subject:"Installing reviewboard"

I resolved that issue by enabling syntax highlighting from the admin panel.

Thanks again!

On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 3:39:04 PM UTC-7, Chris Lang wrote:
>
> Looks like most pages are working properly but when I click on "My 
> Account" I get the following error:
>
> KeyError at /reviews/account/preferences/
>
> u"Key u'syntax_highlighting' not found in Form"
>
> Request Method: GET
> Request URL: http://usspvlreviewbd/reviews/account/preferences/
> Django Version: 1.6.11.6
> Exception Type: KeyError
> Exception Value: 
>
> u"Key u'syntax_highlighting' not found in Form"
>
> Exception Location: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/forms/forms.py 
> in __getitem__, line 114
> Python Executable: /usr/bin/python
> On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 3:27:54 PM UTC-7, Chris Lang wrote:
>>
>> Wow that did it! I can't believe it! haha.
>>
>> Thanks a boat load to both you and Christian for your help!
>>
>> On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 3:15:40 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>>
>>> Everything looks OK except get rid of step 4--that's creating a DB with 
>>> the new schema. Just create an empty database and then use your database 
>>> dump to populate it. rb-site upgrade will convert the schema to the new 
>>> format.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:07 PM Chris Lang  wrote:
>>>
 Alright here are my current steps for upgrading.

 1. Install ReviewBoard 3.0.3 on new machine. 

 easy_install ReviewBoard 

 2. Copy over my site directory from my old machine into the correct 
 location (/var/www/reviews)

 On old machine:

 scp reviews.tar.gz user@newmachine:/var/www/

 On new machine:
 tar xvzf reviews.tar.gz

 3. Create a reviewboard database

 Open mysql:

 mysql -u root -p

 Then in mysql:

 create database reviewboard character setutf8;
 grant all priveleges on reviewboard.* to 'reviewboard'@'localhost';

 4. Initialize the database

 rb-site manage /var/www/reviews syncdb -- --no-initial-data

 5. Mysql dump of reviewboard database on old machine and compress it.

 mysqldump -u root -p reviewboard > reviewboard.sql
 gzip reviewboard.sql

 6. Send sql dump to new machine

 scp reviewboard.sql.gz user@newmachine:/root/reviewboard.sql.gz

 7. Extract sql file on new machine:

 gunzip reviewboard.sql.gz

 8. Import sql statements into new database on new machine

 Open mysql:

 mysql -u root-p

 Then in mysql:

 use reviewboard;
 source /root/reviewboard.sql;

 This runs fine without errors now. (Had to increase max packet size to 
 16M 

 )

 9. Upgrade reviewboard site

 rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviews/

 First error I get here is:

 OSError: [Errno 17] File exists: '/var/www/reviews/htdocs/errordocs'

 Once I delete that symlink it seems to get past that but then I get the 
 following:

 Rebuilding directory structure
 Upgrading site settings_local.py
 Updating database. This may take a while.

 The log output below, including warnings and errors,
 can be ignored unless upgrade fails.

 --  --
 Creating tables ...
 Upgrading Review Board from 2.0.20 to 3.0.3
 There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
 There are unapplied evolutions for attachments.
 There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
 There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
 There are unapplied evolutions for notifications.
 There are unapplied evolutions for oauth.
 There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
 There are unapplied evolutions for site.
 There are unapplied evolutions for webapi.
 Adding baseline version for new models
 Evolutions in notifications baseline: webhooktarget_extra_state, 
 webhooktarget_extra_data_null
 Evolutions in oauth baseline: disabled_for_security
 Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
 Installing custom SQL ...
 Installing indexes ...
 Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)

 This may take a while. Please be patient, and do not cancel the upgrade!

 Applying database evolutions for accounts...
 Applying database evolutions for attachments...
 Applying database evolutions for changedescs...
 Applying database evolutions for diffviewer...
 Applying database evolutions for reviews...
 Database evolutions for reviews failed!
 The SQL statement was: CREATE TABLE `reviews_review_general_comments` (
 `id` integer AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
 `review_id` integer NOT NULL,
 `generalcomment_id` integer NOT NULL,
 UNIQUE (`review_id`, `generalcomment_id`)

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

Looks like most pages are working properly but when I click on "My Account" 
I get the following error:

KeyError at /reviews/account/preferences/

u"Key u'syntax_highlighting' not found in Form"

Request Method: GET
Request URL: http://usspvlreviewbd/reviews/account/preferences/
Django Version: 1.6.11.6
Exception Type: KeyError
Exception Value: 

u"Key u'syntax_highlighting' not found in Form"

Exception Location: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/forms/forms.py 
in __getitem__, line 114
Python Executable: /usr/bin/python
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 3:27:54 PM UTC-7, Chris Lang wrote:
>
> Wow that did it! I can't believe it! haha.
>
> Thanks a boat load to both you and Christian for your help!
>
> On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 3:15:40 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
>>
>> Everything looks OK except get rid of step 4--that's creating a DB with 
>> the new schema. Just create an empty database and then use your database 
>> dump to populate it. rb-site upgrade will convert the schema to the new 
>> format.
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:07 PM Chris Lang  wrote:
>>
>>> Alright here are my current steps for upgrading.
>>>
>>> 1. Install ReviewBoard 3.0.3 on new machine. 
>>>
>>> easy_install ReviewBoard 
>>>
>>> 2. Copy over my site directory from my old machine into the correct 
>>> location (/var/www/reviews)
>>>
>>> On old machine:
>>>
>>> scp reviews.tar.gz user@newmachine:/var/www/
>>>
>>> On new machine:
>>> tar xvzf reviews.tar.gz
>>>
>>> 3. Create a reviewboard database
>>>
>>> Open mysql:
>>>
>>> mysql -u root -p
>>>
>>> Then in mysql:
>>>
>>> create database reviewboard character setutf8;
>>> grant all priveleges on reviewboard.* to 'reviewboard'@'localhost';
>>>
>>> 4. Initialize the database
>>>
>>> rb-site manage /var/www/reviews syncdb -- --no-initial-data
>>>
>>> 5. Mysql dump of reviewboard database on old machine and compress it.
>>>
>>> mysqldump -u root -p reviewboard > reviewboard.sql
>>> gzip reviewboard.sql
>>>
>>> 6. Send sql dump to new machine
>>>
>>> scp reviewboard.sql.gz user@newmachine:/root/reviewboard.sql.gz
>>>
>>> 7. Extract sql file on new machine:
>>>
>>> gunzip reviewboard.sql.gz
>>>
>>> 8. Import sql statements into new database on new machine
>>>
>>> Open mysql:
>>>
>>> mysql -u root-p
>>>
>>> Then in mysql:
>>>
>>> use reviewboard;
>>> source /root/reviewboard.sql;
>>>
>>> This runs fine without errors now. (Had to increase max packet size to 
>>> 16M 
>>> 
>>> )
>>>
>>> 9. Upgrade reviewboard site
>>>
>>> rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviews/
>>>
>>> First error I get here is:
>>>
>>> OSError: [Errno 17] File exists: '/var/www/reviews/htdocs/errordocs'
>>>
>>> Once I delete that symlink it seems to get past that but then I get the 
>>> following:
>>>
>>> Rebuilding directory structure
>>> Upgrading site settings_local.py
>>> Updating database. This may take a while.
>>>
>>> The log output below, including warnings and errors,
>>> can be ignored unless upgrade fails.
>>>
>>> --  --
>>> Creating tables ...
>>> Upgrading Review Board from 2.0.20 to 3.0.3
>>> There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
>>> There are unapplied evolutions for attachments.
>>> There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
>>> There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
>>> There are unapplied evolutions for notifications.
>>> There are unapplied evolutions for oauth.
>>> There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
>>> There are unapplied evolutions for site.
>>> There are unapplied evolutions for webapi.
>>> Adding baseline version for new models
>>> Evolutions in notifications baseline: webhooktarget_extra_state, 
>>> webhooktarget_extra_data_null
>>> Evolutions in oauth baseline: disabled_for_security
>>> Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
>>> Installing custom SQL ...
>>> Installing indexes ...
>>> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
>>>
>>> This may take a while. Please be patient, and do not cancel the upgrade!
>>>
>>> Applying database evolutions for accounts...
>>> Applying database evolutions for attachments...
>>> Applying database evolutions for changedescs...
>>> Applying database evolutions for diffviewer...
>>> Applying database evolutions for reviews...
>>> Database evolutions for reviews failed!
>>> The SQL statement was: CREATE TABLE `reviews_review_general_comments` (
>>> `id` integer AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
>>> `review_id` integer NOT NULL,
>>> `generalcomment_id` integer NOT NULL,
>>> UNIQUE (`review_id`, `generalcomment_id`)
>>> )
>>> ;
>>> The database error was: (1050, "Table 'reviews_review_general_comments' 
>>> already exists")
>>>
>>> CommandError: Error applying evolution for reviews: (1050, "Table 
>>> 'reviews_review_general_comments' already exists")
>>>
>>> I have two questions at this point.
>>>
>>> 1. Does this seem like the proper

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

Wow that did it! I can't believe it! haha.

Thanks a boat load to both you and Christian for your help!

On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 3:15:40 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Everything looks OK except get rid of step 4--that's creating a DB with 
> the new schema. Just create an empty database and then use your database 
> dump to populate it. rb-site upgrade will convert the schema to the new 
> format.
>
> -David
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:07 PM Chris Lang  > wrote:
>
>> Alright here are my current steps for upgrading.
>>
>> 1. Install ReviewBoard 3.0.3 on new machine. 
>>
>> easy_install ReviewBoard 
>>
>> 2. Copy over my site directory from my old machine into the correct 
>> location (/var/www/reviews)
>>
>> On old machine:
>>
>> scp reviews.tar.gz user@newmachine:/var/www/
>>
>> On new machine:
>> tar xvzf reviews.tar.gz
>>
>> 3. Create a reviewboard database
>>
>> Open mysql:
>>
>> mysql -u root -p
>>
>> Then in mysql:
>>
>> create database reviewboard character setutf8;
>> grant all priveleges on reviewboard.* to 'reviewboard'@'localhost';
>>
>> 4. Initialize the database
>>
>> rb-site manage /var/www/reviews syncdb -- --no-initial-data
>>
>> 5. Mysql dump of reviewboard database on old machine and compress it.
>>
>> mysqldump -u root -p reviewboard > reviewboard.sql
>> gzip reviewboard.sql
>>
>> 6. Send sql dump to new machine
>>
>> scp reviewboard.sql.gz user@newmachine:/root/reviewboard.sql.gz
>>
>> 7. Extract sql file on new machine:
>>
>> gunzip reviewboard.sql.gz
>>
>> 8. Import sql statements into new database on new machine
>>
>> Open mysql:
>>
>> mysql -u root-p
>>
>> Then in mysql:
>>
>> use reviewboard;
>> source /root/reviewboard.sql;
>>
>> This runs fine without errors now. (Had to increase max packet size to 
>> 16M 
>> 
>> )
>>
>> 9. Upgrade reviewboard site
>>
>> rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviews/
>>
>> First error I get here is:
>>
>> OSError: [Errno 17] File exists: '/var/www/reviews/htdocs/errordocs'
>>
>> Once I delete that symlink it seems to get past that but then I get the 
>> following:
>>
>> Rebuilding directory structure
>> Upgrading site settings_local.py
>> Updating database. This may take a while.
>>
>> The log output below, including warnings and errors,
>> can be ignored unless upgrade fails.
>>
>> --  --
>> Creating tables ...
>> Upgrading Review Board from 2.0.20 to 3.0.3
>> There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
>> There are unapplied evolutions for attachments.
>> There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
>> There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
>> There are unapplied evolutions for notifications.
>> There are unapplied evolutions for oauth.
>> There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
>> There are unapplied evolutions for site.
>> There are unapplied evolutions for webapi.
>> Adding baseline version for new models
>> Evolutions in notifications baseline: webhooktarget_extra_state, 
>> webhooktarget_extra_data_null
>> Evolutions in oauth baseline: disabled_for_security
>> Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
>> Installing custom SQL ...
>> Installing indexes ...
>> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
>>
>> This may take a while. Please be patient, and do not cancel the upgrade!
>>
>> Applying database evolutions for accounts...
>> Applying database evolutions for attachments...
>> Applying database evolutions for changedescs...
>> Applying database evolutions for diffviewer...
>> Applying database evolutions for reviews...
>> Database evolutions for reviews failed!
>> The SQL statement was: CREATE TABLE `reviews_review_general_comments` (
>> `id` integer AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
>> `review_id` integer NOT NULL,
>> `generalcomment_id` integer NOT NULL,
>> UNIQUE (`review_id`, `generalcomment_id`)
>> )
>> ;
>> The database error was: (1050, "Table 'reviews_review_general_comments' 
>> already exists")
>>
>> CommandError: Error applying evolution for reviews: (1050, "Table 
>> 'reviews_review_general_comments' already exists")
>>
>> I have two questions at this point.
>>
>> 1. Does this seem like the proper steps to take to migrate from my old 
>> server to the new one with the newer ReviewBoard version?
>> 2. What can I do about the error I'm getting while running the rb-site 
>> upgrade?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 1:03:37 PM UTC-7, Chris Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> Hmmm, I did a few things since yesterday, reinstalled ReviewBoard, did 
>>> the rb-site upgrade again and now the site is showing in the browser but 
>>> there are no review requests, nothing in console, and nothing new in the 
>>> reviewboard log.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 6:59:32 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi Chris,

 Looks like it’s using PIL, which is deprecated

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

2018-03-14 Thread David Trowbridge

Everything looks OK except get rid of step 4--that's creating a DB with the
new schema. Just create an empty database and then use your database dump
to populate it. rb-site upgrade will convert the schema to the new format.

-David

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:07 PM Chris Lang  wrote:

> Alright here are my current steps for upgrading.
>
> 1. Install ReviewBoard 3.0.3 on new machine.
>
> easy_install ReviewBoard
>
> 2. Copy over my site directory from my old machine into the correct
> location (/var/www/reviews)
>
> On old machine:
>
> scp reviews.tar.gz user@newmachine:/var/www/
>
> On new machine:
> tar xvzf reviews.tar.gz
>
> 3. Create a reviewboard database
>
> Open mysql:
>
> mysql -u root -p
>
> Then in mysql:
>
> create database reviewboard character setutf8;
> grant all priveleges on reviewboard.* to 'reviewboard'@'localhost';
>
> 4. Initialize the database
>
> rb-site manage /var/www/reviews syncdb -- --no-initial-data
>
> 5. Mysql dump of reviewboard database on old machine and compress it.
>
> mysqldump -u root -p reviewboard > reviewboard.sql
> gzip reviewboard.sql
>
> 6. Send sql dump to new machine
>
> scp reviewboard.sql.gz user@newmachine:/root/reviewboard.sql.gz
>
> 7. Extract sql file on new machine:
>
> gunzip reviewboard.sql.gz
>
> 8. Import sql statements into new database on new machine
>
> Open mysql:
>
> mysql -u root-p
>
> Then in mysql:
>
> use reviewboard;
> source /root/reviewboard.sql;
>
> This runs fine without errors now. (Had to increase max packet size to 16M
> 
> )
>
> 9. Upgrade reviewboard site
>
> rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviews/
>
> First error I get here is:
>
> OSError: [Errno 17] File exists: '/var/www/reviews/htdocs/errordocs'
>
> Once I delete that symlink it seems to get past that but then I get the
> following:
>
> Rebuilding directory structure
> Upgrading site settings_local.py
> Updating database. This may take a while.
>
> The log output below, including warnings and errors,
> can be ignored unless upgrade fails.
>
> --  --
> Creating tables ...
> Upgrading Review Board from 2.0.20 to 3.0.3
> There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
> There are unapplied evolutions for attachments.
> There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
> There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
> There are unapplied evolutions for notifications.
> There are unapplied evolutions for oauth.
> There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
> There are unapplied evolutions for site.
> There are unapplied evolutions for webapi.
> Adding baseline version for new models
> Evolutions in notifications baseline: webhooktarget_extra_state,
> webhooktarget_extra_data_null
> Evolutions in oauth baseline: disabled_for_security
> Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
> Installing custom SQL ...
> Installing indexes ...
> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
>
> This may take a while. Please be patient, and do not cancel the upgrade!
>
> Applying database evolutions for accounts...
> Applying database evolutions for attachments...
> Applying database evolutions for changedescs...
> Applying database evolutions for diffviewer...
> Applying database evolutions for reviews...
> Database evolutions for reviews failed!
> The SQL statement was: CREATE TABLE `reviews_review_general_comments` (
> `id` integer AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
> `review_id` integer NOT NULL,
> `generalcomment_id` integer NOT NULL,
> UNIQUE (`review_id`, `generalcomment_id`)
> )
> ;
> The database error was: (1050, "Table 'reviews_review_general_comments'
> already exists")
>
> CommandError: Error applying evolution for reviews: (1050, "Table
> 'reviews_review_general_comments' already exists")
>
> I have two questions at this point.
>
> 1. Does this seem like the proper steps to take to migrate from my old
> server to the new one with the newer ReviewBoard version?
> 2. What can I do about the error I'm getting while running the rb-site
> upgrade?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 1:03:37 PM UTC-7, Chris Lang wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm, I did a few things since yesterday, reinstalled ReviewBoard, did
>> the rb-site upgrade again and now the site is showing in the browser but
>> there are no review requests, nothing in console, and nothing new in the
>> reviewboard log.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 6:59:32 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> Looks like it’s using PIL, which is deprecated and in your case missing
>>> some dependency. You’ll need to uninstall it and install pillow instead
>>> (which can probably be fetched from your distro, or if not, pip — upgrade
>>> pip first).
>>>
>>> If you use pip, watch its output for the dependencies it finds. If any
>>> are missing, you’ll need the development packages from your distro.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

Alright here are my current steps for upgrading.

1. Install ReviewBoard 3.0.3 on new machine. 

easy_install ReviewBoard 

2. Copy over my site directory from my old machine into the correct 
location (/var/www/reviews)

On old machine:

scp reviews.tar.gz user@newmachine:/var/www/

On new machine:
tar xvzf reviews.tar.gz

3. Create a reviewboard database

Open mysql:

mysql -u root -p

Then in mysql:

create database reviewboard character setutf8;
grant all priveleges on reviewboard.* to 'reviewboard'@'localhost';

4. Initialize the database

rb-site manage /var/www/reviews syncdb -- --no-initial-data

5. Mysql dump of reviewboard database on old machine and compress it.

mysqldump -u root -p reviewboard > reviewboard.sql
gzip reviewboard.sql

6. Send sql dump to new machine

scp reviewboard.sql.gz user@newmachine:/root/reviewboard.sql.gz

7. Extract sql file on new machine:

gunzip reviewboard.sql.gz

8. Import sql statements into new database on new machine

Open mysql:

mysql -u root-p

Then in mysql:

use reviewboard;
source /root/reviewboard.sql;

This runs fine without errors now. (Had to increase max packet size to 16M 

)

9. Upgrade reviewboard site

rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviews/

First error I get here is:

OSError: [Errno 17] File exists: '/var/www/reviews/htdocs/errordocs'

Once I delete that symlink it seems to get past that but then I get the 
following:

Rebuilding directory structure
Upgrading site settings_local.py
Updating database. This may take a while.

The log output below, including warnings and errors,
can be ignored unless upgrade fails.

--  --
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 2.0.20 to 3.0.3
There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
There are unapplied evolutions for attachments.
There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
There are unapplied evolutions for notifications.
There are unapplied evolutions for oauth.
There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
There are unapplied evolutions for site.
There are unapplied evolutions for webapi.
Adding baseline version for new models
Evolutions in notifications baseline: webhooktarget_extra_state, 
webhooktarget_extra_data_null
Evolutions in oauth baseline: disabled_for_security
Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)

This may take a while. Please be patient, and do not cancel the upgrade!

Applying database evolutions for accounts...
Applying database evolutions for attachments...
Applying database evolutions for changedescs...
Applying database evolutions for diffviewer...
Applying database evolutions for reviews...
Database evolutions for reviews failed!
The SQL statement was: CREATE TABLE `reviews_review_general_comments` (
`id` integer AUTO_INCREMENT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
`review_id` integer NOT NULL,
`generalcomment_id` integer NOT NULL,
UNIQUE (`review_id`, `generalcomment_id`)
)
;
The database error was: (1050, "Table 'reviews_review_general_comments' 
already exists")

CommandError: Error applying evolution for reviews: (1050, "Table 
'reviews_review_general_comments' already exists")

I have two questions at this point.

1. Does this seem like the proper steps to take to migrate from my old 
server to the new one with the newer ReviewBoard version?
2. What can I do about the error I'm getting while running the rb-site 
upgrade?

Thanks,
Chris

On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 1:03:37 PM UTC-7, Chris Lang wrote:
>
> Hmmm, I did a few things since yesterday, reinstalled ReviewBoard, did the 
> rb-site upgrade again and now the site is showing in the browser but there 
> are no review requests, nothing in console, and nothing new in the 
> reviewboard log.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 6:59:32 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Looks like it’s using PIL, which is deprecated and in your case missing 
>> some dependency. You’ll need to uninstall it and install pillow instead 
>> (which can probably be fetched from your distro, or if not, pip — upgrade 
>> pip first).
>>
>> If you use pip, watch its output for the dependencies it finds. If any 
>> are missing, you’ll need the development packages from your distro.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 14:08 Chris Lang  wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Christian,
>>>
>>> It almost all went smoothly. Currently I'm getting a 500 error from 
>>> reviewboard.
>>> I checked the log and found the following error:
>>>
>>> 2018-03-12 07:46:54,793 - ERROR -  - Error thumbnailing image file 
>>> uploaded/files/2018/03/12/59e3f458-2488-4a83-8236-5542dfd7337a__cloverleaf.gif
>>>  
>>> and saving as 
>>> uploaded/files/2018/03/12/59e3f458-2488-4a83-8236-5542dfd7337a__cloverleaf_800x200.gif:
>>>  
>>>

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

2018-03-13 Thread Chris Lang

Hmmm, I did a few things since yesterday, reinstalled ReviewBoard, did the 
rb-site upgrade again and now the site is showing in the browser but there 
are no review requests, nothing in console, and nothing new in the 
reviewboard log.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Chris

On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 6:59:32 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Looks like it’s using PIL, which is deprecated and in your case missing 
> some dependency. You’ll need to uninstall it and install pillow instead 
> (which can probably be fetched from your distro, or if not, pip — upgrade 
> pip first).
>
> If you use pip, watch its output for the dependencies it finds. If any are 
> missing, you’ll need the development packages from your distro.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 14:08 Chris Lang  
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Christian,
>>
>> It almost all went smoothly. Currently I'm getting a 500 error from 
>> reviewboard.
>> I checked the log and found the following error:
>>
>> 2018-03-12 07:46:54,793 - ERROR -  - Error thumbnailing image file 
>> uploaded/files/2018/03/12/59e3f458-2488-4a83-8236-5542dfd7337a__cloverleaf.gif
>>  
>> and saving as 
>> uploaded/files/2018/03/12/59e3f458-2488-4a83-8236-5542dfd7337a__cloverleaf_800x200.gif:
>>  
>> encoder zip not available
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File 
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.23-py2.7.egg/djblets/util/templatetags/djblets_images.py",
>>  
>> line 120, in thumbnail
>> save_image_to_storage(image, storage, miniature)
>>   File 
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.23-py2.7.egg/djblets/util/templatetags/djblets_images.py",
>>  
>> line 48, in save_image_to_storage
>> image.save(file, 'png')
>>   File 
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Image.py",
>>  
>> line 1439, in save
>> save_handler(self, fp, filename)
>>   File 
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/PngImagePlugin.py",
>>  
>> line 572, in _save
>> ImageFile._save(im, _idat(fp, chunk), [("zip", (0,0)+im.size, 0, 
>> rawmode)])
>>   File 
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/ImageFile.py",
>>  
>> line 481, in _save
>> e = Image._getencoder(im.mode, e, a, im.encoderconfig)
>>   File 
>> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Image.py",
>>  
>> line 401, in _getencoder
>> raise IOError("encoder %s not available" % encoder_name)
>> IOError: encoder zip not available
>>
>> Let me know if you've seen this before, otherwise I'm still looking into 
>> how to resolve it.
>>
>> Just wanted to give an update.
>>
>> @Stephen, yea I went and tried to do yum install ReviewBoard but it gave 
>> me 2.5 as you pointed out. Easy_install seems to have worked well for the 
>> most part but ya it'd be nice to have the lastest version of ReviewBoard in 
>> EPEL.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 7:53:04 PM UTC-8, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> Just to mention, I maintain an RPM packaged version of the 2.5 series 
>>> for RHEL and Centos in the EPEL repository which should avoid the version 
>>> compatibility question. (I don't work for Beanbag Inc., it's a volunteer 
>>> effort)
>>>
>>> I have it on my TO DO list to get 3.x out for EPEL, but my regular job 
>>> has kept me swamped for the last couple months. Hopefully soon, though.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018, 3:23 PM Chris Lang  wrote:
>>>
 I will take your advice and upgrade, thats great to hear that I will be 
 able to install the newer version.
 I'll go ahead and try that out and then let you know how it goes.

 Thanks for your help Christian!


 On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 6:52:53 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:

> As long as you have a backup of the database and site directory, you 
> have nothing to worry about. It's perfectly safe to install a newer 
> version 
> of Review Board on the target server, copy the site directory over to the 
> same path as on the old server, and then do a 'rb-site upgrade'. It will 
> upgrade the database to Review Board 3.0.
>
> (3.0 is the recommended version at this point.)
>
> If you want to use the older version on the new server for now, you 
> can locate the site-packages directory containing the old Review Board 
> install and see the versions of the packages you were using there. You 
> can 
> force the installation of the appropriate versions with:
>
> sudo easy_install package_name==version
>
> Christian
>

> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Chris Lang  wrote:
>
>> I'm thinking it'll be safer to move to the new machine first and then 
>> upgrade, and in case anything goes wrong with the upgrade, the team can 
>> continue using the old server.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:24:40 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

2018-03-12 Thread Christian Hammond

Hi Chris,

Looks like it’s using PIL, which is deprecated and in your case missing
some dependency. You’ll need to uninstall it and install pillow instead
(which can probably be fetched from your distro, or if not, pip — upgrade
pip first).

If you use pip, watch its output for the dependencies it finds. If any are
missing, you’ll need the development packages from your distro.

Christian


On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 14:08 Chris Lang  wrote:

> Hey Christian,
>
> It almost all went smoothly. Currently I'm getting a 500 error from
> reviewboard.
> I checked the log and found the following error:
>
> 2018-03-12 07:46:54,793 - ERROR -  - Error thumbnailing image file
> uploaded/files/2018/03/12/59e3f458-2488-4a83-8236-5542dfd7337a__cloverleaf.gif
> and saving as
> uploaded/files/2018/03/12/59e3f458-2488-4a83-8236-5542dfd7337a__cloverleaf_800x200.gif:
> encoder zip not available
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.23-py2.7.egg/djblets/util/templatetags/djblets_images.py",
> line 120, in thumbnail
> save_image_to_storage(image, storage, miniature)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.23-py2.7.egg/djblets/util/templatetags/djblets_images.py",
> line 48, in save_image_to_storage
> image.save(file, 'png')
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Image.py",
> line 1439, in save
> save_handler(self, fp, filename)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/PngImagePlugin.py",
> line 572, in _save
> ImageFile._save(im, _idat(fp, chunk), [("zip", (0,0)+im.size, 0,
> rawmode)])
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/ImageFile.py",
> line 481, in _save
> e = Image._getencoder(im.mode, e, a, im.encoderconfig)
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Image.py",
> line 401, in _getencoder
> raise IOError("encoder %s not available" % encoder_name)
> IOError: encoder zip not available
>
> Let me know if you've seen this before, otherwise I'm still looking into
> how to resolve it.
>
> Just wanted to give an update.
>
> @Stephen, yea I went and tried to do yum install ReviewBoard but it gave
> me 2.5 as you pointed out. Easy_install seems to have worked well for the
> most part but ya it'd be nice to have the lastest version of ReviewBoard in
> EPEL.
>
>
> On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 7:53:04 PM UTC-8, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> Just to mention, I maintain an RPM packaged version of the 2.5 series for
>> RHEL and Centos in the EPEL repository which should avoid the version
>> compatibility question. (I don't work for Beanbag Inc., it's a volunteer
>> effort)
>>
>> I have it on my TO DO list to get 3.x out for EPEL, but my regular job
>> has kept me swamped for the last couple months. Hopefully soon, though.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018, 3:23 PM Chris Lang  wrote:
>>
>>> I will take your advice and upgrade, thats great to hear that I will be
>>> able to install the newer version.
>>> I'll go ahead and try that out and then let you know how it goes.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help Christian!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 6:52:53 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
 As long as you have a backup of the database and site directory, you
 have nothing to worry about. It's perfectly safe to install a newer version
 of Review Board on the target server, copy the site directory over to the
 same path as on the old server, and then do a 'rb-site upgrade'. It will
 upgrade the database to Review Board 3.0.

 (3.0 is the recommended version at this point.)

 If you want to use the older version on the new server for now, you can
 locate the site-packages directory containing the old Review Board install
 and see the versions of the packages you were using there. You can force
 the installation of the appropriate versions with:

 sudo easy_install package_name==version

 Christian

>>>
 On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Chris Lang  wrote:

> I'm thinking it'll be safer to move to the new machine first and then
> upgrade, and in case anything goes wrong with the upgrade, the team can
> continue using the old server.
>
>
> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:24:40 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>>
>> Do you think it'd be easier to upgrade first and then move to the new
>> server? CentOS -> Redhat.
>> I'm trying to minimize downtime since our developers use it around
>> the clock.
>>
>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:17:42 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Christian,
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm moving between servers for security reasons. What version
>>> of ReviewBoard would you recommend upgrading to?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

2018-03-12 Thread Chris Lang

Hey Christian,

It almost all went smoothly. Currently I'm getting a 500 error from 
reviewboard.
I checked the log and found the following error:

2018-03-12 07:46:54,793 - ERROR -  - Error thumbnailing image file 
uploaded/files/2018/03/12/59e3f458-2488-4a83-8236-5542dfd7337a__cloverleaf.gif 
and saving as 
uploaded/files/2018/03/12/59e3f458-2488-4a83-8236-5542dfd7337a__cloverleaf_800x200.gif:
 
encoder zip not available
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.23-py2.7.egg/djblets/util/templatetags/djblets_images.py",
 
line 120, in thumbnail
save_image_to_storage(image, storage, miniature)
  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/Djblets-0.8.23-py2.7.egg/djblets/util/templatetags/djblets_images.py",
 
line 48, in save_image_to_storage
image.save(file, 'png')
  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Image.py", 
line 1439, in save
save_handler(self, fp, filename)
  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/PngImagePlugin.py",
 
line 572, in _save
ImageFile._save(im, _idat(fp, chunk), [("zip", (0,0)+im.size, 0, 
rawmode)])
  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/ImageFile.py",
 
line 481, in _save
e = Image._getencoder(im.mode, e, a, im.encoderconfig)
  File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/PIL-1.1.7-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/Image.py", 
line 401, in _getencoder
raise IOError("encoder %s not available" % encoder_name)
IOError: encoder zip not available

Let me know if you've seen this before, otherwise I'm still looking into 
how to resolve it.

Just wanted to give an update.

@Stephen, yea I went and tried to do yum install ReviewBoard but it gave me 
2.5 as you pointed out. Easy_install seems to have worked well for the most 
part but ya it'd be nice to have the lastest version of ReviewBoard in EPEL.


On Friday, March 9, 2018 at 7:53:04 PM UTC-8, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Just to mention, I maintain an RPM packaged version of the 2.5 series for 
> RHEL and Centos in the EPEL repository which should avoid the version 
> compatibility question. (I don't work for Beanbag Inc., it's a volunteer 
> effort)
>
> I have it on my TO DO list to get 3.x out for EPEL, but my regular job has 
> kept me swamped for the last couple months. Hopefully soon, though.
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018, 3:23 PM Chris Lang  
> wrote:
>
>> I will take your advice and upgrade, thats great to hear that I will be 
>> able to install the newer version.
>> I'll go ahead and try that out and then let you know how it goes.
>>
>> Thanks for your help Christian!
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 6:52:53 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>>> As long as you have a backup of the database and site directory, you 
>>> have nothing to worry about. It's perfectly safe to install a newer version 
>>> of Review Board on the target server, copy the site directory over to the 
>>> same path as on the old server, and then do a 'rb-site upgrade'. It will 
>>> upgrade the database to Review Board 3.0.
>>>
>>> (3.0 is the recommended version at this point.)
>>>
>>> If you want to use the older version on the new server for now, you can 
>>> locate the site-packages directory containing the old Review Board install 
>>> and see the versions of the packages you were using there. You can force 
>>> the installation of the appropriate versions with:
>>>
>>> sudo easy_install package_name==version
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Chris Lang  wrote:
>>>
 I'm thinking it'll be safer to move to the new machine first and then 
 upgrade, and in case anything goes wrong with the upgrade, the team can 
 continue using the old server.


 On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:24:40 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>
> Do you think it'd be easier to upgrade first and then move to the new 
> server? CentOS -> Redhat.
> I'm trying to minimize downtime since our developers use it around the 
> clock.
>
> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:17:42 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>>
>> Hey Christian,
>>
>> Yes, I'm moving between servers for security reasons. What version of 
>> ReviewBoard would you recommend upgrading to?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:08:03 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> Django 1.6.11 is correct. You likely have something installed on the 
>>> server that wants a newer version. It’s possible some dependency 
>>> required 
>>> by Review Board or another of its dependencies picked it up.
>>>
>>> This is fixable, but first, can you tell me why you’re installing 
>>> 2.0.20? Are you moving between servers?  I ask because except for major 
>>> security issues, we’re no longer maintaining this release outside of 
>>>

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

2018-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher

Just to mention, I maintain an RPM packaged version of the 2.5 series for
RHEL and Centos in the EPEL repository which should avoid the version
compatibility question. (I don't work for Beanbag Inc., it's a volunteer
effort)

I have it on my TO DO list to get 3.x out for EPEL, but my regular job has
kept me swamped for the last couple months. Hopefully soon, though.

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018, 3:23 PM Chris Lang  wrote:

> I will take your advice and upgrade, thats great to hear that I will be
> able to install the newer version.
> I'll go ahead and try that out and then let you know how it goes.
>
> Thanks for your help Christian!
>
>
> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 6:52:53 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
>> As long as you have a backup of the database and site directory, you have
>> nothing to worry about. It's perfectly safe to install a newer version of
>> Review Board on the target server, copy the site directory over to the same
>> path as on the old server, and then do a 'rb-site upgrade'. It will upgrade
>> the database to Review Board 3.0.
>>
>> (3.0 is the recommended version at this point.)
>>
>> If you want to use the older version on the new server for now, you can
>> locate the site-packages directory containing the old Review Board install
>> and see the versions of the packages you were using there. You can force
>> the installation of the appropriate versions with:
>>
>> sudo easy_install package_name==version
>>
>> Christian
>>
>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Chris Lang  wrote:
>>
>>> I'm thinking it'll be safer to move to the new machine first and then
>>> upgrade, and in case anything goes wrong with the upgrade, the team can
>>> continue using the old server.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:24:40 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:

 Do you think it'd be easier to upgrade first and then move to the new
 server? CentOS -> Redhat.
 I'm trying to minimize downtime since our developers use it around the
 clock.

 On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:17:42 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>
> Hey Christian,
>
> Yes, I'm moving between servers for security reasons. What version of
> ReviewBoard would you recommend upgrading to?
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:08:03 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Django 1.6.11 is correct. You likely have something installed on the
>> server that wants a newer version. It’s possible some dependency required
>> by Review Board or another of its dependencies picked it up.
>>
>> This is fixable, but first, can you tell me why you’re installing
>> 2.0.20? Are you moving between servers?  I ask because except for major
>> security issues, we’re no longer maintaining this release outside of
>> support contracts.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:56 Chris Lang  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to install ReviewBoard 2.0.20 on RedHat 7.4 but am
>>> getting an error when running rb-site install.
>>>
>>> I initially installed ReviewBoard with easy_install
>>> ReviewBoard==2.0.20.
>>>
>>> The current errors I'm getting are:
>>>
>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line
>>> 626, in resolve
>>> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>>> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django>=1.6.11,<1.7
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line
>>> 630, in resolve
>>> raise VersionConflict(dist,req) # XXX put more info here
>>> pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (Django 1.6.11
>>> (/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages), 
>>> Requirement.parse('Django>=1.8,<1.12'))
>>>
>>> I cannot get a version of Django that satisfies both. Not sure what
>>> to do from here.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Review Board Community" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
>> --
>> Christian Hammond
>> President/CEO of Beanbag
>> Makers of Review Board
>>
> --
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know!

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

2018-03-09 Thread Chris Lang

I will take your advice and upgrade, thats great to hear that I will be 
able to install the newer version.
I'll go ahead and try that out and then let you know how it goes.

Thanks for your help Christian!

On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 6:52:53 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> As long as you have a backup of the database and site directory, you have 
> nothing to worry about. It's perfectly safe to install a newer version of 
> Review Board on the target server, copy the site directory over to the same 
> path as on the old server, and then do a 'rb-site upgrade'. It will upgrade 
> the database to Review Board 3.0.
>
> (3.0 is the recommended version at this point.)
>
> If you want to use the older version on the new server for now, you can 
> locate the site-packages directory containing the old Review Board install 
> and see the versions of the packages you were using there. You can force 
> the installation of the appropriate versions with:
>
> sudo easy_install package_name==version
>
> Christian
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Chris Lang  > wrote:
>
>> I'm thinking it'll be safer to move to the new machine first and then 
>> upgrade, and in case anything goes wrong with the upgrade, the team can 
>> continue using the old server.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:24:40 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you think it'd be easier to upgrade first and then move to the new 
>>> server? CentOS -> Redhat.
>>> I'm trying to minimize downtime since our developers use it around the 
>>> clock.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:17:42 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:

 Hey Christian,

 Yes, I'm moving between servers for security reasons. What version of 
 ReviewBoard would you recommend upgrading to?

 Regards,
 Chris

 On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:08:03 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond 
 wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Django 1.6.11 is correct. You likely have something installed on the 
> server that wants a newer version. It’s possible some dependency required 
> by Review Board or another of its dependencies picked it up.
>
> This is fixable, but first, can you tell me why you’re installing 
> 2.0.20? Are you moving between servers?  I ask because except for major 
> security issues, we’re no longer maintaining this release outside of 
> support contracts.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:56 Chris Lang  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to install ReviewBoard 2.0.20 on RedHat 7.4 but am getting 
>> an error when running rb-site install.
>>
>> I initially installed ReviewBoard with easy_install 
>> ReviewBoard==2.0.20.
>>
>> The current errors I'm getting are:
>>
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 626, 
>> in resolve
>> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django>=1.6.11,<1.7
>>
>> and 
>>
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 630, 
>> in resolve
>> raise VersionConflict(dist,req) # XXX put more info here
>> pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (Django 1.6.11 
>> (/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages), 
>> Requirement.parse('Django>=1.8,<1.12'))
>>
>> I cannot get a version of Django that satisfies both. Not sure what 
>> to do from here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Review Board Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> -- 
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag
> Makers of Review Board
>
 -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Review Board Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag 
> Makers of Review Board 
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

2018-03-08 Thread Christian Hammond

As long as you have a backup of the database and site directory, you have
nothing to worry about. It's perfectly safe to install a newer version of
Review Board on the target server, copy the site directory over to the same
path as on the old server, and then do a 'rb-site upgrade'. It will upgrade
the database to Review Board 3.0.

(3.0 is the recommended version at this point.)

If you want to use the older version on the new server for now, you can
locate the site-packages directory containing the old Review Board install
and see the versions of the packages you were using there. You can force
the installation of the appropriate versions with:

sudo easy_install package_name==version

Christian

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Chris Lang  wrote:

> I'm thinking it'll be safer to move to the new machine first and then
> upgrade, and in case anything goes wrong with the upgrade, the team can
> continue using the old server.
>
>
> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:24:40 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>>
>> Do you think it'd be easier to upgrade first and then move to the new
>> server? CentOS -> Redhat.
>> I'm trying to minimize downtime since our developers use it around the
>> clock.
>>
>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:17:42 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Christian,
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm moving between servers for security reasons. What version of
>>> ReviewBoard would you recommend upgrading to?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:08:03 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi Chris,

 Django 1.6.11 is correct. You likely have something installed on the
 server that wants a newer version. It’s possible some dependency required
 by Review Board or another of its dependencies picked it up.

 This is fixable, but first, can you tell me why you’re installing
 2.0.20? Are you moving between servers?  I ask because except for major
 security issues, we’re no longer maintaining this release outside of
 support contracts.

 Christian


 On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:56 Chris Lang  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install ReviewBoard 2.0.20 on RedHat 7.4 but am getting
> an error when running rb-site install.
>
> I initially installed ReviewBoard with easy_install
> ReviewBoard==2.0.20.
>
> The current errors I'm getting are:
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 626,
> in resolve
> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django>=1.6.11,<1.7
>
> and
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 630,
> in resolve
> raise VersionConflict(dist,req) # XXX put more info here
> pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (Django 1.6.11
> (/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages), Requirement.parse('Django>=1.8
> ,<1.12'))
>
> I cannot get a version of Django that satisfies both. Not sure what to
> do from here.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
 --
 --
 Christian Hammond
 President/CEO of Beanbag
 Makers of Review Board

>>> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag 
Makers of Review Board 

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

I'm thinking it'll be safer to move to the new machine first and then 
upgrade, and in case anything goes wrong with the upgrade, the team can 
continue using the old server.

On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:24:40 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>
> Do you think it'd be easier to upgrade first and then move to the new 
> server? CentOS -> Redhat.
> I'm trying to minimize downtime since our developers use it around the 
> clock.
>
> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:17:42 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>>
>> Hey Christian,
>>
>> Yes, I'm moving between servers for security reasons. What version of 
>> ReviewBoard would you recommend upgrading to?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:08:03 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> Django 1.6.11 is correct. You likely have something installed on the 
>>> server that wants a newer version. It’s possible some dependency required 
>>> by Review Board or another of its dependencies picked it up.
>>>
>>> This is fixable, but first, can you tell me why you’re installing 
>>> 2.0.20? Are you moving between servers?  I ask because except for major 
>>> security issues, we’re no longer maintaining this release outside of 
>>> support contracts.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:56 Chris Lang  wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 I'm trying to install ReviewBoard 2.0.20 on RedHat 7.4 but am getting 
 an error when running rb-site install.

 I initially installed ReviewBoard with easy_install ReviewBoard==2.0.20.

 The current errors I'm getting are:

   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 626, 
 in resolve
 raise DistributionNotFound(req)
 pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django>=1.6.11,<1.7

 and 

   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 630, 
 in resolve
 raise VersionConflict(dist,req) # XXX put more info here
 pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (Django 1.6.11 
 (/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages), Requirement.parse('Django>=1.8,<1.12'))

 I cannot get a version of Django that satisfies both. Not sure what to 
 do from here.

 Thanks,
 Chris

 -- 
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "Review Board Community" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>> -- 
>>> -- 
>>> Christian Hammond
>>> President/CEO of Beanbag
>>> Makers of Review Board
>>>
>>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

Do you think it'd be easier to upgrade first and then move to the new 
server? CentOS -> Redhat.
I'm trying to minimize downtime since our developers use it around the 
clock.

On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:17:42 PM UTC-8, Chris Lang wrote:
>
> Hey Christian,
>
> Yes, I'm moving between servers for security reasons. What version of 
> ReviewBoard would you recommend upgrading to?
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:08:03 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Django 1.6.11 is correct. You likely have something installed on the 
>> server that wants a newer version. It’s possible some dependency required 
>> by Review Board or another of its dependencies picked it up.
>>
>> This is fixable, but first, can you tell me why you’re installing 2.0.20? 
>> Are you moving between servers?  I ask because except for major security 
>> issues, we’re no longer maintaining this release outside of support 
>> contracts.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:56 Chris Lang  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to install ReviewBoard 2.0.20 on RedHat 7.4 but am getting an 
>>> error when running rb-site install.
>>>
>>> I initially installed ReviewBoard with easy_install ReviewBoard==2.0.20.
>>>
>>> The current errors I'm getting are:
>>>
>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 626, in 
>>> resolve
>>> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>>> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django>=1.6.11,<1.7
>>>
>>> and 
>>>
>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 630, in 
>>> resolve
>>> raise VersionConflict(dist,req) # XXX put more info here
>>> pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (Django 1.6.11 
>>> (/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages), Requirement.parse('Django>=1.8,<1.12'))
>>>
>>> I cannot get a version of Django that satisfies both. Not sure what to 
>>> do from here.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>>> https://rbcommons.com/
>>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Review Board Community" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Christian Hammond
>> President/CEO of Beanbag
>> Makers of Review Board
>>
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

Hey Christian,

Yes, I'm moving between servers for security reasons. What version of 
ReviewBoard would you recommend upgrading to?

Regards,
Chris

On Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 12:08:03 PM UTC-8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Django 1.6.11 is correct. You likely have something installed on the 
> server that wants a newer version. It’s possible some dependency required 
> by Review Board or another of its dependencies picked it up.
>
> This is fixable, but first, can you tell me why you’re installing 2.0.20? 
> Are you moving between servers?  I ask because except for major security 
> issues, we’re no longer maintaining this release outside of support 
> contracts.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:56 Chris Lang  
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to install ReviewBoard 2.0.20 on RedHat 7.4 but am getting an 
>> error when running rb-site install.
>>
>> I initially installed ReviewBoard with easy_install ReviewBoard==2.0.20.
>>
>> The current errors I'm getting are:
>>
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 626, in 
>> resolve
>> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
>> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django>=1.6.11,<1.7
>>
>> and 
>>
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 630, in 
>> resolve
>> raise VersionConflict(dist,req) # XXX put more info here
>> pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (Django 1.6.11 
>> (/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages), Requirement.parse('Django>=1.8,<1.12'))
>>
>> I cannot get a version of Django that satisfies both. Not sure what to do 
>> from here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>>
>> -- 
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
>> https://rbcommons.com/
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Review Board Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> -- 
> -- 
> Christian Hammond
> President/CEO of Beanbag
> Makers of Review Board
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

2018-03-08 Thread Christian Hammond

Hi Chris,

Django 1.6.11 is correct. You likely have something installed on the server
that wants a newer version. It’s possible some dependency required by
Review Board or another of its dependencies picked it up.

This is fixable, but first, can you tell me why you’re installing 2.0.20?
Are you moving between servers?  I ask because except for major security
issues, we’re no longer maintaining this release outside of support
contracts.

Christian


On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:56 Chris Lang  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install ReviewBoard 2.0.20 on RedHat 7.4 but am getting an
> error when running rb-site install.
>
> I initially installed ReviewBoard with easy_install ReviewBoard==2.0.20.
>
> The current errors I'm getting are:
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 626, in
> resolve
> raise DistributionNotFound(req)
> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django>=1.6.11,<1.7
>
> and
>
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 630, in
> resolve
> raise VersionConflict(dist,req) # XXX put more info here
> pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (Django 1.6.11
> (/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages), Requirement.parse('Django>=1.8,<1.12'))
>
> I cannot get a version of Django that satisfies both. Not sure what to do
> from here.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
-- 
-- 
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag
Makers of Review Board

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Django version mismatch installing ReviewBoard 2.0.20

Hi,

I'm trying to install ReviewBoard 2.0.20 on RedHat 7.4 but am getting an 
error when running rb-site install.

I initially installed ReviewBoard with easy_install ReviewBoard==2.0.20.

The current errors I'm getting are:

  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 626, in 
resolve
raise DistributionNotFound(req)
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django>=1.6.11,<1.7

and 

  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 630, in 
resolve
raise VersionConflict(dist,req) # XXX put more info here
pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (Django 1.6.11 
(/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages), Requirement.parse('Django>=1.8,<1.12'))

I cannot get a version of Django that satisfies both. Not sure what to do 
from here.

Thanks,
Chris

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Installing ReviewBoard using pip

2015-05-06 Thread Sri Ram Kannan

Hi chris,

Thanks for your update. I will go with easy_install.

On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 2:37:57 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi Sri,

 For now, you need to use easy_install, for a number of reasons:

 1. Pip doesn't support eggs (we'll be releasing Wheels in the next release 
 of Review Board).
 2. Pip does support source dists, which we provide, but there's a lot of 
 manual steps needed for those to build, and we do not recommend it at all.
 3. Pip makes it harder to install externally-hosted builds. This will 
 change down the road, apparently, but for now, it's a lot harder to install 
 using pip.

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

 On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Sri Ram Kannan sriram...@gmail.com 
 javascript: wrote:

 Hi,

 I read few posts in this group that Review board cannot installed using 
 pip. 

 But I see reviewboard in PyPi page and when I tried to install using pip, 
 I got the below error:

   Could not find any downloads that satisfy the requirement ReviewBoard
   Some externally hosted files were ignored (use --allow-external 
 ReviewBoard to allow).
 Cleaning up...
 No distributions at all found for ReviewBoard
 Storing debug log for failure in /data/users/skannan/.pip/pip.log

 Can some update me ?

 Regards,
 Sri.

  -- 
 Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
 https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
 https://rbcommons.com/
 Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Installing ReviewBoard using pip

2015-05-06 Thread Sri Ram Kannan

Hi,

I read few posts in this group that Review board cannot installed using 
pip. 

But I see reviewboard in PyPi page and when I tried to install using pip, I 
got the below error:

  Could not find any downloads that satisfy the requirement ReviewBoard
  Some externally hosted files were ignored (use --allow-external 
ReviewBoard to allow).
Cleaning up...
No distributions at all found for ReviewBoard
Storing debug log for failure in /data/users/skannan/.pip/pip.log

Can some update me ?

Regards,
Sri.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Issue 3787 in reviewboard: TypeError: must be char, not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.

2015-03-04 Thread reviewboard


Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #5 on issue 3787 by trowb...@gmail.com: TypeError: must be char,  
not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3787

Fixed in release-2.0.x (d5c710a). Thanks!

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Issue 3787 in reviewboard: TypeError: must be char, not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.



Comment #3 on issue 3787 by chester@gmail.com: TypeError: must be  
char, not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3787

Hi Stefan!

What is the expected output?
What do you see?

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Issue 3787 in reviewboard: TypeError: must be char, not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.



Comment #1 on issue 3787 by chester@gmail.com: TypeError: must be  
char, not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3787

1. I am confused with your What is the expected output? What do you see  
instead?

2. Please indicate that in which file the line 944 is.
3. Is each step a command?

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Issue 3787 in reviewboard: TypeError: must be char, not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.



Comment #2 on issue 3787 by der.se...@gmail.com: TypeError: must be char,  
not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3787

review request: https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/6983/

Hi Chester,

About 1.
Step 1 is downloading reviewboard
Step 2 is the installation of a reviewboard site.
Step 3 to 7 are filling the variables (in cmd) required to install.

2. The fix is in \reviewboard\cmdline\rbsite.py

3. No Step 3 to 7 reviewboard asks for values in cmd



--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Issue 3787 in reviewboard: TypeError: must be char, not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.



Comment #4 on issue 3787 by der.se...@gmail.com: TypeError: must be char,  
not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3787

I updated my review request.
Please have a look there. Then we not have to communicate on two channels.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Issue 3788 in reviewboard: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'chown' when installing reviewboard on Windows

2015-02-27 Thread reviewboard


Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #1 on issue 3788 by trowb...@gmail.com: AttributeError: 'module'  
object has no attribute 'chown' when installing reviewboard on Windows

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3788

Fixed in release-2.0.x (f4fb2c2). Thanks!

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Issue 3788 in reviewboard: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'chown' when installing reviewboard on Windows

2015-02-26 Thread reviewboard

Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 3788 by der.se...@gmail.com: AttributeError: 'module' object has
no attribute 'chown' when installing reviewboard on Windows

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3788

What version are you running?
2.0.13

What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
reviewboard/cmdline

What steps will reproduce the problem?
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. easy_install reviewboard
2. rb-site install D:\reviewboard\www
3. fill all formes

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Install reviewboard to D:\reviewboard\www

What operating system are you using? What browser?
Windows 7 english

Please provide any additional information below.
* Installing the site...
Building site directories ... Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\Python27\Scripts\rb-site-script.py, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==2.0.13', 'console_scripts', 'rb-site')()

File C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg\reviewboard\cmdline\rbsite.py,
line 1883, in main

command.run()

File C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg\reviewboard\cmdline\rbsite.py,
line 1241, in run

self.show_install_status()

File C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg\reviewboard\cmdline\rbsite.py,
line 1550, in show_install_status

site.rebuild_site_directory)

File C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg\reviewboard\cmdline\rbsite.py,
line 1084, in step

func()

File C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg\reviewboard\cmdline\rbsite.py,
line 210, in rebuild_site_directory

os.chown(writable_dir, writable_st.st_uid, writable_st.st_gid)
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'chown'

To fix:
Replace line 210
os.chown(writable_dir, writable_st.st_uid, writable_st.st_gid)

With:
if hasattr(os, 'chown'):
os.chown(writable_dir, writable_st.st_uid, writable_st.st_gid)

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Issue 3787 in reviewboard: TypeError: must be char, not unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.

2015-02-26 Thread reviewboard

Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 3787 by der.se...@gmail.com: TypeError: must be char, not
unicode when installing reviewboard on windows.

https://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3787

*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report will be
*** rejected.
***
*** If you have a security issue to report, please send it confidentially
to
*** secur...@reviewboard.org. Posting security-related issues to this bug
*** tracker causes us to have to do an emergency release.
***
*** For customer support, please post to reviewbo...@googlegroups.com
***
*** If you have a patch, please submit it to
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/
***
*** This bug tracker is public. Please check that any logs or other
information
*** that you include has been stripped of confidential information.

What version are you running?
2.1.13

What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
Reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. easy_install reviewboard
2. rb-site install D:\reviewboard\www
3. Domain: Domain
4. Path: /reviewboard/
5. DB Name: reviewboard
6. DB Server: domain
7. DB User: user

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Prompt for DB user password

What operating system are you using? What browser?
Windows7 eng CMD

Please provide any additional information below.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\Python27\Scripts\rb-site-script.py, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==2.0.13', 'console_scripts', 'rb-site')()

File C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg\reviewboard\cmdline\rbsite.py,
line 1883, in main

command.run()

File C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg\reviewboard\cmdline\rbsite.py,
line 1225, in run

self.ask_database_login()

File C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg\reviewboard\cmdline\rbsite.py,
line 1438, in ask_database_login

save_obj=site, save_var=db_pass)

File C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\reviewboard-2.0.13-py2.7.egg\reviewboard\cmdline\rbsite.py,
line 942, in prompt_input

temp_value = getpass.getpass(prompt)
File C:\Python27\lib\getpass.py, line 95, in win_getpass
msvcrt.putch(c)
TypeError: must be char, not unicode

Can be fixed by replacing line 944 with:
temp_value = getpass.getpass(prompt = prompt.encode('ascii','ignore'))

Best regards, Stefan

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

Re: Installing reviewboard

2014-05-02 Thread Vinay Kv

Hi I am trying to install review board. I am not able to use easy install 
it is giving me following error
Searching for Reviewboard
Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/Reviewboard/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
No local packages or download links found for Reviewboard
error: Could not find suitable distribution for 
Requirement.parse('Reviewboard')

I downloaded all the files from the site, can you please help me how to 
install that files which are in my machine(i.e can you give me a command 
for it)

On Tuesday, 3 December 2013 01:53:42 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Installing from the .tar.gz is going to be a challenge, since it requires 
 a lot of additional tools that the .egg files don't.

 The best way is to download the .egg for Review Board and all of the 
 dependencies, and then use easy_install with that.

 By the way, 1.7.1 is very, very old. Please install the latest 1.7.x 
 release.

 -David


 On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ayappan Perumal 
 ayap...@gmail.comjavascript:
  wrote:

 Hi guys,

  I need to install reviewboard on a linux box which do not have any 
 internet connection. Is there any way to download setup file from another 
 machine, copy to it and install it there?

  I actually downloaded a ReviewBoard-1.7.1.tar.gz from the 
 reviewboard site but don't know which file to run to trigger the install.

 Please help me out guys.Thank you
  
 -- 
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Installing reviewboard

2014-05-02 Thread David Trowbridge

What's the specific command you ran?


-David


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Vinay Kv vinay.kv...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi I am trying to install review board. I am not able to use easy install
 it is giving me following error
 Searching for Reviewboard
 Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/Reviewboard/
 Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
 Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/
 Reading http://www.review-board.org/
 Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
 No local packages or download links found for Reviewboard
 error: Could not find suitable distribution for
 Requirement.parse('Reviewboard')

 I downloaded all the files from the site, can you please help me how to
 install that files which are in my machine(i.e can you give me a command
 for it)

 On Tuesday, 3 December 2013 01:53:42 UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:

 Installing from the .tar.gz is going to be a challenge, since it requires
 a lot of additional tools that the .egg files don't.

 The best way is to download the .egg for Review Board and all of the
 dependencies, and then use easy_install with that.

 By the way, 1.7.1 is very, very old. Please install the latest 1.7.x
 release.

 -David


 On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ayappan Perumal ayap...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi guys,

  I need to install reviewboard on a linux box which do not have any
 internet connection. Is there any way to download setup file from another
 machine, copy to it and install it there?

  I actually downloaded a ReviewBoard-1.7.1.tar.gz from the
 reviewboard site but don't know which file to run to trigger the install.

 Please help me out guys.Thank you

 --
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.

 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


  --
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: 403 Forbidden when installing reviewboard on Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS

2014-01-26 Thread Xiaolin Zhang

pip install PIL works fine. The uri on reviewboard.org is broken.

On Sunday, January 26, 2014 3:30:52 PM UTC+8, Xiaolin Zhang wrote:

 Hi,

 When installing reviewboard on Ubuntu, follows the instruction on 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.7/admin/installation/linux/
 by *easy_install ReviewBoard*, which ends with 403 Forbidden error:

 Searching for ReviewBoard
 Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7.21
 Processing ReviewBoard-1.7.21-py2.7.egg
 ReviewBoard 1.7.21 is already the active version in easy-install.pth
 Installing rb-site script to /usr/local/bin
 Installing rbssh script to /usr/local/bin

 Using /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.21-py2.7.egg
 Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
 Searching for PIL
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/
 Best match: PIL 1.1.6
 Downloading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
 error: Can't download 
 http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz: 403 Forbidden

 How to resolve this problem? Thanks.


-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: 403 Forbidden when installing reviewboard on Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS

2014-01-26 Thread Christian Hammond

Thanks. I'm looking into this.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com


On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Xiaolin Zhang zhangxiaol...@gmail.comwrote:

 pip install PIL works fine. The uri on reviewboard.org is broken.


 On Sunday, January 26, 2014 3:30:52 PM UTC+8, Xiaolin Zhang wrote:

 Hi,

 When installing reviewboard on Ubuntu, follows the instruction on
 http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.7/admin/installation/linux/
 by *easy_install ReviewBoard*, which ends with 403 Forbidden error:

 Searching for ReviewBoard
 Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7.21
 Processing ReviewBoard-1.7.21-py2.7.egg
 ReviewBoard 1.7.21 is already the active version in easy-install.pth
 Installing rb-site script to /usr/local/bin
 Installing rbssh script to /usr/local/bin

 Using /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.21-py2.7.egg
 Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
 Searching for PIL
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/
 Best match: PIL 1.1.6
 Downloading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
 error: Can't download http://downloads.reviewboard.
 org/mirror/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz: 403 Forbidden

 How to resolve this problem? Thanks.

  --
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

403 Forbidden when installing reviewboard on Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS

2014-01-25 Thread Xiaolin Zhang

Hi,

When installing reviewboard on Ubuntu, follows the instruction 
on http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.7/admin/installation/linux/
by *easy_install ReviewBoard*, which ends with 403 Forbidden error:

Searching for ReviewBoard
Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7.21
Processing ReviewBoard-1.7.21-py2.7.egg
ReviewBoard 1.7.21 is already the active version in easy-install.pth
Installing rb-site script to /usr/local/bin
Installing rbssh script to /usr/local/bin

Using /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7.21-py2.7.egg
Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
Searching for PIL
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/
Best match: PIL 1.1.6
Downloading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz
error: Can't download 
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/PIL-1.1.6.tar.gz: 403 Forbidden

How to resolve this problem? Thanks.

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Liinux noob: Trouble with python-docutils dependency while installing ReviewBoard

2013-12-31 Thread Gavin Rehkemper

Stephen,

I'm having the same problem as Mark, but that URL that you posted (
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Subscription_Management/1.0/html/Subscription_Management_Guide/entitlements-and-yum.html
 ) 
no longer works (404) - is there an alternate site that describes how to 
enable the Optional repository? (note that that link is also dead on the 
EPEL page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL (light blue box halfway down 
the page))

Thanks,
Gavin

On Monday, September 23, 2013 6:51:31 AM UTC-5, Stephen Gallagher wrote:

 On 09/11/2013 01:31 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: 
  On 2013-09-11 11:23, Mark Addleman wrote: 
  I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on RHEL.  I have installed the EPEL 
  repository but yum install ReviewBoard returns 
  Error: Package: ReviewBoard-1.7.13-2.el6.noarch (epel) 
  Requires: python-docutils 
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem 
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest 
  
  I'm a little loathe to install the python-docutils rpm directly since 
  I'm a 
  total Linux noob and I can't find one that's specific to RHEL. 
  
  Any help would be appreciated. 
  
  Huh. According to 
  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3581, it never 
  got built for EL6, even though it is built for every current version of 
  Fedora and for EL5. 
  
  If you're stuck, you could try directly installing the EL5 version... or 
  if you're *really* desparate, build your own from either the EL5 spec or 
  whichever Fedora spec most closely matches EL6 (I forget offhand what 
  that is). 
  
  I would definitely file a bug per Stephen's recommendation. 
  

 Sorry it took so long to get back to this. It turns out that the reason 
 python-docutils isn't in EPEL is because it's actually included in the 
 standard RHEL subscription (though not in the standard repository). You 
 need to enable the Optional repository as described here: 


 https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Subscription_Management/1.0/html/Subscription_Management_Guide/entitlements-and-yum.html
  

 Once that's available, ReviewBoard should install fine. 


-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Problem installing ReviewBoard via easy_install on Ubuntu:

2013-10-17 Thread Alexander Mayr

Hello,

I have the following problem installing reviewboard via easy_install3 
(installed via apt-get install python3-setuptools). is there a problem with 
my setup tools or is there really an invalid syntax inside the settings.py?


the piece of code in the underneath mentioned file is:

# Load local settings.  This can override anything in here, but at the very
# least it needs to define database connectivity.
try:
import settings_local
from settings_local import *
except ImportError, exc:
dependency_error('Unable to import settings_local.py: %s' % exc)


don't speak python, but can't it catch the exception ImportError?

thanks for any help

the output.

root@localhost:~# easy_install3 ReviewBoard
Searching for ReviewBoard
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/
Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7.16
Downloading 
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/ReviewBoard-1.7.16.tar.gz
Processing ReviewBoard-1.7.16.tar.gz
Running ReviewBoard-1.7.16/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir 
/tmp/easy_install-z1bun6/ReviewBoard-1.7.16/egg-dist-tmp-fxso95
Traceback (most recent call last):
*  File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 16, in module
import reviewboard.settings
  File 
/tmp/easy_install-z1bun6/ReviewBoard-1.7.16/reviewboard/settings.py, line 
232
except ImportError, exc:
  ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax*
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/easy_install3, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('distribute==0.6.24dev-r0', 'console_scripts', 
'easy_install')()
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
line 1931, in main
with_ei_usage(lambda:
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
line 1912, in with_ei_usage
return f()
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
line 1935, in lambda
distclass=DistributionWithoutHelpCommands, **kw
  File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/core.py, line 148, in setup
dist.run_commands()
  File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 917, in run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
  File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 936, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
line 368, in run
self.easy_install(spec, not self.no_deps)
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
line 608, in easy_install
return self.install_item(spec, dist.location, tmpdir, deps)
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
line 638, in install_item
dists = self.install_eggs(spec, download, tmpdir)
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
line 828, in install_eggs
return self.build_and_install(setup_script, setup_base)
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
line 1105, in build_and_install
self.run_setup(setup_script, setup_base, args)
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
line 1094, in run_setup
run_setup(setup_script, args)
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/sandbox.py, line 31, in 
run_setup
lambda: exec(compile(open(
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/sandbox.py, line 73, in 
run
return func()
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/sandbox.py, line 34, in 
lambda
{'__file__':setup_script, '__name__':'__main__'})
  File setup.py, line 202, in module
  File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/core.py, line 148, in setup
dist.run_commands()
  File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 917, in run_commands
self.run_command(cmd)
  File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 936, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/bdist_egg.py, 
line 172, in run
self.run_command(egg_info)
  File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/cmd.py, line 313, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 936, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File setup.py, line 79, in run
  File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/cmd.py, line 313, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
  File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 936, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
  File setup.py, line 98, in run
RuntimeError: Failed to build media files

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us

Re: Problem installing ReviewBoard via easy_install on Ubuntu:

2013-10-17 Thread David Trowbridge

Review Board does not support Python 3. You'll need to use Python 2.x

-David

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Alexander Mayr
alexander.may...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,
 I have the following problem installing reviewboard via easy_install3 
 (installed via apt-get install python3-setuptools). is there a problem with 
 my setup tools or is there really an invalid syntax inside the settings.py?
 the piece of code in the underneath mentioned file is:
 # Load local settings.  This can override anything in here, but at the very
 # least it needs to define database connectivity.
 try:
 import settings_local
 from settings_local import *
 except ImportError, exc:
 dependency_error('Unable to import settings_local.py: %s' % exc)
 don't speak python, but can't it catch the exception ImportError?
 thanks for any help
 the output.
 root@localhost:~# easy_install3 ReviewBoard
 Searching for ReviewBoard
 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
 Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
 Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/nightlies/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/
 Reading http://www.review-board.org/
 Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7.16
 Downloading 
 http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/ReviewBoard-1.7.16.tar.gz
 Processing ReviewBoard-1.7.16.tar.gz
 Running ReviewBoard-1.7.16/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir 
 /tmp/easy_install-z1bun6/ReviewBoard-1.7.16/egg-dist-tmp-fxso95
 Traceback (most recent call last):
 *  File ./contrib/internal/build-media.py, line 16, in module
 import reviewboard.settings
   File 
 /tmp/easy_install-z1bun6/ReviewBoard-1.7.16/reviewboard/settings.py, line 
 232
 except ImportError, exc:
   ^
 SyntaxError: invalid syntax*
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/easy_install3, line 9, in module
 load_entry_point('distribute==0.6.24dev-r0', 'console_scripts', 
 'easy_install')()
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
 line 1931, in main
 with_ei_usage(lambda:
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
 line 1912, in with_ei_usage
 return f()
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
 line 1935, in lambda
 distclass=DistributionWithoutHelpCommands, **kw
   File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/core.py, line 148, in setup
 dist.run_commands()
   File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 917, in run_commands
 self.run_command(cmd)
   File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 936, in run_command
 cmd_obj.run()
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
 line 368, in run
 self.easy_install(spec, not self.no_deps)
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
 line 608, in easy_install
 return self.install_item(spec, dist.location, tmpdir, deps)
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
 line 638, in install_item
 dists = self.install_eggs(spec, download, tmpdir)
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
 line 828, in install_eggs
 return self.build_and_install(setup_script, setup_base)
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
 line 1105, in build_and_install
 self.run_setup(setup_script, setup_base, args)
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py, 
 line 1094, in run_setup
 run_setup(setup_script, args)
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/sandbox.py, line 31, in 
 run_setup
 lambda: exec(compile(open(
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/sandbox.py, line 73, in 
 run
 return func()
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/sandbox.py, line 34, in 
 lambda
 {'__file__':setup_script, '__name__':'__main__'})
   File setup.py, line 202, in module
   File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/core.py, line 148, in setup
 dist.run_commands()
   File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 917, in run_commands
 self.run_command(cmd)
   File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 936, in run_command
 cmd_obj.run()
   File /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/command/bdist_egg.py, 
 line 172, in run
 self.run_command(egg_info)
   File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/cmd.py, line 313, in run_command
 self.distribution.run_command(command)
   File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 936, in run_command
 cmd_obj.run()
   File setup.py, line 79, in run
   File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/cmd.py, line 313, in run_command
 self.distribution.run_command(command)
   File /usr/lib/python3.2/distutils/dist.py, line 936, in run_command

Re: Liinux noob: Trouble with python-docutils dependency while installing ReviewBoard

2013-09-23 Thread Stephen Gallagher

On 09/11/2013 01:31 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
 On 2013-09-11 11:23, Mark Addleman wrote:
 I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on RHEL.  I have installed the EPEL
 repository but yum install ReviewBoard returns
 Error: Package: ReviewBoard-1.7.13-2.el6.noarch (epel)
 Requires: python-docutils
   You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
   You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

 I'm a little loathe to install the python-docutils rpm directly since
 I'm a
 total Linux noob and I can't find one that's specific to RHEL.

 Any help would be appreciated.
 
 Huh. According to
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3581, it never
 got built for EL6, even though it is built for every current version of
 Fedora and for EL5.
 
 If you're stuck, you could try directly installing the EL5 version... or
 if you're *really* desparate, build your own from either the EL5 spec or
 whichever Fedora spec most closely matches EL6 (I forget offhand what
 that is).
 
 I would definitely file a bug per Stephen's recommendation.
 

Sorry it took so long to get back to this. It turns out that the reason
python-docutils isn't in EPEL is because it's actually included in the
standard RHEL subscription (though not in the standard repository). You
need to enable the Optional repository as described here:

https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Subscription_Management/1.0/html/Subscription_Management_Guide/entitlements-and-yum.html

Once that's available, ReviewBoard should install fine.

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Liinux noob: Trouble with python-docutils dependency while installing ReviewBoard

2013-09-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher

Hmm, would you mind filing this as a bug on bugzilla.redhat.com? Looks like
a packaging issue rather than a ReviewBoard bug.

I'm on vacation until the 23rd, but I'll look into it when I get back.

In the meantime, what happens if you do:

yum clean all
yum install python-docutils

On Wednesday, September 11, 2013, Mark Addleman wrote:

 I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on RHEL.  I have installed the EPEL
 repository but yum install ReviewBoard returns
 Error: Package: ReviewBoard-1.7.13-2.el6.noarch (epel)
Requires: python-docutils
  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
  You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

 I'm a little loathe to install the python-docutils rpm directly since I'm
 a total Linux noob and I can't find one that's specific to RHEL.

 Any help would be appreciated.

  --
 Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
 ---
 Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
 ---
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:_e({},
 'cvml', 'reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com');.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Liinux noob: Trouble with python-docutils dependency while installing ReviewBoard

2013-09-11 Thread Matthew Woehlke


On 2013-09-11 11:23, Mark Addleman wrote:

I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on RHEL.  I have installed the EPEL
repository but yum install ReviewBoard returns
Error: Package: ReviewBoard-1.7.13-2.el6.noarch (epel)
Requires: python-docutils
  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
  You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

I'm a little loathe to install the python-docutils rpm directly since I'm a
total Linux noob and I can't find one that's specific to RHEL.

Any help would be appreciated.


Huh. According to 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3581, it never 
got built for EL6, even though it is built for every current version of 
Fedora and for EL5.


If you're stuck, you could try directly installing the EL5 version... or 
if you're *really* desparate, build your own from either the EL5 spec or 
whichever Fedora spec most closely matches EL6 (I forget offhand what 
that is).


I would definitely file a bug per Stephen's recommendation.

--
Matthew

--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Liinux noob: Trouble with python-docutils dependency while installing ReviewBoard

2013-09-11 Thread Mark Addleman

I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on RHEL.  I have installed the EPEL 
repository but yum install ReviewBoard returns 
Error: Package: ReviewBoard-1.7.13-2.el6.noarch (epel)
   Requires: python-docutils
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

I'm a little loathe to install the python-docutils rpm directly since I'm a 
total Linux noob and I can't find one that's specific to RHEL.  

Any help would be appreciated.

-- 
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

PyErr_Restore () from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0 error while installing Reviewboard on centos5 system

2013-04-24 Thread mamta . nanavati

Hi,
I'm trying to install Reviewboard on centos5. 
Using : Python2.7, Reviewboard -1.7.x and Django-1.4x 
with Apache2.2

I also rebuild mod_wsgi with python2.7 and --enable-shared.
After solving one thing that led to another, I'm finally stuck on a seg 
fault. 
On doing a core dump and inspecting it, I see the following error:
PyErr_Restore () from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0

I've now hit a roadblock , Can someone please provide some pointers?

Thanks,
M

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: PyErr_Restore () from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0 error while installing Reviewboard on centos5 system

2013-04-24 Thread Christian Hammond

Hi,

Looks like it's still using Python 2.4. Something in your stack isn't updated 
to use Python 2.7.

Curious why you're building from source and not using system packages? 

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com

On Apr 24, 2013, at 12:54 PM, mamta.nanav...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I'm trying to install Reviewboard on centos5. 
 Using : Python2.7, Reviewboard -1.7.x and Django-1.4x 
 with Apache2.2
 
 I also rebuild mod_wsgi with python2.7 and --enable-shared.
 After solving one thing that led to another, I'm finally stuck on a seg 
 fault. 
 On doing a core dump and inspecting it, I see the following error:
 PyErr_Restore () from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0
 
 I've now hit a roadblock , Can someone please provide some pointers?
 
 Thanks,
 M
 
 -- 
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: PyErr_Restore () from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0 error while installing Reviewboard on centos5 system

2013-04-24 Thread Mamta Nanavati

Hi Christian,
I'm actually using system packages , the only thing I had to rebuild was 
mod_wsgi since it was using the version for python2.4 with httpd.  
Would you recommend any particular route that I should take?


Thanks,
Mamta
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:06:45 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:

 Hi,

 Looks like it's still using Python 2.4. Something in your stack isn't 
 updated to use Python 2.7.

 Curious why you're building from source and not using system packages? 

 Christian

 -- 
 Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
  
 On Apr 24, 2013, at 12:54 PM, mamta.n...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:

 Hi,
 I'm trying to install Reviewboard on centos5. 
 Using : Python2.7, Reviewboard -1.7.x and Django-1.4x 
 with Apache2.2

 I also rebuild mod_wsgi with python2.7 and --enable-shared.
 After solving one thing that led to another, I'm finally stuck on a seg 
 fault. 
 On doing a core dump and inspecting it, I see the following error:
 PyErr_Restore () from /usr/lib64/libpython2.4.so.1.0

 I've now hit a roadblock , Can someone please provide some pointers?

 Thanks,
 M

 -- 
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
 --- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 reviewboard group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  




-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Error Log while installing Reviewboard.



[root@ip-10-28-87-177 logs]# cat error_log
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] SELinux policy enabled; httpd
running as context unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled
(wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec)
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] module wsgi_module is already
loaded, skipping
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Digest: generating secret for
digest authentication ...
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Digest: done
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] mod_wsgi: Compiled for Python/2.6.2.
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] mod_wsgi: Runtime using Python/
2.6.6.
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) mod_wsgi/3.2
Python/2.6.6 DAV/2 PHP/5.3.3 mod_ssl/2.2.15 OpenSSL/1.0.0-fips
mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.1 configured -- resuming normal operations
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/
Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75: DeprecationWarning:
The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use STATIC_URL
instead.
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error]   use STATIC_URL instead.,
DeprecationWarning)
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/
Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82:
DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use
settings.CACHES instead.
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error]   DeprecationWarning
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] mod_wsgi
(pid=5427): Exception occurred processing WSGI script '/var/www/html/
htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi'., referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] Traceback
(most recent call last):, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/
wsgi.py, line 219, in __call__, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]
self.load_middleware(), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/
base.py, line 45, in load_middleware, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] mod =
import_module(mw_module), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/utils/
importlib.py, line 35, in import_module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]
__import__(name), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/
admin/middleware.py, line 22, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from
reviewboard.admin.views import manual_updates_required, referer:
http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/
admin/views.py, line 19, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from
reviewboard.admin.forms import SSHSettingsForm, referer: 
http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/
admin/forms.py, line 47, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from
reviewboard.scmtools import sshutils, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/
scmtools/sshutils.py, line 6, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] import
paramiko, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg/paramiko/
__init__.py, line 69, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from
transport import SecurityOptions, Transport, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg/paramiko/
transport.py, line 32, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from
paramiko import util, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg/paramiko/
util.py, line 32, in module, referer:

Error Log while installing Reviewboard.

While debugging ReviewBoard installation and configuration, we found
following error in the error log.
Can some one review this and let me know what is the issue here?

Many thanks in advance.

/etc/httpd/logs

[root@ip-10-28-87-177 logs]# cat error_log
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] SELinux policy enabled; httpd
running as context unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled
(wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec)
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] module wsgi_module is already
loaded, skipping
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Digest: generating secret for
digest authentication ...
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Digest: done
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] mod_wsgi: Compiled for Python/2.6.2.
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [warn] mod_wsgi: Runtime using Python/
2.6.6.
[Thu May 31 04:52:40 2012] [notice] Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) mod_wsgi/3.2
Python/2.6.6 DAV/2 PHP/5.3.3 mod_ssl/2.2.15 OpenSSL/1.0.0-fips
mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.1 configured -- resuming normal operations
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/
Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/conf/__init__.py:75: DeprecationWarning:
The ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX setting has been removed; use STATIC_URL
instead.
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error]   use STATIC_URL instead.,
DeprecationWarning)
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/
Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py:82:
DeprecationWarning: settings.CACHE_* is deprecated; use
settings.CACHES instead.
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error]   DeprecationWarning
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] mod_wsgi
(pid=5427): Exception occurred processing WSGI script '/var/www/html/
htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi'., referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] Traceback
(most recent call last):, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/
wsgi.py, line 219, in __call__, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]
self.load_middleware(), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/
base.py, line 45, in load_middleware, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] mod =
import_module(mw_module), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4-py2.6.egg/django/utils/
importlib.py, line 35, in import_module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]
__import__(name), referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/
admin/middleware.py, line 22, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from
reviewboard.admin.views import manual_updates_required, referer:
http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/
admin/views.py, line 19, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from
reviewboard.admin.forms import SSHSettingsForm, referer: 
http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/
admin/forms.py, line 47, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from
reviewboard.scmtools import sshutils, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/
scmtools/sshutils.py, line 6, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] import
paramiko, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg/paramiko/
__init__.py, line 69, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from
transport import SecurityOptions, Transport, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47]   File /usr/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg/paramiko/
transport.py, line 32, in module, referer: http://www.jacklehost.org/
[Thu May 31 04:52:46 2012] [error] [client 76.121.101.47] from
paramiko import util, referer:

Re: Error Log while installing Reviewboard.

All, I deinstalled Django_evaluation 1.4 and reinstall 1.3.1

Performing migrations ... [root@ip-10-28-87-177 ~]# python;
Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Sep 12 2011, 14:03:14)
[GCC 4.4.5 20110214 (Red Hat 4.4.5-6)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
 import django
 print django.VERSION
(1, 3, 1, 'final', 0)

 Then I tried to reinstall review board in the html directory.. I
found following error. Can you please let me know what could be the
possible error.
rb-site install /var/www/html

* Installing the site...
Building site directories ... OK
Building site configuration files ... OK
Creating database ... Creating tables ...
Creating table django_evolution
There are unapplied evolutions for sessions.
There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools.
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
No fixtures found.
Unable to load SCMTool svn = reviewboard.scmtools.svn:SVNTool:
'module' object has no attribute 'HAVE_DECL_MPZ_POWM_SEC'
Unable to load SCMTool git = reviewboard.scmtools.git:GitTool: cannot
import name OSRNG
Unable to load SCMTool bzr = reviewboard.scmtools.bzr:BZRTool: cannot
import name OSRNG
Unable to load SCMTool cvs = reviewboard.scmtools.cvs:CVSTool: cannot
import name OSRNG
Unable to load SCMTool perforce =
reviewboard.scmtools.perforce:PerforceTool: cannot import name OSRNG
Unable to load SCMTool plastic =
reviewboard.scmtools.plastic:PlasticTool: cannot import name OSRNG
Unable to load SCMTool clearcase =
reviewboard.scmtools.clearcase:ClearCaseTool: cannot import name OSRNG
Unable to load SCMTool hg = reviewboard.scmtools.hg:HgTool: cannot
import name OSRNG
OK
Error: Model 'accounts.Profile' already has a field named 'is_private'

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Error Log while installing Reviewboard.

Christian, I could able to solve all the issues with your help. I
installed reviewboard successfully. Thank you for all the help. I
really appreciate.
Thanks, Soumen
www.snapstech.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Problem installing ReviewBoard (www.djangoproject.com)

2012-05-25 Thread Dan Miller

Thanks for the tip.  It was definitely a connection issue.  Turns out
I had set http_proxy but the URL http://www.django.project.com/ is
redirecting to use HTTPS.  And I had not set https_proxy so my system
was not able to use our proxy to access it.

Once the https_proxy was set the installation continued smoothly.

Dan

On May 24, 2:40 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Hi Dan,

 It is looking for 1.3.1 specifically. RB 1.6.x won't work with Django 1.4.

 This looks like some temporary downtime issue with their server. I can
 accesswww.djangoproject.comnow. Can you try again?

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Problem installing ReviewBoard (www.djangoproject.com)

2012-05-24 Thread Dan Miller

My installation was crusing along until it got to www.djangoproject.com.
I'm not sure if it's that easy_install is looking for version 1.3.1
and the latest version is 1.4 (perhaps something moved - I'm not very
familiar with how the internals work here).

Anyways, any ideas of how I can move past this?  I tried downloading
and installing Django 1.3.1 manually but when I go back to
easy_install ReviewBoard it still hangs at the same point.

Thanks!

Logs below:

[root@slc01ozq reviewboard]# easy_install ReviewBoard
Searching for ReviewBoard
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6.6
Downloading 
http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg
Processing ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg
creating /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg
Extracting ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg to /usr/lib/python2.6/site-
packages
Adding ReviewBoard 1.6.6 to easy-install.pth file
Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin

Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
Searching for recaptcha-client
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/recaptcha-client/
Reading http://recaptcha.net
Reading http://recaptcha.net/
Best match: recaptcha-client 1.0.6
Downloading
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/r/recaptcha-client/recaptcha-client-1.0.6.tar.gz#md5=74228180f7e1fb76c4d7089160b0d919
Processing recaptcha-client-1.0.6.tar.gz
Running recaptcha-client-1.0.6/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/
easy_install-rf3kyM/recaptcha-client-1.0.6/egg-dist-tmp-_mGYsF
zip_safe flag not set; analyzing archive contents...
Adding recaptcha-client 1.0.6 to easy-install.pth file

Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/recaptcha_client-1.0.6-
py2.6.egg
Searching for python-dateutil==1.5
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/python-dateutil/
Reading http://labix.org/python-dateutil
Best match: python-dateutil 1.5
Downloading http://labix.org/download/python-dateutil/python-dateutil-1.5.tar.gz
Processing python-dateutil-1.5.tar.gz
Running python-dateutil-1.5/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/
easy_install-3TzSuV/python-dateutil-1.5/egg-dist-tmp-7ucK_1
Adding python-dateutil 1.5 to easy-install.pth file

Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/python_dateutil-1.5-
py2.6.egg
Searching for paramiko=1.7.6
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/paramiko/
Reading http://www.lag.net/~robey/paramiko/
Reading http://www.lag.net/paramiko/
Best match: paramiko 1.7.7.2
Downloading 
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/paramiko/paramiko-1.7.7.2.zip#md5=f6b2dc341ee62c30574570182b7a5744
Processing paramiko-1.7.7.2.zip
Running paramiko-1.7.7.2/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/
easy_install-AP3ptH/paramiko-1.7.7.2/egg-dist-tmp-SIxEiP
zip_safe flag not set; analyzing archive contents...
Adding paramiko 1.7.7.2 to easy-install.pth file

Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg
Searching for flup
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/flup/
Reading http://www.saddi.com/software/flup/
Best match: flup 1.0.3.dev-20110405
Downloading 
http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/f/flup/flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.6.egg#md5=78e71f7a440ebaea55187caf8825c111
Processing flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.6.egg
creating /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-
py2.6.egg
Extracting flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.6.egg to /usr/lib/python2.6/
site-packages
Adding flup 1.0.3.dev-20110405 to easy-install.pth file

Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-
py2.6.egg
Searching for Pygments=1.4
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Pygments/
Reading http://pygments.org/
Reading http://pygments.pocoo.org/
Best match: Pygments 1.5
Downloading 
http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/P/Pygments/Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg#md5=359d667ed004b6d1bee20917a7d06a7b
Processing Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg
creating /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg
Extracting Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg to /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages
Adding Pygments 1.5 to easy-install.pth file
Installing pygmentize script to /usr/bin

Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg
Searching for Djblets==0.6.16
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Djblets/
Reading http://www.review-board.org/wiki/Djblets
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/Djblets/0.5/
Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/Djblets/0.6/
Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/wiki/Djblets
Best match: Djblets 0.6.16
Downloading

Re: Problem installing ReviewBoard (www.djangoproject.com)

2012-05-24 Thread Christian Hammond

Hi Dan,

It is looking for 1.3.1 specifically. RB 1.6.x won't work with Django 1.4.

This looks like some temporary downtime issue with their server. I can
access www.djangoproject.com now. Can you try again?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Dan Miller email.mille...@gmail.comwrote:

 My installation was crusing along until it got to www.djangoproject.com.
 I'm not sure if it's that easy_install is looking for version 1.3.1
 and the latest version is 1.4 (perhaps something moved - I'm not very
 familiar with how the internals work here).

 Anyways, any ideas of how I can move past this?  I tried downloading
 and installing Django 1.3.1 manually but when I go back to
 easy_install ReviewBoard it still hangs at the same point.

 Thanks!

 Logs below:

 [root@slc01ozq reviewboard]# easy_install ReviewBoard
 Searching for ReviewBoard
 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
 Reading http://www.reviewboard.org/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
 Reading http://www.review-board.org/
 Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
 Reading http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
 Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6.6
 Downloading
 http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg
 Processing ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg
 creating /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg
 Extracting ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg to /usr/lib/python2.6/site-
 packages
 Adding ReviewBoard 1.6.6 to easy-install.pth file
 Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
 Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin

 Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.6-py2.6.egg
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
 Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
 Searching for recaptcha-client
 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/recaptcha-client/
 Reading http://recaptcha.net
 Reading http://recaptcha.net/
 Best match: recaptcha-client 1.0.6
 Downloading

 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/r/recaptcha-client/recaptcha-client-1.0.6.tar.gz#md5=74228180f7e1fb76c4d7089160b0d919
 Processing recaptcha-client-1.0.6.tar.gz
 Running recaptcha-client-1.0.6/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/
 easy_install-rf3kyM/recaptcha-client-1.0.6/egg-dist-tmp-_mGYsF
 zip_safe flag not set; analyzing archive contents...
 Adding recaptcha-client 1.0.6 to easy-install.pth file

 Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/recaptcha_client-1.0.6-
 py2.6.egg
 Searching for python-dateutil==1.5
 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/python-dateutil/
 Reading http://labix.org/python-dateutil
 Best match: python-dateutil 1.5
 Downloading
 http://labix.org/download/python-dateutil/python-dateutil-1.5.tar.gz
 Processing python-dateutil-1.5.tar.gz
 Running python-dateutil-1.5/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/
 easy_install-3TzSuV/python-dateutil-1.5/egg-dist-tmp-7ucK_1
 Adding python-dateutil 1.5 to easy-install.pth file

 Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/python_dateutil-1.5-
 py2.6.egg
 Searching for paramiko=1.7.6
 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/paramiko/
 Reading http://www.lag.net/~robey/paramiko/
 Reading http://www.lag.net/paramiko/
 Best match: paramiko 1.7.7.2
 Downloading
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/paramiko/paramiko-1.7.7.2.zip#md5=f6b2dc341ee62c30574570182b7a5744
 Processing paramiko-1.7.7.2.zip
 Running paramiko-1.7.7.2/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/
 easy_install-AP3ptH/paramiko-1.7.7.2/egg-dist-tmp-SIxEiP
 zip_safe flag not set; analyzing archive contents...
 Adding paramiko 1.7.7.2 to easy-install.pth file

 Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paramiko-1.7.7.2-py2.6.egg
 Searching for flup
 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/flup/
 Reading http://www.saddi.com/software/flup/
 Best match: flup 1.0.3.dev-20110405
 Downloading
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/f/flup/flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.6.egg#md5=78e71f7a440ebaea55187caf8825c111
 Processing flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.6.egg
 creating /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-
 py2.6.egg
 Extracting flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-py2.6.egg to /usr/lib/python2.6/
 site-packages
 Adding flup 1.0.3.dev-20110405 to easy-install.pth file

 Installed /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/flup-1.0.3.dev_20110405-
 py2.6.egg
 Searching for Pygments=1.4
 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/Pygments/
 Reading http://pygments.org/
 Reading http://pygments.pocoo.org/
 Best match: Pygments 1.5
 Downloading
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.6/P/Pygments/Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg#md5=359d667ed004b6d1bee20917a7d06a7b
 Processing Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg
 creating /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg
 Extracting Pygments-1.5-py2.6.egg to /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages
 Adding Pygments 1.5 to easy-install.pth file

Re: Issue 2463 in reviewboard: Getting error while installing Reviewboard with rb-site install command

2012-03-10 Thread reviewboard


Updates:
Status: SetupIssue

Comment #3 on issue 2463 by trowb...@gmail.com: Getting error while  
installing Reviewboard with rb-site install command

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2463

(No comment was entered for this change.)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.

Re: Issue 2463 in reviewboard: Getting error while installing Reviewboard with rb-site install command

2012-01-24 Thread reviewboard



Comment #2 on issue 2463 by durrani@gmail.com: Getting error while  
installing Reviewboard with rb-site install command

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2463

No, i had not installed pygtk on my machine but i am installing now, and i
have installed psycopg2 module but still problem is persist.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.

Re: Issue 2463 in reviewboard: Getting error while installing Reviewboard with rb-site install command

2012-01-23 Thread reviewboard


Updates:
Status: NeedInfo

Comment #1 on issue 2463 by trowb...@gmail.com: Getting error while  
installing Reviewboard with rb-site install command

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2463

What version of pygtk is installed?

Also, do you have the psycopg2 python module installed? That's the one  
required for 'postgres' to show up.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.

Issue 2463 in reviewboard: Getting error while installing Reviewboard with rb-site install command

2012-01-22 Thread reviewboard

Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 2463 by durrani@gmail.com: Getting error while installing
Reviewboard with rb-site install command

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2463

* NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report. *
* If you need immediate support, please contact*
* reviewbo...@googlegroups.com *

What version are you running?
1.6

What's the URL of the page containing the problem?

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.When i try this command rb-site install /var/www/reviews.example.com then
getting below error :

[root@localhost ~]# rb-site install /www
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 7, in ?
sys.exit(

File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 1745, in main

command.run()

File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 1272, in run

self.print_introduction()

File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 1339, in print_introduction

page = ui.page(Welcome to the Review Board site installation wizard)

File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6.3-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/cmdline/rbsite.py,
line 948, in page

image = gtk.image_new_from_file(logo_file)
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'image_new_from_file'

2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
When i use rb-site --console then i am able to install but i am not getting
postgres database in database list. althouth i have installed postgres
appropriate adapter mentioned in documentation.

What operating system are you using? What browser?
CentOS 5.7, Firefox 5.0

Please provide any additional information below.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
reviewboard-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.

Re: Installing ReviewBoard on latest Ubuntu

2011-12-16 Thread Bart Celary

I thought I'll share my way of installing RB on Ubuntu.

What I normally do when installing django projects is install
everything via virtualenv script. On Ubuntu you can apt-get install
python-pip and python-virtualenv, then:

# Create Python virtual environments directory
mkdir -p /srv/pve

# Specific project dir
mkdir /srv/pve/project-name
# Create python virtual env, do not inherit any site-packages (clean
python)
virtualenv --no-site-packages --distribute /srv/pve/project-name
# You can source the /srv/pve/project-name/bin/activate file to switch
to your virtualenv:
source /srv/pve/project-name/bin/activate

# now you are free to install whatever python packages (and versions)
you like
# install RB
pip install ReviewBoard

# NOTE: pip supports installing things from the repositories. You can
use the pip freeze option to save the installed packages' versions.

(source and more info for the required modifications to the server
setup: 
http://www.saltycrane.com/blog/2009/05/notes-using-pip-and-virtualenv-django/)

I like the way this keeps my setup independent from the distribution's
site-packages.

HTH

Regards,
Bartek


PS. Not sure if it has been fixed but PIL package did not compiled
correctly in Ubunut 11.04 (the lib locations were not as it expected).
I had to grab it manually and fix the lib's location in the setup.py.

On Dec 14, 4:54 am, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com wrote:
 Finally! Went to the Django site, manually downloaded 1.3.1 and
 installed manually in the normal way. Then I have atleast progressed
 forward.

 Thanks for your pointers.

 MMN

 On Dec 14, 8:23 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:







  The choice of pip vs. easy_install doesn't actually matter here.
  Personally, I use easy_install.

  You're hitting some very strange issues that are not at all common on a
  system.

  I'm a bit stuck as to where you are in this. What exactly is failing?

  What version of Ubuntu is this?

  Christian

  --
  Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
  Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
  VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

  On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:03 PM, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com wrote:
   I might have hit on the issue. I think pip is expected to be the
   replacement for easy_install? I used pip to first remove ReviewBoard
   and then tried to reinstall in verbose mode. From this it looks like
   there is a timeout, but on easy_install even with verbose option
   nothing is getting printed as error. Other than this I cannot think of
   any reason why Django is not found.

   mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100://$ sudo pip -v install ReviewBoard
   Downloading/unpacking ReviewBoard
    Running setup.py egg_info for package ReviewBoard
      running egg_info
      writing requirements to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
   requires.txt
      writing pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/PKG-INFO
      writing top-level names to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
   top_level.txt
      writing dependency_links to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
   dependency_links.txt
      writing entry points to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
   entry_points.txt
      warning: manifest_maker: standard file '-c' not found

      reading manifest file 'pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
   SOURCES.txt'
      reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in'
      warning: no files found matching '*' under directory 'locale'
      no previously-included directories found matching 'docs/*/_build'
      no previously-included directories found matching 'reviewboard/
   htdocs/media/uploaded/images'
      writing manifest file 'pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
   SOURCES.txt'
   Downloading/unpacking Django=1.3.1 (from ReviewBoard)
    Ignoring link
  http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.1.tar.gz#m...
   (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.1 doesn't
   match =1.3.1
    Ignoring link
  http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.7.tar.gz#m...
   (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.7 doesn't
   match =1.3.1
    Ignoring link
  http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.5.tar.gz#m...
   (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.5 doesn't
   match =1.3.1
    Ignoring link
  http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.6.tar.gz#m...
   (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.6 doesn't
   match =1.3.1
    Ignoring link
  http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.4.tar.gz#m...
   (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.4 doesn't
   match =1.3.1
    Ignoring link
  http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.tar.gz#md5...
   (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2 doesn't
   match =1.3.1
    Ignoring link
  http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.1.3.tar.gz#m...
   (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.1.3 doesn't
   match =1.3.1
    Ignoring link

Re: Installing ReviewBoard on latest Ubuntu

2011-12-13 Thread Christian Hammond

Something's red flagging for me here. How did you install Review Board
initially? You shouldn't be hitting any of these dependency errors.

Christian

--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:59 PM, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com wrote:

Now I have everything else installed. Then the installation started
complaining of django not found, though I had django 1.3.2. So I
installed the django1.3.1 using the same mechanism you mentioned
earlier, but still the complaint is the same.

mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:/$ rb-site install /var/www/
xmp.reviews.com
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/rb-site, line 5, in module
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2676,
in module
parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552,
in resolve
raise DistributionNotFound(req)
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: Django=1.3.1

mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:/tmp/djblets$ sudo easy_install
django==1.3.1
Searching for django==1.3.1
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/django/
Reading http://www.djangoproject.com/
Best match: Django 1.3.1
Downloading
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.3.1.tar.gz#md5=62d8642fd06b9a0bf8544178f8500767
error: None

On Dec 13, 11:39 am, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. That fixed it. There are other packages missing, I am getting
them installed as we speak. Looks like the native python installation
on Ubuntu comes with vanilla flavour.

Regards,

On Dec 13, 11:03 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:

Try:

sudo easy_install python-dateutil==1.5

Christian

--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:00 PM, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,

I have installed ReviewBoard and all supporting packages (except
pylucene) on latest Ubuntu 11.10. However when I try to create a site
I am getting
mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:~$ rb-site install /var/www/
xmp.reviews.com
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/rb-site, line 5, in module
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2676,
in module
parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552,
in resolve
raise DistributionNotFound(req)
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: python-dateutil==1.5
mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:~$ sudo apt-get install
python-dateutil
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
python-dateutil is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 259 not upgraded

Can you please help me out? Looks like my python-dateutil is higher
than 1.5 version as it is the latest Ubuntu

Regards,

--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Installing ReviewBoard on latest Ubuntu

2011-12-13 Thread mmn...@gmail.com

Yes. So pip and easy_install should fetch the same results I think.
This is showing a timeout when installing Django 1.3.1 using pip in
verbose mode. I think because of this Django is not getting installed
at all.
I am using Ubuntu 11.10.

I can try manually downloading and installing Django from source and
see as well.

Regards,

On Dec 14, 8:23 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 The choice of pip vs. easy_install doesn't actually matter here.
 Personally, I use easy_install.

 You're hitting some very strange issues that are not at all common on a
 system.

 I'm a bit stuck as to where you are in this. What exactly is failing?

 What version of Ubuntu is this?

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com







 On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:03 PM, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com wrote:
  I might have hit on the issue. I think pip is expected to be the
  replacement for easy_install? I used pip to first remove ReviewBoard
  and then tried to reinstall in verbose mode. From this it looks like
  there is a timeout, but on easy_install even with verbose option
  nothing is getting printed as error. Other than this I cannot think of
  any reason why Django is not found.

  mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100://$ sudo pip -v install ReviewBoard
  Downloading/unpacking ReviewBoard
   Running setup.py egg_info for package ReviewBoard
     running egg_info
     writing requirements to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
  requires.txt
     writing pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/PKG-INFO
     writing top-level names to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
  top_level.txt
     writing dependency_links to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
  dependency_links.txt
     writing entry points to pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
  entry_points.txt
     warning: manifest_maker: standard file '-c' not found

     reading manifest file 'pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
  SOURCES.txt'
     reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in'
     warning: no files found matching '*' under directory 'locale'
     no previously-included directories found matching 'docs/*/_build'
     no previously-included directories found matching 'reviewboard/
  htdocs/media/uploaded/images'
     writing manifest file 'pip-egg-info/ReviewBoard.egg-info/
  SOURCES.txt'
  Downloading/unpacking Django=1.3.1 (from ReviewBoard)
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.1.tar.gz#m...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.1 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.7.tar.gz#m...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.7 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.5.tar.gz#m...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.5 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.6.tar.gz#m...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.6 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.4.tar.gz#m...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.4 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.tar.gz#md5...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.1.3.tar.gz#m...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.1.3 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.3.tar.gz#md5...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.3 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.3.tar.gz#m...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.3 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.1.4.tar.gz#m...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.1.4 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/D/Django/Django-1.2.2.tar.gz#m...
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.2 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://media.djangoproject.com/releases/1.1/Django-1.1.3.tar.gz
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.1.3 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://media.djangoproject.com/releases/1.2/Django-1.2.4.tar.gz
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.4 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://media.djangoproject.com/releases/1.2/Django-1.2.tar.gz
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2 doesn't
  match =1.3.1
   Ignoring link
 http://media.djangoproject.com/releases/1.2/Django-1.2.1.tar.gz
  (fromhttp://pypi.python.org/simple/Django/), version 1.2.1 doesn't
  match

Installing ReviewBoard on latest Ubuntu

2011-12-12 Thread mmn...@gmail.com

Hello,

I have installed ReviewBoard and all supporting packages (except
pylucene) on latest Ubuntu 11.10. However when I try to create a site
I am getting
mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:~$ rb-site install /var/www/
xmp.reviews.com
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/local/bin/rb-site, line 5, in module
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2676,
in module
parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552,
in resolve
raise DistributionNotFound(req)
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: python-dateutil==1.5
mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:~$ sudo apt-get install python-dateutil
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
python-dateutil is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 259 not upgraded

Can you please help me out? Looks like my python-dateutil is higher
than 1.5 version as it is the latest Ubuntu

Regards,

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Installing ReviewBoard on latest Ubuntu

2011-12-12 Thread Christian Hammond

Try:

sudo easy_install python-dateutil==1.5

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:00 PM, mmn...@gmail.com mmn...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I have installed ReviewBoard and all supporting packages (except
 pylucene) on latest Ubuntu 11.10. However when I try to create a site
 I am getting
 mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:~$ rb-site install /var/www/
 xmp.reviews.com
 Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/local/bin/rb-site, line 5, in module
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2676,
 in module
parse_requirements(__requires__), Environment()
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 552,
 in resolve
raise DistributionNotFound(req)
 pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: python-dateutil==1.5
 mmn@mmn-hp-workstation-xw4100:~$ sudo apt-get install python-dateutil
 Reading package lists... Done
 Building dependency tree
 Reading state information... Done
 python-dateutil is already the newest version.
 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 259 not upgraded

 Can you please help me out? Looks like my python-dateutil is higher
 than 1.5 version as it is the latest Ubuntu

 Regards,

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Error Installing ReviewBoard 1.6 on Redhat Linux 5.5

2011-09-20 Thread Sanjay Lal

Thanks. Finally I was able to download thru the web browser.

thanks
sanjay

On Sep 19, 2:32 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Hi Sanjay,

 It's possible that tummy.com was down. That's not our site so we don't have
 any control over it. I can connect to it here.

 What happens when you connect through a web browser?

 Christian









 On Monday, September 19, 2011, Sanjay Lal sklqui...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi,
  I am trying to install ReviewBoard 1.6 on Redhat Linux 5.5. I am
  getting following error.. Any ideas/thoughts -

  [root  ReviewBoard-1.6]# easy_install ReviewBoard
  Searching for ReviewBoard
  Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6
  Processing ReviewBoard-1.6-py2.4.egg
  ReviewBoard 1.6 is already the active version in easy-install.pth
  Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
  Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin

  Using /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6-py2.4.egg
  Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
  Searching for python-memcached
  Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
  Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
  Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/python-memcached/
  Readinghttp://www.tummy.com/Community/software/python-memcached/
  Readingftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/python-memcached/
  error: HTTP/1.1 408 Request Timeout

  I have defined the variables -
     http_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80
     ftp_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80
     secure_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80
  Do I need to do any other settings?

  By any chance is the serverwww.tummy.comdown? When I pingwww.tummy.com
  from my Windows desktop, I get  Request Time out-
     C:\pingwww.tummy.com
     Pingingwww.tummy.com[198.49.126.248] with 32 bytes of data:

     Reply from 10.149.120.2: Destination host unreachable.
     Request timed out.
     Request timed out.
     Reply from 10.149.120.2: Destination host unreachable.

     Ping statistics for 198.49.126.248:
         Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
     Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
         Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

  Here are more details -
  uname -a :
         Linux hostname  2.6.18-194.26.1.0.1.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Nov 9
  19:05:00 EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  cat /etc/redhat-release
         Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga)

  /etc/yum.conf :

     [main]
     cachedir=/var/cache/yum
     keepcache=0
     debuglevel=2
     logfile=/var/log/yum.log
     distroverpkg=redhat-release
     tolerant=1
     exactarch=1
     obsoletes=1
     gpgcheck=1
     plugins=1

     # Note: yum-RHN-plugin doesn't honor this.
     metadata_expire=1h

     # Default.
     # installonly_limit = 3

     # PUT YOUR REPOS HERE OR IN separate files named file.repo
     # in /etc/yum.repos.d
     [download_base]
     name=Fedora Core $releasever - $basearch - ATrpms
     baseurl=http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/ReviewBoard/
     gpgcheck=1

  files in /etc/yum.repos.d:
     mirrors-rpmforge  rpmforge.repo  ULN-Base.repo  ULN-Base.repo.uln-
  int

  Thanks in advance for your time,
  sanjay

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at

 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know 
 athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group 
 at

 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

 --
 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Error Installing ReviewBoard 1.6 on Redhat Linux 5.5

2011-09-19 Thread Sanjay Lal

Hi,
I am trying to install ReviewBoard 1.6 on Redhat Linux 5.5. I am
getting following error.. Any ideas/thoughts -

[root  ReviewBoard-1.6]# easy_install ReviewBoard
Searching for ReviewBoard
Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6
Processing ReviewBoard-1.6-py2.4.egg
ReviewBoard 1.6 is already the active version in easy-install.pth
Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin

Using /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6-py2.4.egg
Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
Searching for python-memcached
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/python-memcached/
Reading http://www.tummy.com/Community/software/python-memcached/
Reading ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/python-memcached/
error: HTTP/1.1 408 Request Timeout

I have defined the variables -
http_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80
ftp_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80
secure_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80
Do I need to do any other settings?

By any chance is the server www.tummy.com down? When I ping www.tummy.com
from my Windows desktop, I get  Request Time out-
C:\ping www.tummy.com
Pinging www.tummy.com [198.49.126.248] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.149.120.2: Destination host unreachable.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 10.149.120.2: Destination host unreachable.

Ping statistics for 198.49.126.248:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms



Here are more details -
uname -a :
Linux hostname  2.6.18-194.26.1.0.1.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Nov 9
19:05:00 EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga)


/etc/yum.conf :

[main]
cachedir=/var/cache/yum
keepcache=0
debuglevel=2
logfile=/var/log/yum.log
distroverpkg=redhat-release
tolerant=1
exactarch=1
obsoletes=1
gpgcheck=1
plugins=1

# Note: yum-RHN-plugin doesn't honor this.
metadata_expire=1h

# Default.
# installonly_limit = 3

# PUT YOUR REPOS HERE OR IN separate files named file.repo
# in /etc/yum.repos.d
[download_base]
name=Fedora Core $releasever - $basearch - ATrpms
baseurl=http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/ReviewBoard/
gpgcheck=1


files in /etc/yum.repos.d:
mirrors-rpmforge  rpmforge.repo  ULN-Base.repo  ULN-Base.repo.uln-
int

Thanks in advance for your time,
sanjay

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Error Installing ReviewBoard 1.6 on Redhat Linux 5.5

2011-09-19 Thread Christian Hammond

Hi Sanjay,

It's possible that tummy.com was down. That's not our site so we don't have
any control over it. I can connect to it here.

What happens when you connect through a web browser?

Christian

On Monday, September 19, 2011, Sanjay Lal sklqui...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 I am trying to install ReviewBoard 1.6 on Redhat Linux 5.5. I am
 getting following error.. Any ideas/thoughts -

 [root  ReviewBoard-1.6]# easy_install ReviewBoard
 Searching for ReviewBoard
 Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6
 Processing ReviewBoard-1.6-py2.4.egg
 ReviewBoard 1.6 is already the active version in easy-install.pth
 Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
 Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin

 Using /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6-py2.4.egg
 Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
 Searching for python-memcached
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
 Reading http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
 Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/python-memcached/
 Reading http://www.tummy.com/Community/software/python-memcached/
 Reading ftp://ftp.tummy.com/pub/python-memcached/
 error: HTTP/1.1 408 Request Timeout

 I have defined the variables -
http_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80
ftp_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80
secure_proxy=www-proxy.us.oracle.com:80
 Do I need to do any other settings?

 By any chance is the server www.tummy.com down? When I ping www.tummy.com
 from my Windows desktop, I get  Request Time out-
C:\ping www.tummy.com
Pinging www.tummy.com [198.49.126.248] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.149.120.2: Destination host unreachable.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 10.149.120.2: Destination host unreachable.

Ping statistics for 198.49.126.248:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms



 Here are more details -
 uname -a :
Linux hostname  2.6.18-194.26.1.0.1.el5xen #1 SMP Tue Nov 9
 19:05:00 EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

 cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga)


 /etc/yum.conf :

[main]
cachedir=/var/cache/yum
keepcache=0
debuglevel=2
logfile=/var/log/yum.log
distroverpkg=redhat-release
tolerant=1
exactarch=1
obsoletes=1
gpgcheck=1
plugins=1

# Note: yum-RHN-plugin doesn't honor this.
metadata_expire=1h

# Default.
# installonly_limit = 3

# PUT YOUR REPOS HERE OR IN separate files named file.repo
# in /etc/yum.repos.d
[download_base]
name=Fedora Core $releasever - $basearch - ATrpms
baseurl=http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/ReviewBoard/
gpgcheck=1


 files in /etc/yum.repos.d:
mirrors-rpmforge  rpmforge.repo  ULN-Base.repo  ULN-Base.repo.uln-
 int

 Thanks in advance for your time,
 sanjay

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Installing ReviewBoard on project web space of SourceForge

2011-07-15 Thread Kapil

Hi,

I installed ReviewBoard (1.6 RC1) for our project (dmtcp.sf.net) in
its web space on sourceforge.net. I installed it in the htdocs folder
and moved the ReviewBoard.wsgi to cgi-bin directory. Since I don't
have root access on the machine, I had to install everything in the
project webspace. The problem is that I don't know how to tell Apache/
ReviewBoard about the install location of all the tools and the custom
path to python site-packages. Is there a way to inform Apache using
the .htaccess files about the location of the virtual environment and
the python library?

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks,
-Kapil

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-21 Thread Dean

At this point, we have gotten past the post-review questions and one
extra where we learned to include the http://reviewboard; prefix. I
am handing over to production this week.
We appreciate all your assistance (and patience) getting us here!

Dean

On Apr 20, 10:39 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 It should work on any and all distros.

 Can you show me the debug output? It'll help in figuring out what URL is
 being accessed. Likely, it's just a configuration problem.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

 On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote:
  So far, everything is working really well with the exception of the
  client-side post-review tool.

  Is there a list of distributions on which post-review works? In our
  case, we are hoping the post-review can be used on distros for Fedora
  9 - Fedora 12.

  We are seeing the Error creating review request: HTTP 404  coming
  from post-review being used the way the documentation describes in the
  Posting Committed Code section.

  On Apr 16, 8:04 am, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com
  wrote:
   On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stephen Gallagher 

   step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote:

Success! Many thanks! It's now working on a Scientific Linux v6 32-bit
prototype box.
I expect to have them drive it around a bit and then build a 64-bit
server for it.

I'm heading over to the documentation to see if I can upgrade it to v
1.5.5

Is there any advice you might have for doing this?

I just pushed the 1.5.5 RPM to the stable repository yesterday, so do
  'yum
update ReviewBoard' and then when that's complete, run 'rb-site upgrade
/path/to/site' as Christian said.

   FYI, I usually have the new releases available in the testing repository
   within three days of the upstream release, so if you're anxious to move
  to
   the latest and greatest, you can usually do 'yum update
   --enablerepo=epel-testing ReviewBoard'.

   By EPEL policy, updates have to either sit in the epel-testing repo for
  two
   weeks or receive sufficient positive karma in the Fedora Update System.

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
  Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote:

 Success! Many thanks! It's now working on a Scientific Linux v6 32-bit
 prototype box.
 I expect to have them drive it around a bit and then build a 64-bit
 server for it.

 I'm heading over to the documentation to see if I can upgrade it to v
 1.5.5

 Is there any advice you might have for doing this?


I just pushed the 1.5.5 RPM to the stable repository yesterday, so do 'yum
update ReviewBoard' and then when that's complete, run 'rb-site upgrade
/path/to/site' as Christian said.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stephen Gallagher 
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:



 On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote:

 Success! Many thanks! It's now working on a Scientific Linux v6 32-bit
 prototype box.
 I expect to have them drive it around a bit and then build a 64-bit
 server for it.

 I'm heading over to the documentation to see if I can upgrade it to v
 1.5.5

 Is there any advice you might have for doing this?


 I just pushed the 1.5.5 RPM to the stable repository yesterday, so do 'yum
 update ReviewBoard' and then when that's complete, run 'rb-site upgrade
 /path/to/site' as Christian said.


FYI, I usually have the new releases available in the testing repository
within three days of the upstream release, so if you're anxious to move to
the latest and greatest, you can usually do 'yum update
--enablerepo=epel-testing ReviewBoard'.

By EPEL policy, updates have to either sit in the epel-testing repo for two
weeks or receive sufficient positive karma in the Fedora Update System.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-15 Thread Dean

Success! Many thanks! It's now working on a Scientific Linux v6 32-bit
prototype box.
I expect to have them drive it around a bit and then build a 64-bit
server for it.

I'm heading over to the documentation to see if I can upgrade it to v
1.5.5

Is there any advice you might have for doing this?

On Apr 14, 1:32 am, Gilles Moris gilles.mo...@free.fr wrote:
 On Thursday 14 April 2011 02:10:42 am Dean wrote:

  After creating a database named reviewboard and creating a UID called
  rbadmin to have full access to it, I added rights for rbadmin to
  have full rights to it:

  mysql USE reviewboard;
  Database changed
  mysql GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON reviewboard TO 'rbdbuser'@'localhost'
  IDENTIFIED BY 'password' WITH GRANT OPTION;
  Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

 First you start talking about a rbadmin user but then seems to actually
 create and use a rbdbuser. May be you mixed both ?

 Another possibility is that you had a syntax error in your GRANT query. When
 you want to grant access to all tables, the syntax is reviewboard.* . Without
 the .*, you may just referring to the reviewboard table in the current
 database.
 mysql GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON reviewboard.* TO 'rbdbuser'@'localhost' ...

 Regards.
 Gilles.

  Tried to run:
  rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard

  ...and got:

  * Installing the site...
  Building site directories ... OK
  Building site configuration files ... OK
  Creating database ... Creating table django_admin_log
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
      load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==1.5.4', 'console_scripts', 'rb-
  site')()
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 1626, in main
      command.run()
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 1177, in run
      self.show_install_status()
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 1436, in show_install_status
      site.sync_database)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 703, in step
      func()
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 339, in sync_database
      self.run_manage_command(syncdb, params)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 397, in run_manage_command
      execute_manager(reviewboard.settings, [__file__, cmd] + params)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
  __init__.py, line 438, in execute_manager
      utility.execute()
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
  __init__.py, line 379, in execute
      self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
  base.py, line 191, in run_from_argv
      self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
  base.py, line 220, in execute
      output = self.handle(*args, **options)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
  base.py, line 351, in handle
      return self.handle_noargs(**options)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
  commands/syncdb.py, line 99, in handle_noargs
      cursor.execute(statement)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/mysql/
  base.py, line 86, in execute
      return self.cursor.execute(query, args)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/cursors.py, line
  173, in execute
      self.errorhandler(self, exc, value)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/connections.py, line
  36, in defaulterrorhandler
      raise errorclass, errorvalue
  _mysql_exceptions.OperationalError: (1142, CREATE command denied to
  user 'rbdbuser'@'localhost' for table 'django_admin_log')

  Thanks for your help.

  What can I fix to finish this correctly?
  Where can I go to find more granular instructions for this
  installation?
  Once I have this test box working, is there a set of instructions I
  can find for upgrading it to version 1.5.5?

  On Apr 13, 12:30 am, Gilles Moris gilles.mo...@free.fr wrote:
   On Tuesday 12 April 2011 11:29:54 pm Dean wrote:
On SL6:
LSB Version:    :core-4.0-ia32:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-
ia32:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-ia32:printing-4.0-noarch
Distributor ID: Scientific
Description:    Scientific Linux release 6.0 (Carbon)
Release:        6.0
Codename:       Carbon

I added mysql, mysql-server, httpd. I installed the EPEL epel-
release-6-5.noarch.rpm.
Installed Reviewboard. Installed memcached and MySQL-python and then
used:

rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard...

and got:
* Installing the site...
Building site directories ... OK
Building site configuration files ... OK
Creating database ... Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-14 Thread Gilles Moris

On Thursday 14 April 2011 02:10:42 am Dean wrote:
 After creating a database named reviewboard and creating a UID called
 rbadmin to have full access to it, I added rights for rbadmin to
 have full rights to it:

 mysql USE reviewboard;
 Database changed
 mysql GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON reviewboard TO 'rbdbuser'@'localhost'
 IDENTIFIED BY 'password' WITH GRANT OPTION;
 Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)


First you start talking about a rbadmin user but then seems to actually 
create and use a rbdbuser. May be you mixed both ?

Another possibility is that you had a syntax error in your GRANT query. When 
you want to grant access to all tables, the syntax is reviewboard.* . Without 
the .*, you may just referring to the reviewboard table in the current 
database.
mysql GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON reviewboard.* TO 'rbdbuser'@'localhost' ...

Regards.
Gilles.

 Tried to run:
 rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard

 ...and got:

 * Installing the site...
 Building site directories ... OK
 Building site configuration files ... OK
 Creating database ... Creating table django_admin_log
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
 load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==1.5.4', 'console_scripts', 'rb-
 site')()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 1626, in main
 command.run()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 1177, in run
 self.show_install_status()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 1436, in show_install_status
 site.sync_database)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 703, in step
 func()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 339, in sync_database
 self.run_manage_command(syncdb, params)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 397, in run_manage_command
 execute_manager(reviewboard.settings, [__file__, cmd] + params)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 __init__.py, line 438, in execute_manager
 utility.execute()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 __init__.py, line 379, in execute
 self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 base.py, line 191, in run_from_argv
 self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 base.py, line 220, in execute
 output = self.handle(*args, **options)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 base.py, line 351, in handle
 return self.handle_noargs(**options)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 commands/syncdb.py, line 99, in handle_noargs
 cursor.execute(statement)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/mysql/
 base.py, line 86, in execute
 return self.cursor.execute(query, args)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/cursors.py, line
 173, in execute
 self.errorhandler(self, exc, value)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/connections.py, line
 36, in defaulterrorhandler
 raise errorclass, errorvalue
 _mysql_exceptions.OperationalError: (1142, CREATE command denied to
 user 'rbdbuser'@'localhost' for table 'django_admin_log')

 Thanks for your help.

 What can I fix to finish this correctly?
 Where can I go to find more granular instructions for this
 installation?
 Once I have this test box working, is there a set of instructions I
 can find for upgrading it to version 1.5.5?

 On Apr 13, 12:30 am, Gilles Moris gilles.mo...@free.fr wrote:
  On Tuesday 12 April 2011 11:29:54 pm Dean wrote:
   On SL6:
   LSB Version:    :core-4.0-ia32:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-
   ia32:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-ia32:printing-4.0-noarch
   Distributor ID: Scientific
   Description:    Scientific Linux release 6.0 (Carbon)
   Release:        6.0
   Codename:       Carbon
  
   I added mysql, mysql-server, httpd. I installed the EPEL epel-
   release-6-5.noarch.rpm.
   Installed Reviewboard. Installed memcached and MySQL-python and then
   used:
  
   rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard...
  
   and got:
   * Installing the site...
   Building site directories ... OK
   Building site configuration files ... OK
   Creating database ... Traceback (most recent call last):
     File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
       load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==1.5.4', 'console_scripts', 'rb-
   site')()
     File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
   rbsite.py, line 1626, in main
       command.run()
     File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
   rbsite.py, line 1177, in run
       self.show_install_status()
     File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
   rbsite.py, line 1436, in show_install_status
       site.sync_database)

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-13 Thread Gilles Moris

On Tuesday 12 April 2011 11:29:54 pm Dean wrote:
 On SL6:
 LSB Version::core-4.0-ia32:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-
 ia32:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-ia32:printing-4.0-noarch
 Distributor ID: Scientific
 Description:Scientific Linux release 6.0 (Carbon)
 Release:6.0
 Codename:   Carbon

 I added mysql, mysql-server, httpd. I installed the EPEL epel-
 release-6-5.noarch.rpm.
 Installed Reviewboard. Installed memcached and MySQL-python and then
 used:

 rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard...

 and got:
 * Installing the site...
 Building site directories ... OK
 Building site configuration files ... OK
 Creating database ... Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
 load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==1.5.4', 'console_scripts', 'rb-
 site')()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 1626, in main
 command.run()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 1177, in run
 self.show_install_status()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 1436, in show_install_status
 site.sync_database)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 703, in step
 func()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 339, in sync_database
 self.run_manage_command(syncdb, params)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
 rbsite.py, line 397, in run_manage_command
 execute_manager(reviewboard.settings, [__file__, cmd] + params)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 __init__.py, line 438, in execute_manager
 utility.execute()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 __init__.py, line 379, in execute
 self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 base.py, line 191, in run_from_argv
 self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 base.py, line 219, in execute
 self.validate()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 base.py, line 249, in validate
 num_errors = get_validation_errors(s, app)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
 validation.py, line 102, in get_validation_errors
 connection.validation.validate_field(e, opts, f)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/mysql/
 validation.py, line 14, in validate_field
 db_version = self.connection.get_server_version()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/mysql/
 base.py, line 313, in get_server_version
 self.cursor()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/
 __init__.py, line 75, in cursor
 cursor = self._cursor()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/mysql/
 base.py, line 297, in _cursor
 self.connection = Database.connect(**kwargs)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/__init__.py, line
 81, in Connect
 return Connection(*args, **kwargs)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/connections.py, line
 187, in __init__
 super(Connection, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs2)
 _mysql_exceptions.OperationalError: (1049, Unknown database
 'reviewboard')

 This was a test run on a 3GB RAM machine with a fresh install of SL v
 6 for i386. Am I still missing something?

 Thanks for your help.


You have to create an empty database before directly from mysql. rb-site 
install will not do it for you.

Regards.
Gilles.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-13 Thread Dean

After creating a database named reviewboard and creating a UID called
rbadmin to have full access to it, I added rights for rbadmin to
have full rights to it:

mysql USE reviewboard;
Database changed
mysql GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON reviewboard TO 'rbdbuser'@'localhost'
IDENTIFIED BY 'password' WITH GRANT OPTION;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

Tried to run:
rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard

...and got:

* Installing the site...
Building site directories ... OK
Building site configuration files ... OK
Creating database ... Creating table django_admin_log
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==1.5.4', 'console_scripts', 'rb-
site')()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 1626, in main
command.run()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 1177, in run
self.show_install_status()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 1436, in show_install_status
site.sync_database)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 703, in step
func()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 339, in sync_database
self.run_manage_command(syncdb, params)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 397, in run_manage_command
execute_manager(reviewboard.settings, [__file__, cmd] + params)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
__init__.py, line 438, in execute_manager
utility.execute()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
__init__.py, line 379, in execute
self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
base.py, line 191, in run_from_argv
self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
base.py, line 220, in execute
output = self.handle(*args, **options)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
base.py, line 351, in handle
return self.handle_noargs(**options)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
commands/syncdb.py, line 99, in handle_noargs
cursor.execute(statement)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/mysql/
base.py, line 86, in execute
return self.cursor.execute(query, args)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/cursors.py, line
173, in execute
self.errorhandler(self, exc, value)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/connections.py, line
36, in defaulterrorhandler
raise errorclass, errorvalue
_mysql_exceptions.OperationalError: (1142, CREATE command denied to
user 'rbdbuser'@'localhost' for table 'django_admin_log')

Thanks for your help.

What can I fix to finish this correctly?
Where can I go to find more granular instructions for this
installation?
Once I have this test box working, is there a set of instructions I
can find for upgrading it to version 1.5.5?


On Apr 13, 12:30 am, Gilles Moris gilles.mo...@free.fr wrote:
 On Tuesday 12 April 2011 11:29:54 pm Dean wrote:



  On SL6:
  LSB Version:    :core-4.0-ia32:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-
  ia32:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-ia32:printing-4.0-noarch
  Distributor ID: Scientific
  Description:    Scientific Linux release 6.0 (Carbon)
  Release:        6.0
  Codename:       Carbon

  I added mysql, mysql-server, httpd. I installed the EPEL epel-
  release-6-5.noarch.rpm.
  Installed Reviewboard. Installed memcached and MySQL-python and then
  used:

  rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard...

  and got:
  * Installing the site...
  Building site directories ... OK
  Building site configuration files ... OK
  Creating database ... Traceback (most recent call last):
    File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
      load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==1.5.4', 'console_scripts', 'rb-
  site')()
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 1626, in main
      command.run()
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 1177, in run
      self.show_install_status()
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 1436, in show_install_status
      site.sync_database)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 703, in step
      func()
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 339, in sync_database
      self.run_manage_command(syncdb, params)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
  rbsite.py, line 397, in run_manage_command
      execute_manager(reviewboard.settings, [__file__, cmd] + params)
    File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
  __init__.py, line 438, in execute_manager
      utility.execute()
    File

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ah Ha! I'd been waiting for Centos 6.  How do you guess I might do
 with Scientific Linux 6 in 64-bit?


Well, in theory Scientific Linux is identical to RHEL 6 (just recompiled),
so I suspect it should work just fine.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-12 Thread Dean

On SL6:
LSB Version::core-4.0-ia32:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-
ia32:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-ia32:printing-4.0-noarch
Distributor ID: Scientific
Description:Scientific Linux release 6.0 (Carbon)
Release:6.0
Codename:   Carbon

I added mysql, mysql-server, httpd. I installed the EPEL epel-
release-6-5.noarch.rpm.
Installed Reviewboard. Installed memcached and MySQL-python and then
used:

rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard...

and got:
* Installing the site...
Building site directories ... OK
Building site configuration files ... OK
Creating database ... Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('ReviewBoard==1.5.4', 'console_scripts', 'rb-
site')()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 1626, in main
command.run()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 1177, in run
self.show_install_status()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 1436, in show_install_status
site.sync_database)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 703, in step
func()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 339, in sync_database
self.run_manage_command(syncdb, params)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/reviewboard/cmdline/
rbsite.py, line 397, in run_manage_command
execute_manager(reviewboard.settings, [__file__, cmd] + params)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
__init__.py, line 438, in execute_manager
utility.execute()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
__init__.py, line 379, in execute
self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
base.py, line 191, in run_from_argv
self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
base.py, line 219, in execute
self.validate()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
base.py, line 249, in validate
num_errors = get_validation_errors(s, app)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/
validation.py, line 102, in get_validation_errors
connection.validation.validate_field(e, opts, f)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/mysql/
validation.py, line 14, in validate_field
db_version = self.connection.get_server_version()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/mysql/
base.py, line 313, in get_server_version
self.cursor()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/
__init__.py, line 75, in cursor
cursor = self._cursor()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/mysql/
base.py, line 297, in _cursor
self.connection = Database.connect(**kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/__init__.py, line
81, in Connect
return Connection(*args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/MySQLdb/connections.py, line
187, in __init__
super(Connection, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs2)
_mysql_exceptions.OperationalError: (1049, Unknown database
'reviewboard')

This was a test run on a 3GB RAM machine with a fresh install of SL v
6 for i386. Am I still missing something?

Thanks for your help.

On Apr 12, 5:11 am, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com
wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote:
  Ah Ha! I'd been waiting for Centos 6.  How do you guess I might do
  with Scientific Linux 6 in 64-bit?

 Well, in theory Scientific Linux is identical to RHEL 6 (just recompiled),
 so I suspect it should work just fine.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-11 Thread Dean

I went back through my notes and backed out everything I had installed
following the original install instructions and then added the EPEL
repo. The EPEL repo and its ReviewBoard installed smoothly. I found
that I needed to re-install mysql-server. That completed, I set the
permissions on the mysql db and started at the rb-install script
again:

# rb-site install /var/www/reviewboard


* Welcome to the Review Board site installation wizard

This will prepare a Review Board site installation in:

/var/www/reviewboard

We need to know a few things before we can prepare your site for
installation. This will only take a few minutes.


* Required modules are missing

You are missing Python modules that are needed before the
installation process. You will need to install the necessary
modules and restart the install.

Databases (required):
* sqlite3 (pysqlite2, sqlite3)
* MySQL (MySQLdb)
* PostgreSQL (psycopg2)

Do I start here with some way to install the python-mysqldb ?
After that, will the rb-site drop Reviewboard recommended information
for configuration data in a file in /etc/httpd/config.d ?

On Apr 8, 9:59 am, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com
wrote:
 On 04/08/2011 11:57 AM, Dean wrote: If I use this method (very attractive) 
 do you recommend I back out the
  steps I've made prior to using your yum/rpm install?

 It's always a good idea to start from a clean state, yes. However
 RPM/yum *should* be able to handle things for you here.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher

 * Required modules are missing

You are missing Python modules that are needed before the
installation process. You will need to install the necessary
modules and restart the install.

Databases (required):
* sqlite3 (pysqlite2, sqlite3)
* MySQL (MySQLdb)
* PostgreSQL (psycopg2)

 Do I start here with some way to install the python-mysqldb ?
 After that, will the rb-site drop Reviewboard recommended information
 for configuration data in a file in /etc/httpd/config.d ?



The package you're looking for is
MySQL-pythonhttp://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=235352.
Unfortunately, I just remembered about
https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555868 which means that
the version shipped in RHEL 5 (and CentOS) is too old for use with Django
and ReviewBoard right now. So you'll probably need to rebuild this package
with version 1.2.1p2 or later. Probably the easiest way to accomplish this
would be to download
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/MySQL-python/1.2.3/1.fc14/src/MySQL-python-1.2.3-1.fc14.src.rpmand
then use 'rpmbuild --rebuild srpm' to rebuild it for your platform.
('yum-builddep srpm' is also useful for installing any prerequisites
needed for building)

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-08 Thread Dean

Thanks! I'll report back on progress.

On Apr 7, 5:07 pm, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
 It looks like you need to install a -devel package for mysql in order to get
 the headers.

 -David

 On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote:
  I'm following the v1.5 admin installation doc, and ran into trouble on
  the mysql-python step.
  I've been installing as root, and am down to wondering if there are
  environment setting I have omitted because everybody know python but
  me...

  I get these errors:

  easy_install mysql-python
  Searching for mysql-python
  Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/mysql-python/
  Readinghttp://sourceforge.net/projects/mysql-python/
  Readinghttp://sourceforge.net/projects/mysql-python
  Best match: MySQL-python 1.2.3
  Downloading
 http://download.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/mysql-python/MySQL-python...
  Processing MySQL-python-1.2.3.tar.gz
  Running MySQL-python-1.2.3/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/
  easy_install-nX4ESs/MySQL-python-1.2.3/egg-dist-tmp-mHwDDq
  warning: no files found matching 'MANIFEST'
  warning: no files found matching 'ChangeLog'
  warning: no files found matching 'GPL'
  _mysql.c:36:23: error: my_config.h: No such file or directory
  _mysql.c:38:19: error: mysql.h: No such file or directory
  _mysql.c:39:26: error: mysqld_error.h: No such file or directory
  _mysql.c:40:20: error: errmsg.h: No such file or directory
  _mysql.c:76: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before ‘MYSQL’
  _mysql.c:90: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
  ‘MYSQL_RES’
  _mysql.c: In function ‘_mysql_Exception’:
  _mysql.c:120: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘mysql_errno’
  _mysql.c:120: error: ‘_mysql_ConnectionObject’ has no member named
  ‘connection’
  _mysql.c:123: error: ‘CR_MAX_ERROR’ undeclared (first use in this
  function)
  _mysql.c:123: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
  _mysql.c:123: error: for each function it appears in.)
  _mysql.c:131: error: ‘CR_COMMANDS_OUT_OF_SYNC’ undeclared (first use
  in this function)
  _mysql.c:132: error: ‘ER_DB_CREATE_EXISTS’ undeclared (first use in
  this function)
  _mysql.c:133: error: ‘ER_SYNTAX_ERROR’ undeclared (first use in this
  function)
  _mysql.c:134: error: ‘ER_PARSE_ERROR’ undeclared (first use in this
  function)
  _mysql.c:135: error: ‘ER_NO_SUCH_TABLE’ undeclared (first use in this
  function)
  _mysql.c:136: error: ‘ER_WRONG_DB_NAME’ undeclared (first use in this
  function)
  _mysql.c:137: error: ‘ER_WRONG_TABLE_NAME’ undeclared (first use in
  this function)
  _mysql.c:138: error: ‘ER_FIELD_SPECIFIED_TWICE’ undeclared (first use
  in this function)
  _mysql.c:139: error: ‘ER_INVALID_GROUP_FUNC_USE’ undeclared (first use
  in this function)
  _mysql.c:140: error: ‘ER_UNSUPPORTED_EXTENSION’ undeclared (first use
  in this function)
  _mysql.c:141: error: ‘ER_TABLE_MUST_HAVE_COLUMNS’ undeclared (first
  use in this function)
  _mysql.c:170: error: ‘ER_DUP_ENTRY’ undeclared (first use in this
  function)
  _mysql.c:213: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘mysql_error’
  _mysql.c:213: error: ‘_mysql_ConnectionObject’ has no member named
  ‘connection’
  _mysql.c:213: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘PyString_FromString’
  makes pointer from integer without a cast
  _mysql.c: In function ‘_mysql_server_init’:
  _mysql.c:308: warning: label ‘finish’ defined but not used
  _mysql.c:234: warning: unused variable ‘item’
  _mysql.c:233: warning: unused variable ‘groupc’
  _mysql.c:233: warning: unused variable ‘i’
  _mysql.c:233: warning: unused variable ‘cmd_argc’
  _mysql.c:232: warning: unused variable ‘s’
  _mysql.c: In function ‘_mysql_ResultObject_Initialize’:
  _mysql.c:363: error: ‘MYSQL_RES’ undeclared (first use in this
  function)
  _mysql.c:363: error: ‘result’ undeclared (first use in this function)
  _mysql.c:368: error: ‘MYSQL_FIELD’ undeclared (first use in this
  function)
  _mysql.c:368: error: ‘fields’ undeclared (first use in this function)
  _mysql.c:377: error: ‘_mysql_ResultObject’ has no member named ‘use’
  _mysql.c:380: warning: implicit declaration of function
  ‘mysql_use_result’
  _mysql.c:380: error: ‘_mysql_ConnectionObject’ has no member named
  ‘connection’
  _mysql.c:382: warning: implicit declaration of function
  ‘mysql_store_result’
  _mysql.c:382: error: ‘_mysql_ConnectionObject’ has no member named
  ‘connection’
  _mysql.c:383: error: ‘_mysql_ResultObject’ has no member named
  ‘result’
  _mysql.c:386: error: ‘_mysql_ResultObject’ has no member named
  ‘converter’
  _mysql.c:389: warning: implicit declaration of function
  ‘mysql_num_fields’
  _mysql.c:390: error: ‘_mysql_ResultObject’ has no member named
  ‘nfields’
  _mysql.c:391: error: ‘_mysql_ResultObject’ has no member named
  ‘converter’
  _mysql.c:392: warning: implicit declaration of function
  ‘mysql_fetch_fields’
  _mysql.c:438: error: ‘_mysql_ResultObject’ has no member named
  ‘converter’
  _mysql.c: In function

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-08 Thread Dean

If I use this method (very attractive) do you recommend I back out the
steps I've made prior to using your yum/rpm install?

On Apr 8, 6:20 am, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com
wrote:
 On 04/07/2011 07:02 PM, Dean wrote:

  I'm following the v1.5 admin installation doc, and ran into trouble on
  the mysql-python step.
  I've been installing as root, and am down to wondering if there are
  environment setting I have omitted because everybody know python but
  me...

 Make your life easier: use the pre-build ReviewBoard RPMs I created for
 EPEL 5.

 Add the EPEL repository (instructions 
 here:http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL#How_can_I_use_these_extra_packages.3F)

 Then 'yum install ReviewBoard' and you'll get everything you need. No
 need to use easy_install or understand python.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-08 Thread Stephen Gallagher

On 04/08/2011 11:57 AM, Dean wrote:
 If I use this method (very attractive) do you recommend I back out the
 steps I've made prior to using your yum/rpm install?
It's always a good idea to start from a clean state, yes. However
RPM/yum *should* be able to handle things for you here.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Trouble with installing ReviewBoard on Windows.

2011-03-20 Thread Sam Batista

Hi, could you post some instructions on how you set up your server on
Windows? Were you using WAMP? Please keep in mind this is for a web
newb, and it would be greatly appreciated.

On Mar 10, 5:01 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Do images load?

 Can you check the Apache error log and see what path it's trying to access?

 Can you also check your site's htdocs/media/ directories and see if there
 are files somewhere within them?

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com







 On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:41 AM, ktckd . ktc...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi Christian,

  Thanks for the reply. You are right I forgot to install mod_python.

  I was able to see the login page after settings things up. But now I
  am having an issue where the css is not properly loaded for any page.
  Any ideas?

  Thanks,

  On Mar 8, 7:38 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
   Hi,

   Do you definitely have mod_python on your system, configured and working?

   In general, I strongly recommend using Linux, as you avoid a lot of
  issues
   specific to Windows across our list of dependencies. A VM works well for
   this.

   Christian

   --
   Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
   Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
   VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

   On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, ktckd . ktc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi List,

I have started to try an install ReviewBoard on my windows platform
and am stuck at 'rb-site -install' phase.

I have successfully completed the step and then later on I tried
copying the VirtualHost contents from 'apache-modpython.conf' to
'httpd.conf'. However I found that after I do this and try to restart
Apache service, it would give out 'Windows could not start the apache
on local computer..' error.

After further investigating I found that I can start the service if I
don't include the below parameters in the httpd.conf under
VirtualHost tag for the Location tag:

               PythonPath ['C:/review.bnb.com/conf'] + sys.path
               PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
               PythonAutoReload Off
               PythonDebug On
               # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same
  apache
               PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review_bnb_com

I am not sure why this is the case. Can some one please throw some
light here?

Below is what I have for my VirtualHost

VirtualHost *:80
       ServerName review.bnb.com
       DocumentRoot C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs

       # Error handlers
       ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html

       # Serve django pages
       Location /
               SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
               SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE C:/
  review.bnb.com/tmp/egg_cache
               SetEnv HOME C:/review.bnb.com/data
               SetHandler mod_python
               PythonPath ['C:/review.bnb.com/conf'] + sys.path
               PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
               PythonAutoReload Off
               PythonDebug On
               # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same
  apache
               PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review_bnb_com
       /Location

       # Serve static media without running it through mod_python
       # (overrides the above)
       Location /media
               SetHandler None
       /Location
       Location /errordocs
               SetHandler None
       /Location

       Directory C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs
               AllowOverride All
       /Directory

       # Alias static media requests to filesystem
       Alias /media C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs/media
       Alias /errordocs C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs/errordocs
/VirtualHost

--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
   http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
   http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
  Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/

Re: Trouble with installing ReviewBoard on Windows.

2011-03-10 Thread Shi Yuanmin - Simon

You should check you apache log first, maybe this is caused by
privilege setting.

On Mar 10, 1:41 am, ktckd . ktc...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Christian,

 Thanks for the reply. You are right I forgot to install mod_python.

 I was able to see the login page after settings things up. But now I
 am having an issue where the css is not properly loaded for any page.
 Any ideas?

 Thanks,

 On Mar 8, 7:38 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:







  Hi,

  Do you definitely have mod_python on your system, configured and working?

  In general, I strongly recommend using Linux, as you avoid a lot of issues
  specific to Windows across our list of dependencies. A VM works well for
  this.

  Christian

  --
  Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
  Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
  VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

  On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, ktckd . ktc...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hi List,

   I have started to try an install ReviewBoard on my windows platform
   and am stuck at 'rb-site -install' phase.

   I have successfully completed the step and then later on I tried
   copying the VirtualHost contents from 'apache-modpython.conf' to
   'httpd.conf'. However I found that after I do this and try to restart
   Apache service, it would give out 'Windows could not start the apache
   on local computer..' error.

   After further investigating I found that I can start the service if I
   don't include the below parameters in the httpd.conf under
   VirtualHost tag for the Location tag:

                  PythonPath ['C:/review.bnb.com/conf'] + sys.path
                  PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
                  PythonAutoReload Off
                  PythonDebug On
                  # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache
                  PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review_bnb_com

   I am not sure why this is the case. Can some one please throw some
   light here?

   Below is what I have for my VirtualHost

   VirtualHost *:80
          ServerName review.bnb.com
          DocumentRoot C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs

          # Error handlers
          ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html

          # Serve django pages
          Location /
                  SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
                  SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE C:/review.bnb.com/tmp/egg_cache
                  SetEnv HOME C:/review.bnb.com/data
                  SetHandler mod_python
                  PythonPath ['C:/review.bnb.com/conf'] + sys.path
                  PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
                  PythonAutoReload Off
                  PythonDebug On
                  # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache
                  PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review_bnb_com
          /Location

          # Serve static media without running it through mod_python
          # (overrides the above)
          Location /media
                  SetHandler None
          /Location
          Location /errordocs
                  SetHandler None
          /Location

          Directory C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs
                  AllowOverride All
          /Directory

          # Alias static media requests to filesystem
          Alias /media C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs/media
          Alias /errordocs C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs/errordocs
   /VirtualHost

   --
   Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
  http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
   Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
   -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Trouble with installing ReviewBoard on Windows.

2011-03-10 Thread Christian Hammond

Do images load?

Can you check the Apache error log and see what path it's trying to access?

Can you also check your site's htdocs/media/ directories and see if there
are files somewhere within them?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:41 AM, ktckd . ktc...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Christian,

 Thanks for the reply. You are right I forgot to install mod_python.

 I was able to see the login page after settings things up. But now I
 am having an issue where the css is not properly loaded for any page.
 Any ideas?

 Thanks,


 On Mar 8, 7:38 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Do you definitely have mod_python on your system, configured and working?
 
  In general, I strongly recommend using Linux, as you avoid a lot of
 issues
  specific to Windows across our list of dependencies. A VM works well for
  this.
 
  Christian
 
  --
  Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
  Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
  VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
 
  On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, ktckd . ktc...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hi List,
 
   I have started to try an install ReviewBoard on my windows platform
   and am stuck at 'rb-site -install' phase.
 
   I have successfully completed the step and then later on I tried
   copying the VirtualHost contents from 'apache-modpython.conf' to
   'httpd.conf'. However I found that after I do this and try to restart
   Apache service, it would give out 'Windows could not start the apache
   on local computer..' error.
 
   After further investigating I found that I can start the service if I
   don't include the below parameters in the httpd.conf under
   VirtualHost tag for the Location tag:
 
  PythonPath ['C:/review.bnb.com/conf'] + sys.path
  PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
  PythonAutoReload Off
  PythonDebug On
  # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same
 apache
  PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review_bnb_com
 
   I am not sure why this is the case. Can some one please throw some
   light here?
 
   Below is what I have for my VirtualHost
 
   VirtualHost *:80
  ServerName review.bnb.com
  DocumentRoot C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs
 
  # Error handlers
  ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html
 
  # Serve django pages
  Location /
  SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
  SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE C:/
 review.bnb.com/tmp/egg_cache
  SetEnv HOME C:/review.bnb.com/data
  SetHandler mod_python
  PythonPath ['C:/review.bnb.com/conf'] + sys.path
  PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
  PythonAutoReload Off
  PythonDebug On
  # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same
 apache
  PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review_bnb_com
  /Location
 
  # Serve static media without running it through mod_python
  # (overrides the above)
  Location /media
  SetHandler None
  /Location
  Location /errordocs
  SetHandler None
  /Location
 
  Directory C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs
  AllowOverride All
  /Directory
 
  # Alias static media requests to filesystem
  Alias /media C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs/media
  Alias /errordocs C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs/errordocs
   /VirtualHost
 
   --
   Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
  http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
   Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
   -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Trouble with installing ReviewBoard on Windows.

2011-03-09 Thread ktckd .

Hi Christian,

Thanks for the reply. You are right I forgot to install mod_python.

I was able to see the login page after settings things up. But now I
am having an issue where the css is not properly loaded for any page.
Any ideas?

Thanks,


On Mar 8, 7:38 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Hi,

 Do you definitely have mod_python on your system, configured and working?

 In general, I strongly recommend using Linux, as you avoid a lot of issues
 specific to Windows across our list of dependencies. A VM works well for
 this.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

 On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:03 PM, ktckd . ktc...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi List,

  I have started to try an install ReviewBoard on my windows platform
  and am stuck at 'rb-site -install' phase.

  I have successfully completed the step and then later on I tried
  copying the VirtualHost contents from 'apache-modpython.conf' to
  'httpd.conf'. However I found that after I do this and try to restart
  Apache service, it would give out 'Windows could not start the apache
  on local computer..' error.

  After further investigating I found that I can start the service if I
  don't include the below parameters in the httpd.conf under
  VirtualHost tag for the Location tag:

 PythonPath ['C:/review.bnb.com/conf'] + sys.path
 PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
 PythonAutoReload Off
 PythonDebug On
 # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache
 PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review_bnb_com

  I am not sure why this is the case. Can some one please throw some
  light here?

  Below is what I have for my VirtualHost

  VirtualHost *:80
 ServerName review.bnb.com
 DocumentRoot C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs

 # Error handlers
 ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html

 # Serve django pages
 Location /
 SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
 SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE C:/review.bnb.com/tmp/egg_cache
 SetEnv HOME C:/review.bnb.com/data
 SetHandler mod_python
 PythonPath ['C:/review.bnb.com/conf'] + sys.path
 PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
 PythonAutoReload Off
 PythonDebug On
 # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache
 PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review_bnb_com
 /Location

 # Serve static media without running it through mod_python
 # (overrides the above)
 Location /media
 SetHandler None
 /Location
 Location /errordocs
 SetHandler None
 /Location

 Directory C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs
 AllowOverride All
 /Directory

 # Alias static media requests to filesystem
 Alias /media C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs/media
 Alias /errordocs C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs/errordocs
  /VirtualHost

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
  Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Trouble with installing ReviewBoard on Windows.

2011-03-08 Thread ktckd .

Hi List,

I have started to try an install ReviewBoard on my windows platform
and am stuck at 'rb-site -install' phase.

I have successfully completed the step and then later on I tried
copying the VirtualHost contents from 'apache-modpython.conf' to
'httpd.conf'. However I found that after I do this and try to restart
Apache service, it would give out 'Windows could not start the apache
on local computer..' error.

After further investigating I found that I can start the service if I
don't include the below parameters in the httpd.conf under
VirtualHost tag for the Location tag:

PythonPath ['C:/review.bnb.com/conf'] + sys.path
PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
PythonAutoReload Off
PythonDebug On
# Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache
PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review_bnb_com


I am not sure why this is the case. Can some one please throw some
light here?

Below is what I have for my VirtualHost


VirtualHost *:80
ServerName review.bnb.com
DocumentRoot C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs

# Error handlers
ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html

# Serve django pages
Location /
SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE C:/review.bnb.com/tmp/egg_cache
SetEnv HOME C:/review.bnb.com/data
SetHandler mod_python
PythonPath ['C:/review.bnb.com/conf'] + sys.path
PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
PythonAutoReload Off
PythonDebug On
# Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache
PythonInterpreter reviewboard_review_bnb_com
/Location

# Serve static media without running it through mod_python
# (overrides the above)
Location /media
SetHandler None
/Location
Location /errordocs
SetHandler None
/Location

Directory C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs
AllowOverride All
/Directory

# Alias static media requests to filesystem
Alias /media C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs/media
Alias /errordocs C:/review.bnb.com/htdocs/errordocs
/VirtualHost

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Installing ReviewBoard in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-09-08 Thread Christian Hammond

Yeah, you're doing things the hard way. You really should follow the
installation instructions and use easy_install.

If you can't download because you're behind an HTTP proxy, you can first do:

$ sudo -s
$ export http_proxy=http://youproxy
$ easy_install -U 

If you can't access the outside world at all from that box, and you have to
download *something*, go download the egg files, not the tarballs, and then
put them all in the same directory. Then try:

$ sudo easy_install -f /path/to/your/downloaded/eggs -U 

As for the freetype problem, install the Ubuntu python-imaging package.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Jeff Andros j...@seguetonowhere.comwrote:

 OK, is there a reason you're not using setuptools and apt rather than
 downloading the tar.gz files?

 --Jeff


 On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Rajat Khandelwal 
 rajatgupt...@gmail.comwrote:

  On 09/07/2010 12:39 PM, Jeff Andros wrote:

 You've tried following the steps here?
 http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/
 I don't know that there's anything different enough in Ubuntu 10.4 that
 would make these instructions not work.

  --Jeff

 On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Rajat Khandelwal rajatgupt...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 Hi all

 I wanted to install review board in my ubuntu 10.04 and as there are no
 good tutorials about that, I am unable to do that. Please help me in this.
 Thanks.

 --
 Rajat Khandelwal
 SD 39 Satpura Hostel
 B.Tech. Comp. Sc.  Engg. 2nd year
 IIT Delhi
  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

 Yes, I have followed the the instructions. I have downloaded
 PIL1.1.7.tar.gz, Djblets.tar.gz and ReviewBoard.tar.gz. Now I did python
 setup.py install in pil directory. After it I did python setup.py install in
 Djblets and it still says pill not installed.
 Again running selftest.py in pil directory, I get freetype not installed,
 tkinter support not installed, pil core not installed, littlecms not
 installed. Now what does that all imply?

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Installing ReviewBoard in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-09-08 Thread Rajat Khandelwal

yeah, I did the network proxy settings and easy_install was very easy.
thanks.



On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:

 Yeah, you're doing things the hard way. You really should follow the
 installation instructions and use easy_install.

 If you can't download because you're behind an HTTP proxy, you can first
 do:

 $ sudo -s
 $ export http_proxy=http://youproxy
 $ easy_install -U 

 If you can't access the outside world at all from that box, and you have to
 download *something*, go download the egg files, not the tarballs, and then
 put them all in the same directory. Then try:

 $ sudo easy_install -f /path/to/your/downloaded/eggs -U 

 As for the freetype problem, install the Ubuntu python-imaging package.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com



 On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Jeff Andros j...@seguetonowhere.comwrote:

 OK, is there a reason you're not using setuptools and apt rather than
 downloading the tar.gz files?

 --Jeff


 On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Rajat Khandelwal rajatgupt...@gmail.com
  wrote:

  On 09/07/2010 12:39 PM, Jeff Andros wrote:

 You've tried following the steps here?
 http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/
 I don't know that there's anything different enough in Ubuntu 10.4 that
 would make these instructions not work.

  --Jeff

 On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Rajat Khandelwal 
 rajatgupt...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all

 I wanted to install review board in my ubuntu 10.04 and as there are no
 good tutorials about that, I am unable to do that. Please help me in this.
 Thanks.

 --
 Rajat Khandelwal
 SD 39 Satpura Hostel
 B.Tech. Comp. Sc.  Engg. 2nd year
 IIT Delhi
  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

 Yes, I have followed the the instructions. I have downloaded
 PIL1.1.7.tar.gz, Djblets.tar.gz and ReviewBoard.tar.gz. Now I did python
 setup.py install in pil directory. After it I did python setup.py install in
 Djblets and it still says pill not installed.
 Again running selftest.py in pil directory, I get freetype not installed,
 tkinter support not installed, pil core not installed, littlecms not
 installed. Now what does that all imply?

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


  --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en




-- 
Rajat Khandelwal
SD 39 Satpura Hostel
B.Tech. Comp. Sc.  Engg. 2nd year
IIT Delhi

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Installing ReviewBoard in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-09-07 Thread Rajat Khandelwal

Hi all

I wanted to install review board in my ubuntu 10.04 and as there are no good
tutorials about that, I am unable to do that. Please help me in this.
Thanks.

-- 
Rajat Khandelwal
SD 39 Satpura Hostel
B.Tech. Comp. Sc.  Engg. 2nd year
IIT Delhi

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Installing ReviewBoard in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-09-07 Thread Rajat Khandelwal

Hi all

I need to use ReviewBoard with Git version control system for my
project. I have been googling for about 3 hrs but I don't think I have
it installed properly. I will be very thankful if you please tell me
step by step how to install it and setup it.

Thanks.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Installing ReviewBoard in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-09-07 Thread Jeff Andros

You've tried following the steps here?
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/I
don't know that there's anything different enough in Ubuntu 10.4 that would
make these instructions not work.

--Jeff

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Rajat Khandelwal rajatgupt...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi all

 I wanted to install review board in my ubuntu 10.04 and as there are no
 good tutorials about that, I am unable to do that. Please help me in this.
 Thanks.

 --
 Rajat Khandelwal
 SD 39 Satpura Hostel
 B.Tech. Comp. Sc.  Engg. 2nd year
 IIT Delhi

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Installing ReviewBoard in Ubuntu 10.04

2010-09-07 Thread Rajat Khandelwal


On 09/07/2010 12:39 PM, Jeff Andros wrote:
You've tried following the steps here? 
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/linux/
I don't know that there's anything different enough in Ubuntu 10.4 
that would make these instructions not work.


--Jeff

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Rajat Khandelwal 
rajatgupt...@gmail.com mailto:rajatgupt...@gmail.com wrote:


Hi all

I wanted to install review board in my ubuntu 10.04 and as there
are no good tutorials about that, I am unable to do that. Please
help me in this. Thanks.

-- 
Rajat Khandelwal

SD 39 Satpura Hostel
B.Tech. Comp. Sc.  Engg. 2nd year
IIT Delhi
-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at

http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
mailto:reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/

Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en 
Yes, I have followed the the instructions. I have downloaded 
PIL1.1.7.tar.gz, Djblets.tar.gz and ReviewBoard.tar.gz. Now I did python 
setup.py install in pil directory. After it I did python setup.py 
install in Djblets and it still says pill not installed.
Again running selftest.py in pil directory, I get freetype not 
installed, tkinter support not installed, pil core not installed, 
littlecms not installed. Now what does that all imply?


--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Installing reviewboard on OpenSuse, getting symbolic link not allowed

2010-01-10 Thread pablo

Hi Christian,

I must be doing something really wrong. This is my reviewboard.conf
file at /etc/apache2/vhosts.d

opentriskelion:/etc/apache2/vhosts.d # cat reviewboard.conf
VirtualHost *:80
ServerName opentriskelion
DocumentRoot /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs

# Error handlers
ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html

# Serve django pages
Location /
PythonPath ['/var/www/opentriskelion/conf'] + sys.path
SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE /var/www/opentriskelion/tmp/egg_cache
SetHandler mod_python
PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
PythonAutoReload Off
PythonDebug On
# Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same apache
PythonInterpreter reviewboard_opentriskelion
/Location

# Serve static media without running it through mod_python
# (overrides the above)
Location /reviewboard/media
SetHandler None
Options FollowSymlinks
/Location
Location /reviewboard/errordocs
SetHandler None
/Location

Directory /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs
AllowOverride All
Options FollowSymLinks
/Directory

# Alias static media requests to filesystem
Alias /reviewboard/media /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/media
Alias /reviewboard/errordocs /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/
errordocs
/VirtualHost

I've restarted apache with

$ rcapache2 restart

But I still see the page not found issue.

And here's my var/log/apache2/error_log file

[Sun Jan 10 02:20:47 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.2] client denied by
server configuration: /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/media/rb/css/
common.css, referer: http://opentriskelion/dashboard
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py:32:
DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
  import md5
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-py2.6.egg/
reviewboard/accounts/views.py:2: DeprecationWarning: the sha module is
deprecated; use the hashlib module instead
  from sha import sha
/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py:32:
DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
  import md5

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,


pablo

On Jan 9, 12:21 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 I'm sorry, I gave you the wrong information. It was late :P

     Options FollowSymlinks

 See if that works for you.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

 On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:26 AM, pablo pslua...@ubu.es wrote:
  Hi Christian,

  I'm sorry but where am I supposed to add this? If I add it to ç

         Location /reviewboard/media
                 SetHandler None
         /Location

  then it raises an error on apache restart

  Syntax error on line 25 of /etc/apache2/vhosts.d/reviewboard.conf:
  Invalid command 'AllowSymLinks', perhaps misspelled or defined by a
  module not included in the server configuration

  This is the content of my path:

  opentriskelion:/etc/apache2/vhosts.d # ls /var/www/opentriskelion/
  htdocs/media/
  admin  djblets  .htaccess  rb  uploaded

  We're trying to develop a new SCM integration with ReviewBoard, so we
  need to set it up first :-P

  Thanks again,

  pablo

  On Jan 8, 12:49 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
   Hi Pablo,

   Does the htdocs/media/rb directory point to a valid location? If so, try
   adding the following to the Location section for media:

       Options AllowSymLinks

   Christian

   --
   Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
   Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
   VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

   On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:37 AM, pablo pslua...@ubu.es wrote:
Hi there,

I guess my question is pretty straightforward but I wasn't able to
figure it out myself.

I've just installed reviewboard following the instructions on the
linux install guide. I'm using:

- apache
- mysql
- mod_python

The db is created but I can't run the site.

If I look into the apache log at /var/log/apache2 I find:

[Fri Jan 08 12:29:17 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.2] Symbolic link
not allowed or link target not accessible: /var/www/opentris
kelion/htdocs/media/rb, referer:http://opentriskelion/dashboard

At /etc/apache2/vhosts.d I've a reviewboard.conf file with the basic
content (copied from the install)
VirtualHost *:80
       ServerName opentriskelion
       DocumentRoot /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs

       # Error handlers
       ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html

       # Serve django pages
       Location /
               PythonPath

Installing reviewboard on OpenSuse, getting symbolic link not allowed

2010-01-08 Thread pablo

Hi there,

I guess my question is pretty straightforward but I wasn't able to
figure it out myself.

I've just installed reviewboard following the instructions on the
linux install guide. I'm using:

- apache
- mysql
- mod_python

The db is created but I can't run the site.

If I look into the apache log at /var/log/apache2 I find:


[Fri Jan 08 12:29:17 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.2] Symbolic link
not allowed or link target not accessible: /var/www/opentris
kelion/htdocs/media/rb, referer: http://opentriskelion/dashboard

At /etc/apache2/vhosts.d I've a reviewboard.conf file with the basic
content (copied from the install)
VirtualHost *:80
ServerName opentriskelion
DocumentRoot /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs

# Error handlers
ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html

# Serve django pages
Location /
PythonPath ['/var/www/opentriskelion/conf'] +
sys.path
SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE /var/www/opentriskelion/tmp/
egg_cache
SetHandler mod_python
PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
PythonAutoReload Off
PythonDebug On
# Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same
apache
PythonInterpreter reviewboard_opentriskelion
/Location

# Serve static media without running it through mod_python
# (overrides the above)
Location /reviewboard/media
SetHandler None
/Location
Location /reviewboard/errordocs
SetHandler None
/Location

Directory /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs
AllowOverride All
/Directory

# Alias static media requests to filesystem
Alias /reviewboard/media /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/
media
Alias /reviewboard/errordocs /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/
errordocs
/VirtualHost

When I try to log in to my reviewboard I just get a 404 page does not
exist


I must be missing something pretty obvious.

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks,

pablo




-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Installing reviewboard on OpenSuse, getting symbolic link not allowed

2010-01-08 Thread Christian Hammond

Hi Pablo,

Does the htdocs/media/rb directory point to a valid location? If so, try
adding the following to the Location section for media:

Options AllowSymLinks

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:37 AM, pablo pslua...@ubu.es wrote:

 Hi there,

 I guess my question is pretty straightforward but I wasn't able to
 figure it out myself.

 I've just installed reviewboard following the instructions on the
 linux install guide. I'm using:

 - apache
 - mysql
 - mod_python

 The db is created but I can't run the site.

 If I look into the apache log at /var/log/apache2 I find:


 [Fri Jan 08 12:29:17 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.2] Symbolic link
 not allowed or link target not accessible: /var/www/opentris
 kelion/htdocs/media/rb, referer: http://opentriskelion/dashboard

 At /etc/apache2/vhosts.d I've a reviewboard.conf file with the basic
 content (copied from the install)
 VirtualHost *:80
ServerName opentriskelion
DocumentRoot /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs

# Error handlers
ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html

# Serve django pages
Location /
PythonPath ['/var/www/opentriskelion/conf'] +
 sys.path
SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE /var/www/opentriskelion/tmp/
 egg_cache
SetHandler mod_python
PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
PythonAutoReload Off
PythonDebug On
# Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same
 apache
PythonInterpreter reviewboard_opentriskelion
/Location

# Serve static media without running it through mod_python
# (overrides the above)
Location /reviewboard/media
SetHandler None
/Location
Location /reviewboard/errordocs
SetHandler None
/Location

Directory /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs
AllowOverride All
/Directory

# Alias static media requests to filesystem
Alias /reviewboard/media /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/
 media
Alias /reviewboard/errordocs /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/
 errordocs
 /VirtualHost

 When I try to log in to my reviewboard I just get a 404 page does not
 exist


 I must be missing something pretty obvious.

 Any help will be appreciated.

 Thanks,

 pablo





 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Installing reviewboard on OpenSuse, getting symbolic link not allowed

2010-01-08 Thread pablo

Hi Christian,

I'm sorry but where am I supposed to add this? If I add it to ç

Location /reviewboard/media
SetHandler None
/Location

then it raises an error on apache restart

Syntax error on line 25 of /etc/apache2/vhosts.d/reviewboard.conf:
Invalid command 'AllowSymLinks', perhaps misspelled or defined by a
module not included in the server configuration

This is the content of my path:

opentriskelion:/etc/apache2/vhosts.d # ls /var/www/opentriskelion/
htdocs/media/
admin  djblets  .htaccess  rb  uploaded

We're trying to develop a new SCM integration with ReviewBoard, so we
need to set it up first :-P

Thanks again,


pablo


On Jan 8, 12:49 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Hi Pablo,

 Does the htdocs/media/rb directory point to a valid location? If so, try
 adding the following to the Location section for media:

     Options AllowSymLinks

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

 On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:37 AM, pablo pslua...@ubu.es wrote:
  Hi there,

  I guess my question is pretty straightforward but I wasn't able to
  figure it out myself.

  I've just installed reviewboard following the instructions on the
  linux install guide. I'm using:

  - apache
  - mysql
  - mod_python

  The db is created but I can't run the site.

  If I look into the apache log at /var/log/apache2 I find:

  [Fri Jan 08 12:29:17 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.2] Symbolic link
  not allowed or link target not accessible: /var/www/opentris
  kelion/htdocs/media/rb, referer:http://opentriskelion/dashboard

  At /etc/apache2/vhosts.d I've a reviewboard.conf file with the basic
  content (copied from the install)
  VirtualHost *:80
         ServerName opentriskelion
         DocumentRoot /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs

         # Error handlers
         ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html

         # Serve django pages
         Location /
                 PythonPath ['/var/www/opentriskelion/conf'] +
  sys.path
                 SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
                 SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE /var/www/opentriskelion/tmp/
  egg_cache
                 SetHandler mod_python
                 PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
                 PythonAutoReload Off
                 PythonDebug On
                 # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same
  apache
                 PythonInterpreter reviewboard_opentriskelion
         /Location

         # Serve static media without running it through mod_python
         # (overrides the above)
         Location /reviewboard/media
                 SetHandler None
         /Location
         Location /reviewboard/errordocs
                 SetHandler None
         /Location

         Directory /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs
                 AllowOverride All
         /Directory

         # Alias static media requests to filesystem
         Alias /reviewboard/media /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/
  media
         Alias /reviewboard/errordocs /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/
  errordocs
  /VirtualHost

  When I try to log in to my reviewboard I just get a 404 page does not
  exist

  I must be missing something pretty obvious.

  Any help will be appreciated.

  Thanks,

  pablo

  --
  Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
  Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
  -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Installing reviewboard on OpenSuse, getting symbolic link not allowed

2010-01-08 Thread Christian Hammond

I'm sorry, I gave you the wrong information. It was late :P

Options FollowSymlinks

See if that works for you.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:26 AM, pablo pslua...@ubu.es wrote:

 Hi Christian,

 I'm sorry but where am I supposed to add this? If I add it to ç

Location /reviewboard/media
SetHandler None
/Location

 then it raises an error on apache restart

 Syntax error on line 25 of /etc/apache2/vhosts.d/reviewboard.conf:
 Invalid command 'AllowSymLinks', perhaps misspelled or defined by a
 module not included in the server configuration

 This is the content of my path:

 opentriskelion:/etc/apache2/vhosts.d # ls /var/www/opentriskelion/
 htdocs/media/
 admin  djblets  .htaccess  rb  uploaded

 We're trying to develop a new SCM integration with ReviewBoard, so we
 need to set it up first :-P

 Thanks again,


 pablo


 On Jan 8, 12:49 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
  Hi Pablo,
 
  Does the htdocs/media/rb directory point to a valid location? If so, try
  adding the following to the Location section for media:
 
  Options AllowSymLinks
 
  Christian
 
  --
  Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
  Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
  VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
 
  On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:37 AM, pablo pslua...@ubu.es wrote:
   Hi there,
 
   I guess my question is pretty straightforward but I wasn't able to
   figure it out myself.
 
   I've just installed reviewboard following the instructions on the
   linux install guide. I'm using:
 
   - apache
   - mysql
   - mod_python
 
   The db is created but I can't run the site.
 
   If I look into the apache log at /var/log/apache2 I find:
 
   [Fri Jan 08 12:29:17 2010] [error] [client 127.0.0.2] Symbolic link
   not allowed or link target not accessible: /var/www/opentris
   kelion/htdocs/media/rb, referer:http://opentriskelion/dashboard
 
   At /etc/apache2/vhosts.d I've a reviewboard.conf file with the basic
   content (copied from the install)
   VirtualHost *:80
  ServerName opentriskelion
  DocumentRoot /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs
 
  # Error handlers
  ErrorDocument 500 /errordocs/500.html
 
  # Serve django pages
  Location /
  PythonPath ['/var/www/opentriskelion/conf'] +
   sys.path
  SetEnv DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE reviewboard.settings
  SetEnv PYTHON_EGG_CACHE /var/www/opentriskelion/tmp/
   egg_cache
  SetHandler mod_python
  PythonHandler django.core.handlers.modpython
  PythonAutoReload Off
  PythonDebug On
  # Used to run multiple mod_python sites in the same
   apache
  PythonInterpreter reviewboard_opentriskelion
  /Location
 
  # Serve static media without running it through mod_python
  # (overrides the above)
  Location /reviewboard/media
  SetHandler None
  /Location
  Location /reviewboard/errordocs
  SetHandler None
  /Location
 
  Directory /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs
  AllowOverride All
  /Directory
 
  # Alias static media requests to filesystem
  Alias /reviewboard/media /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/
   media
  Alias /reviewboard/errordocs /var/www/opentriskelion/htdocs/
   errordocs
   /VirtualHost
 
   When I try to log in to my reviewboard I just get a 404 page does not
   exist
 
   I must be missing something pretty obvious.
 
   Any help will be appreciated.
 
   Thanks,
 
   pablo
 
   --
   Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
  http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
   Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
   -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

 --
 Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
 http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
 Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
 -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send

Re: Installing Reviewboard - lighttpd - 500 Internal Server Error


I am running into this as well and have not been able to locate the
reviewboard.fcgi file.  Did you install this using easy_install?  If
so that'd be a common element between our issues.

Gavin

On Dec 2, 2:45 am, lapluviosilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've been trying to install ReviewBoard for a while now without any
 success. I have a ubuntu 8.10 server running on VMWare Server which
 hosts a lighttpd server. On top of my plan to get reviewboard up and
 running this lighttpd server is also running mediawiki. I've tried
 many different things and I always get the same result. The error log
 shows these two errors every time I try to access the site at http://
 192.168.4.8/review/.

 (mod_fastcgi.c.2802) establishing connection failed: Connection
 refused socket: tcp:127.0.0.1:3033
 (mod_fastcgi.c.2743) fcgi-server re-enabled: tcp:127.0.0.7:3033

  A few steps I took:

 1) I tried setting FORCE_SCRIPT_NAME to / and /review/.
 2) I re-installed todays nightly build for reviewboard because of some
 of the issues with settings_local.py. This got me from a 404 to a 500
 error.
 3) set directory permissions and ownership for /home/reviewboard/
 epmain (reviewboard site install) to www-data:www-data

 Here's the relevant section of my lighttpd.conf. The subfolder for
 reviewboard is /review/

 fastcgi.server = (
                    .php = ((
                      bin-path = /usr/bin/php-cgi,
                      socket = /tmp/php-fastcgi.socket
                    )),
                    /review/reviewboard.fcgi = (
                      main = (
                        host = 127.0.0.1,
                        port = 3033,
                        check-local = disable
                      )
                    ),
 )

 ## WIKIMEDIA INSTALL
 $HTTP[url] =~ ^/w/ {
   server.document-root = /home/mediawiki/
   alias.url = ( /w/ = /home/mediawiki/ )

 }

 ## REVIEWBOARD
 $HTTP[url] =~ ^/review/ {
   server.document-root = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/
   server.errorlog = /home/reviewboard/epmain/logs/lighttpd-error.log

   alias.url = (
       /review/media = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/media,
       /review/errordocs = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/
 errordocs,
   )

 }

 $HTTP[url] =~ ^/review/(css|images|scripts)/ {
   expire.url = (  = access 1 hours )

 }

 url.rewrite-once = (
     ^/wiki/([^?]*)(?:\?(.*))? = /w/index.php?title=$1$1,
     ^/wiki = /w/index.php,
     ^(/review/media/.*)$ = $1,
     ^(/review/errordocs.*)$ = $1,
     ^(/review/.*)$ = /review/reviewboard.fcgi$1
 )

 Any help would be greatly appreciated
 Thanks,
 Paul Strong
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Installing Reviewboard - lighttpd - 500 Internal Server Error

2008-12-02 Thread lapluviosilla


Yes. I followed the install process described in the Getting Started
Wiki (http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/GettingStarted). I've
also tried following the Installing_on_Ubuntu_Gutsy  and
Host_Requirements wikis.

On Dec 2, 2:00 pm, Gavin M. Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am running into this as well and have not been able to locate the
 reviewboard.fcgi file.  Did you install this using easy_install?  If
 so that'd be a common element between our issues.

 Gavin

 On Dec 2, 2:45 am, lapluviosilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I've been trying to install ReviewBoard for a while now without any
  success. I have a ubuntu 8.10 server running on VMWare Server which
  hosts a lighttpd server. On top of my plan to get reviewboard up and
  running this lighttpd server is also running mediawiki. I've tried
  many different things and I always get the same result. The error log
  shows these two errors every time I try to access the site at http://
  192.168.4.8/review/.

  (mod_fastcgi.c.2802) establishing connection failed: Connection
  refused socket: tcp:127.0.0.1:3033
  (mod_fastcgi.c.2743) fcgi-server re-enabled: tcp:127.0.0.7:3033

   A few steps I took:

  1) I tried setting FORCE_SCRIPT_NAME to / and /review/.
  2) I re-installed todays nightly build for reviewboard because of some
  of the issues with settings_local.py. This got me from a 404 to a 500
  error.
  3) set directory permissions and ownership for /home/reviewboard/
  epmain (reviewboard site install) to www-data:www-data

  Here's the relevant section of my lighttpd.conf. The subfolder for
  reviewboard is /review/

  fastcgi.server = (
                     .php = ((
                       bin-path = /usr/bin/php-cgi,
                       socket = /tmp/php-fastcgi.socket
                     )),
                     /review/reviewboard.fcgi = (
                       main = (
                         host = 127.0.0.1,
                         port = 3033,
                         check-local = disable
                       )
                     ),
  )

  ## WIKIMEDIA INSTALL
  $HTTP[url] =~ ^/w/ {
    server.document-root = /home/mediawiki/
    alias.url = ( /w/ = /home/mediawiki/ )

  }

  ## REVIEWBOARD
  $HTTP[url] =~ ^/review/ {
    server.document-root = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/
    server.errorlog = /home/reviewboard/epmain/logs/lighttpd-error.log

    alias.url = (
        /review/media = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/media,
        /review/errordocs = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/
  errordocs,
    )

  }

  $HTTP[url] =~ ^/review/(css|images|scripts)/ {
    expire.url = (  = access 1 hours )

  }

  url.rewrite-once = (
      ^/wiki/([^?]*)(?:\?(.*))? = /w/index.php?title=$1$1,
      ^/wiki = /w/index.php,
      ^(/review/media/.*)$ = $1,
      ^(/review/errordocs.*)$ = $1,
      ^(/review/.*)$ = /review/reviewboard.fcgi$1
  )

  Any help would be greatly appreciated
  Thanks,
  Paul Strong
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Installing Reviewboard - lighttpd - 500 Internal Server Error

Are you missing reviewboard.fcgi as well?

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:22 PM, lapluviosilla [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:


 Yes. I followed the install process described in the Getting Started
 Wiki (http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/GettingStarted). I've
 also tried following the Installing_on_Ubuntu_Gutsy  and
 Host_Requirements wikis.

 On Dec 2, 2:00 pm, Gavin M. Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I am running into this as well and have not been able to locate the
  reviewboard.fcgi file.  Did you install this using easy_install?  If
  so that'd be a common element between our issues.
 
  Gavin
 
  On Dec 2, 2:45 am, lapluviosilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   I've been trying to install ReviewBoard for a while now without any
   success. I have a ubuntu 8.10 server running on VMWare Server which
   hosts a lighttpd server. On top of my plan to get reviewboard up and
   running this lighttpd server is also running mediawiki. I've tried
   many different things and I always get the same result. The error log
   shows these two errors every time I try to access the site at http://
   192.168.4.8/review/.
 
   (mod_fastcgi.c.2802) establishing connection failed: Connection
   refused socket: tcp:127.0.0.1:3033
   (mod_fastcgi.c.2743) fcgi-server re-enabled: tcp:127.0.0.7:3033
 
A few steps I took:
 
   1) I tried setting FORCE_SCRIPT_NAME to / and /review/.
   2) I re-installed todays nightly build for reviewboard because of some
   of the issues with settings_local.py. This got me from a 404 to a 500
   error.
   3) set directory permissions and ownership for /home/reviewboard/
   epmain (reviewboard site install) to www-data:www-data
 
   Here's the relevant section of my lighttpd.conf. The subfolder for
   reviewboard is /review/
 
   fastcgi.server = (
  .php = ((
bin-path = /usr/bin/php-cgi,
socket = /tmp/php-fastcgi.socket
  )),
  /review/reviewboard.fcgi = (
main = (
  host = 127.0.0.1,
  port = 3033,
  check-local = disable
)
  ),
   )
 
   ## WIKIMEDIA INSTALL
   $HTTP[url] =~ ^/w/ {
 server.document-root = /home/mediawiki/
 alias.url = ( /w/ = /home/mediawiki/ )
 
   }
 
   ## REVIEWBOARD
   $HTTP[url] =~ ^/review/ {
 server.document-root = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/
 server.errorlog = /home/reviewboard/epmain/logs/lighttpd-error.log
 
 alias.url = (
 /review/media = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/media,
 /review/errordocs = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/
   errordocs,
 )
 
   }
 
   $HTTP[url] =~ ^/review/(css|images|scripts)/ {
 expire.url = (  = access 1 hours )
 
   }
 
   url.rewrite-once = (
   ^/wiki/([^?]*)(?:\?(.*))? = /w/index.php?title=$1$1,
   ^/wiki = /w/index.php,
   ^(/review/media/.*)$ = $1,
   ^(/review/errordocs.*)$ = $1,
   ^(/review/.*)$ = /review/reviewboard.fcgi$1
   )
 
   Any help would be greatly appreciated
   Thanks,
   Paul Strong
 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Installing Reviewboard - lighttpd - 500 Internal Server Error


What about:

 rb-site manage /home/reviewboard/epmain runfcgi method=threaded
host=127.0.0.1 port=3033 protocol=fcgi

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:33 PM, lapluviosilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Did a complete hard drive search and there is no reviewboard.fcgi to
 be found. The strange thing I just found out is if I run the internal
 django manage server reviewboard works just fine. I use the following
 command to run it sudo rb-site manage /home/reviewboard/epmain
 runserver -- 0.0.0.0:8080. Unfortunately using the internal django
 server is not an option for me.

 On Dec 2, 2:23 pm, Gavin M. Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Are you missing reviewboard.fcgi as well?
 
  On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:22 PM, lapluviosilla [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
 
 
 
   Yes. I followed the install process described in the Getting Started
   Wiki (http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/GettingStarted). I've
   also tried following the Installing_on_Ubuntu_Gutsy  and
   Host_Requirements wikis.
 
   On Dec 2, 2:00 pm, Gavin M. Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running into this as well and have not been able to locate the
reviewboard.fcgi file.  Did you install this using easy_install?  If
so that'd be a common element between our issues.
 
Gavin
 
On Dec 2, 2:45 am, lapluviosilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I've been trying to install ReviewBoard for a while now without any
 success. I have a ubuntu 8.10 server running on VMWare Server which
 hosts a lighttpd server. On top of my plan to get reviewboard up and
 running this lighttpd server is also running mediawiki. I've tried
 many different things and I always get the same result. The error log
 shows these two errors every time I try to access the site at http://
 192.168.4.8/review/.
 
 (mod_fastcgi.c.2802) establishing connection failed: Connection
 refused socket: tcp:127.0.0.1:3033
 (mod_fastcgi.c.2743) fcgi-server re-enabled: tcp:127.0.0.7:3033
 
  A few steps I took:
 
 1) I tried setting FORCE_SCRIPT_NAME to / and /review/.
 2) I re-installed todays nightly build for reviewboard because of some
 of the issues with settings_local.py. This got me from a 404 to a 500
 error.
 3) set directory permissions and ownership for /home/reviewboard/
 epmain (reviewboard site install) to www-data:www-data
 
 Here's the relevant section of my lighttpd.conf. The subfolder for
 reviewboard is /review/
 
 fastcgi.server = (
.php = ((
  bin-path = /usr/bin/php-cgi,
  socket = /tmp/php-fastcgi.socket
)),
/review/reviewboard.fcgi = (
  main = (
host = 127.0.0.1,
port = 3033,
check-local = disable
  )
),
 )
 
 ## WIKIMEDIA INSTALL
 $HTTP[url] =~ ^/w/ {
   server.document-root = /home/mediawiki/
   alias.url = ( /w/ = /home/mediawiki/ )
 
 }
 
 ## REVIEWBOARD
 $HTTP[url] =~ ^/review/ {
   server.document-root = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/
   server.errorlog = /home/reviewboard/epmain/logs/lighttpd-error.log
 
   alias.url = (
   /review/media = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/media,
   /review/errordocs = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/
 errordocs,
   )
 
 }
 
 $HTTP[url] =~ ^/review/(css|images|scripts)/ {
   expire.url = (  = access 1 hours )
 
 }
 
 url.rewrite-once = (
 ^/wiki/([^?]*)(?:\?(.*))? = /w/index.php?title=$1$1,
 ^/wiki = /w/index.php,
 ^(/review/media/.*)$ = $1,
 ^(/review/errordocs.*)$ = $1,
 ^(/review/.*)$ = /review/reviewboard.fcgi$1
 )
 
 Any help would be greatly appreciated
 Thanks,
 Paul Strong
 

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Installing Reviewboard - lighttpd - 500 Internal Server Error

2008-12-02 Thread lapluviosilla


Yes! That seems to have worked. Is easy_install supposed to do this
automatically or why is this not mentioned in the Getting Started
guide. I've never used django myself. Perhaps lighttpd FastCGI should
be setup with a socket instead of a host:port? The configuration
implies that lighttpd will startup the fastcgi server on its own and
that you shouldn't have to run it yourself. I'll try the socket
approach and if it doesn't work then I'll just create a startup script
for that command.

Thanks!!

On Dec 2, 2:46 pm, Gavin M. Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What about:

  rb-site manage /home/reviewboard/epmain runfcgi method=threaded
 host=127.0.0.1 port=3033 protocol=fcgi

 On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:33 PM, lapluviosilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Did a complete hard drive search and there is no reviewboard.fcgi to
  be found. The strange thing I just found out is if I run the internal
  django manage server reviewboard works just fine. I use the following
  command to run it sudo rb-site manage /home/reviewboard/epmain
  runserver -- 0.0.0.0:8080. Unfortunately using the internal django
  server is not an option for me.

  On Dec 2, 2:23 pm, Gavin M. Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Are you missing reviewboard.fcgi as well?

   On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 3:22 PM, lapluviosilla [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

Yes. I followed the install process described in the Getting Started
Wiki (http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/GettingStarted). I've
also tried following the Installing_on_Ubuntu_Gutsy  and
Host_Requirements wikis.

On Dec 2, 2:00 pm, Gavin M. Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am running into this as well and have not been able to locate the
 reviewboard.fcgi file.  Did you install this using easy_install?  If
 so that'd be a common element between our issues.

 Gavin

 On Dec 2, 2:45 am, lapluviosilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I've been trying to install ReviewBoard for a while now without any
  success. I have a ubuntu 8.10 server running on VMWare Server which
  hosts a lighttpd server. On top of my plan to get reviewboard up and
  running this lighttpd server is also running mediawiki. I've tried
  many different things and I always get the same result. The error 
  log
  shows these two errors every time I try to access the site at 
  http://
  192.168.4.8/review/.

  (mod_fastcgi.c.2802) establishing connection failed: Connection
  refused socket: tcp:127.0.0.1:3033
  (mod_fastcgi.c.2743) fcgi-server re-enabled: tcp:127.0.0.7:3033

   A few steps I took:

  1) I tried setting FORCE_SCRIPT_NAME to / and /review/.
  2) I re-installed todays nightly build for reviewboard because of 
  some
  of the issues with settings_local.py. This got me from a 404 to a 
  500
  error.
  3) set directory permissions and ownership for /home/reviewboard/
  epmain (reviewboard site install) to www-data:www-data

  Here's the relevant section of my lighttpd.conf. The subfolder for
  reviewboard is /review/

  fastcgi.server = (
                     .php = ((
                       bin-path = /usr/bin/php-cgi,
                       socket = /tmp/php-fastcgi.socket
                     )),
                     /review/reviewboard.fcgi = (
                       main = (
                         host = 127.0.0.1,
                         port = 3033,
                         check-local = disable
                       )
                     ),
  )

  ## WIKIMEDIA INSTALL
  $HTTP[url] =~ ^/w/ {
    server.document-root = /home/mediawiki/
    alias.url = ( /w/ = /home/mediawiki/ )

  }

  ## REVIEWBOARD
  $HTTP[url] =~ ^/review/ {
    server.document-root = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/
    server.errorlog = 
  /home/reviewboard/epmain/logs/lighttpd-error.log

    alias.url = (
        /review/media = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/media,
        /review/errordocs = /home/reviewboard/epmain/htdocs/
  errordocs,
    )

  }

  $HTTP[url] =~ ^/review/(css|images|scripts)/ {
    expire.url = (  = access 1 hours )

  }

  url.rewrite-once = (
      ^/wiki/([^?]*)(?:\?(.*))? = /w/index.php?title=$1$1,
      ^/wiki = /w/index.php,
      ^(/review/media/.*)$ = $1,
      ^(/review/errordocs.*)$ = $1,
      ^(/review/.*)$ = /review/reviewboard.fcgi$1
  )

  Any help would be greatly appreciated
  Thanks,
  Paul Strong
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Installing Reviewboard - lighttpd - 500 Internal Server Error