apr 11, 6:17 pm, Jan Koprowski jan.koprow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon
an existing cvs repository.
Any
thoughts ?
Thanks for your hard work.
Rob Coward
On Fri, 6 May
2011 02:43:05 -0700 (PDT), Philipp Henkel wrote:
Hi,
Did anyone
had a chance to have look at my post-commit implementation?
http://philipphenkel.github.com/post-reviewboard[1
Rob,
The fix is committed. Could you please test with the latest version of
reviewboard/scmtools/svn_post_tracker.py?
- Philipp
On May 10, 8:58 pm, Philipp Henkel weltraumpi...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Rob,
Thanks, I'm glad you like it.
Currently I rely on svn:log property in order
'Select a valid choice. 1880 is not one of the available choices.'
This sounds like validatation error of the MultipleChoiceField. If
this is true I'm very surprised because I explicitly disabled
validation by using a specialized version of MultipleChoiceField:
class
Hi,
Is there a special syntax to enable the group restriction feature for
the active directory auth settings. I already tried simply the group
name or the ldap syntax (CN=GROUP NAME,OU=OU Name,DC=XX,DC=XX). Both
ways don’t work. The upcoming configuration fields are used:
Domain Name: Name of
17 matches
Mail list logo