Hello,
Is there a way to enable the "Default Reviewer" hook irrespective of review
request state?
We don't use RB for any sensitive patches.
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out
removed, based on a re-run of the algorithm.
> Consider for instance an important confidential security fix that may
> initially trigger a Default Reviewer rule adding some people or groups to
> the list, but the owner of the review request erases them all and assigns
> it instead to a pr
trigger
a Default Reviewer rule adding some people or groups to the list, but the
owner of the review request erases them all and assigns it instead to a
private "security" group. You wouldn't want anyone re-added if you were to
update your change, for security disclosure reasons. Ins
Hello,
If an user uploads a new diff to an already published review request the
default groups doesn't get updated. Is this expected?
On the contrary, an unpublished review requests gets updated properly.
Thanks
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
;>
>> For the sample file paths, I need to see exact paths being shown in the
>> diff viewer. Those are what the Default Reviewer regents will match
>> against. I suspect the refex isn't formatted for those paths.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>>
--
Supe
problems.
>
> For the sample file paths, I need to see exact paths being shown in the
> diff viewer. Those are what the Default Reviewer regents will match
> against. I suspect the refex isn't formatted for those paths.
>
> Christian
>
>
>
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Powe
The repo contains a lot of branches and "stuff" that we don't want to
survey (and we don't want to make things to complicated for our users
ho well...), so the repo path points directly to the "trunk" of our
development.
Too much history and not enough forward thinking at the time...
be matching?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag <https://www.beanbaginc.com/>
Makers of Review Board <https://www.reviewboard.org/>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Shooter Gravatar <
shooter.grava...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good news !
>
>
Good news !
As for the default reviewer, the expression is the following :
> Base/Tools/Nora2/.*
>
The repo is :
> https://x.x.x.x/svn/trunk
>
The commited files are located in :
> myDrive:\_BaseSVN\Trunk\Base\Tools\Nora2 (on Windows...)
>
Le samedi 14 janvier 2
onkey-patch
> the fix in.
>
> This is MySQL warning code 1300. You can see some discussion about this
> here: https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=79317
>
> Now, if you don't enable DEBUG = True in settings_local.py, then this
> warning is harmless. So I suspect your Default Rev
bug.php?id=79317
Now, if you don't enable DEBUG = True in settings_local.py, then this
warning is harmless. So I suspect your Default Reviewer issue is a
configuration issue.
Can you show me what your Default Reviewer configuration looks like?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Bean
he UI by browsing the commits on
> my repo, and the default reviewer rule is applied (the group is assigned to
> the request i just created).
> But i still have the utf8 error on the database.
>
> I now have another problem : i cannot acces the
> /reviewboard/admin/settings/gene
Another update.
I completely remove ReviewBoard 2.5.7 from my system and downloaded again
2.5.6.1 with easy_install.
Run the installation again.
Same configuration as before.
I can now create a review request from the UI by browsing the commits on my
repo, and the default reviewer rule
More info on this.
I started from scratch once again : deleted MySQL database, remove all
reviewboard sites and start the rb-site install process again.
My site now has one repository, 2 users (the admin and me), one group
(myGroup) and one default reviewer (assigns a specific path to myGroup
Hi.
Fresh installation of RB 2.5.7 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS with Mysql Ver 14.14
Distrib 5.7.16.
Repository is SVN.
The instance of Review Board has 6 users, 5 groups and one default reviewer
rule to assign a group for a specific set of files.
Default reviewer rule is:
Base/Tools/Nora2/.*
>
W
pertaining to the
owner of a review request. Specifying a default reviewer for every change
could lead to an inappropriate reviewer if posting a change that applies to
some other area of the company. (This of course dependent on the size and
structure of your server.)
However, you can set a default in your
Hello,
Is there some way to specify a default reviewer group for the user (and not
by the file path as it is mentioned inthe documentation)?
Every time I submit a new issue, I choose my group to be a Reviewer group
and I would like it to happen automatically.
Thank you!
--
Supercharge your
*user:* lijl, zengzq
*review group:* appas, member: lijl, zengzq
*Repositories: *appas
default reviewer:
* name:* appas
File regular expression: .*
Default groups: appas
*Repositories: *appas
在 2016年11月10日星期四 UTC+8上午2:24:29,David Trowbridge写道:
>
> Could you share the
my svn url like this: svn://10.8.199.63:10223/appas
when i add a new request with file regular express ".*", , the default
reviewer dont work
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-gcyKDwAnXj0/WCKu63gj5XI/AG0/I4p1BFjsgac-r9fGtTgWaGXoS_m0HJHdQCLcB/s1600/regular.png>
reviewer2
Now i want that for every review in the trunk of repo 1 admin would be the
default reviewer.
Default review setting are:
name: defaultRepo1
regex: trunk/.*
default group: /
default user: admin
But when I add a new review request of the trunk in repo 1 no default
reviewer would
repo1
trunk
branch
tag
4user:
admin (admin)
me (admin)
reviewer1
reviewer2
Now i want that for every review in the trunk of repo 1 admin would be the
default reviewer.
Default review setting are:
name: defaultRepo1
regex: trunk/.*
default group
Updates:
Labels: Component-Reviews
Comment #2 on issue 2167 by trowb...@gmail.com: Default Reviewer Submitter
Regular Expression
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2167
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you
Hello,
Just wanted to say thanks for the excellent tool. We have been using
reviewboard for over 2 years now. One question though. We use default
reviewers, and associate them with review groups. This helps reduce the
administration as users can join/leave groups as they see fit. We are
using
It's not an intentional decision, it's just not something that we've
had a need for in the past. It would be pretty trivial to add a new
resource for this, especially if you just need read-only (GET) access.
-David
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Scott Quesnelle
scott.quesne...@gmail.com
David,
Thanks. GET access is all that I would really want. This would let me build
up a view of 'who' owns what areas of our source, and also allow developers
to engage the right people when they are thinking of modifying a specific
piece. Will see if I have some time to take at doing this
Comment #2 on issue 2641 by ex...@dps-online.de: Adding repository to
default reviewer fails with HTTP 500
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2641
Thank you for the quick response. Downgrading to Django 1.3.1 fixed the
problem for me, which also occured on our test
Comment #3 on issue 2641 by chip...@gmail.com: Adding repository to default
reviewer fails with HTTP 500
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2641
Installing Review Board 1.6.x forces an install of the proper version of
Django, so it sounds like it was just overridden
Updates:
Status: SetupIssue
Comment #1 on issue 2641 by chip...@gmail.com: Adding repository to default
reviewer fails with HTTP 500
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2641
Review Board 1.6.x is not compatible with Django 1.4. You're going to have
to downgrade
Comment #1 on issue 2167 by andrey...@gmail.com: Default Reviewer Submitter
Regular Expression
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2167
Be able to assign a reviewer name based on submitter name in addition to
files is important for larger teams.
--
You received
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2367 by henry@gmail.com: default reviewer setting for local
site affects main site
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2367
* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 2167 by cea...@gmail.com: Default Reviewer Submitter Regular
Expression
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2167
What version are you running?
1.6 beta 2
What's the URL of the page this enhancement
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 987 by trowbrds: With a default reviewer setup adding a
new review does work as expected.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=987
Please check your admin email for backtraces. It sounds like something is
breaking
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 987 by VirtualThoughts: With a default reviewer setup adding a
new review does work as expected.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=987
*NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report
Hi,
I'm trying to setup default reviewers for my code-base. In the Change
default reviewer config screen, I've the file path regex set to *
and some users selected, but the review requests are not getting
copied to the default reviewers. Any help?
Thanks,
-Nizar
Try .*. It needs to be a regular expression rather than a file glob.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
VMware, Inc.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Nizar niza...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup default reviewers for my code-base. In the Change
default
35 matches
Mail list logo