Re: RB default reviewer group not getting updated

2018-11-08 Thread manoj m
Hello, Is there a way to enable the "Default Reviewer" hook irrespective of review request state? We don't use RB for any sensitive patches. -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out

Re: RB default reviewer group not getting updated

2018-10-26 Thread manoj
removed, based on a re-run of the algorithm. > Consider for instance an important confidential security fix that may > initially trigger a Default Reviewer rule adding some people or groups to > the list, but the owner of the review request erases them all and assigns > it instead to a pr

Re: RB default reviewer group not getting updated

2018-10-25 Thread Christian Hammond
trigger a Default Reviewer rule adding some people or groups to the list, but the owner of the review request erases them all and assigns it instead to a private "security" group. You wouldn't want anyone re-added if you were to update your change, for security disclosure reasons. Ins

RB default reviewer group not getting updated

2018-10-25 Thread manoj m
Hello, If an user uploads a new diff to an already published review request the default groups doesn't get updated. Is this expected? On the contrary, an unpublished review requests gets updated properly. Thanks -- Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-18 Thread Shooter Gravatar
;> >> For the sample file paths, I need to see exact paths being shown in the >> diff viewer. Those are what the Default Reviewer regents will match >> against. I suspect the refex isn't formatted for those paths. >> >> Christian >> >> >> -- Supe

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-18 Thread Shooter Gravatar
problems. > > For the sample file paths, I need to see exact paths being shown in the > diff viewer. Those are what the Default Reviewer regents will match > against. I suspect the refex isn't formatted for those paths. > > Christian > > > -- Supercharge your Review Board with Powe

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-17 Thread Shooter Gravatar
The repo contains a lot of branches and "stuff" that we don't want to survey (and we don't want to make things to complicated for our users ho well...), so the repo path points directly to the "trunk" of our development. Too much history and not enough forward thinking at the time...

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-16 Thread Christian Hammond
be matching? Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/> Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Shooter Gravatar < shooter.grava...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good news ! > >

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-16 Thread Shooter Gravatar
Good news ! As for the default reviewer, the expression is the following : > Base/Tools/Nora2/.* > The repo is : > https://x.x.x.x/svn/trunk > The commited files are located in : > myDrive:\_BaseSVN\Trunk\Base\Tools\Nora2 (on Windows...) > Le samedi 14 janvier 2

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-14 Thread Christian Hammond
onkey-patch > the fix in. > > This is MySQL warning code 1300. You can see some discussion about this > here: https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=79317 > > Now, if you don't enable DEBUG = True in settings_local.py, then this > warning is harmless. So I suspect your Default Rev

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-14 Thread Christian Hammond
bug.php?id=79317 Now, if you don't enable DEBUG = True in settings_local.py, then this warning is harmless. So I suspect your Default Reviewer issue is a configuration issue. Can you show me what your Default Reviewer configuration looks like? Christian -- Christian Hammond President/CEO of Bean

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-13 Thread David Trowbridge
he UI by browsing the commits on > my repo, and the default reviewer rule is applied (the group is assigned to > the request i just created). > But i still have the utf8 error on the database. > > I now have another problem : i cannot acces the > /reviewboard/admin/settings/gene

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-13 Thread Shooter Gravatar
Another update. I completely remove ReviewBoard 2.5.7 from my system and downloaded again 2.5.6.1 with easy_install. Run the installation again. Same configuration as before. I can now create a review request from the UI by browsing the commits on my repo, and the default reviewer rule

Re: Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-13 Thread Shooter Gravatar
More info on this. I started from scratch once again : deleted MySQL database, remove all reviewboard sites and start the rb-site install process again. My site now has one repository, 2 users (the admin and me), one group (myGroup) and one default reviewer (assigns a specific path to myGroup

Default reviewer not assigned to the review (yet another weird utf8 problem)

2017-01-12 Thread Shooter Gravatar
Hi. Fresh installation of RB 2.5.7 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS with Mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.7.16. Repository is SVN. The instance of Review Board has 6 users, 5 groups and one default reviewer rule to assign a group for a specific set of files. Default reviewer rule is: Base/Tools/Nora2/.* > W

Re: Default reviewer per group

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Hammond
pertaining to the owner of a review request. Specifying a default reviewer for every change could lead to an inappropriate reviewer if posting a change that applies to some other area of the company. (This of course dependent on the size and structure of your server.) However, you can set a default in your

Default reviewer per group

2016-12-21 Thread Moisei Rabinovich
Hello, Is there some way to specify a default reviewer group for the user (and not by the file path as it is mentioned inthe documentation)? Every time I submit a new issue, I choose my group to be a Reviewer group and I would like it to happen automatically. Thank you! -- Supercharge your

Re: reviewboard 2.5.7 default reviewer do'nt work

2016-11-10 Thread LeeJunlong
*user:* lijl, zengzq *review group:* appas, member: lijl, zengzq *Repositories: *appas default reviewer: * name:* appas File regular expression: .* Default groups: appas *Repositories: *appas 在 2016年11月10日星期四 UTC+8上午2:24:29,David Trowbridge写道: > > Could you share the

reviewboard 2.5.7 default reviewer do'nt work

2016-11-08 Thread LeeJunlong
my svn url like this: svn://10.8.199.63:10223/appas when i add a new request with file regular express ".*", , the default reviewer dont work <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gcyKDwAnXj0/WCKu63gj5XI/AG0/I4p1BFjsgac-r9fGtTgWaGXoS_m0HJHdQCLcB/s1600/regular.png>

Default reviewer not working

2014-09-23 Thread Dieter Odeurs
reviewer2 Now i want that for every review in the trunk of repo 1 admin would be the default reviewer. Default review setting are: name: defaultRepo1 regex: trunk/.* default group: / default user: admin But when I add a new review request of the trunk in repo 1 no default reviewer would

Re: Default reviewer not working

2014-09-23 Thread Christian Hammond
repo1 trunk branch tag 4user: admin (admin) me (admin) reviewer1 reviewer2 Now i want that for every review in the trunk of repo 1 admin would be the default reviewer. Default review setting are: name: defaultRepo1 regex: trunk/.* default group

Re: Issue 2167 in reviewboard: Default Reviewer Submitter Regular Expression

2012-12-23 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Labels: Component-Reviews Comment #2 on issue 2167 by trowb...@gmail.com: Default Reviewer Submitter Regular Expression http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2167 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you

Default reviewer list

2012-10-17 Thread Scott Quesnelle
Hello, Just wanted to say thanks for the excellent tool. We have been using reviewboard for over 2 years now. One question though. We use default reviewers, and associate them with review groups. This helps reduce the administration as users can join/leave groups as they see fit. We are using

Re: Default reviewer list

2012-10-17 Thread David Trowbridge
It's not an intentional decision, it's just not something that we've had a need for in the past. It would be pretty trivial to add a new resource for this, especially if you just need read-only (GET) access. -David On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Scott Quesnelle scott.quesne...@gmail.com

Re: Default reviewer list

2012-10-17 Thread Scott Quesnelle
David, Thanks. GET access is all that I would really want. This would let me build up a view of 'who' owns what areas of our source, and also allow developers to engage the right people when they are thinking of modifying a specific piece. Will see if I have some time to take at doing this

Re: Issue 2641 in reviewboard: Adding repository to default reviewer fails with HTTP 500

2012-06-20 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2641 by ex...@dps-online.de: Adding repository to default reviewer fails with HTTP 500 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2641 Thank you for the quick response. Downgrading to Django 1.3.1 fixed the problem for me, which also occured on our test

Re: Issue 2641 in reviewboard: Adding repository to default reviewer fails with HTTP 500

2012-06-20 Thread reviewboard
Comment #3 on issue 2641 by chip...@gmail.com: Adding repository to default reviewer fails with HTTP 500 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2641 Installing Review Board 1.6.x forces an install of the proper version of Django, so it sounds like it was just overridden

Re: Issue 2641 in reviewboard: Adding repository to default reviewer fails with HTTP 500

2012-06-19 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: SetupIssue Comment #1 on issue 2641 by chip...@gmail.com: Adding repository to default reviewer fails with HTTP 500 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2641 Review Board 1.6.x is not compatible with Django 1.4. You're going to have to downgrade

Re: Issue 2167 in reviewboard: Default Reviewer Submitter Regular Expression

2012-01-13 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 2167 by andrey...@gmail.com: Default Reviewer Submitter Regular Expression http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2167 Be able to assign a reviewer name based on submitter name in addition to files is important for larger teams. -- You received

Issue 2367 in reviewboard: default reviewer setting for local site affects main site

2011-11-03 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2367 by henry@gmail.com: default reviewer setting for local site affects main site http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2367 * NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report

Issue 2167 in reviewboard: Default Reviewer Submitter Regular Expression

2011-07-08 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 2167 by cea...@gmail.com: Default Reviewer Submitter Regular Expression http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2167 What version are you running? 1.6 beta 2 What's the URL of the page this enhancement

Issue 987 in reviewboard: With a default reviewer setup adding a new review does work as expected.

2009-09-03 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 987 by trowbrds: With a default reviewer setup adding a new review does work as expected. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=987 Please check your admin email for backtraces. It sounds like something is breaking

Issue 987 in reviewboard: With a default reviewer setup adding a new review does work as expected.

2009-03-26 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 987 by VirtualThoughts: With a default reviewer setup adding a new review does work as expected. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=987 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report

Default reviewer

2009-01-29 Thread Nizar
Hi, I'm trying to setup default reviewers for my code-base. In the Change default reviewer config screen, I've the file path regex set to * and some users selected, but the review requests are not getting copied to the default reviewers. Any help? Thanks, -Nizar

Re: Default reviewer

2009-01-29 Thread Christian Hammond
Try .*. It needs to be a regular expression rather than a file glob. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com VMware, Inc. On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Nizar niza...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to setup default reviewers for my code-base. In the Change default