. Is there a way to do
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Thank you Christian,
I was just curious as to whether the size of DB was a big issue. Looks
like it isn't from your response and looking at my (limited) usage.
And yes, I'll come up with a suitable backup plan.
On Mar 17, 10:36 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com
, they will be
shown as revisions in review board. This way a reviewer can easily
changed between the original review request and the update he just got
after the developer incorporated the review comments.
2. Correct. Review will not submit the code in SCM.
On Apr 9, 12:33 am, Ritesh Nadhani rite
Can you provide the complete output of post-review -d? My first guess
would be that it is due to a space in the file path.
On Apr 13, 10:25 am, roshanpius roshanpiustho...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been using post-review tool for posting reviews for Review Board
for a Perforce
On May 12, 12:48 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Review Board doesn't have any way of preventing code from being checked in.
As H M said, you'll need a pre-commit hook for this. I think there's one
onhttp://reviews.review-boardorg/somewhere. At some point we may
, that concept is not very
useful. In fact, I would consider the engineer to be the owner of the
request always. But that's just me.
Hope that helps.
On Jun 1, 3:04 pm, sailor...@gmail.com sailor...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new for reviewboard.
There are a couple of questions need your
Before using review board, you should set up a repository as specified
I strongly recommend you read the entire user/administration manual.
That'll help you to get started quickly.
On Jun 8, 2:16
You need to have a diff.exe that supports unified output format in
your path. If you don't have it, you can get it by installing Cygwin
On Jun 11, 3:34 pm, Amit agrawalamit2...@gmail.com wrote:
Tanks a lot for response. I could intergate with p4win.
I would be more than happy to help with that. I am in IST timezone.
On Jun 12, 3:28 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
As I'm sure you all have seen, we've been getting some spam lately. There
was a discussion in an earlier thread about
On Jun 19, 5:10 am, Eduardo Felipe eduardofelip...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, that actually is part of my Google Summer of Code project for
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Christian Hammondchip...@chipx86.com wrote:
We're waiting until 1.5
and I can change the
template to somewhat
reduce the content of the e-mails. I understand that I'll have patch
it every time I upgrade
but that's not a big deal.
On Jun 17, 11:02 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
There's a bug open for this somewhere. There are plans
post-review is usually run from the user's development box, not the
server. It will connect
to the server over http(s) and upload the review request.
On Oct 8, 10:47 pm, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com wrote:
I'm still in the process of setting up out ReviewBoard server
I am using latest version of ReviewBoard.
I have some doubts in using post-review functionality.
1) Do i need to create corresponding users in ReviewBoard for svn users to
see correct commiter name ?
2) How can i upload full code for ReviewBoard to manage it ?
3) Do ReviewBoard contain
Mail list logo