Trophy causing problems

: u'review_request.id' Thanks! Martin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard

Re: Trophy causing problems

Hi Christian, thanks so much! I'll update our server first thing in the morning. How else do you get a trophy? That was so neat to see that the st ID got a trophy :) Thanks, Martin On Jan 16, 5:43 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi Martin. There's a patch up to fix

anonymous users shouldn't be able to leave comments

they are not in the database). Wouldn't it be better to turn off the ability to create comments when you are not logged in? My colleague spent half an hour creating comments, which he lost because he didn't realize he was not logged in. Thanks, Martin

Re: anonymous users shouldn't be able to leave comments

- chip...@chipx86.com VMware, Inc. On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, A colleague of mine just ran into that: I had anonymous viewing of reviews and diffs enabled. If you now view a diff as anonymous, you can leave comments. Attempts to publish or edit

Re: anonymous users shouldn't be able to leave comments

issue is already closed! Thanks for the quick fix, Christian! On Jan 22, 8:38 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote: here it is http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=827 thanks. On Jan 21, 4:54 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: I'm surprised I missed

Re: can't search because python doesn't find libjava.so

meh, I think you can ignore this. I believe this is an issue while compiling pylucene... turns out I had some wrong paths while building jcc sorry for the noise On Jan 30, 10:41 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I set up pylucene I added the path to libjava.so to /etc

Re: Review Board 1.0 alpha 2 released

thank you!! looks lovely! migrating from a svn based install to rb-site/easy_install was a breeze! found and reported one bug (848) regarding not being able to delete images from a review. On Feb 3, 10:11 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hey everyone, We've just put out the

Sometimes I get Diff currently unavailable

log file. Anything else I can tell you I have alpha2 installed from the release date. Thanks, Martin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard

Re: using django.po for custom strings

I did run django-admin.py compilemessages being in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha2- py2.4.egg/reviewboard restarted httpd, but no luck :( On Feb 6, 9:52 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like to replace some strings with my own strings (i.e. replace

using django.po for custom strings

httpd to apply the changes in the po file? Thanks, Martin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group

Re: Sometimes I get Diff currently unavailable

awesome!! now, I am really looking forward to alpha3 :) On Feb 6, 5:34 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Also fixed in last night's nightly. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com VMware, Inc. On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote

Diff between revisions is broken in alpha4

in httpd's error log. Am I the only one experiencing that? Thanks, Martin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe

Re: Diff between revisions is broken in alpha4

ah, somebody already opened a bug for this: http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=892 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to

Re: can't create comments, javascript error?

same with IE7 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: can't create comments, javascript error?

-http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote: the error points into the js code: I added [line 361:] which firefox tells me where the error occurs.  /*     * Shows the comment dialog

Re: can't create comments, javascript error?

I also restarted memcached. On Mar 30, 12:06 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote: I use django 1.0.2 final if that matters. On Mar 30, 12:05 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote: after the easy_install I did [r...@vmcodereview ~]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard Rebuilding

Re: can't create comments, javascript error?

I use django 1.0.2 final if that matters. On Mar 30, 12:05 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote: after the easy_install I did [r...@vmcodereview ~]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard Rebuilding directory structure Updating database Upgrading Review Board from 1.0alpha4 to 1.0beta1

Store large data in memcached

the software to store larger data? Thanks, Martin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

Re: Store large data in memcached

...@gmail.com wrote: Hum. I thought we had worked around all of our cache size problems by splitting stuff up under multiple keys. What version are you running? -David On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you, I will try the memcache parameters. Swapping

post-review with git-svn parent throwing error

/postreview.py, line 503, in upload_diff debug(Uploading diff, size: %d % len(diff_content)) TypeError: object of type 'NoneType' has no len() If I run git diff between the branches I see all the differences. Does anyone knows why this is failing? The server runs 1.5.1 version. Thanks, Martin

I can't use the post-review. I get Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

git repo in ReviewBoard as a non-bare repository, in fact, is a git svn clone of a central SVN. Does anybody can help me, please? Thanks in advance. Martin. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http

Error with post-review. I get Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

git repo in ReviewBoard as a non-bare repository, in fact, is a git svn clone of a central SVN. Does anybody can help me, please? Thanks in advance. Martin. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http

Re: Error with post-review. I get Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

Nothing happens. The command is executed but I don't get anything by the standar output. Any else tip will be useful. Thanks a lot. MArtin. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users

Re: Error with post-review. I get Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

Before anything... I configured my non-bare git repository in ReviewBoard. This repository is a git svn clone of a central SVN repository. I'm trying to execute a pre commit review, using the post-review commit with the following syntax: cat file.diff |post-review -d --diff-filename=- Is this

Re: Error with post-review. I get Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

The full debug log below -bash-4.0$ cat AirStories.diff |post-review --debug --diff-filename=- RBTools 0.3.2 Home = /home/hudsonhome svn info git rev-parse --git-dir git symbolic-ref -q HEAD Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD'] -bash-4.0$ echo $? 1 -bash-4.0$ I

New error with post-review

Hi all. I fixed the las error re- installing RBTools. Now, when I try to execute post-review -o, I get Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/post-review, line 8, in module load_entry_point('RBTools==0.3.2', 'console_scripts', 'post-review')() File

Re: Realized web-based post-commit reviews

Congratulations, I saw you customization and is great. Do you know if there is something like that for git? Thanks in advance. Martin. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users

Re: Problem upgrading from 1.6beta1 to 1.6rc1

:02 PM, martin martin.don...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Christian. Screenshot:http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9410307/evolutions.PNG #- Evolution for sessions from django_evolution.mutations import * from django.db import models MUTATIONS = [    ChangeField('Session', 'expire_date', initial

Re: Problem upgrading from 1.6beta1 to 1.6rc1

of django_evolution you have installed? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:00 PM, martin martin.don...@gmail.com wrote: I updated from 1.5.4 to 1.6beta1 to 1.6rc1

Re: Problem upgrading from 1.6beta1 to 1.6rc1

Upgraded to django_evolution 0.6.4, I mean. sorry. On Jun 30, 11:14 am, martin martin.don...@gmail.com wrote: beta1 upgrade was done through easy_install also. 1.5 and beta1 were using evolution 0.6.2, the rc1 install upgraded to evolution 0.6.2. On Jun 29, 5:27 pm, Christian Hammond chip

Change email of users

Hi, I'm using RB 1.6.1 with LDAP authentication. I want to each user can modifiy his email address. I tried add the users a group with auth|user|Can change user, but it still not working... Does somebody can help me? Thanks in advance. Martin. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate

Re: Change email of users

Thanks a lot Chris. I am managing my own instance of ReviewBoard, but, the LDAP is under the client control. So, the only chance to change the email is from the admin account. I will tell you if I can figure out an alternative way. Thanks you very much. Regards. MArtin. -- Want to help

I want to see the first name or last name in list of reviews

Hi, I have installed the RB 1.6.1. I'm using LDAP autentication. When I go to All reviews request, in the people column, I see the userId, but I want to see the first Name or LAst Name. Does anybody knows how I can do this? Thanks in advance. Martin. -- Want to help the Review Board project

Check structure of summary

Hi group, I want to check if summary of each new review request is compliant with a defined structure. It could be performed using regular expressions, for instance. Does someone know if there is this feature or if there is a workaround to do this? Thanks in advance. Regards. MArtin

Table 'rb17.extensions_registeredextension' doesn't exist

I'm getting this error on a fresh install of 1.7.6. rb-site install didn't report any problems (though I didn't see it creating this table). Versions: Python 2.6.6, Django 1.4.5, Djblets 0.7.11 -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/

Re: settings_local.py ?

Hi, I have got the same problem using lighthttpd and sqlite. I have just followed the standard installation instructions. Martin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post

Re: settings_local.py ?

Thanks a lot! This seems to work now. Martin On Feb 11, 11:26 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Okay, looks like the reviewboard.fcgi file isn't being generated correctly. Can you two edit that file and append /conf/ to the path being inserted? For example

Using X.509 Public Key for Authentication

enabled logging with severity DEBUG, but the log file of the reviewboard remains empty. Any ideas? Thanks, Martin -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users

Re: Rational Synergy and ReviewBoard?

Keith, did you contribute these scripts back to the project? They sound quite useful for anyone trying to link Rational tools to reviewboard. Best regards, Ryan Martin On Friday, April 12, 2013 12:14:41 PM UTC-4, Keith Moyer wrote: On Monday, April 2, 2012 9:12:02 AM UTC-6, ed wrote: Hello

Bazaar review request - revision does not exists

When trying to create a new review request on recently updated files on my bazaar repository, I get the error: Requested revision: 'date:2013-07-04 19:23:10' does not exist in branch: whatever It seems to be a problem related to timezone. My bazaar repository is in UTC (I don't want to change

Re: Bazaar review request - revision does not exists

Looks like it's not even a matter of hours, but minutes (around 20-30). I'm starting to think the timezone is not the problem. Is there a minimum version of Bazaar required or recommended? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user?

Re: Restore data into other server - errors displaying many diffs ('ascii' codec can't decode byte xxx in position yy: ordinal not in range(128))

de abril de 2015, 9:05:32 (UTC+2), Fernando Martin escribió: It looks like a problem with the repositories config. I'm using Bitbucket, when I try to modify something in the repository configurations I'm getting same error: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0x94 in position 0: ordinal

Re: Restore data into other server - errors displaying many diffs ('ascii' codec can't decode byte xxx in position yy: ordinal not in range(128))

it seems there are problems with thebitbucket repositories. I cannot mofify them and most of the reviews show also this same error. Any advice would be much appreciated. El miércoles, 29 de abril de 2015, 20:38:54 (UTC+2), Fernando Martin escribió: Hi all, I've created a backup of my

Does ReviewBoard properly support Perforce like it does Hg

I get the impression ReviewBoard's support for P4 is extrememly limited. Is there any way to get a list of changes in the RB menu such that users can simply choose one without resorting to command line tools and being forced to post review requests manually? Also, no matter what I do with

Re: site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

an unfinished upgrade to 1.7.27 with an inconsistent state in between. Version was rolled back to 1.7.14 then, but maybe some artifacts remained, which are causing the current trouble. Am Montag, 3. Juni 2019 15:28:47 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Gallagher: > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:25 AM

site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

going wrong here? I'm grateful for any ideas how to solve this problem. Extra question: I expected an upgrade to version 3. Instead I got 2.0.20. Why is that? Kind regards, Martin -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review

Re: site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

Hi Eric, thanks for your reply. As it was not top priority to migrate all the old data to the new version I installed a fresh, empty 3.0 instance and restored the old 1.7 instance to an at least working state for archive purposes. Kind regards, Martin Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2019 19:43:12 UTC+2

Re: Reviewboard showing only 20 branches of gitlab repository

ine, cwd=self._git_toplevel, *args, **kwargs)* * File "C:\Program Files (x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-1.0.3-py2.7.egg\rbtools\utils\process.py", line 155, in execute* ***popen_encoding_args)* * File "C:\Program Files (x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\subpro

Upgrade from 3.0.20 to 4.0.7

Hello, what is the correct method to upgrade from 3.0.20 to 4.0.7 ? I inherited the server and was asked to upgrade, however the method described in the documentation (pip upgrade ...) does not work, it fails with python errors. I understood the 3.x runs with python 2.7 and 4.x runs with

Re: Upgrade from 3.0.20 to 4.0.7

] [pid 1856] [client 10.103.108.170:60804] ImportError: cannot import name py31compat, referer: https://10.103.100.250/ Dátum: pondelok 27. júna 2022, čas: 15:38:50 UTC+2, odosielateľ: Martin Marusinec > Hello, > > what is the correct method to upgrade from 3.0.20 to 4.0.7 ? I inherite

LDAP Configuration

New to Review Board and trying to get LDAP config to work. in log file getting 2017-03-31 10:14:41,923 - WARNING - - LDAP error: {'desc': "Can't contact LDAP server"} I know the parameters I use are correct since they are used elsewhere ldap://host:389 Bindaccount accountusedbefore

Review Board Ticket #4719: Timezone incorrect regardless of settings

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4719/ -- New ticket #4719 by guzzard For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New

Review Board Ticket #4720: Avatar, file upload not working

-- To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4720/ -- New ticket #4720 by guzzard For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board Status: New